Re: Yacc Support?
> ">" == kj1nabble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Any thoughts? I think it has something to do with how I set up my bin in >> Makefile.am. You don't say how it failed... >> bin_PROGRAMS = app >> lc_SOURCES = l.l app.c g.y appgen.c You either want to have 'bin_PROGRAMS = lc', or you want to name your program 'app' and have 'app_SOURCES'. Tom
Yacc Support?
I can't figure out how to do automake using yacc. I made a makefile (Makefile-noAutomake) and generating/compiling with yacc works fine in this simple case. However, I need to ensure it build with automake. I have used automake in the past with just C code, but yacc/lex has been cryptic. I've been going over the gnu page for 2 days now. I believe I'm following the gnu docs (http://www.gnu.org/software/automake...c-and-Lex.html) Any thoughts? I think it has something to do with how I set up my bin in Makefile.am. First, the files and compiling using a simple makefile. Files: -- g.y l.l appgen.c app.c app.h Makefile: "Makefile-noAutomake": --- OBJS:=g.o l.o app.o appgen.o all: app $(OBJS): app.h lc: y.tab.h $(OBJS) gcc -o app $(OBJS) y.tab.h: g.y yacc -d g.y --- Running (w/output): $ make -f Makefile-noAutomake yacc -d g.y yacc g.y mv -f y.tab.c g.c gcc -g -O0 -c -o g.o g.c flex -t l.l > l.c gcc -g -O0 -c -o l.o l.c gcc -g -O0 -c -o app.o app.c gcc -g -O0 -c -o appgen.o appgen.c gcc -o app g.o l.o app.o appgen.o rm g.c l.c - Now to the automake stuff that doesn't seem to work... configure.ac: ... AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR([ylwrap]) # do I need ylwrap? AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE ... AC_MSG_NOTICE([using CFLAGS=$CFLAGS]) AC_MSG_NOTICE([using CXXFLAGS=$CXXFLAGS]) AC_MSG_NOTICE([using CPPFLAGS=$CPPFLAGS]) AC_MSG_NOTICE([using LDFLAGS=$LDFLAGS]) AC_MSG_NOTICE([using YFLAGS=$YFLAGS]) ... AC_PROG_CXX AC_PROG_CC AC_PROG_INSTALL AC_PROG_LIBTOOL AC_PROG_YACC AC_PROG_LEX ... -- Makefile.am: bin_PROGRAMS = app lc_SOURCES = l.l app.c g.y appgen.c AM_YFLAGS=-d AM_CXXFLAGS = -g -O0 AM_LFLAGS=-t -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Yacc-Support--tf3332417.html#a9266040 Sent from the Gnu - Automake - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
depcomp supporting MSVC's --showIncludes?
Hi folks, Does anybody know a patch for depcomp to support the -showIncludes flag of Microsoft's recent compiler? Regards Harri
Re: Wishlist: Clean target for generated C files?
Hi Bob, * Bob Proulx wrote on Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 05:18:21AM CET: > > > > Looks to me like if your generated code had proper dependencies you > > would not need the 'moreclean' step. Is that observation correct? > > If no, what am I missing? If yes, then let's see why you have not > > (or can not?) describe the dependencies properly within a Makefile.am. > > Do you normally write "proper dependencies" so that when yacc or lex > is updated that targets using them become out of date? I don't see > any such dependencies in automake generated Makefiles that I can see. D'oh. I was under the impression that the generator was part of your package. Sorry for the noise. I think your request is valid, and probably a good idea. Cheers, Ralf
