Re: [aur-general] Package delete request

2013-10-11 Thread Maxime Gauduin
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 9:14 AM, xantares 09  wrote:

> Hi, could you delete minw-w64- ? It's a mistake.
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-w64-/
>
> x.
>


Gone, thx.

-- 
Maxime


Re: [aur-general] Package delete request

2013-10-09 Thread Dicebot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 10/09/2013 08:31 PM, xantares 09 wrote:
> My package was pushed with a typo, x64 instead of w64 
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-x64-libxslt/

Deleted.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSVaE7AAoJEHYfrWm6BsapL0wH/R64AZdiw2IBzbjelZ1Fa43o
L8zFD3nkAZU+aKzDMdmBX72P0eSkx1eb6lA01SjB9/BGxGRRfksZxzxKBTn9rRWx
HiCzgQAxlcawj+JBgpUNp0MJlBfTm1lYCXj8CswHtViVEC9mhgBYDK6bMHgGOXUF
tntYGTeCZuTRO0D/avb/v8ZmqJlcqH4Tt0j93XX1V0OK3MdJIBNs9GYKvU0l4Ytd
YSFyT07/SYmU8k7TPsZihzK0hfglc/m+7WkRv7sQlz2DTVUbyUib3/LrmZXxz0kz
G/JaaDQ1leVutZlHcWw30/0ulBOxryDMWmo5VetXCpsOCEswYxBgNuXxltU4wLA=
=m/Bs
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Re: [aur-general] Package delete request

2013-10-08 Thread Maxime Gauduin



On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 8:52 PM, Jonathan Arnold  
wrote:

Can you delete my package iceray-git[1]? I've re-uploaded it as
iceray[2], as it is a Go package that just happens to be hosted on
Github. 


[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/iceray-git/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/iceray/

--
Jonathan ArnoldWebstream: http://hieronymus.soup.io

If you want to go fast, go alone. If you want to go far, you
need a team ~ John Wooden

Please use the source array to download the source code instead of 'go 
get'. This should stay as 'iceray-git' and needs a pkgver() function, 
unless you wish to pull a specific tag, in that case 'iceray' and no 
pkgver() is the way to go. I've deleted 'iceray' for the time being.


Cheers,
--
Maxime


Re: [aur-general] Package delete request

2013-10-08 Thread Maxime Gauduin



On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 8:17 PM, xantares 09  
wrote:

Hi,

Could one of my packages be removed, I noticed the license makes it 
not free software:

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ahmed/

Regards.
 		 	   		  


Gone, thx.
--
Maxime


Re: [aur-general] Package delete request

2013-10-04 Thread Doug Newgard

> Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 14:52:48 -0400
> From: jdarn...@buddydog.org
> To: aur-general@archlinux.org
> Subject: [aur-general] Package delete request
>
> Can you delete my package iceray-git[1]? I've re-uploaded it as
> iceray[2], as it is a Go package that just happens to be hosted on
> Github.
>
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/iceray-git/
> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/iceray/
>
> --
> Jonathan Arnold Webstream: http://hieronymus.soup.io
>
> If you want to go fast, go alone. If you want to go far, you
> need a team ~ John Wooden
>

When you're pulling from Git master, the -git in the pkgname is correct 
  

Re: [aur-general] Package delete request

2013-03-22 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On 22 March 2013 15:16, Christoph Seitz  wrote:
> Hi TUs,
>
> please delete the me-tv2-bzr [1] package. The development stopped 2
> years ago and the maintainer changed. The new one chose to do a complete
> rewrite and me-tv2 was discontinued. The current development version is
> found in me-tv-bzr. [2]

Removed, thanks.


Re: [aur-general] package delete request

2013-03-19 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On 20 March 2013 05:20, Eiro Neemous  wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Please delete my package eclipse-rap,
> it's useless now since we can get rap directly.
> thanks in advance!
>
> Cheers,
> Eiro Neemous

Removed, thanks.


Re: [aur-general] package delete request

2012-11-01 Thread Ike Devolder
Op donderdag 1 november 2012 19:01:04 schreef Panos Kanavos:
> Hello,
> 
> If possible, please remove this package
> 
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=63875
> 
> There's already a git version for it.
> 
> Thanks in advance.
> 
> Panos

deleted, thx

--Ike

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [aur-general] package delete request

2012-11-01 Thread Panos Kanavos
Yes, you are correct. The other "moses" package I uploaded today 
(https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=64202) is for a specific release 
branch that will eventually become the "stable" version.

Thanks.

On Thursday 01 of November 2012 13:17:07 Limao Luo wrote:
> When you asked to remove mosesdecoder-git [1], and said it already has a
> git version,
> moses-git [2] is the  package you're referring to, correct?
> 
> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=63661


Re: [aur-general] package delete request

2012-11-01 Thread Limao Luo
When you asked to remove mosesdecoder-git [1], and said it already has a 
git version,

moses-git [2] is the  package you're referring to, correct?

[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=63661


Re: [aur-general] Package delete request: xf86-video-radeonhd

2009-04-10 Thread Eric BĂ©langer
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Jan de Groot  wrote:
> Please delete this package, it's included in extra for a while now:
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16498
>

done