Re: [Aus-soaring] Aus-soaring Digest, Vol 79, Issue 5

2010-04-07 Thread David Lawley






ll 
  
  I am having trouble connecting my Flarm to my ipaq 4700 PDA. 
  I have cables that fit, but no input comes through (in the Terminal  
  window on ipaq) 
  
  I think other people have done all this (maybe a few years ago) and  
  hope there is some advice for me. 
  
  I now understand some people have Swiss Flarm and some Oz Flarm 
  Mine is Oz Flarm, it is mounted under the panel, one of the two plugs 
  
  in the back provides data (and power I think) to a mini panel 
 display. 
  
  I have tried different Baud rates on the PDA, nothing seems to work. 
  
  Is my wiring wrong (i.e. I got cabling from Cumulus Soaring but it is 
  
  probably for Swiss Flarm - is it different)? 
  
  Is there a wiring diagram anywhere? 
  
  Thanks 
  
  Ed Marel 
*

Hi Ed,

If you have an origianl OZ FLARM, you need to use the left socket when viewed 
from the rear.  In XCsoar I use  Volkslogger as device and 19,200 as port speed 
and have never had any trouble. Your problem is the repeater is using the left 
socket.

The Pinouts are in the OZFLARM manual as mentioned. The OZ FLARM can be powered 
from either socket. 

Viewed from the rear (Assumed from now on), the right socket has a raw generic 
4800 bps GPS output (Note: this output does not include FLARM data or Baro 
sensor data).


Consult the manual as this socket is NOT wired to IGC standard.

The left socket conforms to the IGC spec (Volkslogger is the same). 

Only 3 wires max needed.

1.Earth

2.RX data. (Not available fromt he right socket, it has TX only)

3.TX data. (The important one, as a PDA really only needs to talk TO a GPS
if a task declaration is involved)

The TX data of one device must be connected to the RX data of the other and 
vice versa.

To sum up, you will need to make up a custom adapter cable from a 8 pin RJ plug 
to whatever is on the end of your cumulus cable.

Until recently I had some nice cradles for IPAQ 4700 which had built in 12V-5V 
convertor, with RJ socket that was wired similarly to the IGC standard allowing 
simple cables to be made, for about $100. Sadly they are no longer obtainable.

If you wish I can assemble a cable for you, if you can tell me the pinouts of 
your existing IPAQ cable. If sop plese contact me off list.

Regards

Dave L








  
_
Need a new place to live? Find it on Domain.com.au
http://clk.atdmt.com/NMN/go/157631292/direct/01/___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

Re: [Aus-soaring] NZ Accident Investigation

2010-04-07 Thread Gary Stevenson
Interesting (and tragic)!
In my experience there is hardly a gliding accident (mechanical failure aside), 
that can be attributed to a single cause. In this case it is highly likely that 
ALL the factors mentioned in the newspaper report were in play. 

It is entirely possible that there were factors in play that were not even 
mentioned- for example the pilot's mental state on the day, and terrain (the 
availability of a good outlanding paddock or paddocks). {High definition images 
of the area are available on Google Earth.} Was there a strong wind blowing? 

I wonder how low the series of low level turns was. The pilot would not need 
much height to cover 2 km, even into a strong wind, so I guess that low is 
bloody low! This data was no doubt available to the investigator and the 
Coroner from the flight recorder. I note that the CAA investigator, Alan 
Moselen, did not rule out the possibility of fatigue or dehydration as 
contributing factors: He simply said they were unlikely to be the over-riding 
factors.

I would hope that the message Julie Hall was trying to get out re dehydration, 
was well and truly already known to pilots flying in this country, at least. I 
can remember Maurie Bradley doing tests at the Renmark Nationals in '96 and 
'97, and making known his results soon after. The message - keep hydrated - has 
been iterated over and over again since then.

Ditto re spinning off a turn - especially at low level.

Gary
  - Original Message - 
  From: Christopher Mc Donnell 
  To: aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net 
  Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 12:05 PM
  Subject: [Aus-soaring] NZ Accident Investigation


  Another view. CAA  Coroner at odds.


   
   
  Glider death cause disputed 
  By NATALIE AKOORIE and BELINDA FEEK - Waikato Times 
  Last updated 13:00 08/04/2010

   
  The wife of a Cambridge glider pilot killed in a crash outside Matamata more 
than two years ago has questioned a Civil Aviation Authority report that her 
husband was being too competitive when he attempted a fatal turn at low 
altitude. 

  Trevor Atkins, a scientist originally from Canada, died when he crashed into 
a paddock 2 kilometres from the Matamata Aerodrome, near Waharoa, while 
competing in the national gliding championships in February, 2008. 

  In the CAA report out yesterday, safety investigator Alan Moselen said Dr 
Atkins' decision to continue flying toward the aerodrome, rather than landing 
early, could have been because he believed a thermal was nearby or because of 
the pressure of competition to keep going. 

  What was on offer was the opportunity to acquire competition points, and 
this alone was possibly the primary driver that influenced the pilot's 
decision-making process. 

  The 51-year-old, who was a gliding administrator and had more than 1200 
hours' flying experience, was competing with another pilot for the trans-Tasman 
Trophy. 

  Mr Moselen found the decision to carry out a series of low-level turns and 
the eventual loss of control was likely to have been influenced by competition 
and human error rather than any overriding degree of human under-performance 
caused by fatigue and or dehydration. 

  But Dr Atkins' wife, Niwa scientist Julie Hall, said a coroner's report into 
her husband's death released last month pointed to fatigue and dehydration as 
other contributing factors in the crash. 

  When asked whether her husband was so competitive he would put his life at 
risk, Dr Hall, a glider pilot herself, said: Absolutely not. I don't believe 
Trevor was competitive at all costs ... anybody that knows him well would say 
no. Anybody that knew him well, and other pilots who have competed with him, 
say no. To be totally put down to competitiveness is out of character. 

  Dr Hall did not dispute that her husband was competitive but believed fatigue 
and dehydration were just as significant contributing factors in his 
decision-making. 

  I thought his decision-making was impaired in some way and there is good 
scientific evidence that cognitive function can be impacted at low levels of 
dehydration and that's a message that needs to go out. 

  She wanted the flying, in particular gliding, community to be more aware of 
the impact of those factors when up in the air. 

  She is still in discussion with the CAA over the report which was released to 
her in January. 

  In his final findings into the death of Dr Atkins, coroner Peter Ryan said he 
accepted the pilot's poor decision-making at the time of the accident may 
have been affected by dehydration and fatigue. 

  With respect to the author of the (CAA) report, dehydration and fatigue 
would, in my view, have been significant factors making up the human error 
factor referred to in the report. 
   
   
   
   
   
  Opinion poll 




--


  ___
  Aus-soaring mailing list