Re: [aur-general] nerolinux

2016-02-29 Thread WebDawg 
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Mark Weiman  wrote:

>
> I'm pretty sure only a TU or Developer can delete package bases and the
> maintainer (if not a TU/dev) can only delete a package base by filing a 
> deletion
> request, which would then be completed by a TU/dev.
>
> As far as I know, when you clone a repository of a base that doesn't exist, it
> is reserved for your user, so perhaps someone reserved it for him/herself and
> hasn't uploaded it yet. A deletion is also a possible case.
>
> Mark Weiman

I get that, but it has data still in it.  Like someone deleted the
package and it did not delete the repo.

Re: [aur-general] nerolinux

2016-02-29 Thread Mark Weiman 
On Sun, 2016-02-28 at 16:04 -0700, WebDawg wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 4:01 PM, Eli Schwartz  wrote:
> > 
> > On 02/28/2016 05:58 PM, WebDawg wrote:
> > > 
> > > Is there anyway to track the reason it was deleted?
> > You could try looking through the aur-requests mailing list for a
> > deletion request.
> > 
> > --
> > Eli Schwartz
> I see requests for nerolinux3 but not nerolinux, does this mean the
> maintainer deleted it, considering this stuff is all git based now
> there is no other way to track?

I'm pretty sure only a TU or Developer can delete package bases and the
maintainer (if not a TU/dev) can only delete a package base by filing a deletion
request, which would then be completed by a TU/dev.

As far as I know, when you clone a repository of a base that doesn't exist, it
is reserved for your user, so perhaps someone reserved it for him/herself and
hasn't uploaded it yet. A deletion is also a possible case.

Mark Weiman

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [aur-general] nerolinux

2016-02-28 Thread WebDawg 
On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 4:01 PM, Eli Schwartz  wrote:
> On 02/28/2016 05:58 PM, WebDawg wrote:
>> Is there anyway to track the reason it was deleted?
>
> You could try looking through the aur-requests mailing list for a
> deletion request.
>
> --
> Eli Schwartz

I see requests for nerolinux3 but not nerolinux, does this mean the
maintainer deleted it, considering this stuff is all git based now
there is no other way to track?

Re: [aur-general] nerolinux

2016-02-28 Thread Eli Schwartz 
On 02/28/2016 05:58 PM, WebDawg wrote:
> Is there anyway to track the reason it was deleted?

You could try looking through the aur-requests mailing list for a
deletion request.

-- 
Eli Schwartz

Re: [aur-general] nerolinux

2016-02-28 Thread WebDawg 
On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Eli Schwartz  wrote:
> On 02/28/2016 05:48 PM, WebDawg wrote:
>> I can git clone nerolinux from the aur but I cannot find it in the
>> search in the aur?
>>
>> What is the deal?
>>
>
> That means it has been deleted from the AUR.
>
> Deleted packages do not have their git history purged.
>
> --
> Eli Schwartz


Is there anyway to track the reason it was deleted?

Web...

Re: [aur-general] nerolinux

2016-02-28 Thread brent timothy saner 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

On 02/28/2016 05:50 PM, Félix Piédallu wrote:
> I can confirm. The AUR page is referenced in Duckduckgo but there is a 404 
> error once i am on the aur page. 
> 
> Le 28 février 2016 23:48:43 GMT+01:00, WebDawg  a écrit :
>> I can git clone nerolinux from the aur but I cannot find it in the
>> search in the aur?
>>
>> What is the deal?
> 

Presumably, someone has created the repository but not entered a
PKGBUILD for the project yet so it is empty but reserved. I'd have to
look at AUR4's source to confirm as I didn't design nor maintain it, but
would this be a possibility?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=q4tp
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [aur-general] nerolinux

2016-02-28 Thread Eli Schwartz 
On 02/28/2016 05:48 PM, WebDawg wrote:
> I can git clone nerolinux from the aur but I cannot find it in the
> search in the aur?
> 
> What is the deal?
> 

That means it has been deleted from the AUR.

Deleted packages do not have their git history purged.

-- 
Eli Schwartz

Re: [aur-general] nerolinux

2016-02-28 Thread Félix Piédallu 
I can confirm. The AUR page is referenced in Duckduckgo but there is a 404 
error once i am on the aur page. 

Le 28 février 2016 23:48:43 GMT+01:00, WebDawg  a écrit :
>I can git clone nerolinux from the aur but I cannot find it in the
>search in the aur?
>
>What is the deal?

-- 
Envoyé de mon appareil Android avec K-9 Mail. Veuillez excuser ma brièveté.