Re: Awesome - The name!
On Mar 7, 2012 3:26 AM, "Anurag Priyam" wrote: > Though I wonder if I get relevant search results because of > personalization. I have been around in the awesome community for > reasonably long. Honestly I've found that awesomewm produces pretty goods results, at least with duckduckgo and Google. -Wayne
Re: Awesome - The name!
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Anurag Priyam wrote: > I have never been very happy about the name, including awful and > naughty. But because of the way full text search (and hence Google) > works, I don't think that adding a 'wm' to it is gonna make a huge > difference. Most of the time 'wm' (and 'window manager') is anyway > used in conjunction with 'awesome' in the same document. Though I wonder if I get relevant search results because of personalization. I have been around in the awesome community for reasonably long. -- Anurag Priyam -- To unsubscribe, send mail to awesome-unsubscr...@naquadah.org.
Re: Awesome - The name!
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 1:57 PM, David Sorkovsky wrote: > While I understand your comment, I must say that there is a lot more out > there than your (a) & (b) and (no disrespect intended) the awesome wiki is > not so awesome :-( You can always add things to the wiki if you find it lacking in any aspect :). > Anyway - It was just throwing out my 2c to see what people thought I have never been very happy about the name, including awful and naughty. But because of the way full text search (and hence Google) works, I don't think that adding a 'wm' to it is gonna make a huge difference. Most of the time 'wm' (and 'window manager') is anyway used in conjunction with 'awesome' in the same document. -- Anurag Priyam -- To unsubscribe, send mail to awesome-unsubscr...@naquadah.org.
Re: Awesome - The name!
You know, I'm of the hunch that this sort of thing has been discussed before - as a new user, I agree with the sentiment of this thread, but I don't want to bring up old topics (if this is indeed an old topic). On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 12:27 AM, David Sorkovsky wrote: > > Hi Alexander, > > While I understand your comment, I must say that there is a lot more out > there than your (a) & (b) and (no disrespect intended) the awesome wiki is > not so awesome :-( > > I have spent MANY hours searching for other snippets of information and > they > are what allowed me to get through the initial getting started barrier. I'm > sure that many people try Awesome but end up stumbling and move on - their > loss, but our loss as well as we lose some potentially good contributors! > > Anyway - It was just throwing out my 2c to see what people thought > > > PS: I don't think that adding WM to the "official" name and not actually > changing the code would be a pretty reasonable idea. > > > > Regards > > David > > > -Original Message- > From: Alexander Yakushev [mailto:yakushev.a...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, 7 March 2012 4:40 PM > To: awesome@naquadah.org > Subject: Re: Awesome - The name! > > Hello, David, > > I understand what you are talking about. I also have a frustration googling > awesome. But the thing is there is no much data on awesome around the web > except: > a) awesome wiki > b) this mailgroup > > So changing the name so the googling of a dozen of pages becomes easier > seems too radical to me. This issue was to be thought in the first place, > not after five years passed. > > Regards, > Alexander > > -- > To unsubscribe, send mail to awesome-unsubscr...@naquadah.org. > > > -- > To unsubscribe, send mail to awesome-unsubscr...@naquadah.org. >
RE: Awesome - The name!
Hi Alexander, While I understand your comment, I must say that there is a lot more out there than your (a) & (b) and (no disrespect intended) the awesome wiki is not so awesome :-( I have spent MANY hours searching for other snippets of information and they are what allowed me to get through the initial getting started barrier. I'm sure that many people try Awesome but end up stumbling and move on - their loss, but our loss as well as we lose some potentially good contributors! Anyway - It was just throwing out my 2c to see what people thought PS: I don't think that adding WM to the "official" name and not actually changing the code would be a pretty reasonable idea. Regards David -Original Message- From: Alexander Yakushev [mailto:yakushev.a...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, 7 March 2012 4:40 PM To: awesome@naquadah.org Subject: Re: Awesome - The name! Hello, David, I understand what you are talking about. I also have a frustration googling awesome. But the thing is there is no much data on awesome around the web except: a) awesome wiki b) this mailgroup So changing the name so the googling of a dozen of pages becomes easier seems too radical to me. This issue was to be thought in the first place, not after five years passed. Regards, Alexander -- To unsubscribe, send mail to awesome-unsubscr...@naquadah.org. -- To unsubscribe, send mail to awesome-unsubscr...@naquadah.org.
Re: Awesome - The name!
Hello, David, I understand what you are talking about. I also have a frustration googling awesome. But the thing is there is no much data on awesome around the web except: a) awesome wiki b) this mailgroup So changing the name so the googling of a dozen of pages becomes easier seems too radical to me. This issue was to be thought in the first place, not after five years passed. Regards, Alexander -- To unsubscribe, send mail to awesome-unsubscr...@naquadah.org.