Re: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Where is the dataarea table?
SSMS is SQL Server Management Studio (SQL 2005). If you are using SQL 2000, use the Query Analyzer to view the table. Cheers Arijit On Jan 8, 2008 2:39 PM, Tarek Saleh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks my friend, But where i can find the SSMS? Regards, Tarek Arijit Basu [EMAIL PROTECTED] arijit.basu%40gmail.com wrote: Hi, That is a system table and you will NOT find in the AOT. You can open SSMS and see the table but its better if you dont try to modify it. Regards, Arijit On Jan 8, 2008 12:18 PM, Tarek Saleh [EMAIL PROTECTED]tarekegy4%40yahoo.com wrote: Dear All, can we customize in the dataarea table,by adding new field represent the company group. So far i was not able to find the table under the AOT table anybody knowes were i can find the table? and is it possible to add in new field in it. Thanks a lot Tarek - Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] -- Arijit Basu [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] - Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] -- Arijit Basu [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Where is the dataarea table?
Thanks again, Arijit Basu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: SSMS is SQL Server Management Studio (SQL 2005). If you are using SQL 2000, use the Query Analyzer to view the table. Cheers Arijit On Jan 8, 2008 2:39 PM, Tarek Saleh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks my friend, But where i can find the SSMS? Regards, Tarek Arijit Basu [EMAIL PROTECTED] arijit.basu%40gmail.com wrote: Hi, That is a system table and you will NOT find in the AOT. You can open SSMS and see the table but its better if you dont try to modify it. Regards, Arijit On Jan 8, 2008 12:18 PM, Tarek Saleh [EMAIL PROTECTED]tarekegy4%40yahoo.com wrote: Dear All, can we customize in the dataarea table,by adding new field represent the company group. So far i was not able to find the table under the AOT table anybody knowes were i can find the table? and is it possible to add in new field in it. Thanks a lot Tarek - Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] -- Arijit Basu [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] - Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] -- Arijit Basu [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] - Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Where is the dataarea table?
Thanks my friend, But where i can find the SSMS? Regards, Tarek Arijit Basu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, That is a system table and you will NOT find in the AOT. You can open SSMS and see the table but its better if you dont try to modify it. Regards, Arijit On Jan 8, 2008 12:18 PM, Tarek Saleh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear All, can we customize in the dataarea table,by adding new field represent the company group. So far i was not able to find the table under the AOT table anybody knowes were i can find the table? and is it possible to add in new field in it. Thanks a lot Tarek - Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] -- Arijit Basu [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] - Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Re: Credit Note Misc. charges
hi hi thank you for your response. However, i am still confused, should the whole amount be reversed or not? The misc. charge is put on the hearder and allocated to the lines. it appears that that whole charge is reversed, not just the one applicable to the item returned. Thanks Yifat --- In Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com, Hemant Kumthekar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Just check if the misc. charges were allocated to each line using allocation method. It should happen that the whole charge amount gets reversed. Check what modifications were done to the object. It should not happen. Hemant K - Original Message From: yifath1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, January 5, 2008 4:52:34 AM Subject: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Credit Note Misc. charges hi all, I just want to verify something. My client applies a misc. charge on the purchase order, let say $100 for 5 items, therefore, the misc. charge per item is $20. Then the client returns 1 item to the supplier. i have tested this and it appears that the whole misc. charge is reversed... $100 is this correct? I think some modification has been done on this version of Axapta 3. Please can some one just verify and tell me what should happen when credit note is created and posted. we are using misc. charge as landed cost - whereby it is debiting the item and crediting a different account. Thanks Yifat _ ___ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Re: Credit Note Misc. charges
Hi, Ask the user to use only the charges in the lines. As you have to reverse only the amount related to the particular item, ask the suer to enter the charges propotionate to the item in the lines alone. The charges should not be defined at header level. Regards Prasanna - Original Message From: yifath1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, 8 January, 2008 3:21:32 PM Subject: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Re: Credit Note Misc. charges hi hi thank you for your response. However, i am still confused, should the whole amount be reversed or not? The misc. charge is put on the hearder and allocated to the lines. it appears that that whole charge is reversed, not just the one applicable to the item returned. Thanks Yifat --- In Axapta-Knowledge- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com, Hemant Kumthekar hemantdk66@ ... wrote: Hi, Just check if the misc. charges were allocated to each line using allocation method. It should happen that the whole charge amount gets reversed. Check what modifications were done to the object. It should not happen. Hemant K - Original Message From: yifath1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Axapta-Knowledge- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com Sent: Saturday, January 5, 2008 4:52:34 AM Subject: [Axapta-Knowledge- Village] Credit Note Misc. charges hi all, I just want to verify something. My client applies a misc. charge on the purchase order, let say $100 for 5 items, therefore, the misc. charge per item is $20. Then the client returns 1 item to the supplier. i have tested this and it appears that the whole misc. charge is reversed... $100 is this correct? I think some modification has been done on this version of Axapta 3. Please can some one just verify and tell me what should happen when credit note is created and posted. we are using misc. charge as landed cost - whereby it is debiting the item and crediting a different account. Thanks Yifat _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile. yahoo.com/ ;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR 8HDtDypao8Wcj9tA cJ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] 5, 50, 500, 5000 - Store N number of mails in your inbox. Go to http://help.yahoo.com/l/in/yahoo/mail/yahoomail/tools/tools-08.html [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Re: Axapta slower on SQL Server 2005 then SQL Server 2000?
Hi Harry, Can you give me tips on how to build a good multi-user benchmark? I have a few long running db intensive task in Axapta that I was thinking of running. I can probably test it with 4 or maybe 5 client at time, do you think that will be multi-user enough? regards, Steeve... --- In Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com, Harry Deshpande [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Another thing to note is if you are running benchmarks then please run the benchmarks in multi-user environment. SQL Server 2005 is much better than '2000' in handling multi-user environment. (After all your live system works multi-user) You will get 100% advantage once you upgrade to 4.0+ version since concurrency has even been introduced in the AX application. Regards Harry This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no rights. Use of included script samples are subject to the terms specified at http://www.microsoft.com/info/cpyright.htm; The code provided (if any) may be written from the point of view of a third party and the programming style/development standards may suit such a point of view. From: Harry Deshpande Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 11:15 AM To: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Axapta slower on SQL Server 2005 then SQL Server 2000? Hi As per my experience SQL Server 2005 performance is much better than '2000'. 1. Please check whether the SQL Server setup is in line with Microsoft recommendations. 2. Go further and check things like disc-alignment. Take a look at http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/christian/archive/2007/10/09/disk- sector-alignment.aspx 3. SQL Server 2005 engine is heavily optimized towards cluster indexes. You will see a lot of cluster indexes introduced from V4.0 onwards. Please back-port them. However, please note that there is a small chance that the cluster indexes for some tables in standard Ax may not be appropriate with your data usage pattern. In this case you will have to figure out the best fit cluster index yourself. 4. Last but not the least make sure you are running the database with compatibility mode 90. (It is easy to forget this). I must say I am a very happy camper since I started using SQL Server 2005. Regards Harry This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no rights. Use of included script samples are subject to the terms specified at http://www.microsoft.com/info/cpyright.htm; The code provided (if any) may be written from the point of view of a third party and the programming style/development standards may suit such a point of view. From: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Axapta- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steeve Gilbert Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 10:51 AM To: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Axapta slower on SQL Server 2005 then SQL Server 2000? I read a couple of post here and there about Axapta being slower on SQL Server 2005 then 2000. I thought that people that have problem post messages and those who don't stays quiet. That's why I was only seeing post about SQL 2005 being slower. But then I stubble on a post on MBS forum (http://www.microsoft.com/Businesssolutions/Community/Newsgroups/dgbro ws er/en-us/default.mspx? query=sql+2005dg=microsoft.public.axapta.databasecat=lang=encr=US pt =catlist=8d3f188d-a0E9-40e4-86e2- 46508a35c759dglist=ptlist=exp=sloc=en-us). And the quote is : First of all Ax database runing on same hardware with SQL2005 is ~20% slower than SQL200 database (tested). I can't find something clearer that this. So, does my friends of the Axapta Knowledge Village acknowledge this statement? I'm gonna test this in our dev environment and if it turns out true, then it's gonna be the end of our SQL Server 2005 migration I guess. Btw, we are staying at Ax3.0 SP3 even if we migrate to SQL 2005. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Where is the dataarea table?
You can look at system tables in the AOT under System Documentation - Tables. You can browse them from there like any other table but you will not be able to change the definition. Regards, Varden Morris 276 Taralake Terrace N.E. Calgary, Alberta T3J 0A1 Canada (403) 366-8434 (H) (403) 615-1604 (C) [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message From: Tarek Saleh [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, January 8, 2008 2:24:03 AM Subject: Re: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Where is the dataarea table? Thanks again, Arijit Basu arijit.basu@ gmail.com wrote: SSMS is SQL Server Management Studio (SQL 2005). If you are using SQL 2000, use the Query Analyzer to view the table. Cheers Arijit On Jan 8, 2008 2:39 PM, Tarek Saleh [EMAIL PROTECTED] com wrote: Thanks my friend, But where i can find the SSMS? Regards, Tarek Arijit Basu arijit.basu@ gmail.com arijit.basu% 40gmail.com wrote: Hi, That is a system table and you will NOT find in the AOT. You can open SSMS and see the table but its better if you dont try to modify it. Regards, Arijit On Jan 8, 2008 12:18 PM, Tarek Saleh [EMAIL PROTECTED] comtarekegy4%40yahoo. com wrote: Dear All, can we customize in the dataarea table,by adding new field represent the company group. So far i was not able to find the table under the AOT table anybody knowes were i can find the table? and is it possible to add in new field in it. Thanks a lot Tarek - - --- Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] -- Arijit Basu [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] - - --- Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] -- Arijit Basu [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] - - --- Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
RE: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Re: Axapta slower on SQL Server 2005 then SQL Server 2000?
However, I must tell you that I am not an expert on bench-marking Regards Harry Ps: and I forgot to include the disclaimer in my last email*s* This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no rights. Use of included script samples are subject to the terms specified at http://www.microsoft.com/info/cpyright.htm; The code provided (if any) may be written from the point of view of a third party and the programming style/development standards may suit such a point of view. From: Harry Deshpande Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 9:13 AM To: 'Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com' Subject: RE: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Re: Axapta slower on SQL Server 2005 then SQL Server 2000? Hi Are you planning to use the same task for all the clients? May be that is not a good idea since they will end up locking each other. I would say one client can do sales order, another can do gl posting, another can do something in projects and so on. Regards harry From: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steeve Gilbert Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 7:15 AM To: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Re: Axapta slower on SQL Server 2005 then SQL Server 2000? Hi Harry, Can you give me tips on how to build a good multi-user benchmark? I have a few long running db intensive task in Axapta that I was thinking of running. I can probably test it with 4 or maybe 5 client at time, do you think that will be multi-user enough? regards, Steeve... --- In Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.commailto:Axapta-Knowledge-Village%40yahoogroups.com, Harry Deshpande [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Another thing to note is if you are running benchmarks then please run the benchmarks in multi-user environment. SQL Server 2005 is much better than '2000' in handling multi-user environment. (After all your live system works multi-user) You will get 100% advantage once you upgrade to 4.0+ version since concurrency has even been introduced in the AX application. Regards Harry This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no rights. Use of included script samples are subject to the terms specified at http://www.microsoft.com/info/cpyright.htm; The code provided (if any) may be written from the point of view of a third party and the programming style/development standards may suit such a point of view. From: Harry Deshpande Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 11:15 AM To: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.commailto:Axapta-Knowledge-Village%40yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Axapta slower on SQL Server 2005 then SQL Server 2000? Hi As per my experience SQL Server 2005 performance is much better than '2000'. 1. Please check whether the SQL Server setup is in line with Microsoft recommendations. 2. Go further and check things like disc-alignment. Take a look at http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/christian/archive/2007/10/09/disk- sector-alignment.aspx 3. SQL Server 2005 engine is heavily optimized towards cluster indexes. You will see a lot of cluster indexes introduced from V4.0 onwards. Please back-port them. However, please note that there is a small chance that the cluster indexes for some tables in standard Ax may not be appropriate with your data usage pattern. In this case you will have to figure out the best fit cluster index yourself. 4. Last but not the least make sure you are running the database with compatibility mode 90. (It is easy to forget this). I must say I am a very happy camper since I started using SQL Server 2005. Regards Harry This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no rights. Use of included script samples are subject to the terms specified at http://www.microsoft.com/info/cpyright.htm; The code provided (if any) may be written from the point of view of a third party and the programming style/development standards may suit such a point of view. From: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.commailto:Axapta-Knowledge-Village%40yahoogroups.com [mailto:Axapta- [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:Knowledge-Village%40yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Steeve Gilbert Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 10:51 AM To: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.commailto:Axapta-Knowledge-Village%40yahoogroups.com Subject: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Axapta slower on SQL Server 2005 then SQL Server 2000? I read a couple of post here and there about Axapta being slower on SQL Server 2005 then 2000. I thought that people that have problem post messages and those who don't stays quiet. That's why I was only seeing post about SQL 2005 being slower. But then I stubble on a post on MBS forum (http://www.microsoft.com/Businesssolutions/Community/Newsgroups/dgbro ws er/en-us/default.mspx? query=sql+2005dg=microsoft.public.axapta.databasecat=lang=encr=US pt =catlist=8d3f188d-a0E9-40e4-86e2- 46508a35c759dglist=ptlist=exp=sloc=en-us). And
RE: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Re: Axapta slower on SQL Server 2005 then SQL Server 2000?
Hi Are you planning to use the same task for all the clients? May be that is not a good idea since they will end up locking each other. I would say one client can do sales order, another can do gl posting, another can do something in projects and so on. Regards harry From: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steeve Gilbert Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 7:15 AM To: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Re: Axapta slower on SQL Server 2005 then SQL Server 2000? Hi Harry, Can you give me tips on how to build a good multi-user benchmark? I have a few long running db intensive task in Axapta that I was thinking of running. I can probably test it with 4 or maybe 5 client at time, do you think that will be multi-user enough? regards, Steeve... --- In Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.commailto:Axapta-Knowledge-Village%40yahoogroups.com, Harry Deshpande [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Another thing to note is if you are running benchmarks then please run the benchmarks in multi-user environment. SQL Server 2005 is much better than '2000' in handling multi-user environment. (After all your live system works multi-user) You will get 100% advantage once you upgrade to 4.0+ version since concurrency has even been introduced in the AX application. Regards Harry This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no rights. Use of included script samples are subject to the terms specified at http://www.microsoft.com/info/cpyright.htm; The code provided (if any) may be written from the point of view of a third party and the programming style/development standards may suit such a point of view. From: Harry Deshpande Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 11:15 AM To: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.commailto:Axapta-Knowledge-Village%40yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Axapta slower on SQL Server 2005 then SQL Server 2000? Hi As per my experience SQL Server 2005 performance is much better than '2000'. 1. Please check whether the SQL Server setup is in line with Microsoft recommendations. 2. Go further and check things like disc-alignment. Take a look at http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/christian/archive/2007/10/09/disk- sector-alignment.aspx 3. SQL Server 2005 engine is heavily optimized towards cluster indexes. You will see a lot of cluster indexes introduced from V4.0 onwards. Please back-port them. However, please note that there is a small chance that the cluster indexes for some tables in standard Ax may not be appropriate with your data usage pattern. In this case you will have to figure out the best fit cluster index yourself. 4. Last but not the least make sure you are running the database with compatibility mode 90. (It is easy to forget this). I must say I am a very happy camper since I started using SQL Server 2005. Regards Harry This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no rights. Use of included script samples are subject to the terms specified at http://www.microsoft.com/info/cpyright.htm; The code provided (if any) may be written from the point of view of a third party and the programming style/development standards may suit such a point of view. From: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.commailto:Axapta-Knowledge-Village%40yahoogroups.com [mailto:Axapta- [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:Knowledge-Village%40yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Steeve Gilbert Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 10:51 AM To: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.commailto:Axapta-Knowledge-Village%40yahoogroups.com Subject: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Axapta slower on SQL Server 2005 then SQL Server 2000? I read a couple of post here and there about Axapta being slower on SQL Server 2005 then 2000. I thought that people that have problem post messages and those who don't stays quiet. That's why I was only seeing post about SQL 2005 being slower. But then I stubble on a post on MBS forum (http://www.microsoft.com/Businesssolutions/Community/Newsgroups/dgbro ws er/en-us/default.mspx? query=sql+2005dg=microsoft.public.axapta.databasecat=lang=encr=US pt =catlist=8d3f188d-a0E9-40e4-86e2- 46508a35c759dglist=ptlist=exp=sloc=en-us). And the quote is : First of all Ax database runing on same hardware with SQL2005 is ~20% slower than SQL200 database (tested). I can't find something clearer that this. So, does my friends of the Axapta Knowledge Village acknowledge this statement? I'm gonna test this in our dev environment and if it turns out true, then it's gonna be the end of our SQL Server 2005 migration I guess. Btw, we are staying at Ax3.0 SP3 even if we migrate to SQL 2005. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Financial year closing problem
Hi All, we are facing some problems regarding GL closing. we have some transactions open for the financial year 2005. and by mistake we closed 2006 without closing year 2005. so those entries left open at that time. it is showing some balances regarding those entries during balance. please suggest how to close those entries so that it will not effect the current year closing. waiting for reply..its urgent. Regards, -- Mukesh [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
RE: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Covergare Group
Dear all, Am using Ax.40,I have noticed that there is option named coverage group in the general tap of the items form, what is this option for?? It has a list as follow: Group default Min/Max Min/Max Period 365 Period 365 Requ Requirement Plz all, anybody knows What are these option and does it have any effect? And when to choose these options?? Thnx a lot ALL, Alaa [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
RE: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] What are InventSumDateTable and InventSumDateTrans used for?
Are you sure that these are DAX 4.0 tables?I couldn't find them in any DAX 4.0 db that I have. To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 18:52:03 +0400Subject: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] What are InventSumDateTable and InventSumDateTrans used for? Sorry i am not sure whether I asked this before (but i guess even if I didthen there was no answer so its worth asking again)Can someone please tell me or give me any idea what the InventSumDateTableand InventSumDateTrans tables are used for in AX4.0?I looked at them and thought they were for the function of 'Posting periodicphysical' but even though I dont use that function they are gettingpopulated and i would like to be sure as anything around InventSum issomething that should be very clear about :)ThanksJames[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Loading opening balances
Hi Akshay, I found another way to do it without using offset account ..While defining excel template use the Offset company account (Define offset company acc as any acc). While importing and posting no need to define offset accounts of each and every line in G/L journal. Thanks Maharaja Akshay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Use the General Journal and offset just a single a/c called opening balances. At the end of all opening balances being imported the net balnce on this a/c should be 0. As far as the inventory is concerned offset the same account in the movement journal. Note that you shouldn't post the inventory accounts through Gen Journal, as it gets done through the Movement Journal. On Jan 3, 2008 10:41 AM, Maharaja g [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Friends, I would like to know how to load the opening financial and item stock balances in Axapta?Any document would be very usefulIdeas also would be very much valued... Thanks in advance Maharaja - Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] - Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Re: FRX report
Kumar, Have you installed FRX? You have to run the script files on your databese. Then run the dimension Wizard. All the step by step information are available in Readme document. Chirani
[Axapta-Knowledge-Village] SysUserSecurity Report
Hi, I want to modify the sysusersecurity report and send an attached email to a list of persons. Can someone with experience in this area please assist. Thanks Sophie.
