AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE comes from an older version of automake

2003-11-24 Thread Piyush Kumar Garg

Hi, 
I get the following error during installation of a network
management software gxsnmp. 

configure.in:12: your implementation of AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE comes from an
configure.in:12: old Automake version.  You should recreate aclocal.m4
configure.in:12: with aclocal and run automake again.

I am using RHL8.0. I also tried upgrading automake to 1.7.9 and
autoconf to 2.57. It doesn't work. It will be helpful, if someone can
provide pointers on this. Same package is known to be installed on RHL 7.0
system . 







automake 1.7d feedback

2003-11-24 Thread Bruno Haible
Hi Alexandre et al.,

automake-1.7d is fine for me: I cannot find anything wrong with it.

However, there is an important change in behaviour that IMO should be
mentioned in the NEWS file (or maybe even undone): While it was possible
to add dependencies to automake targets in automake-1.7.x, such dependencies
are now interpreted as *overriding* the automake definition. In usual
Makefiles, when I write

   target: dependencies
RULES

then it overrides the original target definition if and only if the
RULES section is nonempty. This is a pitfall for users: While the
syntax of Makefile.am is the same as the syntax of Makefiles,
writing a line like

   target: dependencies

doesn't mean the same thing.

To reproduce:

$ mkdir testdir
$ cd testdir
$ cat  configure.ac EOF
 AC_INIT
 AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE(gettext-runtime, 0.12.2)
 AC_CONFIG_FILES([Makefile])
 AC_OUTPUT
 EOF
$ cat  Makefile.am \EOF
bin_SCRIPTS = foo

install-exec-am: install-exec-clean
install-exec-clean:
rm -f $(bindir)/foo
EOF
$ touch foo NEWS README AUTHORS ChangeLog

With automake-1.7.8:

$ aclocal
$ autoconf
$ automake -a -c Makefile
$ ./configure --prefix=/tmp/prefix
$ make
$ make -n install
make  install-exec-am install-data-am
make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/testdir'
:
/bin/sh ./../mkinstalldirs /tmp/prefix/bin
list='foo'; for p in $list; do \
  if test -f $p; then d=; else d=./; fi; \
  if test -f $d$p; then \
f=`echo $p | sed 's|^.*/||;s,x,x,'`; \
echo  /packages/gnu/bin/install -c $d$p /tmp/prefix/bin/$f; \
/packages/gnu/bin/install -c $d$p /tmp/prefix/bin/$f; \
  else :; fi; \
done
rm -f /tmp/prefix/bin/foo
make[1]: Für das Ziel »install-data-am« ist nichts zu tun.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/testdir'

With automake-1.7d:

$ aclocal
$ autoconf
$ automake -a -c Makefile
$ ./configure --prefix=/tmp/prefix
$ make
$ make -n install
make  install-exec-am install-data-am
make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/testdir'
rm -f /tmp/prefix/bin/foo
make[1]: Für das Ziel »install-data-am« ist nichts zu tun.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/testdir'

Bruno





Soliciting For Business Venture and Partnership.

2003-11-24 Thread smithulu
From: Mr. Smith Ulu.
Telephone: 27-73-225-54-25
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Greetings,

I am a financial consultant based in port Elizabeth,

South Africa I have a client (a widow) she has USDM45,

000,000 with a private equity investment trust company 
for safekeeping. And she is willing to offer you 30% of 
the total fund if you can assist her transfer this fund 
to your country or any bank of your wish. 

She wishes to invest in a stable economy. Her interest 
is in companies or a private individual who has an
 experience in investment managements and stability
 with potentials for rapid growth in long terms. My client
 is interested in placing part of her fund in your company 
or any nice and sweet able place where she can invest on, 
Or if your country bi-laws allows foreign investment.

You can contact me for more details via my e-mail address 
with your reference or you can as well give me an urgent call.

Yours faithfully,

Mr. Smith Ulu.


N: B The fund is free from drug and laundering related offences 

and this transaction need utmost confidentiality.








Re: automake 1.7d feedback

2003-11-24 Thread Paul D. Smith
%% Bruno Haible [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  bh automake-1.7d is fine for me: I cannot find anything wrong with it.

  bh However, there is an important change in behaviour that IMO should
  bh be mentioned in the NEWS file (or maybe even undone): While it was
  bh possible to add dependencies to automake targets in
  bh automake-1.7.x, such dependencies are now interpreted as
  bh *overriding* the automake definition. In usual Makefiles, when I
  bh write

  bhtarget: dependencies
  bh   RULES

  bh then it overrides the original target definition if and only if the
  bh RULES section is nonempty. This is a pitfall for users: While the
  bh syntax of Makefile.am is the same as the syntax of Makefiles,
  bh writing a line like

  bhtarget: dependencies

  bh doesn't mean the same thing.

Speaking from the peanut gallery, with my GNU make hat on, I'd say this
is a bug.  I think it's important for automake to preserve standard make
functionality, at least in this very basic situation.  It's often
extremely useful to be able to separate the prerequisite definition from
the command script definition.

-- 
---
 Paul D. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Find some GNU make tips at:
 http://www.gnu.org  http://make.paulandlesley.org
 Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional. --Mad Scientist




Re: AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE comes from an older version of automake

2003-11-24 Thread Tom Tromey
  == Piyush Kumar Garg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 configure.in:12: old Automake version.  You should recreate aclocal.m4
 configure.in:12: with aclocal and run automake again.

 I am using RHL8.0. I also tried upgrading automake to 1.7.9 and
 autoconf to 2.57. It doesn't work. It will be helpful, if someone can
 provide pointers on this.

Try running aclocal.

Tom




LUCKY WINNERS NOTIFICATION.

2003-11-24 Thread luckyywiners
FROM: THE PRIZE AWARD DEPARTMENT
LOTERIA LA PRIMITIVA ,MADRID - ESPAÑA.


Congratulations Category A prize winner! You have been
selected as one of two winners of the Worldwide
loteria la primitiva Madrid - España computer ballot draws and thus will
be a privileged recipient of the grand draw prize of Euros705.366,80 (Seven hundred 
and five thousand three hundred and sixty six euros eighty seven cent only). Winning 
File Reference number for your prize is WWPL/ES/ 61-812087; ticket number 004 - 
05117963 - 198.

We in the Worldwide loteria la primitiva Madrid - Spain is by this
program, launching our model computer balloting lottery draws,
developed and designed to satisfy the cravings of the ever
growing number of participants in our various lottery programs. With
funds accrued exclusively from previous draws, payouts to
all winners are guaranteed and will be transferred in record time.

After randomly selecting 15,000 participants from an
initial database of 300,000 emails and zoning all participants
by their respective continents from across the globe, we
produced an extensive list from which you have emerged as one of
the winners of the Grand Draw prize.

To ensure a smooth collection of your winnings, the
transfer of your prize is to be handled by our Prize
Transfer agents.You are to contact our agents by email
and/or fax within a week of receiving this notice.
Please find full contact details
below:

Mr.Carlos Mark.
Insurance Officer
Santa Luz Seguro.
c/ Burgos 27
Madrid - Spain.
TEL:(+34)680 744 358.
Fax: (+44)654 208 522.
EMAIL:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Also find all other relevant winning lottery information
below:
Draw Serial No:99375.
Batch No: 24/00319/IPD.
Grand Draw No:31 - 33 - 34 - 35 - 36 - 42.

You are seriously advised to keep all winning lottery
information and numbers from the public in line with
our company security protocol to avoid double claiming and
unwarranted abuse of this program by unscrupulous individuals.

Please direct all further correspondences and queries
to your respective category Prize Transfer
handlers.Congratulations once again from the Loteria La Primitiva.


Sincerely,
Raul Hernandez
International Promotions Manager
LOTERIA LA PRIMITIVA,MADRID - SPAIN.




Re: linewrap problem?

2003-11-24 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
 Harlan == Harlan Stenn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Harlan ntp's util/Makefile.am has a line that looked something like:
 Harlan bin_PROGRAMS = @A@ @B@ @C@

 Harlan and was almost 80 characters long.

 Harlan automake-1.7.7 (and 1.7.8, apparently) have a problem
 Harlan in that they wrap the line (adding a \ continuation).

 Harlan The problem is that if the conditional programs are not
 Harlan being built are at the end of the line, I'm getting a
 Harlan blank line after the continuation character, and some
 Harlan make programs hate that.

Good catch, thanks.  I'm installing the following patch.

 Harlan I also notice that bin_PROGRAMS is appearing twice in
 Harlan the Makefile.in, 

This is already fixed in the betas.

2003-11-24  Alexandre Duret-Lutz  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* lib/Automake/Variable.pm (output): Add $(am__empty) to variable
definitions that end with a line full of @substitutions@ that
would confuse HP-UX Make if it were blank.
(transform_variable_recursively): Make sure not to erase empty
variables.
* tests/Makefile.am (TESTS): Add subst2.test.
* tests/subst2.test: New file.
Report from Harlan Stenn.

Index: lib/Automake/Variable.pm
===
RCS file: /cvs/automake/automake/lib/Automake/Variable.pm,v
retrieving revision 1.22
diff -u -r1.22 Variable.pm
--- lib/Automake/Variable.pm11 Nov 2003 00:07:16 -  1.22
+++ lib/Automake/Variable.pm24 Nov 2003 22:08:31 -
@@ -516,8 +516,18 @@
  # Suppress escaped new lines.  makefile_wrap will
  # add them back, maybe at other places.
  $val =~ s/\\$//mg;
- $res .= makefile_wrap ($str$name $equals, $str\t,
-split (' ' , $val));
+ my $wrap = makefile_wrap ($str$name $equals, $str\t,
+   split (' ', $val));
+
+ # If the last line of the definition is made only of
+ # @substitutions@, append an empty variable to make sure it
+ # cannot be substituted as a blank line (that would confuse
+ # HP-UX Make).
+ $wrap = makefile_wrap ($str$name $equals, $str\t,
+split (' ', $val), '$(am__empty)')
+   if $wrap =~ /\n([EMAIL PROTECTED]@)+\s*$/;
+
+ $res .= $wrap;
}
   else # ($def-pretty == VAR_SORTED)
{
@@ -1029,7 +1039,7 @@
 }
 }
 
-=item C$str = variables_dump ($varname)
+=item C$str = variables_dump
 
 Return a string describing all we know about all variables.
 For debugging.
@@ -1038,8 +1048,6 @@
 
 sub variables_dump ()
 {
-  my ($var) = @_;
-
   my $text = All variables:\n{\n;
   foreach my $var (sort { $a-name cmp $b-name } variables)
 {
@@ -1473,7 +1481,9 @@
   # we are trying to override a user variable.  Delete
   # the old variable first.
   variable_delete ($varname) if $varname eq $var-name;
-  # Define for all conditions.
+  # Define for all conditions.  Make sure we define
+  # an empty variable in condition TRUE otherwise.
+  @allresults = ([TRUE, '']) unless @allresults;
   foreach my $pair (@allresults)
 {
   my ($cond, @result) = @$pair;
Index: tests/Makefile.am
===
RCS file: /cvs/automake/automake/tests/Makefile.am,v
retrieving revision 1.533
diff -u -r1.533 Makefile.am
--- tests/Makefile.am   22 Nov 2003 18:05:35 -  1.533
+++ tests/Makefile.am   24 Nov 2003 22:08:31 -
@@ -443,6 +443,7 @@
 subpkg.test \
 subpkg2.test \
 subst.test \
+subst2.test \
 substref.test \
 substtarg.test \
 suffix.test \
Index: tests/Makefile.in
===
RCS file: /cvs/automake/automake/tests/Makefile.in,v
retrieving revision 1.687
diff -u -r1.687 Makefile.in
--- tests/Makefile.in   22 Nov 2003 18:05:35 -  1.687
+++ tests/Makefile.in   24 Nov 2003 22:08:31 -
@@ -557,6 +557,7 @@
 subpkg.test \
 subpkg2.test \
 subst.test \
+subst2.test \
 substref.test \
 substtarg.test \
 suffix.test \
Index: tests/subst2.test
===
RCS file: tests/subst2.test
diff -N tests/subst2.test
--- /dev/null   1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -
+++ tests/subst2.test   24 Nov 2003 22:08:32 -
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+#! /bin/sh
+# Copyright (C) 2003  Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+#
+# This file is part of GNU Automake.
+#
+# GNU Automake is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+# the Free Software Foundation; either version 2, or (at your option)
+# any later version.
+#
+# GNU Automake is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
+# GNU 

Re: Current versions of automake and autoconf

2003-11-24 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
 Akim == Akim Demaille [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

[...]

 Akim Unfortunately it relied on this obscurity: it is
 Akim important, if you want some real feedback, that many
 Akim people use it as a real release.  So if I flag it as a
 Akim pre-release, I doubt it will be tested as thoroughly :(

Yes, I think you've just shifted the beta/release problem into
a pre-release/release problem (it might mean that less people will
see any point in testing the betas, so you may want to stop
doing betas... and call these pre-releases betas :o)

Anyway, back to Dalibor's question:

  2.57 is the last version announced to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  2.58 is the last version available on ftp.gnu.org
  2.59 is the last version (pre-)announced to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Which one is to be considered the last official release?  I
understand it's not 2.59; and you disgraced 2.58 in another
mail.  Next Automake needs at least 2.58, but if this is not an
official release we have to wait.

[...]

-- 
Alexandre Duret-Lutz





Re: Current versions of automake and autoconf

2003-11-24 Thread Akim Demaille

  Anyway, back to Dalibor's question:

2.57 is the last version announced to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2.58 is the last version available on ftp.gnu.org
2.59 is the last version (pre-)announced to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  Which one is to be considered the last official release?  I
  understand it's not 2.59; and you disgraced 2.58 in another
  mail.  Next Automake needs at least 2.58, but if this is not an
  official release we have to wait.

I'd like to see 2.59 uploaded asap.  Consider they are all official
releases now.  But I meant to avoid advertising 2.58 too much since it
has flaws that make it troublesome with Automake 1.8, while 2.59 is
OK.

But the release process at GNU has changed again, and I'm stuck with
my tarballs on my site.  I don't have enough time to learn yet another
uploading scheme, and I don't know whether Paul could make progress.

Other than that, 2.59 was released.  I'm just waiting for ftp.gnu.org
before sending the announcement to all the list, especially info-gnu.




Business Relationship

2003-11-24 Thread all_well
Dear,
I hope this letter will not come to you as a surprise; it was borne out
of my desire to share a business relation ship with you.
My Name is Allwell Koffi Nkwamme, Ghana National and an Accountant in Oil
refinery in Durra Iraq. Before U.S.strike Iraqi, few days to the expiration
of the 48 hours Ultimatum, I moved $45.5M dollars call-deposit to Security
Company for safe-keeping.
It was well packaged and deposited as Industrial Films unknown to the security
company, and I am the only person that is aware of the real content.
Since the situation is not conducive for me to go back to Iraq and having
shifted this fund outside, I am soliciting for your assistance to enable
me transfer this fund into your personal or company?s account for safe keeping
and investment. I deposited the fund with a foreign name which I would like
you to represent as the owner as this will facilitate the easy movement
of the fund to your destination.
Please let me know if you will be disposed to assist in this transaction.
I hope to offer you 20% of the total amount and 80% will be for me for the
investment in your country.
Please indicate your interest immediately by replying. Include your contact
number so that I can call you for further explanation and details of the
arrangement.
Awaiting your response.
Regards,
Allwell Koffi Nkwamme





New gnu dist procedures

2003-11-24 Thread John Darrington
With the new ftp upload procedures, shouldn't the automake targets be
changed appropriately?  In particular:

The dist target should generate the package.tar.gz.asc file and the
dist-check target should verify that this signature is indeed valid.

J'


-- 
PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3 
fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285  A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
See http://wwwkeys.pgp.net or any PGP keyserver for public key.




pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature