Michael,
Are your service functions are declared inside a ,
#ifdef __cplusplus
extern "C"
{
#endif
directives ? If not you should, because your service code seems to be
C++.
And also check whether your code running is running with
simple_axis2_server.
Thanks,
-Manjula.
On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 14:25 +0200, Michael Sutter wrote:
> Hello Supun,
>
> the service is generated from a WSDL via the Java code generation.
>
> The problem is, that the service is calling external libraries which
> can throw
> exceptions. Every time the call throws a exception (which belongs to
> the system
> and mainly depends on the time the library is called) I get a
> segmentation fault,
> but only when a exception is thrown. The call of the external library
> is inside
> a try - catch block, so I think the segmentation fault could not
> occur.
>
> Kind regards
> Michael
>
> Supun Kamburugamuva wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > It seems that the problem occurs in your service code. Can you
> > please double check weather the service code is correct? BTW did you
> > generate the service or write it manually?
> >
> > Supun..
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 4:50 PM, Michael Sutter
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello Rajika,
> >
> > I have done what you told me and was able to debug the http
> > daemon.
> > The stack trace after the segmentation fault is:
> >
> > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> > 0x4252875e in parse_lsda_header () from /usr/lib/libstdc
> > ++.so.5
> > (gdb) where
> > #0 0x4252875e in parse_lsda_header () from /usr/lib/libstdc
> > ++.so.5
> > #1 0x42528a5c in __gxx_personality_v0 ()
> > from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5
> > #2 0x42555454 in _Unwind_RaiseException ()
> > from /lib/libgcc_s.so.1
> > #3 0x42dc in _Unwind_Resume_or_Rethrow ()
> > from /lib/libgcc_s.so.1
> > #4 0x42528e9f in __cxa_rethrow () from /usr/lib/libstdc
> > ++.so.5
> > #5 0x4103b92f in Esm::EsmClient::SetDaqState ()
> > from /opt/auger/lib/libEsmClient.so.1.2
> > #6 0x40ff9ea2 in EyeDaq::EsmProxy::setDaqState ()
> > from
> > /home/auger/axis2c-1.4.0//services/DaqStatusChange/libDaqStatusChange.so
> > #7 0x40fe7eab in axis2_skel_DaqStatusChange_setState ()
> > from
> > /home/auger/axis2c-1.4.0//services/DaqStatusChange/libDaqStatusChange.so
> > #8 0x40fe4927 in axis2_svc_skel_DaqStatusChange_invoke ()
> > from
> > /home/auger/axis2c-1.4.0//services/DaqStatusChange/libDaqStatusChange.so
> > #9 0x404d2f78 in
> > axis2_raw_xml_in_out_msg_recv_invoke_business_logic_sync
> > (msg_recv=0x405db914, env=Variable "env" is not available.
> > ) at raw_xml_in_out_msg_recv.c:219
> > #10 0x404d2608 in axis2_msg_recv_invoke_business_logic
> > (msg_recv=0x0, env=0x84c4378, in_msg_ctx=0x84c4c68,
> > out_msg_ctx=0x84b91a8)
> > at msg_recv.c:392
> > #11 0x404d2b70 in axis2_msg_recv_receive_impl
> > (msg_recv=0x405db914, env=0x84c4378, msg_ctx=0x84c4c68,
> > callback_recv_param=0x0)
> > at msg_recv.c:319
> > #12 0x404d2678 in axis2_msg_recv_receive (msg_recv=0x0,
> > env=0x84c4378, msg_ctx=0x84c4c68, callback_recv_param=0x0)
> > at msg_recv.c:431
> > #13 0x404c8de4 in axis2_engine_receive (engine=0x84b8c90,
> > env=Variable "env" is not available.
> > ) at engine.c:315
> > #14 0x404a547e in
> > axis2_http_transport_utils_process_http_post_request
> > (env=Variable "env" is not available.
> > ) at http_transport_utils.c:595
> > #15 0x404a1744 in axis2_apache2_worker_process_request
> > (apache2_worker=0x405a02fc, env=0x84c4378,
> > request=0x84b0710)
> > at apache2_worker.c:619
> > #16 0x4049feb2 in axis2_handler (req=0x84b0710) at
> > mod_axis2.c:362
> > #17 0x08069228 in ap_run_handler ()
> > #18 0x080994c0 in num_request_notes ()
> > #19 0x08141170 in ?? ()
> > #20 0x0809a36c in __JCR_LIST__ ()
> > #21 0x084b0710 in ?? ()
> > #22 0x084b0710 in ?? ()
> > #23 0xbfffe8a8 in ?? ()
> > #24 0x0806c847 in ap_invoke_handler ()
> > Previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)
> >
> > So I think the parse_lsda_header function causes the
> > segmentation fault.
> > I searched through the internet and found a solution that I
> > should add
> > -fPIC to my compile arguments, but I doesn't solved my
> > problem.
> > Have you any suggestions?
> >
> > Kind regards
> > Michael
> >
> >
> > Rajika Kumarasiri wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Michae
