I'm using xmlbeans, and I noticed that the unwrap option doesn't have
any effect. I get the same results.
I think I tried adb with unwrap false, and since false is the default,
I think there is not a need to specify it.
-Michael
On 8/2/07, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael,
>
> Did you try the ADB binding ("-d adb") option with unwrap option ("-uw"?)
>
> thanks,
> dims
>
> On 8/2/07, Michael Mattox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm trying out Axis2 after using XFire. I have a WSDL that is
> > document literal wrapped. My WSDL operation has a single element
> > named parameters. This element refers to a complex type called
> > XInHolder. This element contains a single element, called XIn which
> > is a complextype.
> >
> > As I understand the wrapped standard, my method foo should have one
> > parameter named XIn. This is because each element of the "wrapper
> > object" is a parameter to the method. This is the case with XFire.
> >
> > With Axis2, my method foo has a XDocument parameter (using xmlbeans
> > bindings). This document class as a getXInHolder method. The result
> > is Axis2 is generating the code with not only the wrapper element
> > (which shouldn't be) but also a Document object which wraps the
> > wrapper element. This adds 2 levels to my web service.
> >
> > This isn't a major problem because my web service simply delegates to
> > a business service and we can dereference the objects and pass the
> > correct object (XIn). But it doesn't seem like Axis2 is respecting
> > the wrapped standard. Actually I'm not sure this is even specified in
> > the standard.
> >
> > Any ideas?
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]