[jira] Commented: (AXIS2-1749) Wrong Java2WSDL generation
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-1749?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12481909
]
Davanum Srinivas commented on AXIS2-1749:
-
Fixed in svn revision 519539
> Wrong Java2WSDL generation
> --
>
> Key: AXIS2-1749
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-1749
> Project: Axis 2.0 (Axis2)
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: codegen
>Affects Versions: 1.1
>Reporter: Jabber W
> Assigned To: Deepal Jayasinghe
> Attachments: axis2-1749and2116.txt, axis2patch1749and2116-v2.txt,
> axis2patch1749and2116-v3.txt, patch-1749.txt
>
>
> During the generation of type definitions Java2WSDL of axis2-1.1 flattens
> chains of extender java data types to independent schema types without
> extending relations between them, while Axis121 stores these relations by
> .
> For example: say,
> class A { public String someString; public A someLink; } and
> class B extends A { public int someInt; }
> and the exposed service is:
> class MySvc { String myOp(A arg) {..} }
> Running of Java2WSDL on it:
> java2wsdl -cn MySvc -xc B
> creates 2 non-related types:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> and
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> while B should be:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Since complexType B is not extension of ? it (the B type element) can't be
> passed as the someLink.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[jira] Commented: (AXIS2-1749) Wrong Java2WSDL generation
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-1749?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12481515
]
Geir Egil Hansen commented on AXIS2-1749:
-
Although it is possible to do restriction by inheritance in Java (and C++),
there is no specific syntax denoting that is what is done. It's done only
programatically.
So I cannot see how to differ between restriction and extension. I think Axis2
should always use extension. Another thing; how will Axis2 generate client
code (and server code for that matter) on WSDL's using restriction and/or
extension? Haven't checked this out yet. But I'm gonna!
> Wrong Java2WSDL generation
> --
>
> Key: AXIS2-1749
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-1749
> Project: Axis 2.0 (Axis2)
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: codegen
>Affects Versions: 1.1
>Reporter: Jabber W
> Assigned To: Deepal Jayasinghe
> Attachments: axis2-1749and2116.txt, axis2patch1749and2116-v2.txt,
> patch-1749.txt
>
>
> During the generation of type definitions Java2WSDL of axis2-1.1 flattens
> chains of extender java data types to independent schema types without
> extending relations between them, while Axis121 stores these relations by
> .
> For example: say,
> class A { public String someString; public A someLink; } and
> class B extends A { public int someInt; }
> and the exposed service is:
> class MySvc { String myOp(A arg) {..} }
> Running of Java2WSDL on it:
> java2wsdl -cn MySvc -xc B
> creates 2 non-related types:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> and
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> while B should be:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Since complexType B is not extension of ? it (the B type element) can't be
> passed as the someLink.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[jira] Commented: (AXIS2-1749) Wrong Java2WSDL generation
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-1749?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12481280
]
Manoj Khangaonkar commented on AXIS2-1749:
--
Gier,
I meant it to be ComplexExtension , but looks like I made it
ComplexRestriction. Good catch.
In java derived types extend base types - hence extension
Since this is java2WSDL - how do you model restriction in java ? In other
words, can you think of a case in java code
where the corresponding schema needs to be restriction.
I will update the patch to generate https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-1749
> Project: Axis 2.0 (Axis2)
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: codegen
>Affects Versions: 1.1
>Reporter: Jabber W
> Assigned To: Deepal Jayasinghe
> Attachments: axis2-1749and2116.txt, axis2patch1749and2116-v2.txt,
> patch-1749.txt
>
>
> During the generation of type definitions Java2WSDL of axis2-1.1 flattens
> chains of extender java data types to independent schema types without
> extending relations between them, while Axis121 stores these relations by
> .
> For example: say,
> class A { public String someString; public A someLink; } and
> class B extends A { public int someInt; }
> and the exposed service is:
> class MySvc { String myOp(A arg) {..} }
> Running of Java2WSDL on it:
> java2wsdl -cn MySvc -xc B
> creates 2 non-related types:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> and
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> while B should be:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Since complexType B is not extension of ? it (the B type element) can't be
> passed as the someLink.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[jira] Commented: (AXIS2-1749) Wrong Java2WSDL generation
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-1749?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12481131
]
Geir Egil Hansen commented on AXIS2-1749:
-
With the patch installed on Axis2 1.1.1 I now get
shouldn't it be
In my case, the sub-class is an extension to base rather than a restriction.
Is there any cases where restriction is necessary? Couldn't extension always be
used here?
I changed the patched a bit by replacing
XmlSchemaComplexContentRestriction complexRestriction = new
XmlSchemaComplexContentRestriction();
with
XmlSchemaComplexContentExtension complexExtension = new
XmlSchemaComplexContentExtension();
and of course replacing use of complexRestriction with complexExtension.
But the question is; When to use extension and when to use restriction, and how
to switch between the two?
> Wrong Java2WSDL generation
> --
>
> Key: AXIS2-1749
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-1749
> Project: Axis 2.0 (Axis2)
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: codegen
>Affects Versions: 1.1
>Reporter: Jabber W
> Assigned To: Deepal Jayasinghe
> Attachments: axis2-1749and2116.txt, axis2patch1749and2116-v2.txt,
> patch-1749.txt
>
>
> During the generation of type definitions Java2WSDL of axis2-1.1 flattens
> chains of extender java data types to independent schema types without
> extending relations between them, while Axis121 stores these relations by
> .
> For example: say,
> class A { public String someString; public A someLink; } and
> class B extends A { public int someInt; }
> and the exposed service is:
> class MySvc { String myOp(A arg) {..} }
> Running of Java2WSDL on it:
> java2wsdl -cn MySvc -xc B
> creates 2 non-related types:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> and
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> while B should be:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Since complexType B is not extension of ? it (the B type element) can't be
> passed as the someLink.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[jira] Commented: (AXIS2-1749) Wrong Java2WSDL generation
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-1749?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12472115
]
Manoj Khangaonkar commented on AXIS2-1749:
--
Hi all,
I am working on this issue and will provide a patch shortly.
Mj
> Wrong Java2WSDL generation
> --
>
> Key: AXIS2-1749
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-1749
> Project: Axis 2.0 (Axis2)
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: codegen
>Affects Versions: 1.1
>Reporter: Jabber W
> Assigned To: Deepal Jayasinghe
>
> During the generation of type definitions Java2WSDL of axis2-1.1 flattens
> chains of extender java data types to independent schema types without
> extending relations between them, while Axis121 stores these relations by
> .
> For example: say,
> class A { public String someString; public A someLink; } and
> class B extends A { public int someInt; }
> and the exposed service is:
> class MySvc { String myOp(A arg) {..} }
> Running of Java2WSDL on it:
> java2wsdl -cn MySvc -xc B
> creates 2 non-related types:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> and
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> while B should be:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Since complexType B is not extension of ? it (the B type element) can't be
> passed as the someLink.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
