Re: [aur-general] nvidia-ice needs to be updated

2012-10-25 Thread Cian Mc Govern
Didn't know it existed :) I've adapted the nvidia-all package:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32908 and updated it for
304.60. I used your PKGBUILD from the nvidia-beta-all package but
changed it slightly so that it doesn't build the module for the
linux-mainline kernel. I'm currently maintaining the nvidia-mainline
package and I think it's better to keep them seperate as the
nvidia-mainline package regularly needs patching to compile against
the mainline kernel.

On 25 October 2012 01:38, Oon-Ee Ng ngoonee.t...@gmail.com wrote:
 Shameless plug - why not just use nvidia-all (or nvidia-beta-all if
 that floats your boat). nvidea-X packages, where X is some custom
 kernel, tend to have very low usage since usage of X kernel to begin
 with is pretty low, and nvidia-X usage must be a subset of that.

 On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 5:03 AM, Cian Mc Govern c...@cianmcgovern.com wrote:
 No, I'll send the maintainer an email now. I didn't think there would
 be any need seeing as it hasn't been updated in over a year.

 On 24 October 2012 22:00, Alexandre Ferrando alfer...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 24 October 2012 22:47, Cian Mc Govern c...@cianmcgovern.com wrote:
 The nvidia-ice package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15441 
 hasn't
 been updated in over a year. Can the powers at be transfer the maintenance
 of the package over to me? My username is cian1500ww.

 Thanks.

 Have you contacted the maintainer over e-mail and waited two weeks for
 response? If yes, ask for orphaning the package. If not, contact him.

 Trusted Users can't just transfer maintenance of one package from one
 person to another.



-- 
Cian Mc Govern
Killaneen
Ballinamore
Co. Leitrim
Ireland
http://www.cianmcgovern.com

My GPG Public Key: http://www.cianmcgovern.com/gpg-public-key/


Re: [aur-general] nvidia-ice needs to be updated

2012-10-25 Thread Oon-Ee Ng
Getting a bit off-topic here, but if it regularly needs patching take
a look at the example patch given with nvidia-beta-all (PKGBUILD
includes logic to include arbitrary patches if the names match from
the srcdir).

On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 9:24 PM, Cian Mc Govern c...@cianmcgovern.com wrote:
 Didn't know it existed :) I've adapted the nvidia-all package:
 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32908 and updated it for
 304.60. I used your PKGBUILD from the nvidia-beta-all package but
 changed it slightly so that it doesn't build the module for the
 linux-mainline kernel. I'm currently maintaining the nvidia-mainline
 package and I think it's better to keep them seperate as the
 nvidia-mainline package regularly needs patching to compile against
 the mainline kernel.

 On 25 October 2012 01:38, Oon-Ee Ng ngoonee.t...@gmail.com wrote:
 Shameless plug - why not just use nvidia-all (or nvidia-beta-all if
 that floats your boat). nvidea-X packages, where X is some custom
 kernel, tend to have very low usage since usage of X kernel to begin
 with is pretty low, and nvidia-X usage must be a subset of that.

 On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 5:03 AM, Cian Mc Govern c...@cianmcgovern.com 
 wrote:
 No, I'll send the maintainer an email now. I didn't think there would
 be any need seeing as it hasn't been updated in over a year.

 On 24 October 2012 22:00, Alexandre Ferrando alfer...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 24 October 2012 22:47, Cian Mc Govern c...@cianmcgovern.com wrote:
 The nvidia-ice package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15441 
 hasn't
 been updated in over a year. Can the powers at be transfer the maintenance
 of the package over to me? My username is cian1500ww.

 Thanks.

 Have you contacted the maintainer over e-mail and waited two weeks for
 response? If yes, ask for orphaning the package. If not, contact him.

 Trusted Users can't just transfer maintenance of one package from one
 person to another.



 --
 Cian Mc Govern
 Killaneen
 Ballinamore
 Co. Leitrim
 Ireland
 http://www.cianmcgovern.com

 My GPG Public Key: http://www.cianmcgovern.com/gpg-public-key/


Re: [aur-general] nvidia-ice needs to be updated

2012-10-25 Thread Cian Mc Govern
I considered doing that but the package would need to be updated more
often to allow for changes to patches and I think that would be an
unnecessary inconvenience for anyone that is using nvidia-all but not
using linux-mainline. It doesn't make a huge difference overall to me
so I don't mind maintaining them as seperate packages.

On 25 October 2012 15:03, Oon-Ee Ng ngoonee.t...@gmail.com wrote:
 Getting a bit off-topic here, but if it regularly needs patching take
 a look at the example patch given with nvidia-beta-all (PKGBUILD
 includes logic to include arbitrary patches if the names match from
 the srcdir).

 On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 9:24 PM, Cian Mc Govern c...@cianmcgovern.com wrote:
 Didn't know it existed :) I've adapted the nvidia-all package:
 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32908 and updated it for
 304.60. I used your PKGBUILD from the nvidia-beta-all package but
 changed it slightly so that it doesn't build the module for the
 linux-mainline kernel. I'm currently maintaining the nvidia-mainline
 package and I think it's better to keep them seperate as the
 nvidia-mainline package regularly needs patching to compile against
 the mainline kernel.

 On 25 October 2012 01:38, Oon-Ee Ng ngoonee.t...@gmail.com wrote:
 Shameless plug - why not just use nvidia-all (or nvidia-beta-all if
 that floats your boat). nvidea-X packages, where X is some custom
 kernel, tend to have very low usage since usage of X kernel to begin
 with is pretty low, and nvidia-X usage must be a subset of that.

 On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 5:03 AM, Cian Mc Govern c...@cianmcgovern.com 
 wrote:
 No, I'll send the maintainer an email now. I didn't think there would
 be any need seeing as it hasn't been updated in over a year.

 On 24 October 2012 22:00, Alexandre Ferrando alfer...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 24 October 2012 22:47, Cian Mc Govern c...@cianmcgovern.com wrote:
 The nvidia-ice package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15441 
 hasn't
 been updated in over a year. Can the powers at be transfer the 
 maintenance
 of the package over to me? My username is cian1500ww.

 Thanks.

 Have you contacted the maintainer over e-mail and waited two weeks for
 response? If yes, ask for orphaning the package. If not, contact him.

 Trusted Users can't just transfer maintenance of one package from one
 person to another.



 --
 Cian Mc Govern
 Killaneen
 Ballinamore
 Co. Leitrim
 Ireland
 http://www.cianmcgovern.com

 My GPG Public Key: http://www.cianmcgovern.com/gpg-public-key/



-- 
Cian Mc Govern
Killaneen
Ballinamore
Co. Leitrim
Ireland
http://www.cianmcgovern.com

My GPG Public Key: http://www.cianmcgovern.com/gpg-public-key/


Re: [aur-general] nvidia-ice needs to be updated

2012-10-24 Thread Alexandre Ferrando
On 24 October 2012 22:47, Cian Mc Govern c...@cianmcgovern.com wrote:
 The nvidia-ice package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15441 hasn't
 been updated in over a year. Can the powers at be transfer the maintenance
 of the package over to me? My username is cian1500ww.

 Thanks.

Have you contacted the maintainer over e-mail and waited two weeks for
response? If yes, ask for orphaning the package. If not, contact him.

Trusted Users can't just transfer maintenance of one package from one
person to another.


Re: [aur-general] nvidia-ice needs to be updated

2012-10-24 Thread Cian Mc Govern
No, I'll send the maintainer an email now. I didn't think there would
be any need seeing as it hasn't been updated in over a year.

On 24 October 2012 22:00, Alexandre Ferrando alfer...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 24 October 2012 22:47, Cian Mc Govern c...@cianmcgovern.com wrote:
 The nvidia-ice package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15441 
 hasn't
 been updated in over a year. Can the powers at be transfer the maintenance
 of the package over to me? My username is cian1500ww.

 Thanks.

 Have you contacted the maintainer over e-mail and waited two weeks for
 response? If yes, ask for orphaning the package. If not, contact him.

 Trusted Users can't just transfer maintenance of one package from one
 person to another.


Re: [aur-general] nvidia-ice needs to be updated

2012-10-24 Thread Oon-Ee Ng
Shameless plug - why not just use nvidia-all (or nvidia-beta-all if
that floats your boat). nvidea-X packages, where X is some custom
kernel, tend to have very low usage since usage of X kernel to begin
with is pretty low, and nvidia-X usage must be a subset of that.

On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 5:03 AM, Cian Mc Govern c...@cianmcgovern.com wrote:
 No, I'll send the maintainer an email now. I didn't think there would
 be any need seeing as it hasn't been updated in over a year.

 On 24 October 2012 22:00, Alexandre Ferrando alfer...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 24 October 2012 22:47, Cian Mc Govern c...@cianmcgovern.com wrote:
 The nvidia-ice package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15441 
 hasn't
 been updated in over a year. Can the powers at be transfer the maintenance
 of the package over to me? My username is cian1500ww.

 Thanks.

 Have you contacted the maintainer over e-mail and waited two weeks for
 response? If yes, ask for orphaning the package. If not, contact him.

 Trusted Users can't just transfer maintenance of one package from one
 person to another.