Re: Install to lib64
Jason Sewall wrote: > I'm maintaining an autotools-configured project, and I've noticed that > the make install resulting from my build (on x86_64 arch, linux) puts > generated libraries in prefix/lib instead of prefix/lib64 - is there > something I should do differently, or is the the expected behaviour? That is the expected behavior. On normal/pure 64-bit systems that is usually the normal expected location. On my 64-bit system lib and not lib64 is the correct location since there isn't any 32-bit version. 64-bit systems are first class citizens too. If you need it in a specific location then you should tell it that at configure time. You can always set up a site specific configuration so that it will default to a particular location for you on your system if you desire. The locations that the autotools default to using are the GNU standard locations. The GNU system is designed to be its own system and it has its own set of standards. This has been around a long time and predates both POSIX and the newer FHS. But the autotools are very configurable and everyone is free to set up installation locations as they see fit. The typical procedure for packagers is to set any system specific locations on the configure command line but to codify those locations in the package build script. This is usually done by package management systems in different ways. On RPM based systems (e.g. Red Hat, SuSE) look at using the %configure macro which is designed to do this for you easily. On DPKG based systems (e.g. Debian, Ubuntu) this is usually done in the rules file. The syntax and interface is standardized and well known. Bob
Re: Install to lib64
On Sunday 2009-01-25 22:54, Jason Sewall wrote:
>I'm maintaining an autotools-configured project, and I've noticed that
>the make install resulting from my build (on x86_64 arch, linux) puts
>generated libraries in prefix/lib instead of prefix/lib64 - is there
>something I should do differently, or is the the expected behaviour?
Seems pretty expected. All distros that get it right have some sort of
mechanism to always call configure with --libdir='${prefix}/lib64'
(or similar, but still with lib64); rpm for example has
%configure which expands to all the fluff needed or wanted by the
distro, including correct libdir for a given %arch.
Install to lib64
I'm maintaining an autotools-configured project, and I've noticed that the make install resulting from my build (on x86_64 arch, linux) puts generated libraries in prefix/lib instead of prefix/lib64 - is there something I should do differently, or is the the expected behaviour? Thanks, Jason
