Re: [aur-general] warez in the AUR

2012-01-11 Thread Karol Blazewicz
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Alexander Rødseth  wrote:
> If you wish to push the issue further, I'm not sure where to go from
> here. Perhaps a new forum thread?

Nah, let's leave it as it is. Thanks for your work on this subject.
There's already a thread on the forums and a couple threads on the ML
+ a wiki discussion and Arch is not my personal project so I don't
want to force anyone into accepting my point of view.


Re: [aur-general] warez in the AUR

2012-01-11 Thread Alexander Rødseth
Hi,

I don't think the forum etiquette rules applies to AUR packages.
If I understand you correctly, the point is that it would be natural
to create rules for AUR that are within the same spirit as the forum
etiquette rules?
I can agree with this, but the forum etiquette rules are, IMO, unclear
on both the topic of abandonware and also on which laws for which
countries are "applicable".

Crafting a similar etiquette rule for AUR would surely spark several
lengthy discussions and should probably involve more than just one TU.

If you wish to push the issue further, I'm not sure where to go from
here. Perhaps a new forum thread?

-- 
Sincerely,
 Alexander Rødseth
 Arch Linux Trusted User
 (xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)


Re: [aur-general] warez in the AUR

2012-01-03 Thread Karol Blazewicz
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 7:47 PM, Alexander Rødseth  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While I don't really think a PKGBUILD can count as warez (and believe
> the subject is misleading)

I'll try to be be more precise in the future :-)

[...]
> Adopting, modifying and disowning the four packages in question.

The links are still present in the PKGBUILDs. We still have no rules
against this and I'm not sure I can invoke forum rules here:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Forum_Etiquette#Legality


Re: [aur-general] warez in the AUR

2012-01-03 Thread Alexander Rødseth
Hi,

While I don't really think a PKGBUILD can count as warez (and believe
the subject is misleading), I agree with "the ioni-solution" of not
linking directly to copyrighted content in the "source" array.
Adopting, modifying and disowning the four packages in question.

-- 
Best regards,
 Alexander Rødseth
 Arch Linux Trusted User
 (xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)