[Aus-soaring] Glider Tugs

2008-01-19 Thread Jenny Ganderton
Has anyone any experience of using a Citabria 160hp 7GCBC as a tug? Is 
160 hp enough?

Jenny
___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring


[Aus-soaring] Glider Tugs

2008-01-20 Thread Jenny Ganderton
I guess this means that no-one except John Hoye has towed behind a 
Citabria then.

Jenny
___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring


Re: [Aus-soaring] Glider Tugs

2008-01-19 Thread John Hoye
Jenny,

I've flown a couple of flapless Citabrias in England. One had the 150hp 
carby engine and the other was fuel injected, maybe a 160hp. We operated 
from a small airfield with 950yds, being the longest run available and then 
a climb over trees at each end. They were nice to fly, easy to operate but 
lacked grunt because both engines were well into their hours. Their 
performance would be badly affected by the high temp experienced in summer 
in Oz.

When I started gliding (late 60's) we used a 130 hp Tiger moth which was 
good with the old gliders we had. Then we used 150 hp super cubs and these 
were good in their day. A lot of these were upgraded (at other clubs) to 
180hp fixed pitch to get 700ft/min climb rates. With the advent of glass 
fibre two seaters weighing around 900lbs better tugs were needed and Pawnees 
were used at the smaller clubs (like ours). Clubs operating from long 
runways in the UK still used Robin D400 180hp tugs because of their fuel 
efficiency and low maintenance costs compared with the Pawnee

John

- Original Message - 
From: "Jenny Ganderton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Aus-Soaring" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2008 2:14 PM
Subject: [Aus-soaring] Glider Tugs


> Has anyone any experience of using a Citabria 160hp 7GCBC as a tug? Is
> 160 hp enough?
>
> Jenny
> ___
> Aus-soaring mailing list
> Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
> To check or change subscription details, visit:
> http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring 
___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring


Re: [Aus-soaring] Glider Tugs

2008-01-19 Thread Anthony Smith
A basic way to roughly compare performance as a tug is to look at power
to weight ratios.  

Find the weight of the Citabria and the glider you want to tow.  Divide
the power by this total.

Next you can look at the performance of a Pawnee towing a glider.  Again
divide the Pawnee's power by the combined weight of the Pawnee and the
glider.

This is really a rough way to compare performance, but should give you a
rough idea.

You can also look at the climb rate of the Citabria at say 70 kts (or
what you want to tow at) and then knock it back by the ratio of the
weight of the Citabria divided by the combined weight of the Citabria
and the weight of the glider.

Again a very rough way to work it out to give you an idea.

Certainly a Citabria may tow an Arrow or a Boomerang.

Have a look at the Super Dimona's performance when towing - the Dimona
operating at 700kg or thereabouts and a 115 HP engine staggers skywards
when towing a single seater.  I don't know the climb rates achieved.

Anthony

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John
Hoye
Sent: Sunday, 20 January 2008 4:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Discussion of issues relating to
Soaring in Australia.
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] Glider Tugs

Jenny,

I've flown a couple of flapless Citabrias in England. One had the 150hp 
carby engine and the other was fuel injected, maybe a 160hp. We operated

from a small airfield with 950yds, being the longest run available and
then 
a climb over trees at each end. They were nice to fly, easy to operate
but 
lacked grunt because both engines were well into their hours. Their 
performance would be badly affected by the high temp experienced in
summer 
in Oz.

When I started gliding (late 60's) we used a 130 hp Tiger moth which was

good with the old gliders we had. Then we used 150 hp super cubs and
these 
were good in their day. A lot of these were upgraded (at other clubs) to

180hp fixed pitch to get 700ft/min climb rates. With the advent of glass

fibre two seaters weighing around 900lbs better tugs were needed and
Pawnees 
were used at the smaller clubs (like ours). Clubs operating from long 
runways in the UK still used Robin D400 180hp tugs because of their fuel

efficiency and low maintenance costs compared with the Pawnee

John

- Original Message - 
From: "Jenny Ganderton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Aus-Soaring" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2008 2:14 PM
Subject: [Aus-soaring] Glider Tugs


> Has anyone any experience of using a Citabria 160hp 7GCBC as a tug? Is
> 160 hp enough?
>
> Jenny
> ___
> Aus-soaring mailing list
> Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
> To check or change subscription details, visit:
> http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring 
___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring


Re: [Aus-soaring] Glider Tugs

2008-01-19 Thread Mark Newton

On 20/01/2008, at 4:34 PM, Anthony Smith wrote:

> Have a look at the Super Dimona's performance when towing - the Dimona
> operating at 700kg or thereabouts and a 115 HP engine staggers  
> skywards
> when towing a single seater.  I don't know the climb rates achieved.

Mankind is yet to develop an instrument with sufficient precision to
measure climb rates that small?

   - mark


I tried an internal modem,[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  but it hurt when I walked.  Mark Newton
- Voice: +61-4-1620-2223 - Fax: +61-8-82231777 -


___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring


Re: [Aus-soaring] Glider Tugs

2008-01-20 Thread John Hoye
The Super Dimona's climb rate is reasonable and the turn round per tow is 
good when it is remembered it uses it's airbrakes during the descent. It 
needs a good grass runway length or hard runway to get up to climbing speed 
when towing and is not suitable for towing out of small grass airfields when 
they are soft. Don't be put off by the 115HP engine though, it's the HP 
available for the climb that's important.

There was an article in S&G Aug-Sept 2007 about a Grob 109B Turbo towing 
gliders. It's worth a read.

John
- Original Message - 
From: "Mark Newton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Discussion of issues relating to 
Soaring in Australia." 
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2008 6:00 PM
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] Glider Tugs


>
> On 20/01/2008, at 4:34 PM, Anthony Smith wrote:
>
>> Have a look at the Super Dimona's performance when towing - the Dimona
>> operating at 700kg or thereabouts and a 115 HP engine staggers
>> skywards
>> when towing a single seater.  I don't know the climb rates achieved.
>
> Mankind is yet to develop an instrument with sufficient precision to
> measure climb rates that small?
>
>   - mark
>
> 
> I tried an internal modem,[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  but it hurt when I walked.  Mark Newton
> - Voice: +61-4-1620-2223 - Fax: +61-8-82231777 -
>
>
> ___
> Aus-soaring mailing list
> Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
> To check or change subscription details, visit:
> http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
> 
___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring


Re: [Aus-soaring] Glider Tugs

2008-01-20 Thread Stuart & Kerri FERGUSON
Jenny,
  Flown them, nice aircraft but I have no experience with them as 
a tug; however we did an exercise several years ago with the Supper
Decathlon (180 bhp, constant speed prop, aerobatic wing), we established it
was unsuitable for our site due to density altitude, runway lengths, surface
and slope etc - we operate from 2500ft.  

This does not mean this aircraft is not suitable for your site.

Stuart  

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Newton
Sent: Sunday, 20 January 2008 6:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Discussion of issues relating to Soaring
in Australia.
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] Glider Tugs


On 20/01/2008, at 4:34 PM, Anthony Smith wrote:

> Have a look at the Super Dimona's performance when towing - the Dimona
> operating at 700kg or thereabouts and a 115 HP engine staggers  
> skywards
> when towing a single seater.  I don't know the climb rates achieved.

Mankind is yet to develop an instrument with sufficient precision to
measure climb rates that small?

   - mark


I tried an internal modem,[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  but it hurt when I walked.  Mark Newton
- Voice: +61-4-1620-2223 - Fax: +61-8-82231777 -


___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring


Re: [Aus-soaring] Glider Tugs

2008-01-20 Thread Derek Ruddock
Didn't the guys in Queensland have issues with rebuilding the tail of
the 150 they use for towing?



> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:aus-soaring-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Borgelt
> Sent: Monday, 21 January 2008 10:37 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Discussion of issues relating to
Soaring in
> Australia.
> Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] Glider Tugs
> 
> At 01:14 PM 20/01/2008, you wrote:
> >Has anyone any experience of using a Citabria 160hp 7GCBC as a tug?
Is
> >160 hp enough?
> >
> >Jenny
> >___
> >Aus-soaring mailing list
> >Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
> >To check or change subscription details, visit:
> >http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
> 
> 
> Just get a Cessna 150 and put a Lyc O-360 in it.
> 
> There is an STC, so no approval problems and there is over 15 years
> experience with it at Kingaroy. Boonah also have one and are planning
a second.
> 
> An O-360 is 2/3 of an O-540 out of the Pawnee so around 2/3 the fuel
> burn and overhaul cost and the last LAME I talked to was very
> positive about the C150 airframe and really didn't think much of the
Pawnee.
> 
> I've watched the 180 Hp C150 outclimb the 235 Pawnee with similar
> gliders behind and launched behind it in the Duo. Very impressive.
> 
> Power/weight counts but drag is still important and while nobody
> would claim the C150 to be the ultimate in aerodynamic refinement it
> is lots better than the Piper Speedbrake.
> 
> Mike
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> .
> 
> 
> Borgelt Instruments - manufacturers of quality soaring instruments
> phone Int'l + 61 746 355784
> fax   Int'l + 61 746 358796
> cellphone Int'l + 61 428 355784
>Int'l + 61 429 355784
> email:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> website: www.borgeltinstruments.com
> ___
> Aus-soaring mailing list
> Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
> To check or change subscription details, visit:
> http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring


Re: [Aus-soaring] Glider Tugs

2008-01-20 Thread Mike Borgelt
At 01:14 PM 20/01/2008, you wrote:
>Has anyone any experience of using a Citabria 160hp 7GCBC as a tug? Is
>160 hp enough?
>
>Jenny
>___
>Aus-soaring mailing list
>Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
>To check or change subscription details, visit:
>http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring


Just get a Cessna 150 and put a Lyc O-360 in it.

There is an STC, so no approval problems and there is over 15 years 
experience with it at Kingaroy. Boonah also have one and are planning a second.

An O-360 is 2/3 of an O-540 out of the Pawnee so around 2/3 the fuel 
burn and overhaul cost and the last LAME I talked to was very 
positive about the C150 airframe and really didn't think much of the Pawnee.

I've watched the 180 Hp C150 outclimb the 235 Pawnee with similar 
gliders behind and launched behind it in the Duo. Very impressive.

Power/weight counts but drag is still important and while nobody 
would claim the C150 to be the ultimate in aerodynamic refinement it 
is lots better than the Piper Speedbrake.

Mike







.


Borgelt Instruments - manufacturers of quality soaring instruments
phone Int'l + 61 746 355784
fax   Int'l + 61 746 358796
cellphone Int'l + 61 428 355784
   Int'l + 61 429 355784
email:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
website: www.borgeltinstruments.com
___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring


Re: [Aus-soaring] Glider Tugs

2008-01-20 Thread Mike Borgelt
At 09:57 AM 21/01/2008, you wrote:
>Didn't the guys in Queensland have issues with rebuilding the tail of
>the 150 they use for towing?
>
>

No,

That was disinformation on the E-tug writeup.

The Kingaroy 150 had a loose tailplane. When they repainted it they 
found the retaining bolts had never been properly tightened. That was 
done and no problem.

Ask Greg Schmidt. He's at Temora right now.

Mike
Borgelt Instruments - manufacturers of quality soaring instruments
phone Int'l + 61 746 355784
fax   Int'l + 61 746 358796
cellphone Int'l + 61 428 355784
   Int'l + 61 429 355784
email:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
website: www.borgeltinstruments.com
___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring


Re: [Aus-soaring] Glider Tugs

2008-01-20 Thread Derek Ruddock
What was the power of that Husky you had?
Towing behind that was marginal enough thank you...



> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:aus-soaring-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jenny Ganderton
> Sent: Monday, 21 January 2008 3:00 PM
> To: Aus-Soaring
> Subject: [Aus-soaring] Glider Tugs
> 
> I guess this means that no-one except John Hoye has towed behind a
> Citabria then.
> 
> Jenny
> ___
> Aus-soaring mailing list
> Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
> To check or change subscription details, visit:
> http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring


Re: [Aus-soaring] Glider Tugs

2008-01-20 Thread Paul Bart
>
> Just get a Cessna 150 and put a Lyc O-360 in it.
>
> There is an STC, so no approval problems and there is over 15 years
> experience with it at Kingaroy. Boonah also have one and are planning a
> second.


Are they not going ahead with the  Subaru powered tug?  I have read about it
in their website, seemed like a good idea, but I have not seen any updates
there since 2006.

Paul



Mike
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> .
>
>
___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

Re: [Aus-soaring] Glider Tugs

2008-01-21 Thread Mike Borgelt
At 05:35 PM 21/01/2008, you wrote:
>Just get a Cessna 150 and put a Lyc O-360 in it.
>
>There is an STC, so no approval problems and there is over 15 years
>experience with it at Kingaroy. Boonah also have one and are 
>planning a second.
>
>
>Are they not going ahead with the  Subaru powered tug?  I have read 
>about it in their website, seemed like a good idea, but I have not 
>seen any updates there since 2006.
>
>Paul
>

Don't know. I think the second 150 was planned to get a Subaru. This 
should have the same approval problems as a V8 Pawnee.
I did talk to Richard Van Grunsven (RV series designer) about it and 
he wasn't that impressed by the idea. Lycomings at least have known 
problems. After talking about it we both concluded that neither 
engine was likely to explode but some accessory was more likely to 
stop it. An engine suitable for a homebuilder who tinkers with it to 
keep it running well is a different thing from an engine in a tug 
where lots of people fly it and it is mission critical for launching 
gliders. Direct drive, air cooled engines have their shortcomings but 
they are also simple.
Some of the Subaru conversions available as firewall forward kits 
were at least as expensive as a Lycoming last I looked.

Mike
Borgelt Instruments - manufacturers of quality soaring instruments
phone Int'l + 61 746 355784
fax   Int'l + 61 746 358796
cellphone Int'l + 61 428 355784
   Int'l + 61 429 355784
email:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
website: www.borgeltinstruments.com
___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring


Re: [Aus-soaring] Glider Tugs

2008-01-21 Thread D S Baker
I was there (Boonah) in August and then September of '07, and I believe they
had a Cessna at the time. I didn't mind being towed behind their tug.
Granted, it wasn't as quick as WGC's Pawnee (VH-WGC, I believe it's 250hp or
so, as oppose to the usual 225/30hp of a standard Pawnee?), it was
noticeably slower (although not by too much), but it was a damn lot quieter.

Dion Baker

On 21/01/2008, Paul Bart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Just get a Cessna 150 and put a Lyc O-360 in it.
> >
> > There is an STC, so no approval problems and there is over 15 years
> > experience with it at Kingaroy. Boonah also have one and are planning a
> > second.
>
>
> Are they not going ahead with the  Subaru powered tug?  I have read about
> it in their website, seemed like a good idea, but I have not seen any
> updates there since 2006.
>
> Paul
>
>
>
> Mike
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > .
> >
> >
>
> ___
> Aus-soaring mailing list
> Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
> To check or change subscription details, visit:
> http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
>



-- 
 In our high school library, at the librarians desk there was a pair
of scissors for students to use, to stop people from stealing them the
genius had tied them to the leg of the desk with a piece of string.
___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

Re: [Aus-soaring] Glider Tugs

2008-01-21 Thread Paul Bart
Thanks Mike, whilst I do not know a great deal about tug engines I thought
the main advantage of such engines was the ability to be maintained by non
LAME labour, lower consumption and the ability to descent rapidly due to
water cooling.  Not sure if it outweighs the problems you have mentioned.
Reading their website it would seem that the kit had an approval, but I do
not really know.

Paul


On 21/01/2008, Mike Borgelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> At 05:35 PM 21/01/2008, you wrote:
> >Just get a Cessna 150 and put a Lyc O-360 in it.
> >
> >There is an STC, so no approval problems and there is over 15 years
> >experience with it at Kingaroy. Boonah also have one and are
> >planning a second.
> >
> >
> >Are they not going ahead with the  Subaru powered tug?  I have read
> >about it in their website, seemed like a good idea, but I have not
> >seen any updates there since 2006.
> >
> >Paul
> >
>
> Don't know. I think the second 150 was planned to get a Subaru. This
> should have the same approval problems as a V8 Pawnee.
> I did talk to Richard Van Grunsven (RV series designer) about it and
> he wasn't that impressed by the idea. Lycomings at least have known
> problems. After talking about it we both concluded that neither
> engine was likely to explode but some accessory was more likely to
> stop it. An engine suitable for a homebuilder who tinkers with it to
> keep it running well is a different thing from an engine in a tug
> where lots of people fly it and it is mission critical for launching
> gliders. Direct drive, air cooled engines have their shortcomings but
> they are also simple.
> Some of the Subaru conversions available as firewall forward kits
> were at least as expensive as a Lycoming last I looked.
>
> Mike
> Borgelt Instruments - manufacturers of quality soaring instruments
> phone Int'l + 61 746 355784
> fax   Int'l + 61 746 358796
> cellphone Int'l + 61 428 355784
>Int'l + 61 429 355784
> email:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> website: www.borgeltinstruments.com
> ___
> Aus-soaring mailing list
> Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
> To check or change subscription details, visit:
> http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
>
___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

Re: [Aus-soaring] Glider Tugs

2008-01-22 Thread Mike Borgelt
At 09:42 PM 21/01/2008, you wrote:
>Thanks Mike, whilst I do not know a great deal about tug engines I 
>thought the main advantage of such engines was the ability to be 
>maintained by non LAME labour, lower consumption and the ability to 
>descent rapidly due to water cooling.  Not sure if it outweighs the 
>problems you have mentioned.   Reading their website it would seem 
>that the kit had an approval, but I do not really know.
>
>Paul
>

I don't know why nobody has designed a proper set of cowl 
flaps/louvres to keep the air cooled engine warm in descent. Easier 
than a new engine installation surely.
There is a limit to the fuel gain. You are running at full power with 
a load and detonation would be just as bad for a water cooled engine 
as for air cooled.
Who maintains the engine gets into the approval thingy. If you do an 
STC for the new engine you still need a LAME only he isn't familiar 
with the engine!
You can do one off experimentals but AFAIK you still need a LAME 
unless it is a homebuilt and you are the builder and get the 
repairman certificate.

Mike

Borgelt Instruments - manufacturers of quality soaring instruments
phone Int'l + 61 746 355784
fax   Int'l + 61 746 358796
cellphone Int'l + 61 428 355784
   Int'l + 61 429 355784
email:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
website: www.borgeltinstruments.com
___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring


Re: [Aus-soaring] Glider Tugs

2008-01-22 Thread Stuart & Kerri FERGUSON
We have cowl flaps on our Pawnee plus strict operating procedures for the
pilots particularly during decent. One of our challenges is protecting the
engine from thermal shock during the winter wave season when we may have
long tows to 6500ft AMSL (4000ft AGL)or higher where temps can be below
freezing. Our maintenance workshop also recommended we also change the oil
every 33 hours and got 2100 hours our of our last engine.

Personally I would like to see one of the new generation aero turbo diesels
developed for a tug 

http://www.deltahawkengines.com/econom00.shtml

SDF

   
  


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike
Borgelt
Sent: Tuesday, 22 January 2008 7:05 PM
To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] Glider Tugs

At 09:42 PM 21/01/2008, you wrote:
>Thanks Mike, whilst I do not know a great deal about tug engines I 
>thought the main advantage of such engines was the ability to be 
>maintained by non LAME labour, lower consumption and the ability to 
>descent rapidly due to water cooling.  Not sure if it outweighs the 
>problems you have mentioned.   Reading their website it would seem 
>that the kit had an approval, but I do not really know.
>
>Paul
>

I don't know why nobody has designed a proper set of cowl 
flaps/louvres to keep the air cooled engine warm in descent. Easier 
than a new engine installation surely.
There is a limit to the fuel gain. You are running at full power with 
a load and detonation would be just as bad for a water cooled engine 
as for air cooled.
Who maintains the engine gets into the approval thingy. If you do an 
STC for the new engine you still need a LAME only he isn't familiar 
with the engine!
You can do one off experimentals but AFAIK you still need a LAME 
unless it is a homebuilt and you are the builder and get the 
repairman certificate.

Mike

Borgelt Instruments - manufacturers of quality soaring instruments
phone Int'l + 61 746 355784
fax   Int'l + 61 746 358796
cellphone Int'l + 61 428 355784
   Int'l + 61 429 355784
email:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
website: www.borgeltinstruments.com
___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring


Re: [Aus-soaring] Glider Tugs

2008-01-23 Thread Jenny Ganderton
I don't know - before my time here. But I heard it wasn't very nice to 
fly. I am looking at putting a syndicate together for a back up tug, for 
when the main one has a 100 hourly, or needs a bit of TLC which requires 
it to stop flying for a day or so. I thought a two seater which is fun 
to fly, and could be used for taildragger endorsements and aerobatics as 
well as for towing and towing training, and cheaper to run than a Pawnee 
would be nice.

A cessna 150 with a 180 hp engine does not pass the fun to fly test.

 From the comments here, a 160 hp citabria would be too gutless I think. 
A 180 hp one might do the trick. Other countries do seem to use 180 hp tugs.

Derek Ruddock wrote:
> What was the power of that Husky you had?
> Towing behind that was marginal enough thank you...
>
>
>
>   
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:aus-soaring-
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jenny Ganderton
>> Sent: Monday, 21 January 2008 3:00 PM
>> To: Aus-Soaring
>> Subject: [Aus-soaring] Glider Tugs
>>
>> I guess this means that no-one except John Hoye has towed behind a
>> Citabria then.
>>
>> Jenny
>> ___
>> Aus-soaring mailing list
>> Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
>> To check or change subscription details, visit:
>> http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
>> 
>
> ___
> Aus-soaring mailing list
> Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
> To check or change subscription details, visit:
> http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
>
>   
___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring


Re: [Aus-soaring] Glider Tugs

2008-01-23 Thread Mike Borgelt
At 07:31 PM 23/01/2008, you wrote:
>I don't know - before my time here. But I heard it wasn't very nice to
>fly. I am looking at putting a syndicate together for a back up tug, for
>when the main one has a 100 hourly, or needs a bit of TLC which requires
>it to stop flying for a day or so. I thought a two seater which is fun
>to fly, and could be used for taildragger endorsements and aerobatics as
>well as for towing and towing training, and cheaper to run than a Pawnee
>would be nice.
>
>A cessna 150 with a 180 hp engine does not pass the fun to fly test.
>
>  From the comments here, a 160 hp citabria would be too gutless I think.
>A 180 hp one might do the trick. Other countries do seem to use 180 hp tugs.

OK so now we get the rest of the requirements.

The only thing wrong with Cessna 150's is lack of power. The aircraft 
is actually light on the controls and well co-ordinated and last time 
I flew one I found it delightful - mind you I had been spending some 
time in the Piper Tomahawk which in retrospect is an appalling flying 
machine (note I didn't say aircraft) which was probably designed by 
the team from Sirius Cybernetics. The 180 HP engine fixes the 
problems of the 150. Anything with that much power has to be fun to 
fly. I once flew a C150 with 150HP and was most impressed. So it 
won't do aerobatics or tailwheel endorsements although you might look 
in to the Texas Taildragger (C150 tailwheel conversion) and see if it 
can have 180HP. The C150 also doesn't have fabric covering.

Mike
Borgelt Instruments - manufacturers of quality soaring instruments
phone Int'l + 61 746 355784
fax   Int'l + 61 746 358796
cellphone Int'l + 61 428 355784
   Int'l + 61 429 355784
email:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
website: www.borgeltinstruments.com
___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring


Re: [Aus-soaring] Glider Tugs

2008-01-28 Thread Mark Rowe

I agree with mike, a texas taildrager with 180hp is a ripper.
they do have to be beefed up in the rear for towing though, not a big deal with 
the testing that has been done.
Now lets see one with a small turboprop
 
MR> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:56:50 +1000> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 
aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: 
[Aus-soaring] Glider Tugs> > At 07:31 PM 23/01/2008, you wrote:> >I don't know 
- before my time here. But I heard it wasn't very nice to> >fly. I am looking 
at putting a syndicate together for a back up tug, for> >when the main one has 
a 100 hourly, or needs a bit of TLC which requires> >it to stop flying for a 
day or so. I thought a two seater which is fun> >to fly, and could be used for 
taildragger endorsements and aerobatics as> >well as for towing and towing 
training, and cheaper to run than a Pawnee> >would be nice.> >> >A cessna 150 
with a 180 hp engine does not pass the fun to fly test.> >> > From the comments 
here, a 160 hp citabria would be too gutless I think.> >A 180 hp one might do 
the trick. Other countries do seem to use 180 hp tugs.> > OK so now we get the 
rest of the requirements.> > The only thing wrong with Cessna 150's is lack of 
power. The aircraft > is actually light on the controls and well co-ordinated 
and last time > I flew one I found it delightful - mind you I had been spending 
some > time in the Piper Tomahawk which in retrospect is an appalling flying > 
machine (note I didn't say aircraft) which was probably designed by > the team 
from Sirius Cybernetics. The 180 HP engine fixes the > problems of the 150. 
Anything with that much power has to be fun to > fly. I once flew a C150 with 
150HP and was most impressed. So it > won't do aerobatics or tailwheel 
endorsements although you might look > in to the Texas Taildragger (C150 
tailwheel conversion) and see if it > can have 180HP. The C150 also doesn't 
have fabric covering.> > Mike> Borgelt Instruments - manufacturers of quality 
soaring instruments> phone Int'l + 61 746 355784> fax Int'l + 61 746 358796> 
cellphone Int'l + 61 428 355784> Int'l + 61 429 355784> email: [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]> website: www.borgeltinstruments.com> 
___> Aus-soaring mailing list> 
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net> To check or change subscription details, 
visit:> http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
_
Overpaid or Underpaid? Check our comprehensive Salary Centre
http://a.ninemsn.com.au/b.aspx?URL=http%3A%2F%2Fcontent%2Emycareer%2Ecom%2Eau%2Fsalary%2Dcentre%3Fs%5Fcid%3D595810&_t=766724125&_r=Hotmail_Email_Tagline_MyCareer_Oct07&_m=EXT___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring