Re: [Aus-soaring] varios, redundancy

2015-04-28 Thread go_soaring
The vent hole on the shroud is an excellent idea, McPhee alerted me to that you 
came up with that idea - it's on my list to do this form2. I can only imagine 
the life span it'd take away from my instruments.

I'd like to change my shroud color too, the color wasn't chosen by me. Another 
one of those jobs to get around too..

Re: fuses, there's an extra one on my panel for the electric bug wipers that'll 
one day find themselves installed. 

On a side note, I'm with James Dutschke - the B700 is amazing as a vario. It'd 
be also great as a sole vario in your glider. I've in fact have owned two, 
reason: to long to describe, rest assured it was for good reasons!


Safe Circles,
WPP


 On 28 Apr 2015, at 19:26, Mike Borgelt mborg...@borgeltinstruments.com 
 wrote:
 
 I don't see a magnetic compass. Isn't compliant with airworthiness 
 requirements.
 
 Also nasty shine on the black instrument panel cover. Humbrol Matt Black 33 
 from your local Toyworld or hobby shop fixes that. 2 coats out of two small 
 cans. Brushes nicely with 1/2 soft brush.
 
 Also  no  vent hole in the cover to let out hot air. Bad pup, no biscuit.
 
 Mike
 
 
 
 At 06:32 PM 28/04/2015, you wrote:
 You have a whole lot of fuses and switches there.  More fuses than 
 instruments.
 
 Why so many?
 
 On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 6:57 AM, go_soaring go_soar...@hotmail.com  wrote:
 G'day all, 
 My apologies, forgot to mention that I run an LX Colibri II as my 
 independent backup vario  nav source. I've flown a practice 400km flight 
 with it prior to the Nationals this year, surprisingly worked really well as 
 a vario. After all, Tobias Geiger almost won a world championships by flying 
 with a Colibri II alone!!
 The only thing that would make me feel even better about my CNv, is to have 
 Borgelts brilliant backup battery supply to his B instruments added to the 
 CNv - I'm sure it's saved many Mike!
 
 Cheers,
 WPP
 P.s. My panel as it is now
 2a115de.JPG 
 
 
 On 27 Apr 2015, at 18:11, Peter Champness plchampn...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 I have just been choosing instruments for a new glider.
 I did wonder for a moment after reading Adam's post whether I had wasted 
 money on the Winter Vario.
 However I agree with Mike.  A set on basic instruments (redundancy) is 
 good insurance.  In my case I have something in case of electrical failure.
 No doubt thermal can be found and used without any instruments, but it 
 difficult.
 On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Mike Borgelt  
 mborg...@borgeltinstruments.com wrote:
 At 08:14 AM 27/04/2015, you wrote:
 There̢۪s no need for a winter backup now
  Maybe not a Winter vario as backup but you should have a backup. Adam's 
  advice is probably the silliest thing I've read in a long time.
 The only time you may reasonably want to rely on one vario is in a 
 motorglider if you are prepared to start the motor and fly home if the 
 single vario fails.
 Too bad if you are half way round a 500km triangle and set to win the 
 Nationals if you do reasonably this day.
 For the paleo engineless gliders you are likely to risk an outlanding with 
 its attendant hazards. Pretty stupid to risk breaking your glider or 
 yourself over lack of a backup.
 If you are serious about competition you should be equipped to cope with 
 single failures of equipment. Most people carry two flight recorders for 
 good reason.
 A main navigation system and some reasonable backup is also necessary. 
 Hint: fly with the backups working. The time to find out they have failed 
 is NOT when you've had another failure.
 The backup vario may also have a different speed of response and  will 
 likely just display TE vario. Your primary should be showing netto 
 (airmass) or relative netto ( airmass offset down by the sink rate in 
 circling flight - this means it always shows the rate of climb you would 
 get if you slowed down and circled, no matter your current airspeed). The 
 two varios may show slightly different information without changing modes 
 which can be useful.
 
 We've all had even modern electronic equipment fail. Phones, PC's GPS , etc 
 etc. It is pretty good nowadays but anyone doing what Adam says is tempting 
 fate, Murphy's Law and what a physics teacher of mine called the innate 
 cussedness of inanimate matter.
 When you decide to use a backup you might like to consider that the Winter 
 doesn't have an audio or an averager. Do you really want to be sharing 
 thermals with other gliders without an audio? If flying cross country you 
 would find you would miss the averager.
 If you have a backup electronic vario it should have its own independent 
 backup power supply. While a glider electrical system can be fused properly 
 so that the radio for example developing an internal short doesn't take out 
 the main battery fuse (and if everything dies because of this or similar , 
 are you going to simply flip the switch to battery 2 and take out *its* 
 fuse also?) I suspect many aren't.
 If you decide to join the 

Re: [Aus-soaring] varios, redundancy

2015-04-28 Thread Mike Borgelt

At 08:38 PM 27/04/2015, you wrote:


So you are saying that a outlanding is a risky occurrence?

People are outlanding all the time, except for a few occasions they 
seem to be walking away and still have a glider they can use.


Maybe we should ban outlandings? Suggested new rule may read: You 
must remain in gliding distance of a suitable landing point, unless 
you have a working vario.





Anyone who doesn't think an outlanding in a glider is a greater risk 
than landing back at the known aerodrome they took off from should 
get some re-training. Or start thinking.


After all what could possibly go wrong?

You couldn't possibly get a loss of control while manoeuvering for 
the landing on an unfamiliar paddock could you?
Or while trying to catch a thermal to get away from low altitude? 
Made more difficult in the case under discussion by not having a vario.

Or hit an impossible to see power line?
Or a tree?
Or a line of trees cause unexpected wind shear?
Or ground loop and break the tailboom because the wingtip caught in 
the grass which was longer than you thought?
Or hit the hidden fence in the long grass? (two very experienced 
contest pilots took a dual high tow one day to do some performance 
comparisons. They had a fine old time until one said to the other 
we're at 2500 feet. Where is the aerodrome? Yes, two outlandings in 
the same paddock. Fairly rough, long grass, the second guy to land 
landed to one side of the other. When they got out and met they found 
they were different sides of a fence. Yes, failure to adequately 
brief and decide who was formation lead at what time, amongst others.)

Or damage the landing gear  by dropping into a rabbit hole?
Or cattle were in the paddock when the ground was wet leaving deep 
hoofprints now that the ground is rock hard?

Or there are hidden largish rocks in the grass?
Or the tailskid  causes a fire (it has happened)?
Or the hidden ditch?
Or the river bed that looked like a last ditch way to avoid a bad 
accident in a contest flown over unlandable terrain with only the 
occasional ranch airstrip turned out to be full of human head sized boulders?


I'm sure there have been other creative ways to break people and 
gliders in outlandings.


I've done 62 in real paddocks not counting aerodromes I didn't 
originally intend to land on. Only damage was a flat tyre when a lump 
of Mallee root hit the wheel rim, removing a segment which slashed 
the tube but not the tyre on the way out. Last day of a contest 
fortunately. Luck.


Yes, there are procedures. They are designed to minimise risk but 
they won't eliminate it in this case as there are things simply 
beyond your ability to sense. There is always an element of luck.
Mindlessly following these procedures and expecting everything will 
be OK is hopelessly naive.


And no, gliding doesn't need more stupid rules. There are far too 
many already. Application of knowledge and commonsense would be good though.




Mike












___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring


Borgelt Instruments - design  manufacture of quality soaring 
instrumentation since 1978

www.borgeltinstruments.com
tel:   07 4635 5784 overseas: int+61-7-4635 5784
mob: 042835 5784:  int+61-42835 5784
P O Box 4607, Toowoomba East, QLD 4350, Australia  ___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

Re: [Aus-soaring] varios, redundancy

2015-04-27 Thread Mike Borgelt

At 05:32 PM 27/04/2015, I wrote:


If you decide to join the 21st century for your backup vario get in 
touch and I'll sell you something you'll be happy to fly with when 
you need it.




We sold 1000+ B40's from 1995 to 2005.

My US outlet told me many many US pilots were installing them and 
turning off the audio on their LNAVs.


You may find that the backup is the vario you like better.


Mike



















Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring


Borgelt Instruments - design  manufacture of quality soaring 
instrumentation since 1978

www.borgeltinstruments.com
tel:   07 4635 5784 overseas: int+61-7-4635 5784
mob: 042835 5784:  int+61-42835 5784
P O Box 4607, Toowoomba East, QLD 4350, Australia
___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring


Borgelt Instruments - design  manufacture of quality soaring 
instrumentation since 1978

www.borgeltinstruments.com
tel:   07 4635 5784 overseas: int+61-7-4635 5784
mob: 042835 5784:  int+61-42835 5784
P O Box 4607, Toowoomba East, QLD 4350, Australia  ___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

Re: [Aus-soaring] varios, redundancy

2015-04-27 Thread Nick Gilbert
Surely a backup electric vario is a more useful backup than a mechanical? With 
its own emergency battery you get a backup audio and averager as well as the 
needle. With all the stress that goes with a power failure having to stare at 
the instrument would make things worse. 

Nick


 On 27 Apr 2015, at 5:41 pm, Peter Champness plchampn...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 I have just been choosing instruments for a new glider.
 
 I did wonder for a moment after reading Adam's post whether I had wasted 
 money on the Winter Vario.
 
 However I agree with Mike.  A set on basic instruments (redundancy) is good 
 insurance.  In my case I have something in case of electrical failure.
 
 No doubt thermal can be found and used without any instruments, but it 
 difficult.
 
 On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Mike Borgelt 
 mborg...@borgeltinstruments.com wrote:
 At 08:14 AM 27/04/2015, you wrote:
 
 There’s no need for a winter backup now
 
 Maybe not a Winter vario as backup but you should have a backup. Adam's 
 advice is probably the silliest thing I've read in a long time.
 
 The only time you may reasonably want to rely on one vario is in a 
 motorglider if you are prepared to start the motor and fly home if the 
 single vario fails.
 
 Too bad if you are half way round a 500km triangle and set to win the 
 Nationals if you do reasonably this day.
 
 For the paleo engineless gliders you are likely to risk an outlanding with 
 its attendant hazards. Pretty stupid to risk breaking your glider or 
 yourself over lack of a backup.
 
 If you are serious about competition you should be equipped to cope with 
 single failures of equipment. Most people carry two flight recorders for 
 good reason.
 
 A main navigation system and some reasonable backup is also necessary. Hint: 
 fly with the backups working. The time to find out they have failed is NOT 
 when you've had another failure.
 
 The backup vario may also have a different speed of response and  will 
 likely just display TE vario. Your primary should be showing netto (airmass) 
 or relative netto ( airmass offset down by the sink rate in circling flight 
 - this means it always shows the rate of climb you would get if you slowed 
 down and circled, no matter your current airspeed). The two varios may show 
 slightly different information without changing modes which can be useful.
 
 We've all had even modern electronic equipment fail. Phones, PC's GPS , etc 
 etc. It is pretty good nowadays but anyone doing what Adam says is tempting 
 fate, Murphy's Law and what a physics teacher of mine called the innate 
 cussedness of inanimate matter.
 
 When you decide to use a backup you might like to consider that the Winter 
 doesn't have an audio or an averager. Do you really want to be sharing 
 thermals with other gliders without an audio? If flying cross country you 
 would find you would miss the averager.
 
 If you have a backup electronic vario it should have its own independent 
 backup power supply. While a glider electrical system can be fused properly 
 so that the radio for example developing an internal short doesn't take out 
 the main battery fuse (and if everything dies because of this or similar , 
 are you going to simply flip the switch to battery 2 and take out *its* fuse 
 also?) I suspect many aren't.
 
 If you decide to join the 21st century for your backup vario get in touch 
 and I'll sell you something you'll be happy to fly with when you need it. 
 
 Mike
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Aus-soaring mailing list
 Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
 To check or change subscription details, visit:
 http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
 Borgelt Instruments - design  manufacture of quality soaring 
 instrumentation since 1978
 www.borgeltinstruments.com
 tel:   07 4635 5784 overseas: int+61-7-4635 5784
 mob: 042835 5784 :  int+61-42835 5784
 P O Box 4607, Toowoomba East, QLD 4350, Australia
 
 
 ___
 Aus-soaring mailing list
 Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
 To check or change subscription details, visit:
 http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
 
 ___
 Aus-soaring mailing list
 Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
 To check or change subscription details, visit:
 http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

Re: [Aus-soaring] varios, redundancy

2015-04-27 Thread Matthew Scutter
Which turns out to be remarkably self enforcing, because for someone who's
only ever flown with a vario it's extraordinarily hard to get out of
gliding distance without one.

On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 8:38 PM, Sean Jorgensen-Day 
sean.jorgensen...@bigpond.com wrote:

 *“*For the paleo engineless gliders you are likely to risk an outlanding
 with its attendant hazards. Pretty stupid to risk breaking your glider or
 yourself over lack of a backup.”

 So you are saying that a outlanding is a risky occurrence?

 People are outlanding all the time, except for a few occasions they seem
 to be walking away and still have a glider they can use.

 Maybe we should ban outlandings? Suggested new rule may read: “You must
 remain in gliding distance of a suitable landing point, unless you have a
 working vario.”







 ___
 Aus-soaring mailing list
 Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
 To check or change subscription details, visit:
 http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

Re: [Aus-soaring] varios, redundancy

2015-04-27 Thread pam
YES in the Nationals. It felt like the wings had fallen off. I had no backup…..

 

From: aus-soaring-boun...@lists.internode.on.net 
[mailto:aus-soaring-boun...@lists.internode.on.net] On Behalf Of James Dutschke
Sent: Monday, 27 April 2015 7:55 PM
To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] varios, redundancy

 

Straw poll.

 

Has anyone, had a vario failure. 


Sent from my iPhone


On 27 Apr 2015, at 19:14, Nick Gilbert cirru...@gmail.com 
mailto:cirru...@gmail.com  wrote:

Surely a backup electric vario is a more useful backup than a mechanical? With 
its own emergency battery you get a backup audio and averager as well as the 
needle. With all the stress that goes with a power failure having to stare at 
the instrument would make things worse. 

 

Nick

 


On 27 Apr 2015, at 5:41 pm, Peter Champness plchampn...@gmail.com 
mailto:plchampn...@gmail.com  wrote:

I have just been choosing instruments for a new glider.

 

I did wonder for a moment after reading Adam's post whether I had wasted money 
on the Winter Vario.

 

However I agree with Mike.  A set on basic instruments (redundancy) is good 
insurance.  In my case I have something in case of electrical failure.

 

No doubt thermal can be found and used without any instruments, but it 
difficult.

 

On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Mike Borgelt mborg...@borgeltinstruments.com 
mailto:mborg...@borgeltinstruments.com  wrote:

At 08:14 AM 27/04/2015, you wrote:

There’s no need for a winter backup now

Maybe not a Winter vario as backup but you should have a backup. Adam's advice 
is probably the silliest thing I've read in a long time.

The only time you may reasonably want to rely on one vario is in a motorglider 
if you are prepared to start the motor and fly home if the single vario fails.

Too bad if you are half way round a 500km triangle and set to win the Nationals 
if you do reasonably this day.

For the paleo engineless gliders you are likely to risk an outlanding with its 
attendant hazards. Pretty stupid to risk breaking your glider or yourself over 
lack of a backup.

If you are serious about competition you should be equipped to cope with single 
failures of equipment. Most people carry two flight recorders for good reason.

A main navigation system and some reasonable backup is also necessary. Hint: 
fly with the backups working. The time to find out they have failed is NOT when 
you've had another failure.

The backup vario may also have a different speed of response and  will likely 
just display TE vario. Your primary should be showing netto (airmass) or 
relative netto ( airmass offset down by the sink rate in circling flight - this 
means it always shows the rate of climb you would get if you slowed down and 
circled, no matter your current airspeed). The two varios may show slightly 
different information without changing modes which can be useful.

We've all had even modern electronic equipment fail. Phones, PC's GPS , etc 
etc. It is pretty good nowadays but anyone doing what Adam says is tempting 
fate, Murphy's Law and what a physics teacher of mine called the innate 
cussedness of inanimate matter.

When you decide to use a backup you might like to consider that the Winter 
doesn't have an audio or an averager. Do you really want to be sharing thermals 
with other gliders without an audio? If flying cross country you would find you 
would miss the averager.

If you have a backup electronic vario it should have its own independent backup 
power supply. While a glider electrical system can be fused properly so that 
the radio for example developing an internal short doesn't take out the main 
battery fuse (and if everything dies because of this or similar , are you going 
to simply flip the switch to battery 2 and take out *its* fuse also?) I suspect 
many aren't.

If you decide to join the 21st century for your backup vario get in touch and 
I'll sell you something you'll be happy to fly with when you need it. 

Mike












Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net mailto:Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net 
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring 

Borgelt Instruments - design  manufacture of quality soaring instrumentation 
since 1978
www.borgeltinstruments.com http://www.borgeltinstruments.com/ 
tel:   07 4635 5784 overseas: int+61-7-4635 5784
mob: 042835 5784 :  int+61-42835 5784
P O Box 4607, Toowoomba East, QLD 4350, Australia 


___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net mailto:Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net 
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

 

___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net mailto:Aus-soaring

Re: [Aus-soaring] varios, redundancy

2015-04-27 Thread James Dutschke
Straw poll.

Has anyone, had a vario failure. 

Sent from my iPhone

 On 27 Apr 2015, at 19:14, Nick Gilbert cirru...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Surely a backup electric vario is a more useful backup than a mechanical? 
 With its own emergency battery you get a backup audio and averager as well as 
 the needle. With all the stress that goes with a power failure having to 
 stare at the instrument would make things worse. 
 
 Nick
 
 
 On 27 Apr 2015, at 5:41 pm, Peter Champness plchampn...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 I have just been choosing instruments for a new glider.
 
 I did wonder for a moment after reading Adam's post whether I had wasted 
 money on the Winter Vario.
 
 However I agree with Mike.  A set on basic instruments (redundancy) is good 
 insurance.  In my case I have something in case of electrical failure.
 
 No doubt thermal can be found and used without any instruments, but it 
 difficult.
 
 On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Mike Borgelt 
 mborg...@borgeltinstruments.com wrote:
 At 08:14 AM 27/04/2015, you wrote:
 
 There’s no need for a winter backup now
 
 Maybe not a Winter vario as backup but you should have a backup. Adam's 
 advice is probably the silliest thing I've read in a long time.
 
 The only time you may reasonably want to rely on one vario is in a 
 motorglider if you are prepared to start the motor and fly home if the 
 single vario fails.
 
 Too bad if you are half way round a 500km triangle and set to win the 
 Nationals if you do reasonably this day.
 
 For the paleo engineless gliders you are likely to risk an outlanding with 
 its attendant hazards. Pretty stupid to risk breaking your glider or 
 yourself over lack of a backup.
 
 If you are serious about competition you should be equipped to cope with 
 single failures of equipment. Most people carry two flight recorders for 
 good reason.
 
 A main navigation system and some reasonable backup is also necessary. 
 Hint: fly with the backups working. The time to find out they have failed 
 is NOT when you've had another failure.
 
 The backup vario may also have a different speed of response and  will 
 likely just display TE vario. Your primary should be showing netto 
 (airmass) or relative netto ( airmass offset down by the sink rate in 
 circling flight - this means it always shows the rate of climb you would 
 get if you slowed down and circled, no matter your current airspeed). The 
 two varios may show slightly different information without changing modes 
 which can be useful.
 
 We've all had even modern electronic equipment fail. Phones, PC's GPS , etc 
 etc. It is pretty good nowadays but anyone doing what Adam says is tempting 
 fate, Murphy's Law and what a physics teacher of mine called the innate 
 cussedness of inanimate matter.
 
 When you decide to use a backup you might like to consider that the Winter 
 doesn't have an audio or an averager. Do you really want to be sharing 
 thermals with other gliders without an audio? If flying cross country you 
 would find you would miss the averager.
 
 If you have a backup electronic vario it should have its own independent 
 backup power supply. While a glider electrical system can be fused properly 
 so that the radio for example developing an internal short doesn't take out 
 the main battery fuse (and if everything dies because of this or similar , 
 are you going to simply flip the switch to battery 2 and take out *its* 
 fuse also?) I suspect many aren't.
 
 If you decide to join the 21st century for your backup vario get in touch 
 and I'll sell you something you'll be happy to fly with when you need it. 
 
 Mike
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Aus-soaring mailing list
 Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
 To check or change subscription details, visit:
 http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
 Borgelt Instruments - design  manufacture of quality soaring 
 instrumentation since 1978
 www.borgeltinstruments.com
 tel:   07 4635 5784 overseas: int+61-7-4635 5784
 mob: 042835 5784 :  int+61-42835 5784
 P O Box 4607, Toowoomba East, QLD 4350, Australia
 
 
 ___
 Aus-soaring mailing list
 Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
 To check or change subscription details, visit:
 http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
 
 ___
 Aus-soaring mailing list
 Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
 To check or change subscription details, visit:
 http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
 ___
 Aus-soaring mailing list
 Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
 To check or change subscription details, visit:
 http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:

Re: [Aus-soaring] varios, redundancy

2015-04-27 Thread Sean Jorgensen-Day
For the paleo engineless gliders you are likely to risk an outlanding with
its attendant hazards. Pretty stupid to risk breaking your glider or
yourself over lack of a backup.

So you are saying that a outlanding is a risky occurrence? 

People are outlanding all the time, except for a few occasions they seem to
be walking away and still have a glider they can use. 

Maybe we should ban outlandings? Suggested new rule may read: You must
remain in gliding distance of a suitable landing point, unless you have a
working vario.

 

 

 

___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

Re: [Aus-soaring] varios, redundancy

2015-04-27 Thread Derek Ruddock
Twice. Both in state comps.

 

From: aus-soaring-boun...@lists.internode.on.net 
[mailto:aus-soaring-boun...@lists.internode.on.net] On Behalf Of James Dutschke
Sent: Monday, 27 April 2015 7:55 PM
To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] varios, redundancy

 

Straw poll.

 

Has anyone, had a vario failure. 


Sent from my iPhone


On 27 Apr 2015, at 19:14, Nick Gilbert cirru...@gmail.com wrote:

Surely a backup electric vario is a more useful backup than a mechanical? With 
its own emergency battery you get a backup audio and averager as well as the 
needle. With all the stress that goes with a power failure having to stare at 
the instrument would make things worse. 

 

Nick

 


On 27 Apr 2015, at 5:41 pm, Peter Champness plchampn...@gmail.com wrote:

I have just been choosing instruments for a new glider.

 

I did wonder for a moment after reading Adam's post whether I had wasted money 
on the Winter Vario.

 

However I agree with Mike.  A set on basic instruments (redundancy) is good 
insurance.  In my case I have something in case of electrical failure.

 

No doubt thermal can be found and used without any instruments, but it 
difficult.

 

On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Mike Borgelt mborg...@borgeltinstruments.com 
wrote:

At 08:14 AM 27/04/2015, you wrote:

There’s no need for a winter backup now

Maybe not a Winter vario as backup but you should have a backup. Adam's advice 
is probably the silliest thing I've read in a long time.

The only time you may reasonably want to rely on one vario is in a motorglider 
if you are prepared to start the motor and fly home if the single vario fails.

Too bad if you are half way round a 500km triangle and set to win the Nationals 
if you do reasonably this day.

For the paleo engineless gliders you are likely to risk an outlanding with its 
attendant hazards. Pretty stupid to risk breaking your glider or yourself over 
lack of a backup.

If you are serious about competition you should be equipped to cope with single 
failures of equipment. Most people carry two flight recorders for good reason.

A main navigation system and some reasonable backup is also necessary. Hint: 
fly with the backups working. The time to find out they have failed is NOT when 
you've had another failure.

The backup vario may also have a different speed of response and  will likely 
just display TE vario. Your primary should be showing netto (airmass) or 
relative netto ( airmass offset down by the sink rate in circling flight - this 
means it always shows the rate of climb you would get if you slowed down and 
circled, no matter your current airspeed). The two varios may show slightly 
different information without changing modes which can be useful.

We've all had even modern electronic equipment fail. Phones, PC's GPS , etc 
etc. It is pretty good nowadays but anyone doing what Adam says is tempting 
fate, Murphy's Law and what a physics teacher of mine called the innate 
cussedness of inanimate matter.

When you decide to use a backup you might like to consider that the Winter 
doesn't have an audio or an averager. Do you really want to be sharing thermals 
with other gliders without an audio? If flying cross country you would find you 
would miss the averager.

If you have a backup electronic vario it should have its own independent backup 
power supply. While a glider electrical system can be fused properly so that 
the radio for example developing an internal short doesn't take out the main 
battery fuse (and if everything dies because of this or similar , are you going 
to simply flip the switch to battery 2 and take out *its* fuse also?) I suspect 
many aren't.

If you decide to join the 21st century for your backup vario get in touch and 
I'll sell you something you'll be happy to fly with when you need it. 

Mike












Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring 

Borgelt Instruments - design  manufacture of quality soaring instrumentation 
since 1978
www.borgeltinstruments.com http://www.borgeltinstruments.com/ 
tel:   07 4635 5784 overseas: int+61-7-4635 5784
mob: 042835 5784 :  int+61-42835 5784
P O Box 4607, Toowoomba East, QLD 4350, Australia 


___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

 

___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http

Re: [Aus-soaring] varios, redundancy

2015-04-27 Thread Mike Borgelt

At 08:14 AM 27/04/2015, you wrote:

There’s no need for a winter backup now

Maybe not a Winter vario as backup but you should 
have a backup. Adam's advice is probably the 
silliest thing I've read in a long time.


The only time you may reasonably want to rely on 
one vario is in a motorglider if you are prepared 
to start the motor and fly home if the single vario fails.


Too bad if you are half way round a 500km 
triangle and set to win the Nationals if you do reasonably this day.


For the paleo engineless gliders you are likely 
to risk an outlanding with its attendant hazards. 
Pretty stupid to risk breaking your glider or yourself over lack of a backup.


If you are serious about competition you should 
be equipped to cope with single failures of 
equipment. Most people carry two flight recorders for good reason.


A main navigation system and some reasonable 
backup is also necessary. Hint: fly with the 
backups working. The time to find out they have 
failed is NOT when you've had another failure.


The backup vario may also have a different speed 
of response and  will likely just display TE 
vario. Your primary should be showing netto 
(airmass) or relative netto ( airmass offset down 
by the sink rate in circling flight - this means 
it always shows the rate of climb you would get 
if you slowed down and circled, no matter your 
current airspeed). The two varios may show 
slightly different information without changing modes which can be useful.


We've all had even modern electronic equipment 
fail. Phones, PC's GPS , etc etc. It is pretty 
good nowadays but anyone doing what Adam says is 
tempting fate, Murphy's Law and what a physics 
teacher of mine called the innate cussedness of inanimate matter.


When you decide to use a backup you might like to 
consider that the Winter doesn't have an audio or 
an averager. Do you really want to be sharing 
thermals with other gliders without an audio? If 
flying cross country you would find you would miss the averager.


If you have a backup electronic vario it should 
have its own independent backup power supply. 
While a glider electrical system can be fused 
properly so that the radio for example developing 
an internal short doesn't take out the main 
battery fuse (and if everything dies because of 
this or similar , are you going to simply flip 
the switch to battery 2 and take out *its* fuse also?) I suspect many aren't.


If you decide to join the 21st century for your 
backup vario get in touch and I'll sell you 
something you'll be happy to fly with when you need it.


Mike










Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring


Borgelt Instruments - design  manufacture of 
quality soaring instrumentation since 1978

www.borgeltinstruments.com
tel:   07 4635 5784 overseas: int+61-7-4635 5784
mob: 042835 5784:  int+61-42835 5784
P O Box 4607, Toowoomba East, QLD 4350, Australia  ___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

Re: [Aus-soaring] varios, redundancy

2015-04-27 Thread Harry
Hi All,

Don’t usually give free plugs but Mike’s B700 is about as good a backup or main 
vario as it is possible to obtain. It has the works. A back up battery and a 
good audio, averager and vario. About the same cost as a manual vario but many 
times better. I have an expensive bells and whistles vario but the needles move 
in unison with Mike’s modestly priced B700,

Harry Medlicott

From: Mike Borgelt 
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 5:32 PM
To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia. 
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] varios, redundancy

At 08:14 AM 27/04/2015, you wrote:

There’s no need for a winter backup now

Maybe not a Winter vario as backup but you should have a backup. Adam's advice 
is probably the silliest thing I've read in a long time.

The only time you may reasonably want to rely on one vario is in a motorglider 
if you are prepared to start the motor and fly home if the single vario fails.

Too bad if you are half way round a 500km triangle and set to win the Nationals 
if you do reasonably this day.

For the paleo engineless gliders you are likely to risk an outlanding with its 
attendant hazards. Pretty stupid to risk breaking your glider or yourself over 
lack of a backup.

If you are serious about competition you should be equipped to cope with single 
failures of equipment. Most people carry two flight recorders for good reason.

A main navigation system and some reasonable backup is also necessary. Hint: 
fly with the backups working. The time to find out they have failed is NOT when 
you've had another failure.

The backup vario may also have a different speed of response and  will likely 
just display TE vario. Your primary should be showing netto (airmass) or 
relative netto ( airmass offset down by the sink rate in circling flight - this 
means it always shows the rate of climb you would get if you slowed down and 
circled, no matter your current airspeed). The two varios may show slightly 
different information without changing modes which can be useful.

We've all had even modern electronic equipment fail. Phones, PC's GPS , etc 
etc. It is pretty good nowadays but anyone doing what Adam says is tempting 
fate, Murphy's Law and what a physics teacher of mine called the innate 
cussedness of inanimate matter.

When you decide to use a backup you might like to consider that the Winter 
doesn't have an audio or an averager. Do you really want to be sharing thermals 
with other gliders without an audio? If flying cross country you would find you 
would miss the averager.

If you have a backup electronic vario it should have its own independent backup 
power supply. While a glider electrical system can be fused properly so that 
the radio for example developing an internal short doesn't take out the main 
battery fuse (and if everything dies because of this or similar , are you going 
to simply flip the switch to battery 2 and take out *its* fuse also?) I suspect 
many aren't.

If you decide to join the 21st century for your backup vario get in touch and 
I'll sell you something you'll be happy to fly with when you need it. 

Mike









  
  Aus-soaring mailing list
  Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
  To check or change subscription details, visit:
  http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring 
Borgelt Instruments - design  manufacture of quality soaring instrumentation 
since 1978
www.borgeltinstruments.com
tel:   07 4635 5784 overseas: int+61-7-4635 5784
mob: 042835 5784 :  int+61-42835 5784
P O Box 4607, Toowoomba East, QLD 4350, Australia 




___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

Re: [Aus-soaring] varios, redundancy

2015-04-27 Thread Peter Champness
I have just been choosing instruments for a new glider.

I did wonder for a moment after reading Adam's post whether I had wasted
money on the Winter Vario.

However I agree with Mike.  A set on basic instruments (redundancy) is good
insurance.  In my case I have something in case of electrical failure.

No doubt thermal can be found and used without any instruments, but it
difficult.

On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Mike Borgelt 
mborg...@borgeltinstruments.com wrote:

  At 08:14 AM 27/04/2015, you wrote:



 *There’s no need for a winter backup now *Maybe not a Winter vario as
 backup but you should have a backup. Adam's advice is probably the silliest
 thing I've read in a long time.

 The only time you may reasonably want to rely on one vario is in a
 motorglider if you are prepared to start the motor and fly home if the
 single vario fails.

 Too bad if you are half way round a 500km triangle and set to win the
 Nationals if you do reasonably this day.

 For the paleo engineless gliders you are likely to risk an outlanding with
 its attendant hazards. Pretty stupid to risk breaking your glider or
 yourself over lack of a backup.

 If you are serious about competition you should be equipped to cope with
 single failures of equipment. Most people carry two flight recorders for
 good reason.

 A main navigation system and some reasonable backup is also necessary.
 Hint: fly with the backups working. The time to find out they have failed
 is NOT when you've had another failure.

 The backup vario may also have a different speed of response and  will
 likely just display TE vario. Your primary should be showing netto
 (airmass) or relative netto ( airmass offset down by the sink rate in
 circling flight - this means it always shows the rate of climb you would
 get if you slowed down and circled, no matter your current airspeed). The
 two varios may show slightly different information without changing modes
 which can be useful.

 We've all had even modern electronic equipment fail. Phones, PC's GPS ,
 etc etc. It is pretty good nowadays but anyone doing what Adam says is
 tempting fate, Murphy's Law and what a physics teacher of mine called the
 innate cussedness of inanimate matter.

 When you decide to use a backup you might like to consider that the Winter
 doesn't have an audio or an averager. Do you really want to be sharing
 thermals with other gliders without an audio? If flying cross country you
 would find you would miss the averager.

 If you have a backup electronic vario it should have its own independent
 backup power supply. While a glider electrical system can be fused properly
 so that the radio for example developing an internal short doesn't take out
 the main battery fuse (and if everything dies because of this or similar ,
 are you going to simply flip the switch to battery 2 and take out *its*
 fuse also?) I suspect many aren't.

 If you decide to join the 21st century for your backup vario get in touch
 and I'll sell you something you'll be happy to fly with when you need it.

 Mike








  
 Aus-soaring mailing list
 Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
 To check or change subscription details, visit:
  http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

  *Borgelt Instruments* -
 *design  manufacture of quality soaring instrumentation since 1978 *
 www.borgeltinstruments.com
 tel:   07 4635 5784 overseas: int+61-7-4635 5784
 mob: 042835 5784 :  int+61-42835 5784
 P O Box 4607, Toowoomba East, QLD 4350, Australia

 ___
 Aus-soaring mailing list
 Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
 To check or change subscription details, visit:
 http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

Re: [Aus-soaring] varios, redundancy

2015-04-27 Thread Anthony Smith
Not a failure as such.  But I did do a flight in a club aircraft with only an 
airspeed indicator,  altimeter and a radio functional.  I knew that was all 
that was working at take-off though.  I flew in thermals for over an hour.

 

Fortunately the launch before mine marked a thermal for me.  But I managed to 
feel my way around the sky from there.  Did wonders for my early thermalling 
skills.

 

Anthony

 

 

 

From: aus-soaring-boun...@lists.internode.on.net 
[mailto:aus-soaring-boun...@lists.internode.on.net] On Behalf Of James Dutschke
Sent: Monday, 27 April 2015 7:25 PM
To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] varios, redundancy

 

Straw poll.

 

Has anyone, had a vario failure. 


Sent from my iPhone


On 27 Apr 2015, at 19:14, Nick Gilbert cirru...@gmail.com 
mailto:cirru...@gmail.com  wrote:

Surely a backup electric vario is a more useful backup than a mechanical? With 
its own emergency battery you get a backup audio and averager as well as the 
needle. With all the stress that goes with a power failure having to stare at 
the instrument would make things worse. 

 

Nick

 


On 27 Apr 2015, at 5:41 pm, Peter Champness plchampn...@gmail.com 
mailto:plchampn...@gmail.com  wrote:

I have just been choosing instruments for a new glider.

 

I did wonder for a moment after reading Adam's post whether I had wasted money 
on the Winter Vario.

 

However I agree with Mike.  A set on basic instruments (redundancy) is good 
insurance.  In my case I have something in case of electrical failure.

 

No doubt thermal can be found and used without any instruments, but it 
difficult.

 

On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Mike Borgelt mborg...@borgeltinstruments.com 
mailto:mborg...@borgeltinstruments.com  wrote:

At 08:14 AM 27/04/2015, you wrote:

There’s no need for a winter backup now

Maybe not a Winter vario as backup but you should have a backup. Adam's advice 
is probably the silliest thing I've read in a long time.

The only time you may reasonably want to rely on one vario is in a motorglider 
if you are prepared to start the motor and fly home if the single vario fails.

Too bad if you are half way round a 500km triangle and set to win the Nationals 
if you do reasonably this day.

For the paleo engineless gliders you are likely to risk an outlanding with its 
attendant hazards. Pretty stupid to risk breaking your glider or yourself over 
lack of a backup.

If you are serious about competition you should be equipped to cope with single 
failures of equipment. Most people carry two flight recorders for good reason.

A main navigation system and some reasonable backup is also necessary. Hint: 
fly with the backups working. The time to find out they have failed is NOT when 
you've had another failure.

The backup vario may also have a different speed of response and  will likely 
just display TE vario. Your primary should be showing netto (airmass) or 
relative netto ( airmass offset down by the sink rate in circling flight - this 
means it always shows the rate of climb you would get if you slowed down and 
circled, no matter your current airspeed). The two varios may show slightly 
different information without changing modes which can be useful.

We've all had even modern electronic equipment fail. Phones, PC's GPS , etc 
etc. It is pretty good nowadays but anyone doing what Adam says is tempting 
fate, Murphy's Law and what a physics teacher of mine called the innate 
cussedness of inanimate matter.

When you decide to use a backup you might like to consider that the Winter 
doesn't have an audio or an averager. Do you really want to be sharing thermals 
with other gliders without an audio? If flying cross country you would find you 
would miss the averager.

If you have a backup electronic vario it should have its own independent backup 
power supply. While a glider electrical system can be fused properly so that 
the radio for example developing an internal short doesn't take out the main 
battery fuse (and if everything dies because of this or similar , are you going 
to simply flip the switch to battery 2 and take out *its* fuse also?) I suspect 
many aren't.

If you decide to join the 21st century for your backup vario get in touch and 
I'll sell you something you'll be happy to fly with when you need it. 

Mike












Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net mailto:Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net 
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring 

Borgelt Instruments - design  manufacture of quality soaring instrumentation 
since 1978
www.borgeltinstruments.com http://www.borgeltinstruments.com/ 
tel:   07 4635 5784 overseas: int+61-7-4635 5784
mob: 042835 5784 :  int+61-42835 5784
P O Box 4607, Toowoomba East, QLD 4350, Australia 


___
Aus-soaring

Re: [Aus-soaring] varios, redundancy

2015-04-27 Thread Mark Newton
It's easy: point the nose away from the field and wait. You'll be out of 
gliding distance in no time.

- mark

On 27 Apr 2015, at 8:55 pm, Matthew Scutter yellowplant...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Which turns out to be remarkably self enforcing, because for someone who's 
 only ever flown with a vario it's extraordinarily hard to get out of gliding 
 distance without one.
 
 On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 8:38 PM, Sean Jorgensen-Day 
 sean.jorgensen...@bigpond.com wrote:
 “For the paleo engineless gliders you are likely to risk an outlanding with 
 its attendant hazards. Pretty stupid to risk breaking your glider or 
 yourself over lack of a backup.”
 
 So you are saying that a outlanding is a risky occurrence?
 
 People are outlanding all the time, except for a few occasions they seem to 
 be walking away and still have a glider they can use.
 
 Maybe we should ban outlandings? Suggested new rule may read: “You must 
 remain in gliding distance of a suitable landing point, unless you have a 
 working vario.”
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 
 ___
 Aus-soaring mailing list
 Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
 To check or change subscription details, visit:
 http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
 
 ___
 Aus-soaring mailing list
 Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
 To check or change subscription details, visit:
 http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

Re: [Aus-soaring] varios, redundancy

2015-04-27 Thread emilis prelgauskas

Straw poll. 
Has anyone, had a vario failure.


Yes, Catherine lent me her son and newly arrived 2 seater with its 
single vario which chose to rest the needle in the top right corner, so 
we had to use the back up on the bottom of the back seat.
___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

Re: [Aus-soaring] varios, redundancy

2015-04-27 Thread Ross McLean
Yes, on several occasions. First time was halfway around the task in the 
Nationals. 

Always due to main battery failure so I lost the main flight computer and audio 
as well.  The Winter got me home every time. I learned to soar on manual varios 
with no audio so it was just back to basics.

On two occasions I used WinPilot running on its own battery for my averager but 
it was a pain.

I now have triple battery systems, dual loggers (LX9000 plus Colibri II), dual 
GPS and electric + mechanical vario's.

ROSS

 

From: aus-soaring-boun...@lists.internode.on.net 
[mailto:aus-soaring-boun...@lists.internode.on.net] On Behalf Of James Dutschke
Sent: Monday, 27 April 2015 7:55 PM
To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] varios, redundancy

 

Straw poll.

 

Has anyone, had a vario failure. 


Sent from my iPhone


On 27 Apr 2015, at 19:14, Nick Gilbert cirru...@gmail.com wrote:

Surely a backup electric vario is a more useful backup than a mechanical? With 
its own emergency battery you get a backup audio and averager as well as the 
needle. With all the stress that goes with a power failure having to stare at 
the instrument would make things worse. 

 

Nick

 


On 27 Apr 2015, at 5:41 pm, Peter Champness plchampn...@gmail.com wrote:

I have just been choosing instruments for a new glider.

 

I did wonder for a moment after reading Adam's post whether I had wasted money 
on the Winter Vario.

 

However I agree with Mike.  A set on basic instruments (redundancy) is good 
insurance.  In my case I have something in case of electrical failure.

 

No doubt thermal can be found and used without any instruments, but it 
difficult.

 

On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Mike Borgelt mborg...@borgeltinstruments.com 
wrote:

At 08:14 AM 27/04/2015, you wrote:

There’s no need for a winter backup now

Maybe not a Winter vario as backup but you should have a backup. Adam's advice 
is probably the silliest thing I've read in a long time.

The only time you may reasonably want to rely on one vario is in a motorglider 
if you are prepared to start the motor and fly home if the single vario fails.

Too bad if you are half way round a 500km triangle and set to win the Nationals 
if you do reasonably this day.

For the paleo engineless gliders you are likely to risk an outlanding with its 
attendant hazards. Pretty stupid to risk breaking your glider or yourself over 
lack of a backup.

If you are serious about competition you should be equipped to cope with single 
failures of equipment. Most people carry two flight recorders for good reason.

A main navigation system and some reasonable backup is also necessary. Hint: 
fly with the backups working. The time to find out they have failed is NOT when 
you've had another failure.

The backup vario may also have a different speed of response and  will likely 
just display TE vario. Your primary should be showing netto (airmass) or 
relative netto ( airmass offset down by the sink rate in circling flight - this 
means it always shows the rate of climb you would get if you slowed down and 
circled, no matter your current airspeed). The two varios may show slightly 
different information without changing modes which can be useful.

We've all had even modern electronic equipment fail. Phones, PC's GPS , etc 
etc. It is pretty good nowadays but anyone doing what Adam says is tempting 
fate, Murphy's Law and what a physics teacher of mine called the innate 
cussedness of inanimate matter.

When you decide to use a backup you might like to consider that the Winter 
doesn't have an audio or an averager. Do you really want to be sharing thermals 
with other gliders without an audio? If flying cross country you would find you 
would miss the averager.

If you have a backup electronic vario it should have its own independent backup 
power supply. While a glider electrical system can be fused properly so that 
the radio for example developing an internal short doesn't take out the main 
battery fuse (and if everything dies because of this or similar , are you going 
to simply flip the switch to battery 2 and take out *its* fuse also?) I suspect 
many aren't.

If you decide to join the 21st century for your backup vario get in touch and 
I'll sell you something you'll be happy to fly with when you need it. 

Mike












Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring 

Borgelt Instruments - design  manufacture of quality soaring instrumentation 
since 1978
www.borgeltinstruments.com http://www.borgeltinstruments.com/ 
tel:   07 4635 5784 overseas: int+61-7-4635 5784
mob: 042835 5784 :  int+61-42835 5784
P O Box 4607, Toowoomba East, QLD 4350, Australia 


___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net

Re: [Aus-soaring] varios, redundancy

2015-04-27 Thread Bruce
Nick,

I used the faster time constant Winter mechanical on every single flight (the 
standard Winter is a nice instrument, but the faster version is magnificent). 
It wasn't there as a backup (although it obviously could have served that 
purpose). It was there as the primary. It was better than any electric I flew 
with, and came with a guarantee that no computer algorithm was between the 
reading and what I could feel. 

I often flew with the audio volume low - so that I could hear the air. This was 
particularly important in the Discus at high wing loadings, as the feel was 
damped. I heard Ingo on this subject (turn down the audio volume) in casual 
conversation. If it was good for Ingo then I figured it was worth doing too. My 
view is that any volume dial has turn up for SLOW as a consequence not just 
the radio. That's not an argument against audio vario - it's an argument to use 
it judiciously and not drown out the sound of the air.

The Winter got me home on the last weak thermal of the day a couple of times. 
The electrics were still working fine, but the Winter had greater sensitivity. 
By the way, I also tried a Sage mechanical for a couple of seasons, and went 
back to the Winter.

Get your wiring right. Don't save cents on low grade wire. Replace batteries 
regularly, and install a backup. Use a good charger. Probability of failure 
reduces from low to very unlikely. But still have a mechanical because it helps 
centering, and in weak lift, and helps you to figure out the language of the 
air moving past the cockpit.

Cheers

Bruce

Sent from my iPad from a comfortable couch seat in temporary retirement (from 
gliding)

 On 27 Apr 2015, at 7:14 pm, Nick Gilbert cirru...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Surely a backup electric vario is a more useful backup than a mechanical? 
 With its own emergency battery you get a backup audio and averager as well as 
 the needle. With all the stress that goes with a power failure having to 
 stare at the instrument would make things worse. 
 
 Nick
 
 
 On 27 Apr 2015, at 5:41 pm, Peter Champness plchampn...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 I have just been choosing instruments for a new glider.
 
 I did wonder for a moment after reading Adam's post whether I had wasted 
 money on the Winter Vario.
 
 However I agree with Mike.  A set on basic instruments (redundancy) is good 
 insurance.  In my case I have something in case of electrical failure.
 
 No doubt thermal can be found and used without any instruments, but it 
 difficult.
 
 On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Mike Borgelt 
 mborg...@borgeltinstruments.com wrote:
 At 08:14 AM 27/04/2015, you wrote:
 
 There’s no need for a winter backup now
 
 Maybe not a Winter vario as backup but you should have a backup. Adam's 
 advice is probably the silliest thing I've read in a long time.
 
 The only time you may reasonably want to rely on one vario is in a 
 motorglider if you are prepared to start the motor and fly home if the 
 single vario fails.
 
 Too bad if you are half way round a 500km triangle and set to win the 
 Nationals if you do reasonably this day.
 
 For the paleo engineless gliders you are likely to risk an outlanding with 
 its attendant hazards. Pretty stupid to risk breaking your glider or 
 yourself over lack of a backup.
 
 If you are serious about competition you should be equipped to cope with 
 single failures of equipment. Most people carry two flight recorders for 
 good reason.
 
 A main navigation system and some reasonable backup is also necessary. 
 Hint: fly with the backups working. The time to find out they have failed 
 is NOT when you've had another failure.
 
 The backup vario may also have a different speed of response and  will 
 likely just display TE vario. Your primary should be showing netto 
 (airmass) or relative netto ( airmass offset down by the sink rate in 
 circling flight - this means it always shows the rate of climb you would 
 get if you slowed down and circled, no matter your current airspeed). The 
 two varios may show slightly different information without changing modes 
 which can be useful.
 
 We've all had even modern electronic equipment fail. Phones, PC's GPS , etc 
 etc. It is pretty good nowadays but anyone doing what Adam says is tempting 
 fate, Murphy's Law and what a physics teacher of mine called the innate 
 cussedness of inanimate matter.
 
 When you decide to use a backup you might like to consider that the Winter 
 doesn't have an audio or an averager. Do you really want to be sharing 
 thermals with other gliders without an audio? If flying cross country you 
 would find you would miss the averager.
 
 If you have a backup electronic vario it should have its own independent 
 backup power supply. While a glider electrical system can be fused properly 
 so that the radio for example developing an internal short doesn't take out 
 the main battery fuse (and if everything dies because of this or similar , 
 are you going to simply flip the switch to 

Re: [Aus-soaring] varios, redundancy

2015-04-27 Thread Gary Stevenson
Hi James,

Good question, deserving an answer.

 

In a lifetime of flying, here is my experience with instrument failure:

 Direct failure of the vario – once only. Ironically it was the mechanical 
vario that failed,  but I had an electronic “ back up” – not a big deal.

 

Experienced a plugged TE probe once – proved to be a VERY small spider (alive 
at the time, so it moved about in the line, thus rendering the DI check 
useless). I could fly by the “seat of my pants” OK, but not effectively 
compete. Task was eventually abandoned, and I returned to base, and blew out 
the line.

 

Also (in a comp) – and once only thank God – total power failure INCLUDING 
failure of the back- up battery – unbelievable! I was very happy to have a 
mechanical Sage I can tell you, and hardly missed a beat, soaring wise, despite 
the elevated level of stress, and having to mentally do the final glide 
calculations. However the lesson I learnt here had nothing to do with any of 
this.  Not having a radio at the finish proved, in the event, to be quite 
dangerous. So, if you ever find yourself in this situation, allow yourself a 
bit of extra height, to visually work out what is going on at the finish 
aerodrome, when you arrive, and if the wind is reasonably light, it is probably 
a good idea  not to land on the active strip.

 

Also had one altimeter failure in flight. Again not a big deal.

 

Never  had an in flight radio failure.

 

That’s it!

 

Regarding Mike B’s original comment on this topic, I think he has more or less  
totally covered it. However I will make one comment on his post. I think he 
makes a little too much of the dangers associated with outlanding: Make no 
mistake – there ARE very real dangers. However each and every one of us has 
been taught the proper procedures on how to deal with an outlanding. If you 
follow the procedures, you will be generally OK, with NO damage to glider or 
self, in almost 100% of cases. If you choose to ignore the procedures, well all 
I can say is “good luck”, because you will need it!

 

Gary

 

From: aus-soaring-boun...@lists.internode.on.net 
[mailto:aus-soaring-boun...@lists.internode.on.net] On Behalf Of James Dutschke
Sent: Monday, 27 April 2015 7:55 PM
To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] varios, redundancy

 

Straw poll.

 

Has anyone, had a vario failure. 


Sent from my iPhone


On 27 Apr 2015, at 19:14, Nick Gilbert cirru...@gmail.com wrote:

Surely a backup electric vario is a more useful backup than a mechanical? With 
its own emergency battery you get a backup audio and averager as well as the 
needle. With all the stress that goes with a power failure having to stare at 
the instrument would make things worse. 

 

Nick

 


On 27 Apr 2015, at 5:41 pm, Peter Champness plchampn...@gmail.com wrote:

I have just been choosing instruments for a new glider.

 

I did wonder for a moment after reading Adam's post whether I had wasted money 
on the Winter Vario.

 

However I agree with Mike.  A set on basic instruments (redundancy) is good 
insurance.  In my case I have something in case of electrical failure.

 

No doubt thermal can be found and used without any instruments, but it 
difficult.

 

On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Mike Borgelt mborg...@borgeltinstruments.com 
wrote:

At 08:14 AM 27/04/2015, you wrote:

There’s no need for a winter backup now

Maybe not a Winter vario as backup but you should have a backup. Adam's advice 
is probably the silliest thing I've read in a long time.

The only time you may reasonably want to rely on one vario is in a motorglider 
if you are prepared to start the motor and fly home if the single vario fails.

Too bad if you are half way round a 500km triangle and set to win the Nationals 
if you do reasonably this day.

For the paleo engineless gliders you are likely to risk an outlanding with its 
attendant hazards. Pretty stupid to risk breaking your glider or yourself over 
lack of a backup.

If you are serious about competition you should be equipped to cope with single 
failures of equipment. Most people carry two flight recorders for good reason.

A main navigation system and some reasonable backup is also necessary. Hint: 
fly with the backups working. The time to find out they have failed is NOT when 
you've had another failure.

The backup vario may also have a different speed of response and  will likely 
just display TE vario. Your primary should be showing netto (airmass) or 
relative netto ( airmass offset down by the sink rate in circling flight - this 
means it always shows the rate of climb you would get if you slowed down and 
circled, no matter your current airspeed). The two varios may show slightly 
different information without changing modes which can be useful.

We've all had even modern electronic equipment fail. Phones, PC's GPS , etc 
etc. It is pretty good nowadays but anyone doing what Adam says is tempting 
fate, Murphy's Law

Re: [Aus-soaring] varios, redundancy

2015-04-27 Thread DMcD
The Winter got me home on the last weak thermal of the day a couple of times. 
The electrics were still working fine, but the Winter had greater sensitivity.

Agreed. Although I use the audio from an electrovario, there's
something about the way the Winter needle moves which tells you far
more about the air in the immediate vicinity of a thermal. That and
your arse.

You hear the noise from the noisy vario, glance down at the vibrating
needle of the Winter and then wait to turn or pass it up. I rarely
look at the electric thing other than to see what the average is after
a few turns.

My opinion is that the undamped mechanical varios are very useful indeed.

D
___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring


Re: [Aus-soaring] varios, redundancy

2015-04-27 Thread Jim Staniforth

Mike was the first to include this feature, but...
Every electric vario can have a backup battery.
Pardon the Text-O-CAD.
Jim
  SPDT ON/ON Switch
|
Main Supply + _
\__ Instrument +
Backup Supply + ___

___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring


Re: [Aus-soaring] varios

2014-12-05 Thread Mike Borgelt



I should add that none of our instruments have required a flask since 
1982. We've used solid state silicon pressure sensors since then.


Also all drive vario repeater displays for two seaters. Metric or 
knots and on the B600/B800/B700/B900 the calibration can be changed 
by PC(B600/800) or in the instrument (B700/900) and by flipping the 
display bezel around the 45 degrees axis.


Mike









Borgelt Instruments - design  manufacture of quality soaring 
instrumentation since 1978

www.borgeltinstruments.com
tel:   07 4635 5784 overseas: int+61-7-4635 5784
mob: 042835 5784:  int+61-42835 5784
P O Box 4607, Toowoomba East, QLD 4350, Australia  ___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

Re: [Aus-soaring] varios

2014-11-30 Thread Mike Borgelt


The new 2015 B600/B800 software is available. A minor bugfix and some 
re-arrangement of the GCD for better ergonomics (mostly can fly just 
on the one display page). Plus some internal cleanups.


Email me off list for a copy.

I'll take a photo of the new GCD flying page later this afternoon I hope.

Mike








___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

Re: [Aus-soaring] varios

2014-11-30 Thread Paul Bart
Hi Mike

I would like one please.



Cheers

Paul

On 1 December 2014 at 13:02, Mike Borgelt mborg...@borgeltinstruments.com
wrote:


 The new 2015 B600/B800 software is available. A minor bugfix and some
 re-arrangement of the GCD for better ergonomics (mostly can fly just on the
 one display page). Plus some internal cleanups.

 Email me off list for a copy.

 I'll take a photo of the new GCD flying page later this afternoon I hope.

 Mike









 ___
 Aus-soaring mailing list
 Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
 To check or change subscription details, visit:
 http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

Re: [Aus-soaring] varios

2014-11-30 Thread Christopher McDonnell


From: Paul Bart 
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 1:50 PM
To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia. 
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] varios

Hi Mike

I would like one please.



Cheers

Paul

On 1 December 2014 at 13:02, Mike Borgelt mborg...@borgeltinstruments.com 
wrote:


  The new 2015 B600/B800 software is available. A minor bugfix and some 
re-arrangement of the GCD for better ergonomics (mostly can fly just on the one 
display page). Plus some internal cleanups.

  Email me off list for a copy.

  I'll take a photo of the new GCD flying page later this afternoon I hope.

  Mike










  ___
  Aus-soaring mailing list
  Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
  To check or change subscription details, visit:
  http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring





___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

Re: [Aus-soaring] varios

2014-11-30 Thread Paul Bart
Funny

Cheers

Paul

On 1 December 2014 at 14:00, Christopher McDonnell wommamuku...@bigpond.com
 wrote:

   [image: Winking smile]

  *From:* Paul Bart pb2...@gmail.com
 *Sent:* Monday, December 01, 2014 1:50 PM
 *To:* Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
 aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
 *Subject:* Re: [Aus-soaring] varios

  Hi Mike

 I would like one please.



  Cheers

 Paul

 On 1 December 2014 at 13:02, Mike Borgelt mborg...@borgeltinstruments.com
  wrote:


 The new 2015 B600/B800 software is available. A minor bugfix and some
 re-arrangement of the GCD for better ergonomics (mostly can fly just on the
 one display page). Plus some internal cleanups.

 Email me off list for a copy.

 I'll take a photo of the new GCD flying page later this afternoon I hope.

 Mike









 ___
 Aus-soaring mailing list
 Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
 To check or change subscription details, visit:
 http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring



 --
 ___
 Aus-soaring mailing list
 Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
 To check or change subscription details, visit:
 http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring


 ___
 Aus-soaring mailing list
 Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
 To check or change subscription details, visit:
 http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

Re: [Aus-soaring] varios

2014-11-30 Thread Mike Borgelt

Offline , please.

Mike

At 01:50 PM 1/12/2014, you wrote:

Hi Mike

I would like one please.



Cheers

Paul

On 1 December 2014 at 13:02, Mike Borgelt 
mailto:mborg...@borgeltinstruments.commborg...@borgeltinstruments.com 
wrote:


The new 2015 B600/B800 software is available. A minor bugfix and 
some re-arrangement of the GCD for better ergonomics (mostly can fly 
just on the one display page). Plus some internal cleanups.


Email me off list for a copy.

I'll take a photo of the new GCD flying page later this afternoon I hope.

Mike









___
Aus-soaring mailing list
mailto:Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.netAus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaringhttp://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring


___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring


Borgelt Instruments - design  manufacture of quality soaring 
instrumentation since 1978

www.borgeltinstruments.com
tel:   07 4635 5784 overseas: int+61-7-4635 5784
mob: 042835 5784:  int+61-42835 5784
P O Box 4607, Toowoomba East, QLD 4350, Australia  ___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

Re: [Aus-soaring] varios

2014-11-30 Thread Paul Bart
Already got my reprimand :), with a picture, rather an apt one.

Cheers

Paul

On 1 December 2014 at 14:10, Mike Borgelt mborg...@borgeltinstruments.com
wrote:

  Offline , please.

 Mike


 At 01:50 PM 1/12/2014, you wrote:

 Hi Mike

 I would like one please.



 Cheers

 Paul

 On 1 December 2014 at 13:02, Mike Borgelt 
 mborg...@borgeltinstruments.com wrote:

  The new 2015 B600/B800 software is available. A minor bugfix and some
 re-arrangement of the GCD for better ergonomics (mostly can fly just on the
 one display page). Plus some internal cleanups.

 Email me off list for a copy.

 I'll take a photo of the new GCD flying page later this afternoon I hope.

 Mike









 ___
 Aus-soaring mailing list
  Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
 To check or change subscription details, visit:
  http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring


 ___
 Aus-soaring mailing list
 Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
 To check or change subscription details, visit:
  http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

  *Borgelt Instruments* -
 *design  manufacture of quality soaring instrumentation since 1978 *
 www.borgeltinstruments.com
 tel:   07 4635 5784 overseas: int+61-7-4635 5784
 mob: 042835 5784 :  int+61-42835 5784
 P O Box 4607, Toowoomba East, QLD 4350, Australia

 ___
 Aus-soaring mailing list
 Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
 To check or change subscription details, visit:
 http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

Re: [Aus-soaring] varios(was FLARM maths)

2006-11-19 Thread Bruce Taylor
I guess there are a few things to consider when contemplating a total 
electrical failure. The first is that in many hours and many kilometres I 
have never had one, though I am quite fussy about how I set up and care for 
the whole system. The second is that with the B40/B400 you would have an 
independently supplied averager/audio still running, and the third is that 
if you were flying a comp, you would now have no means of verification, so 
you may as well go home anyway. I guess your point is that going home might 
be pretty difficult with nothing but an altimeter...


BT

- Original Message - 
From: JR [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia. 
aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net

Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2006 5:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] varios(was FLARM maths)



Thanks Bruce,
I flew a mates glider not long ago, and it had an all electric panel, and
the thought crossed my mind, if you had an electrical failure you would be
up shite creek, regardless of what the next turnpoint was, and for that
reason alone a little winter tucked away on the panel is a good thing.
regards JR
- Original Message - 
From: Bruce Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2006 11:52 AM
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] varios(was FLARM maths)



I have my audio set so that it breaks tone right on zero, and I find that
quite satisfactory, even in very light lift. Once again, the only thing

that

really matters is what the averager is saying, and in this situation you

are

looking for it to stay positive.

I still have a Winter vario on my panel, but would be quite content with 
a

electric backup, especially something like the B40/B400 which gives an

audio

and averager function as well. I've been trying to get Cambridge to make
such an instrument for about 10 years now!

I don't think what I do is any different to most competent cross-country
pilots. I do see a number of people baffling themselves with science, and
good, clean soaring flight needs to be kept simple. All the really useful
info is outside, especially when you find yourself low and in trouble.

When
you are in such a stressful situation it is very easy to focus back 
inside
the cockpit, and I still have to tell myself to look up and out when 
the

pressure is on.

BT

- Original Message - 
From: JR [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2006 11:43 AM
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] varios(was FLARM maths)


 Bruce, how does your system work in very weak lift, and does anybody

else

 other than me still use a mechanical vario on the panel ?
 regards JR
 - Original Message - 
 From: Luke Dodd [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
 aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
 Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 9:16 PM
 Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] varios(was FLARM maths)


  I have taken too much space already... back into my box.
 
  BT

 Oh no you haven't, please vent more from your informed spleen.

 Luke


 ___
 Aus-soaring mailing list
 Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
 To check or change subscription details, visit:
 http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring


 ___
 Aus-soaring mailing list
 Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
 To check or change subscription details, visit:
 http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring


___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring



___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring



___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring


Re: [Aus-soaring] varios(was FLARM maths)

2006-11-19 Thread JR
yep that was the point
JR
- Original Message - 
From: Bruce Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2006 8:57 PM
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] varios(was FLARM maths)


 I guess there are a few things to consider when contemplating a total
 electrical failure. The first is that in many hours and many kilometres I
 have never had one, though I am quite fussy about how I set up and care
for
 the whole system. The second is that with the B40/B400 you would have an
 independently supplied averager/audio still running, and the third is that
 if you were flying a comp, you would now have no means of verification, so
 you may as well go home anyway. I guess your point is that going home
might
 be pretty difficult with nothing but an altimeter...

 BT

 - Original Message - 
 From: JR [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
 aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
 Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2006 5:29 PM
 Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] varios(was FLARM maths)


  Thanks Bruce,
  I flew a mates glider not long ago, and it had an all electric panel,
and
  the thought crossed my mind, if you had an electrical failure you would
be
  up shite creek, regardless of what the next turnpoint was, and for that
  reason alone a little winter tucked away on the panel is a good thing.
  regards JR
  - Original Message - 
  From: Bruce Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
  aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
  Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2006 11:52 AM
  Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] varios(was FLARM maths)
 
 
  I have my audio set so that it breaks tone right on zero, and I find
that
  quite satisfactory, even in very light lift. Once again, the only thing
  that
  really matters is what the averager is saying, and in this situation
you
  are
  looking for it to stay positive.
 
  I still have a Winter vario on my panel, but would be quite content
with
  a
  electric backup, especially something like the B40/B400 which gives an
  audio
  and averager function as well. I've been trying to get Cambridge to
make
  such an instrument for about 10 years now!
 
  I don't think what I do is any different to most competent
cross-country
  pilots. I do see a number of people baffling themselves with science,
and
  good, clean soaring flight needs to be kept simple. All the really
useful
  info is outside, especially when you find yourself low and in trouble.
  When
  you are in such a stressful situation it is very easy to focus back
  inside
  the cockpit, and I still have to tell myself to look up and out when
  the
  pressure is on.
 
  BT
 
  - Original Message - 
  From: JR [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
  aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
  Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2006 11:43 AM
  Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] varios(was FLARM maths)
 
 
   Bruce, how does your system work in very weak lift, and does anybody
  else
   other than me still use a mechanical vario on the panel ?
   regards JR
   - Original Message - 
   From: Luke Dodd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
   aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
   Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 9:16 PM
   Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] varios(was FLARM maths)
  
  
I have taken too much space already... back into my box.
   
BT
  
   Oh no you haven't, please vent more from your informed spleen.
  
   Luke
  
  
   ___
   Aus-soaring mailing list
   Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
   To check or change subscription details, visit:
   http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
  
  
   ___
   Aus-soaring mailing list
   Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
   To check or change subscription details, visit:
   http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
  
 
  ___
  Aus-soaring mailing list
  Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
  To check or change subscription details, visit:
  http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
 
 
  ___
  Aus-soaring mailing list
  Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
  To check or change subscription details, visit:
  http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
 

 ___
 Aus-soaring mailing list
 Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
 To check or change subscription details, visit:
 http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring


___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring


Re: [Aus-soaring] varios

2006-11-19 Thread Chris
Ok I guess I can take some heat for my input into this discussion if I put 
my foot in it, so here goes


On new or revamped instrument installations my recommendations are as 
follows,  for what its worth:-


use a primary vario / speed command of your choice all the major 
manufacturers have their good and bad features, but Oz built has its 
advantages when there's a problem, Mike has always got time to try and nut 
out the problems  on the phone or email with glitches in the system.
If you want to run a backup Vario, (and as Bruce says how often do you get 
total electrical failure) apart from club gliders where the gorillas (sic) 
have worked on them ! run a electric  vario that compliments the primary 
vario, in which I mean most modern systems today run pressure transducers, 
and mixing pneumatic various which are flow technology with pressure T/X is 
asking for trouble, as there is  going to be some interaction between the 
two varios, which could degrade the primary vario, the up side of fitting a 
modern electric vario is you will get a faster response  instrument and 
audio vario as a bonus, and it will probably have its own back up battery 
pack, if you get one of these fabled total power failures.
all for a very similar price to a steam driven vario  with all the 
features listed, if you make the right choice (I'm trying very hard not to 
let my bias show  here)


Chris Runeckles
Universal Plastics
W.A. agent for Borgelt Instruments




- Original Message - 
From: JR [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia. 
aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net

Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2006 6:56 PM
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] varios(was FLARM maths)



yep that was the point
JR
- Original Message - 
From: Bruce Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2006 8:57 PM
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] varios(was FLARM maths)



I guess there are a few things to consider when contemplating a total
electrical failure. The first is that in many hours and many kilometres I
have never had one, though I am quite fussy about how I set up and care

for

the whole system. The second is that with the B40/B400 you would have an
independently supplied averager/audio still running, and the third is 
that
if you were flying a comp, you would now have no means of verification, 
so

you may as well go home anyway. I guess your point is that going home

might

be pretty difficult with nothing but an altimeter...

BT

- Original Message - 
From: JR [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2006 5:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] varios(was FLARM maths)


 Thanks Bruce,
 I flew a mates glider not long ago, and it had an all electric panel,

and

 the thought crossed my mind, if you had an electrical failure you would

be

 up shite creek, regardless of what the next turnpoint was, and for that
 reason alone a little winter tucked away on the panel is a good thing.
 regards JR
 - Original Message - 
 From: Bruce Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
 aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
 Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2006 11:52 AM
 Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] varios(was FLARM maths)


 I have my audio set so that it breaks tone right on zero, and I find

that
 quite satisfactory, even in very light lift. Once again, the only 
 thing

 that
 really matters is what the averager is saying, and in this situation

you

 are
 looking for it to stay positive.

 I still have a Winter vario on my panel, but would be quite content

with

 a
 electric backup, especially something like the B40/B400 which gives an
 audio
 and averager function as well. I've been trying to get Cambridge to

make

 such an instrument for about 10 years now!

 I don't think what I do is any different to most competent

cross-country

 pilots. I do see a number of people baffling themselves with science,

and

 good, clean soaring flight needs to be kept simple. All the really

useful

 info is outside, especially when you find yourself low and in trouble.
 When
 you are in such a stressful situation it is very easy to focus back
 inside
 the cockpit, and I still have to tell myself to look up and out when
 the
 pressure is on.

 BT

 - Original Message - 
 From: JR [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
 aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
 Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2006 11:43 AM
 Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] varios(was FLARM maths)


  Bruce, how does your system work in very weak lift, and does anybody
 else
  other than me still use a mechanical vario on the panel ?
  regards JR
  - Original Message - 
  From: Luke Dodd [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
  aus

Re: [Aus-soaring] varios(was FLARM maths)

2006-11-18 Thread Bruce Taylor
I have my audio set so that it breaks tone right on zero, and I find that 
quite satisfactory, even in very light lift. Once again, the only thing that 
really matters is what the averager is saying, and in this situation you are 
looking for it to stay positive.


I still have a Winter vario on my panel, but would be quite content with a 
electric backup, especially something like the B40/B400 which gives an audio 
and averager function as well. I've been trying to get Cambridge to make 
such an instrument for about 10 years now!


I don't think what I do is any different to most competent cross-country 
pilots. I do see a number of people baffling themselves with science, and 
good, clean soaring flight needs to be kept simple. All the really useful 
info is outside, especially when you find yourself low and in trouble. When 
you are in such a stressful situation it is very easy to focus back inside 
the cockpit, and I still have to tell myself to look up and out when the 
pressure is on.


BT

- Original Message - 
From: JR [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia. 
aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net

Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2006 11:43 AM
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] varios(was FLARM maths)



Bruce, how does your system work in very weak lift, and does anybody else
other than me still use a mechanical vario on the panel ?
regards JR
- Original Message - 
From: Luke Dodd [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 9:16 PM
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] varios(was FLARM maths)



 I have taken too much space already... back into my box.

 BT

Oh no you haven't, please vent more from your informed spleen.

Luke


___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring



___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring



___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring


Re: [Aus-soaring] varios(was FLARM maths)

2006-11-18 Thread JR
Thanks Bruce,
I flew a mates glider not long ago, and it had an all electric panel, and
the thought crossed my mind, if you had an electrical failure you would be
up shite creek, regardless of what the next turnpoint was, and for that
reason alone a little winter tucked away on the panel is a good thing.
regards JR
- Original Message - 
From: Bruce Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2006 11:52 AM
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] varios(was FLARM maths)


 I have my audio set so that it breaks tone right on zero, and I find that
 quite satisfactory, even in very light lift. Once again, the only thing
that
 really matters is what the averager is saying, and in this situation you
are
 looking for it to stay positive.

 I still have a Winter vario on my panel, but would be quite content with a
 electric backup, especially something like the B40/B400 which gives an
audio
 and averager function as well. I've been trying to get Cambridge to make
 such an instrument for about 10 years now!

 I don't think what I do is any different to most competent cross-country
 pilots. I do see a number of people baffling themselves with science, and
 good, clean soaring flight needs to be kept simple. All the really useful
 info is outside, especially when you find yourself low and in trouble.
When
 you are in such a stressful situation it is very easy to focus back inside
 the cockpit, and I still have to tell myself to look up and out when the
 pressure is on.

 BT

 - Original Message - 
 From: JR [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
 aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
 Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2006 11:43 AM
 Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] varios(was FLARM maths)


  Bruce, how does your system work in very weak lift, and does anybody
else
  other than me still use a mechanical vario on the panel ?
  regards JR
  - Original Message - 
  From: Luke Dodd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
  aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
  Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 9:16 PM
  Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] varios(was FLARM maths)
 
 
   I have taken too much space already... back into my box.
  
   BT
 
  Oh no you haven't, please vent more from your informed spleen.
 
  Luke
 
 
  ___
  Aus-soaring mailing list
  Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
  To check or change subscription details, visit:
  http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
 
 
  ___
  Aus-soaring mailing list
  Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
  To check or change subscription details, visit:
  http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
 

 ___
 Aus-soaring mailing list
 Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
 To check or change subscription details, visit:
 http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring


___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring


Re: [Aus-soaring] varios(was FLARM maths)

2006-11-17 Thread Bruce Taylor

Hi All,

I was imagining I might be able to stay silent, but I can't help myself...

Please, no offence to Mike or any others, it is just that we all see things 
slightly differently, thank heavens.


I don't think I ever watch the vario needle while flying. I would very 
happily fly at any level with a good audio and a large, easily read digital 
averager set high on the panel, and pretty much nothing else. Soon I plan to 
fly some comp days with everything else covered up, just to see whether I 
really do ignore it, but I have had a number of people flying in the back 
seat while I am in front comment on the fact that I almost never look at the 
panel.


I prefer my audio to have a single tone, and find no need for any indication 
of whether I am in rising air that is above or below my Macready setting. I 
simply want to know if I am going up, or if I am not. I also do not use 
relative netto during the cruise, but this is a very personal choice. This 
audio MUST be as close to perfectly compensated as is possible with the 
system that you are using. I have to say that very few gliders I have 
borrowed/stolen have a vario that really works. And I have to agree totally 
with Mike - if the vario signal is coming from one source, then make it a 
good one, and if it is coming from two sources, pitot and static, then give 
it a good chance of working and keep the lines from both as close to the 
same length as you can. This doesn't have to cost heaps of money. Work on 
the KISS principle...


The decision to stop and climb in any particular bit of rising air comes 
from other sources, primarily the structure of the thermal that is felt as 
you fly into it, much more than any peak vario indication. Usually you find 
that a well-structured thermal will produce a better bottom-to-top average 
than one which shows strong gusts and high peak readings as you approach it. 
As you are arriving at the edge of a thermal is not a good time to be 
watching the panel, for a lot of reasons.


I have taken too much space already... back into my box.

BT


- Original Message - 
From: Mike Borgelt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia. 
aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net

Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 1:17 PM
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] varios(was FLARM maths)



At 06:46 PM 14/11/2006, David Griffiths wrote:

I am impressed
I did not even know that this type of gear was available.
Is this all prototype stuff or is it in production?


You might like to look at the B500 on our site at
www.borgeltinstruments.com
Australian designed and manufactured, sold worldwide.


Before getting too excited about varios without visual indicators people 
might like to consider how they decide whether to turn in a particular 
thermal that is encountered. The vario pointer isn't the only thing but I 
bet it is an important part of your decision. Relative netto was designed 
to help with this - see our website for details if you don't know what 
relative netto does(it is in articles).


Changing the audio at the MacCready setting as we do in the B500 and B50 
lets you know to look at the vario but for reasons explained by John 
Cochrane in his paper and nearly 40 years ago by Anthony Edwards, you fly 
at Macready settings that are quite low compared to the actual rates of 
climb you get so you might not make the decision to turn just based on 
that audio change.


Likewise when picking a best path through the air,  particularly when 
streeting, including the vario pointer in your scan is important. To be 
really useful here the vario pointer should be high resolution too. We 
rejected LCDs on the grounds that the pointer resolution was too coarse.


When working very weak lift the speed of response and resolution of the 
vario itself becomes important. When working 5 knots at altitude a poor 
vario will do. When at 600 feet over a paddock trying to avoid an 
outlanding by working +/-0.5 knots you need all the help you can get.


With some vario technologies there are unavoidable speed of 
response/resolution tradeoffs.


Lastly, Total energy is total energy whether it is done by a probe 
providing suction below static pressure or whether you measure pitot and 
static pressures and add them electronically to provide the same thing. 
They both suffer from horizontal gust effects (see article on website) to 
the same extent but the pitot/static scheme has some additional problems - 
the pitot and static ports are more sensitive to yaw and sideslip than the 
modern two hole TE probe is and you need to organise the pitot and static 
signals to arrive at the same time at the instrument to avoid undesirable 
transient effects.


Mike




Borgelt Instruments - manufacturers of quality soaring instruments
phone Int'l + 61 746 355784
fax   Int'l + 61 746 358796
cellphone Int'l + 61 428 355784
  Int'l + 61 429 355784
email:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
website: www.borgeltinstruments.com

Re: [Aus-soaring] varios(was FLARM maths)

2006-11-17 Thread Luke Dodd
 I have taken too much space already... back into my box.
 
 BT

Oh no you haven't, please vent more from your informed spleen.

Luke


___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring


Re: [Aus-soaring] varios(was FLARM maths)

2006-11-17 Thread Ian McPhee
Further to Bruce a few years ago a guy had a needle fall off his electric 
vario and he was actually happy to keep flying that week as it made him 
listen to the audio.  He still had his digital averager which was the only 
thing he wanted to look at!!

Ian McPhee

- Original Message - 
From: Bruce Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia. 
aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net

Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 9:36 PM
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] varios(was FLARM maths)



Hi All,
I was imagining I might be able to stay silent, but I can't help myself...

Please, no offence to Mike or any others, it is just that we all see 
things slightly differently, thank heavens.


I don't think I ever watch the vario needle while flying. I would very 
happily fly at any level with a good audio and a large, easily read 
digital averager set high on the panel, and pretty much nothing else. Soon 
I plan to fly some comp days with everything else covered up, just to see 
whether I really do ignore it, but I have had a number of people flying in 
the back seat while I am in front comment on the fact that I almost never 
look at the panel.


I prefer my audio to have a single tone, and find no need for any 
indication of whether I am in rising air that is above or below my 
Macready setting. I simply want to know if I am going up, or if I am not. 
I also do not use relative netto during the cruise, but this is a very 
personal choice. This audio MUST be as close to perfectly compensated as 
is possible with the system that you are using. I have to say that very 
few gliders I have borrowed/stolen have a vario that really works. And I 
have to agree totally with Mike - if the vario signal is coming from one 
source, then make it a good one, and if it is coming from two sources, 
pitot and static, then give it a good chance of working and keep the lines 
from both as close to the same length as you can. This doesn't have to 
cost heaps of money. Work on the KISS principle...


The decision to stop and climb in any particular bit of rising air comes 
from other sources, primarily the structure of the thermal that is felt as 
you fly into it, much more than any peak vario indication. Usually you 
find that a well-structured thermal will produce a better bottom-to-top 
average than one which shows strong gusts and high peak readings as you 
approach it. As you are arriving at the edge of a thermal is not a good 
time to be watching the panel, for a lot of reasons.


I have taken too much space already... back into my box.

BT


- Original Message - 
From: Mike Borgelt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia. 
aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net

Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 1:17 PM
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] varios(was FLARM maths)



At 06:46 PM 14/11/2006, David Griffiths wrote:

I am impressed
I did not even know that this type of gear was available.
Is this all prototype stuff or is it in production?


You might like to look at the B500 on our site at
www.borgeltinstruments.com
Australian designed and manufactured, sold worldwide.


Before getting too excited about varios without visual indicators people 
might like to consider how they decide whether to turn in a particular 
thermal that is encountered. The vario pointer isn't the only thing but I 
bet it is an important part of your decision. Relative netto was designed 
to help with this - see our website for details if you don't know what 
relative netto does(it is in articles).


Changing the audio at the MacCready setting as we do in the B500 and B50 
lets you know to look at the vario but for reasons explained by John 
Cochrane in his paper and nearly 40 years ago by Anthony Edwards, you fly 
at Macready settings that are quite low compared to the actual rates of 
climb you get so you might not make the decision to turn just based on 
that audio change.


Likewise when picking a best path through the air,  particularly when 
streeting, including the vario pointer in your scan is important. To be 
really useful here the vario pointer should be high resolution too. We 
rejected LCDs on the grounds that the pointer resolution was too coarse.


When working very weak lift the speed of response and resolution of the 
vario itself becomes important. When working 5 knots at altitude a poor 
vario will do. When at 600 feet over a paddock trying to avoid an 
outlanding by working +/-0.5 knots you need all the help you can get.


With some vario technologies there are unavoidable speed of 
response/resolution tradeoffs.


Lastly, Total energy is total energy whether it is done by a probe 
providing suction below static pressure or whether you measure pitot and 
static pressures and add them electronically to provide the same thing. 
They both suffer from horizontal gust effects (see article on website) to 
the same extent but the pitot/static scheme has some additional 
problems

Re: [Aus-soaring] varios(was FLARM maths)

2006-11-17 Thread JR
Bruce, how does your system work in very weak lift, and does anybody else
other than me still use a mechanical vario on the panel ?
regards JR
- Original Message - 
From: Luke Dodd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 9:16 PM
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] varios(was FLARM maths)


  I have taken too much space already... back into my box.
 
  BT

 Oh no you haven't, please vent more from your informed spleen.

 Luke


 ___
 Aus-soaring mailing list
 Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
 To check or change subscription details, visit:
 http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring


___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring


Re: [Aus-soaring] varios(was FLARM maths)

2006-11-15 Thread Mike Borgelt

At 06:46 PM 14/11/2006, David Griffiths wrote:

I am impressed
I did not even know that this type of gear was available.
Is this all prototype stuff or is it in production?


You might like to look at the B500 on our site at
www.borgeltinstruments.com
Australian designed and manufactured, sold worldwide.


Before getting too excited about varios without visual indicators 
people might like to consider how they decide whether to turn in a 
particular thermal that is encountered. The vario pointer isn't the 
only thing but I bet it is an important part of your decision. 
Relative netto was designed to help with this - see our website for 
details if you don't know what relative netto does(it is in articles).


Changing the audio at the MacCready setting as we do in the B500 and 
B50 lets you know to look at the vario but for reasons explained by 
John Cochrane in his paper and nearly 40 years ago by Anthony 
Edwards, you fly at Macready settings that are quite low compared to 
the actual rates of climb you get so you might not make the decision 
to turn just based on that audio change.


Likewise when picking a best path through the air,  particularly when 
streeting, including the vario pointer in your scan is important. To 
be really useful here the vario pointer should be high resolution 
too. We rejected LCDs on the grounds that the pointer resolution was 
too coarse.


When working very weak lift the speed of response and resolution of 
the vario itself becomes important. When working 5 knots at altitude 
a poor vario will do. When at 600 feet over a paddock trying to avoid 
an outlanding by working +/-0.5 knots you need all the help you can get.


With some vario technologies there are unavoidable speed of 
response/resolution tradeoffs.


Lastly, Total energy is total energy whether it is done by a probe 
providing suction below static pressure or whether you measure pitot 
and static pressures and add them electronically to provide the same 
thing. They both suffer from horizontal gust effects (see article on 
website) to the same extent but the pitot/static scheme has some 
additional problems - the pitot and static ports are more sensitive 
to yaw and sideslip than the modern two hole TE probe is and you need 
to organise the pitot and static signals to arrive at the same time 
at the instrument to avoid undesirable transient effects.


Mike




Borgelt Instruments - manufacturers of quality soaring instruments
phone Int'l + 61 746 355784
fax   Int'l + 61 746 358796
cellphone Int'l + 61 428 355784
  Int'l + 61 429 355784
email:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
website: www.borgeltinstruments.com
___
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring