Re: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX
Hi Jose, Could you kindly share how XMLBean handles xsd:anyType? Thanks. On 3/26/07, José Antonio Sánchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not exactly. Xmlbeans can generate classes for every possible schema automatically. JiBX only generates both classes and mapping description for a limited set of schemas (for example, no xsd:anyType is allowed). For that schemas you have to define the mapping manually. On 3/26/07, Josh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just for my own knowledge, is this a true statement?: This is because XMLBeans implementation can understand all the XSD (i.e. schema) constructs. Does JiBX have mapping limitations? Regards, Joshua On 3/26/07, Nilesh Ghorpade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, As per my understanding AXIS 2 uses AXIOM API's internally for any XML related activities. Hence as you have mentioned that you are confused to choose between POJO, AXIOM, JIBX, ADB or XMLBeans, the AXIOM is an invalid option here. Secondly in AXIS 2 you can create web services using either the Spring Framework or POJO. JiBX, XMLBeans and ADB are more related to the data binding frameworks which AXIS 2 supports. Hence it depends on your schema on which data binding framework you would want to select. As per my knowledge XMLBeans is the best when it comes to complex schemas. This is because XMLBeans implementation can understand all the XSD ( i.e. schema) constructs. To answer your second question, the answer is YES. If you want to use the wsdl2java command from AXIS2 for generating your stubs and skeletons you will need the WSDL. Generating a WSDL is also not a diccficult task. YOu can have your SEI defined i.e. the Service Endpoint Interface with all the method signatures which you want to expose as web service operations. On executing the java2wsdl command from AXIS2 you would be able to get the WSDL. And using this WSDL you can generate the remaining artifacts of your web service. WSDL is nothing but an interface and hence even if you have defined an interface in Java, you can generate a WSDL from it. Hope that answers your queries. Regards Niles - Original Message From: Martin Gainty [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: axis-user@ws.apache.org Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 3:15:01 AM Subject: Re: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX Anil- I found this whitepaper quite informative SAX2 processes fastest..with DOM bein http://www.mail-archive.com/jibx-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg01044.html FWIW, M-- --- This e-mail message (including attachments, if any) is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, proprietary , confidential and exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. --- Le présent message électronique (y compris les pièces qui y sont annexées, le cas échéant) s'adresse au destinataire indiqué et peut contenir des renseignements de caractère privé ou confidentiel. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire de ce document, nous vous signalons qu'il est strictement interdit de le diffuser, de le distribuer ou de le reproduire. - Original Message - From: Anil [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: axis-user@ws.apache.org Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 4:37 PM Subject: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX Hi, I'm new to Axis2, what is the criteria to choose between POJO, AXIOM, JIBX, ADB or XMLBeans. How do we decide architecture wise. My second question is, is wsdl file mandatory to create stub and skeleton interfaces or can we use just skeleton file to create wsdl file. Thanks. Bored stiff? Loosen up... Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games. http://games.yahoo.com/games/front - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TV dinner still cooling? Check out Tonight's Picks on Yahoo! TV. -- Saludos. José Antonio Sánchez - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX
XMLBeans implementation can understand all the XSD ( i.e. schema) constructs. To answer your second question, the answer is YES. If you want to use the wsdl2java command from AXIS2 for generating your stubs and skeletons you will need the WSDL. Generating a WSDL is also not a diccficult task. YOu can have your SEI defined i.e. the Service Endpoint Interface with all the method signatures which you want to expose as web service operations. On executing the java2wsdl command from AXIS2 you would be able to get the WSDL. And using this WSDL you can generate the remaining artifacts of your web service. WSDL is nothing but an interface and hence even if you have defined an interface in Java, you can generate a WSDL from it. Hope that answers your queries. Regards Niles - Original Message From: Martin Gainty [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: axis-user@ws.apache.org Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 3:15:01 AM Subject: Re: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX Anil- I found this whitepaper quite informative SAX2 processes fastest..with DOM bein http://www.mail-archive.com/jibx-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg01044.html FWIW, M-- --- This e-mail message (including attachments, if any) is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, proprietary , confidential and exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. --- Le présent message électronique (y compris les pièces qui y sont annexées, le cas échéant) s'adresse au destinataire indiqué et peut contenir des renseignements de caractère privé ou confidentiel. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire de ce document, nous vous signalons qu'il est strictement interdit de le diffuser, de le distribuer ou de le reproduire. - Original Message - From: Anil [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: axis-user@ws.apache.org Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 4:37 PM Subject: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX Hi, I'm new to Axis2, what is the criteria to choose between POJO, AXIOM, JIBX, ADB or XMLBeans. How do we decide architecture wise. My second question is, is wsdl file mandatory to create stub and skeleton interfaces or can we use just skeleton file to create wsdl file. Thanks. Bored stiff? Loosen up... Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games. http://games.yahoo.com/games/front - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TV dinner still cooling? Check out Tonight's Picks on Yahoo! TV. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX
In xmlbeans xsd:anyType maps to XmlObject, which is the most basic class in xmlbeans. This is the class hierarchy that xmlbeans maps: http://xmlbeans.apache.org/docs/2.0.0/guide/conXMLBeansSupportBuiltInSchemaTypes.html On 3/29/07, Xinjun Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Jose, Could you kindly share how XMLBean handles xsd:anyType? Thanks. On 3/26/07, José Antonio Sánchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not exactly. Xmlbeans can generate classes for every possible schema automatically. JiBX only generates both classes and mapping description for a limited set of schemas (for example, no xsd:anyType is allowed). For that schemas you have to define the mapping manually. On 3/26/07, Josh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just for my own knowledge, is this a true statement?: This is because XMLBeans implementation can understand all the XSD (i.e. schema) constructs. Does JiBX have mapping limitations? Regards, Joshua On 3/26/07, Nilesh Ghorpade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, As per my understanding AXIS 2 uses AXIOM API's internally for any XML related activities. Hence as you have mentioned that you are confused to choose between POJO, AXIOM, JIBX, ADB or XMLBeans, the AXIOM is an invalid option here. Secondly in AXIS 2 you can create web services using either the Spring Framework or POJO. JiBX, XMLBeans and ADB are more related to the data binding frameworks which AXIS 2 supports. Hence it depends on your schema on which data binding framework you would want to select. As per my knowledge XMLBeans is the best when it comes to complex schemas. This is because XMLBeans implementation can understand all the XSD ( i.e. schema) constructs. To answer your second question, the answer is YES. If you want to use the wsdl2java command from AXIS2 for generating your stubs and skeletons you will need the WSDL. Generating a WSDL is also not a diccficult task. YOu can have your SEI defined i.e. the Service Endpoint Interface with all the method signatures which you want to expose as web service operations. On executing the java2wsdl command from AXIS2 you would be able to get the WSDL. And using this WSDL you can generate the remaining artifacts of your web service. WSDL is nothing but an interface and hence even if you have defined an interface in Java, you can generate a WSDL from it. Hope that answers your queries. Regards Niles - Original Message From: Martin Gainty [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: axis-user@ws.apache.org Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 3:15:01 AM Subject: Re: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX Anil- I found this whitepaper quite informative SAX2 processes fastest..with DOM bein http://www.mail-archive.com/jibx-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg01044.html FWIW, M-- --- This e-mail message (including attachments, if any) is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, proprietary , confidential and exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. --- Le présent message électronique (y compris les pièces qui y sont annexées, le cas échéant) s'adresse au destinataire indiqué et peut contenir des renseignements de caractère privé ou confidentiel. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire de ce document, nous vous signalons qu'il est strictement interdit de le diffuser, de le distribuer ou de le reproduire. - Original Message - From: Anil [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: axis-user@ws.apache.org Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 4:37 PM Subject: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX Hi, I'm new to Axis2, what is the criteria to choose between POJO, AXIOM, JIBX, ADB or XMLBeans. How do we decide architecture wise. My second question is, is wsdl file mandatory to create stub and skeleton interfaces or can we use just skeleton file to create wsdl file. Thanks. Bored stiff? Loosen up... Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games. http://games.yahoo.com/games/front - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TV dinner still cooling? Check out Tonight's Picks on Yahoo! TV. -- Saludos. José Antonio Sánchez - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional
Re: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX
. schema) constructs. Does JiBX have mapping limitations? Regards, Joshua On 3/26/07, Nilesh Ghorpade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, As per my understanding AXIS 2 uses AXIOM API's internally for any XML related activities. Hence as you have mentioned that you are confused to choose between POJO, AXIOM, JIBX, ADB or XMLBeans, the AXIOM is an invalid option here. Secondly in AXIS 2 you can create web services using either the Spring Framework or POJO. JiBX, XMLBeans and ADB are more related to the data binding frameworks which AXIS 2 supports. Hence it depends on your schema on which data binding framework you would want to select. As per my knowledge XMLBeans is the best when it comes to complex schemas. This is because XMLBeans implementation can understand all the XSD ( i.e. schema) constructs. To answer your second question, the answer is YES. If you want to use the wsdl2java command from AXIS2 for generating your stubs and skeletons you will need the WSDL. Generating a WSDL is also not a diccficult task. YOu can have your SEI defined i.e. the Service Endpoint Interface with all the method signatures which you want to expose as web service operations. On executing the java2wsdl command from AXIS2 you would be able to get the WSDL. And using this WSDL you can generate the remaining artifacts of your web service. WSDL is nothing but an interface and hence even if you have defined an interface in Java, you can generate a WSDL from it. Hope that answers your queries. Regards Niles - Original Message From: Martin Gainty [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: axis-user@ws.apache.org Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 3:15:01 AM Subject: Re: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX Anil- I found this whitepaper quite informative SAX2 processes fastest..with DOM bein http://www.mail-archive.com/jibx-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg01044.html FWIW, M-- --- This e-mail message (including attachments, if any) is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, proprietary , confidential and exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. --- Le présent message électronique (y compris les pièces qui y sont annexées, le cas échéant) s'adresse au destinataire indiqué et peut contenir des renseignements de caractère privé ou confidentiel. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire de ce document, nous vous signalons qu'il est strictement interdit de le diffuser, de le distribuer ou de le reproduire. - Original Message - From: Anil [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: axis-user@ws.apache.org Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 4:37 PM Subject: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX Hi, I'm new to Axis2, what is the criteria to choose between POJO, AXIOM, JIBX, ADB or XMLBeans. How do we decide architecture wise. My second question is, is wsdl file mandatory to create stub and skeleton interfaces or can we use just skeleton file to create wsdl file. Thanks. Bored stiff? Loosen up... Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games. http://games.yahoo.com/games/front - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TV dinner still cooling? Check out Tonight's Picks on Yahoo! TV. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX
only generates both classes and mapping description for a limited set of schemas (for example, no xsd:anyType is allowed). For that schemas you have to define the mapping manually. On 3/26/07, Josh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just for my own knowledge, is this a true statement?: This is because XMLBeans implementation can understand all the XSD (i.e. schema) constructs. Does JiBX have mapping limitations? Regards, Joshua On 3/26/07, Nilesh Ghorpade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, As per my understanding AXIS 2 uses AXIOM API's internally for any XML related activities. Hence as you have mentioned that you are confused to choose between POJO, AXIOM, JIBX, ADB or XMLBeans, the AXIOM is an invalid option here. Secondly in AXIS 2 you can create web services using either the Spring Framework or POJO. JiBX, XMLBeans and ADB are more related to the data binding frameworks which AXIS 2 supports. Hence it depends on your schema on which data binding framework you would want to select. As per my knowledge XMLBeans is the best when it comes to complex schemas. This is because XMLBeans implementation can understand all the XSD ( i.e. schema) constructs. To answer your second question, the answer is YES. If you want to use the wsdl2java command from AXIS2 for generating your stubs and skeletons you will need the WSDL. Generating a WSDL is also not a diccficult task. YOu can have your SEI defined i.e. the Service Endpoint Interface with all the method signatures which you want to expose as web service operations. On executing the java2wsdl command from AXIS2 you would be able to get the WSDL. And using this WSDL you can generate the remaining artifacts of your web service. WSDL is nothing but an interface and hence even if you have defined an interface in Java, you can generate a WSDL from it. Hope that answers your queries. Regards Niles - Original Message From: Martin Gainty [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: axis-user@ws.apache.org Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 3:15:01 AM Subject: Re: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX Anil- I found this whitepaper quite informative SAX2 processes fastest..with DOM bein http://www.mail-archive.com/jibx-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg01044.html FWIW, M-- --- This e-mail message (including attachments, if any) is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, proprietary , confidential and exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. --- Le présent message électronique (y compris les pièces qui y sont annexées, le cas échéant) s'adresse au destinataire indiqué et peut contenir des renseignements de caractère privé ou confidentiel. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire de ce document, nous vous signalons qu'il est strictement interdit de le diffuser, de le distribuer ou de le reproduire. - Original Message - From: Anil [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: axis-user@ws.apache.org Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 4:37 PM Subject: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX Hi, I'm new to Axis2, what is the criteria to choose between POJO, AXIOM, JIBX, ADB or XMLBeans. How do we decide architecture wise. My second question is, is wsdl file mandatory to create stub and skeleton interfaces or can we use just skeleton file to create wsdl file. Thanks. Bored stiff? Loosen up... Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games. http://games.yahoo.com/games/front - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TV dinner still cooling? Check out Tonight's Picks on Yahoo! TV. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX
so your suggestion is to go AXIS2 with ADB for speed? dims -- There seems to be a few pics missing on the link http://wso2.org/library/91 http://www.wso2.net/article/perf_1/images/set1-echo-primitives.png http://www.wso2.net/article/perf_1/images/set1-echo-complextypes.png http://www.wso2.net/article/perf_1/images/set2-send-receive-echo-doubles.png overall a complete and comprehensive analysis-- Thanks, M-- --- This e-mail message (including attachments, if any) is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, proprietary , confidential and exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. --- Le présent message électronique (y compris les pièces qui y sont annexées, le cas échéant) s'adresse au destinataire indiqué et peut contenir des renseignements de caractère privé ou confidentiel. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire de ce document, nous vous signalons qu'il est strictement interdit de le diffuser, de le distribuer ou de le reproduire. - Original Message - From: robert lazarski [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: axis-user@ws.apache.org Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 9:21 AM Subject: Re: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX I meant to add that it may be worth exploring jaxws, since it seems to have some code in svn which works with ejb - not sure about how mature it is at this point. I believe jaxws will be labeled experimental in the 1.2 release. Robert On 3/29/07, robert lazarski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll step in here to briefly comment about the ejb part of the question. I think its pretty clear that if full schema support is required, use xmlbeans or jaxb. adb and jibx come close enough in many cases, and give better performance which you can see here: http://wso2.org/library/91 (seem to remember there was an adb / jibx performance comparison ar some point but I can't find it easily). Regarding ejb, axis2 1.2rc1 has support in org.apache.axis2.rpc.receivers.ejb . There was a tutorial in the works but it doesn't seem to be in svn. Another option which I often do is simply create the service, and inside that do local ejb calls. HTH, Robert On 3/29/07, Xinjun Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Dennis, I am trying to expose existing EJBs as web services. What I want to do is as follows: 1. Receive an EJB Remote interface and the related domain object classes, and generate data binder classes for the Remote interface methods. 2. Generate wsdl for the EJB Remote interface. 3. When receives SOAP Request from a client, I convert the XML message into domain object using the binder classes and invoke an appropriate EJB with the domain object. Since the remote EJB and domain objects are fixed, the generated binder must do binding for the existing domain object class (without modifying the domain object class since they will be used in rmi). What's the data binding tool I should use? Regards, Xinjun On 3/27/07, Dennis Sosnoski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Good summary, José, but I'll add that even with manual binding definitions JiBX can't handle all aspects of schema correctly. Of course, that's also true of most data binding frameworks. XMLBeans was designed from the start to handle all of schema, and aside from some quirks and peculiarities it does so pretty well. But schema is a mess, and not all parts of it can be handled cleanly. The biggest downsides to XMLBeans for Java developers are that (1) many people find the generated data model API awkward to work with, (2) XMLBeans performance can be relatively poor (both in terms of time and memory usage), and (3) schema is being misused (especially in the web services world) in ways which AFAIK XMLBeans cannot handle. For (3), I'll point in particular at the use of flexible unmarshalling. What this means is taking the schema as a base, but then ignoring any elements which do not match the schema. This was the way most of the first- and second-generation web services frameworks operated, and some users now demand it. JAXB 2.0 operates this way by default (over my objections), and I added support for it in JiBX due to client requests. I personally think it's a bad way to go - why have a schema at all, if you're not going to enforce it? - but can see the appeal. It allows groups to use a common schema with ad hoc extensions for individual needs. JiBX was originally designed with the focus on providing fast and flexible conversions between XML and Java. Schema was an afterthought for JiBX, though it's become more of a driving force as developers using JiBX have wanted to support different
Re: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX
is allowed). For that schemas you have to define the mapping manually. On 3/26/07, Josh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just for my own knowledge, is this a true statement?: This is because XMLBeans implementation can understand all the XSD (i.e. schema) constructs. Does JiBX have mapping limitations? Regards, Joshua On 3/26/07, Nilesh Ghorpade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, As per my understanding AXIS 2 uses AXIOM API's internally for any XML related activities. Hence as you have mentioned that you are confused to choose between POJO, AXIOM, JIBX, ADB or XMLBeans, the AXIOM is an invalid option here. Secondly in AXIS 2 you can create web services using either the Spring Framework or POJO. JiBX, XMLBeans and ADB are more related to the data binding frameworks which AXIS 2 supports. Hence it depends on your schema on which data binding framework you would want to select. As per my knowledge XMLBeans is the best when it comes to complex schemas. This is because XMLBeans implementation can understand all the XSD ( i.e. schema) constructs. To answer your second question, the answer is YES. If you want to use the wsdl2java command from AXIS2 for generating your stubs and skeletons you will need the WSDL. Generating a WSDL is also not a diccficult task. YOu can have your SEI defined i.e. the Service Endpoint Interface with all the method signatures which you want to expose as web service operations. On executing the java2wsdl command from AXIS2 you would be able to get the WSDL. And using this WSDL you can generate the remaining artifacts of your web service. WSDL is nothing but an interface and hence even if you have defined an interface in Java, you can generate a WSDL from it. Hope that answers your queries. Regards Niles - Original Message From: Martin Gainty [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: axis-user@ws.apache.org Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 3:15:01 AM Subject: Re: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX Anil- I found this whitepaper quite informative SAX2 processes fastest..with DOM bein http://www.mail-archive.com/jibx-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg01044.html FWIW, M-- --- This e-mail message (including attachments, if any) is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, proprietary , confidential and exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. --- Le présent message électronique (y compris les pièces qui y sont annexées, le cas échéant) s'adresse au destinataire indiqué et peut contenir des renseignements de caractère privé ou confidentiel. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire de ce document, nous vous signalons qu'il est strictement interdit de le diffuser, de le distribuer ou de le reproduire. - Original Message - From: Anil [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: axis-user@ws.apache.org Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 4:37 PM Subject: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX Hi, I'm new to Axis2, what is the criteria to choose between POJO, AXIOM, JIBX, ADB or XMLBeans. How do we decide architecture wise. My second question is, is wsdl file mandatory to create stub and skeleton interfaces or can we use just skeleton file to create wsdl file. Thanks. Bored stiff? Loosen up... Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games. http://games.yahoo.com/games/front - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TV dinner still cooling? Check out Tonight's Picks on Yahoo! TV. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX
Hi Nilesh, Thanks for detailed response. So, the AddressBookService example (at http://people.apache.org/~thilina/axis2/docs/jibx/jibx-unwrapped-example.html) which uses POJO as a data transfer object, can be implemented using any Data binding framework (JIBX or ADB) to create Java classes. What is JiBX binding definition, is this property only applicable to JiBX framework -EbindingFile /resources/jibxbindingFile.xml And also, can we send the client request using SOAP (instead of writing Java Client) and get the response back in SOAP? In which case, this type of scenario comes in. Thanks, Anil Nilesh Ghorpade wrote: Hi Anil, The Data binding frameworks come into picture when you are generating the Java code artifacts from WSDL. If you observe the wsdl2java command there is a command line argument namely -d with which you can specify the Data binding framework which you want to use. In case u want to use JiBX you would be specifying something like $ wsdl2java -o /outputDir -d jibx -EbindingFile /resources/jibxbindingFile.xml -uri MyWebService.wsdl The above command is just for making things more simpler. Also if there are no schema references in the WSDL or if the WSDL is not having any schema types then the Data binding framework would not be coming into picture. (Others Please correct me if I am wrong.) You would just be deciding which Data binding framework you should be using. AXIS 2 would internally be using the same and generating the Java classes for you. Do not get confused by the approach which you are choosing to build the web service and the data binding framework. The data binding framework is just to map the schema which is defined in the WSDL to Java classes. Thats the only purpose of the data binding framework. Using POJO's for web services means you would be writing a POJO class which would be capturing all the information you need for invoking the particular web service operation. For example if you see the AddressBookService in the AXIS 2 samples you can see that the addEntry method takes in a POJO as its input parameter namely Entry. Regarding your second question I am not able to understand it correctly. Also the flow which you have mentioned from the Client to the Service is correct and it would remain the same for any Web service for that matter i.e. not only AXIS 2 but any web service which is developed using any other framework. Hope that answers your queries. Regards Nilesh - Original Message From: Anil VVNN [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: axis-user@ws.apache.org Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 7:56:35 PM Subject: Re: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX Hi Niles, Thanks for answering my questions. As I said I'm a beginner, I have few more questions related to previous one. (1) When exactly do we use Binding frameworks (JIBX, ADB or XMLBeans) ? For instance, the examples given in Axis2 website (i.e. StockQuoteService) referring to simple method call, client calling WS for getPrice/update operations but there's no XSD involved, I think this kind of operations can be easily accomplished using POJO option. But I'm confused when to use POJO or anyother Binding framework(JIBX). (2) What is the difference between XML Processing Model and SOAP Processing Model, when do we use these models independently. To my understanding, this is the typical flow of Axis2 services, Client calls--- Stub (generated by wsdl2java) calls[SOAP request]--- Skeleton Interface (generated by wsdl2java) --Business Logic And this SOAP request can be handled using any transport (eg. TCP, JMS etc.) Please correct me if I'm wrong. Thanks. - Anil Nilesh Ghorpade wrote: Hi, As per my understanding AXIS 2 uses AXIOM API's internally for any XML related activities. Hence as you have mentioned that you are confused to choose between POJO, AXIOM, JIBX, ADB or XMLBeans, the AXIOM is an invalid option here. Secondly in AXIS 2 you can create web services using either the Spring Framework or POJO. JiBX, XMLBeans and ADB are more related to the data binding frameworks which AXIS 2 supports. Hence it depends on your schema on which data binding framework you would want to select. As per my knowledge XMLBeans is the best when it comes to complex schemas. This is because XMLBeans implementation can understand all the XSD (i.e. schema) constructs. To answer your second question, the answer is YES. If you want to use the wsdl2java command from AXIS2 for generating your stubs and skeletons you will need the WSDL. Generating a WSDL is also not a diccficult task. YOu can have your SEI defined i.e. the Service Endpoint Interface with all the method signatures which you want to expose as web service operations. On executing the java2wsdl command from AXIS2 you would be able to get the WSDL. And using this WSDL you can generate the remaining artifacts of your web service. WSDL is nothing
Re: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX
Hi Anil, The JiBX XML file which I had mentioned contains the mapping between XML and the Java classes. You can generate this file using the jibx commands. Please refer the JiBX documentation for more details. Secondly your question related to sending a SOAP request. We always send a SOAP request to a Web Service. I mean even if we have a Java client written what we do is create a SOAP request and then send the same over HTTP or any other transport protocol to the Web Service endpoint. So the Client request would always be in SOAP whether you have a java/.NET/C/C++ client accessing the web service. Regards Nilesh Anil VVNN [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Nilesh, Thanks for detailed response. So, the AddressBookService example (at http://people.apache.org/~thilina/axis2/docs/jibx/jibx-unwrapped-example.html) which uses POJO as a data transfer object, can be implemented using any Data binding framework (JIBX or ADB) to create Java classes. What is JiBX binding definition, is this property only applicable to JiBX framework -EbindingFile /resources/jibxbindingFile.xml And also, can we send the client request using SOAP (instead of writing Java Client) and get the response back in SOAP? In which case, this type of scenario comes in. Thanks, Anil Nilesh Ghorpade wrote: Hi Anil, The Data binding frameworks come into picture when you are generating the Java code artifacts from WSDL. If you observe the wsdl2java command there is a command line argument namely -d with which you can specify the Data binding framework which you want to use. In case u want to use JiBX you would be specifying something like $ wsdl2java -o /outputDir -d jibx -EbindingFile /resources/jibxbindingFile.xml -uri MyWebService.wsdl The above command is just for making things more simpler. Also if there are no schema references in the WSDL or if the WSDL is not having any schema types then the Data binding framework would not be coming into picture. (Others Please correct me if I am wrong.) You would just be deciding which Data binding framework you should be using. AXIS 2 would internally be using the same and generating the Java classes for you. Do not get confused by the approach which you are choosing to build the web service and the data binding framework. The data binding framework is just to map the schema which is defined in the WSDL to Java classes. Thats the only purpose of the data binding framework. Using POJO's for web services means you would be writing a POJO class which would be capturing all the information you need for invoking the particular web service operation. For example if you see the AddressBookService in the AXIS 2 samples you can see that the addEntry method takes in a POJO as its input parameter namely Entry. Regarding your second question I am not able to understand it correctly. Also the flow which you have mentioned from the Client to the Service is correct and it would remain the same for any Web service for that matter i.e. not only AXIS 2 but any web service which is developed using any other framework. Hope that answers your queries. Regards Nilesh - Original Message From: Anil VVNN To: axis-user@ws.apache.org Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 7:56:35 PM Subject: Re: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX Hi Niles, Thanks for answering my questions. As I said I'm a beginner, I have few more questions related to previous one. (1) When exactly do we use Binding frameworks (JIBX, ADB or XMLBeans) ? For instance, the examples given in Axis2 website (i.e. StockQuoteService) referring to simple method call, client calling WS for getPrice/update operations but there's no XSD involved, I think this kind of operations can be easily accomplished using POJO option. But I'm confused when to use POJO or anyother Binding framework(JIBX). (2) What is the difference between XML Processing Model and SOAP Processing Model, when do we use these models independently. To my understanding, this is the typical flow of Axis2 services, Client calls--- Stub (generated by wsdl2java) calls[SOAP request]--- Skeleton Interface (generated by wsdl2java) --Business Logic And this SOAP request can be handled using any transport (eg. TCP, JMS etc.) Please correct me if I'm wrong. Thanks. - Anil Nilesh Ghorpade wrote: Hi, As per my understanding AXIS 2 uses AXIOM API's internally for any XML related activities. Hence as you have mentioned that you are confused to choose between POJO, AXIOM, JIBX, ADB or XMLBeans, the AXIOM is an invalid option here. Secondly in AXIS 2 you can create web services using either the Spring Framework or POJO. JiBX, XMLBeans and ADB are more related to the data binding frameworks which AXIS 2 supports. Hence it depends on your schema on which data binding framework you would want to select. As per my knowledge XMLBeans
Re: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX
Hi Anil, The JiBX XML file which I had mentioned contains the mapping between XML and the Java classes. You can generate this file using the jibx commands. Please refer the JiBX documentation for more details. Secondly your question related to sending a SOAP request. We always send a SOAP request to a Web Service. I mean even if we have a Java client written what we do is create a SOAP request and then send the same over HTTP or any other transport protocol to the Web Service endpoint. So the Client request would always be in SOAP whether you have a java/.NET/C/C++ client accessing the web service. Regards Nilesh Anil VVNN [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Nilesh, Thanks for detailed response. So, the AddressBookService example (at http://people.apache.org/~thilina/axis2/docs/jibx/jibx-unwrapped-example.html) which uses POJO as a data transfer object, can be implemented using any Data binding framework (JIBX or ADB) to create Java classes. What is JiBX binding definition, is this property only applicable to JiBX framework -EbindingFile /resources/jibxbindingFile.xml And also, can we send the client request using SOAP (instead of writing Java Client) and get the response back in SOAP? In which case, this type of scenario comes in. Thanks, Anil Nilesh Ghorpade wrote: Hi Anil, The Data binding frameworks come into picture when you are generating the Java code artifacts from WSDL. If you observe the wsdl2java command there is a command line argument namely -d with which you can specify the Data binding framework which you want to use. In case u want to use JiBX you would be specifying something like $ wsdl2java -o /outputDir -d jibx -EbindingFile /resources/jibxbindingFile.xml -uri MyWebService.wsdl The above command is just for making things more simpler. Also if there are no schema references in the WSDL or if the WSDL is not having any schema types then the Data binding framework would not be coming into picture. (Others Please correct me if I am wrong.) You would just be deciding which Data binding framework you should be using. AXIS 2 would internally be using the same and generating the Java classes for you. Do not get confused by the approach which you are choosing to build the web service and the data binding framework. The data binding framework is just to map the schema which is defined in the WSDL to Java classes. Thats the only purpose of the data binding framework. Using POJO's for web services means you would be writing a POJO class which would be capturing all the information you need for invoking the particular web service operation. For example if you see the AddressBookService in the AXIS 2 samples you can see that the addEntry method takes in a POJO as its input parameter namely Entry. Regarding your second question I am not able to understand it correctly. Also the flow which you have mentioned from the Client to the Service is correct and it would remain the same for any Web service for that matter i.e. not only AXIS 2 but any web service which is developed using any other framework. Hope that answers your queries. Regards Nilesh - Original Message From: Anil VVNN To: axis-user@ws.apache.org Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 7:56:35 PM Subject: Re: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX Hi Niles, Thanks for answering my questions. As I said I'm a beginner, I have few more questions related to previous one. (1) When exactly do we use Binding frameworks (JIBX, ADB or XMLBeans) ? For instance, the examples given in Axis2 website (i.e. StockQuoteService) referring to simple method call, client calling WS for getPrice/update operations but there's no XSD involved, I think this kind of operations can be easily accomplished using POJO option. But I'm confused when to use POJO or anyother Binding framework(JIBX). (2) What is the difference between XML Processing Model and SOAP Processing Model, when do we use these models independently. To my understanding, this is the typical flow of Axis2 services, Client calls--- Stub (generated by wsdl2java) calls[SOAP request]--- Skeleton Interface (generated by wsdl2java) --Business Logic And this SOAP request can be handled using any transport (eg. TCP, JMS etc.) Please correct me if I'm wrong. Thanks. - Anil Nilesh Ghorpade wrote: Hi, As per my understanding AXIS 2 uses AXIOM API's internally for any XML related activities. Hence as you have mentioned that you are confused to choose between POJO, AXIOM, JIBX, ADB or XMLBeans, the AXIOM is an invalid option here. Secondly in AXIS 2 you can create web services using either the Spring Framework or POJO. JiBX, XMLBeans and ADB are more related to the data binding frameworks which AXIS 2 supports. Hence it depends on your schema on which data binding framework you would want to select. As per my knowledge XMLBeans
Re: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX
Hi Anil, The JiBX XML file which I had mentioned contains the mapping between XML and the Java classes. You can generate this file using the jibx commands. Please refer the JiBX documentation for more details. Secondly your question related to sending a SOAP request. We always send a SOAP request to a Web Service. I mean even if we have a Java client written what we do is create a SOAP request and then send the same over HTTP or any other transport protocol to the Web Service endpoint. So the Client request would always be in SOAP whether you have a java/.NET/C/C++ client accessing the web service. Regards Nilesh - Original Message From: Anil VVNN [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: axis-user@ws.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 2:53:58 AM Subject: Re: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX Hi Nilesh, Thanks for detailed response. So, the AddressBookService example (at http://people.apache.org/~thilina/axis2/docs/jibx/jibx-unwrapped-example.html) which uses POJO as a data transfer object, can be implemented using any Data binding framework (JIBX or ADB) to create Java classes. What is JiBX binding definition, is this property only applicable to JiBX framework -EbindingFile /resources/jibxbindingFile.xml And also, can we send the client request using SOAP (instead of writing Java Client) and get the response back in SOAP? In which case, this type of scenario comes in. Thanks, Anil Nilesh Ghorpade wrote: Hi Anil, The Data binding frameworks come into picture when you are generating the Java code artifacts from WSDL. If you observe the wsdl2java command there is a command line argument namely -d with which you can specify the Data binding framework which you want to use. In case u want to use JiBX you would be specifying something like $ wsdl2java -o /outputDir -d jibx -EbindingFile /resources/jibxbindingFile.xml -uri MyWebService.wsdl The above command is just for making things more simpler. Also if there are no schema references in the WSDL or if the WSDL is not having any schema types then the Data binding framework would not be coming into picture. (Others Please correct me if I am wrong.) You would just be deciding which Data binding framework you should be using. AXIS 2 would internally be using the same and generating the Java classes for you. Do not get confused by the approach which you are choosing to build the web service and the data binding framework. The data binding framework is just to map the schema which is defined in the WSDL to Java classes. Thats the only purpose of the data binding framework. Using POJO's for web services means you would be writing a POJO class which would be capturing all the information you need for invoking the particular web service operation. For example if you see the AddressBookService in the AXIS 2 samples you can see that the addEntry method takes in a POJO as its input parameter namely Entry. Regarding your second question I am not able to understand it correctly. Also the flow which you have mentioned from the Client to the Service is correct and it would remain the same for any Web service for that matter i.e. not only AXIS 2 but any web service which is developed using any other framework. Hope that answers your queries. Regards Nilesh - Original Message From: Anil VVNN [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: axis-user@ws.apache.org Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 7:56:35 PM Subject: Re: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX Hi Niles, Thanks for answering my questions. As I said I'm a beginner, I have few more questions related to previous one. (1) When exactly do we use Binding frameworks (JIBX, ADB or XMLBeans) ? For instance, the examples given in Axis2 website (i.e. StockQuoteService) referring to simple method call, client calling WS for getPrice/update operations but there's no XSD involved, I think this kind of operations can be easily accomplished using POJO option. But I'm confused when to use POJO or anyother Binding framework(JIBX). (2) What is the difference between XML Processing Model and SOAP Processing Model, when do we use these models independently. To my understanding, this is the typical flow of Axis2 services, Client calls--- Stub (generated by wsdl2java) calls[SOAP request]--- Skeleton Interface (generated by wsdl2java) --Business Logic And this SOAP request can be handled using any transport (eg. TCP, JMS etc.) Please correct me if I'm wrong. Thanks. - Anil Nilesh Ghorpade wrote: Hi, As per my understanding AXIS 2 uses AXIOM API's internally for any XML related activities. Hence as you have mentioned that you are confused to choose between POJO, AXIOM, JIBX, ADB or XMLBeans, the AXIOM is an invalid option here. Secondly in AXIS 2 you can create web services using either the Spring Framework or POJO. JiBX, XMLBeans and ADB are more related to the data binding frameworks which AXIS 2 supports. Hence
Re: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX
Hi, As per my understanding AXIS 2 uses AXIOM API's internally for any XML related activities. Hence as you have mentioned that you are confused to choose between POJO, AXIOM, JIBX, ADB or XMLBeans, the AXIOM is an invalid option here. Secondly in AXIS 2 you can create web services using either the Spring Framework or POJO. JiBX, XMLBeans and ADB are more related to the data binding frameworks which AXIS 2 supports. Hence it depends on your schema on which data binding framework you would want to select. As per my knowledge XMLBeans is the best when it comes to complex schemas. This is because XMLBeans implementation can understand all the XSD (i.e. schema) constructs. To answer your second question, the answer is YES. If you want to use the wsdl2java command from AXIS2 for generating your stubs and skeletons you will need the WSDL. Generating a WSDL is also not a diccficult task. YOu can have your SEI defined i.e. the Service Endpoint Interface with all the method signatures which you want to expose as web service operations. On executing the java2wsdl command from AXIS2 you would be able to get the WSDL. And using this WSDL you can generate the remaining artifacts of your web service. WSDL is nothing but an interface and hence even if you have defined an interface in Java, you can generate a WSDL from it. Hope that answers your queries. Regards Niles - Original Message From: Martin Gainty [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: axis-user@ws.apache.org Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 3:15:01 AM Subject: Re: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX Anil- I found this whitepaper quite informative SAX2 processes fastest..with DOM bein http://www.mail-archive.com/jibx-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg01044.html FWIW, M-- --- This e-mail message (including attachments, if any) is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, proprietary , confidential and exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. --- Le présent message électronique (y compris les pièces qui y sont annexées, le cas échéant) s'adresse au destinataire indiqué et peut contenir des renseignements de caractère privé ou confidentiel. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire de ce document, nous vous signalons qu'il est strictement interdit de le diffuser, de le distribuer ou de le reproduire. - Original Message - From: Anil [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: axis-user@ws.apache.org Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 4:37 PM Subject: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX Hi, I'm new to Axis2, what is the criteria to choose between POJO, AXIOM, JIBX, ADB or XMLBeans. How do we decide architecture wise. My second question is, is wsdl file mandatory to create stub and skeleton interfaces or can we use just skeleton file to create wsdl file. Thanks. Bored stiff? Loosen up... Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games. http://games.yahoo.com/games/front - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The fish are biting. Get more visitors on your site using Yahoo! Search Marketing. http://searchmarketing.yahoo.com/arp/sponsoredsearch_v2.php
Re: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX
Just for my own knowledge, is this a true statement?: This is because XMLBeans implementation can understand all the XSD (i.e. schema) constructs. Does JiBX have mapping limitations? Regards, Joshua On 3/26/07, Nilesh Ghorpade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, As per my understanding AXIS 2 uses AXIOM API's internally for any XML related activities. Hence as you have mentioned that you are confused to choose between POJO, AXIOM, JIBX, ADB or XMLBeans, the AXIOM is an invalid option here. Secondly in AXIS 2 you can create web services using either the Spring Framework or POJO. JiBX, XMLBeans and ADB are more related to the data binding frameworks which AXIS 2 supports. Hence it depends on your schema on which data binding framework you would want to select. As per my knowledge XMLBeans is the best when it comes to complex schemas. This is because XMLBeans implementation can understand all the XSD (i.e. schema) constructs. To answer your second question, the answer is YES. If you want to use the wsdl2java command from AXIS2 for generating your stubs and skeletons you will need the WSDL. Generating a WSDL is also not a diccficult task. YOu can have your SEI defined i.e. the Service Endpoint Interface with all the method signatures which you want to expose as web service operations. On executing the java2wsdl command from AXIS2 you would be able to get the WSDL. And using this WSDL you can generate the remaining artifacts of your web service. WSDL is nothing but an interface and hence even if you have defined an interface in Java, you can generate a WSDL from it. Hope that answers your queries. Regards Niles - Original Message From: Martin Gainty [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: axis-user@ws.apache.org Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 3:15:01 AM Subject: Re: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX Anil- I found this whitepaper quite informative SAX2 processes fastest..with DOM bein http://www.mail-archive.com/jibx-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg01044.html FWIW, M-- --- This e-mail message (including attachments, if any) is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, proprietary , confidential and exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. --- Le présent message électronique (y compris les pièces qui y sont annexées, le cas échéant) s'adresse au destinataire indiqué et peut contenir des renseignements de caractère privé ou confidentiel. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire de ce document, nous vous signalons qu'il est strictement interdit de le diffuser, de le distribuer ou de le reproduire. - Original Message - From: Anil [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: axis-user@ws.apache.org Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 4:37 PM Subject: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX Hi, I'm new to Axis2, what is the criteria to choose between POJO, AXIOM, JIBX, ADB or XMLBeans. How do we decide architecture wise. My second question is, is wsdl file mandatory to create stub and skeleton interfaces or can we use just skeleton file to create wsdl file. Thanks. Bored stiff? Loosen up... Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games. http://games.yahoo.com/games/front - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- TV dinner still cooling? Check out Tonight's Pickshttp://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=49979/*http://tv.yahoo.com/on Yahoo! TV.
Re: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX
Hi Niles, Thanks for answering my questions. As I said I'm a beginner, I have few more questions related to previous one. (1) When exactly do we use Binding frameworks (JIBX, ADB or XMLBeans) ? For instance, the examples given in Axis2 website (i.e. StockQuoteService) referring to simple method call, client calling WS for getPrice/update operations but there's no XSD involved, I think this kind of operations can be easily accomplished using POJO option. But I'm confused when to use POJO or anyother Binding framework(JIBX). (2) What is the difference between XML Processing Model and SOAP Processing Model, when do we use these models independently. To my understanding, this is the typical flow of Axis2 services, Client calls--- Stub (generated by wsdl2java) calls[SOAP request]--- Skeleton Interface (generated by wsdl2java) --Business Logic And this SOAP request can be handled using any transport (eg. TCP, JMS etc.) Please correct me if I'm wrong. Thanks. - Anil Nilesh Ghorpade wrote: Hi, As per my understanding AXIS 2 uses AXIOM API's internally for any XML related activities. Hence as you have mentioned that you are confused to choose between POJO, AXIOM, JIBX, ADB or XMLBeans, the AXIOM is an invalid option here. Secondly in AXIS 2 you can create web services using either the Spring Framework or POJO. JiBX, XMLBeans and ADB are more related to the data binding frameworks which AXIS 2 supports. Hence it depends on your schema on which data binding framework you would want to select. As per my knowledge XMLBeans is the best when it comes to complex schemas. This is because XMLBeans implementation can understand all the XSD (i.e. schema) constructs. To answer your second question, the answer is YES. If you want to use the wsdl2java command from AXIS2 for generating your stubs and skeletons you will need the WSDL. Generating a WSDL is also not a diccficult task. YOu can have your SEI defined i.e. the Service Endpoint Interface with all the method signatures which you want to expose as web service operations. On executing the java2wsdl command from AXIS2 you would be able to get the WSDL. And using this WSDL you can generate the remaining artifacts of your web service. WSDL is nothing but an interface and hence even if you have defined an interface in Java, you can generate a WSDL from it. Hope that answers your queries. Regards Niles - Original Message From: Martin Gainty [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: axis-user@ws.apache.org Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 3:15:01 AM Subject: Re: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX Anil- I found this whitepaper quite informative SAX2 processes fastest..with DOM bein http://www.mail-archive.com/jibx-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg01044.html FWIW, M-- --- This e-mail message (including attachments, if any) is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, proprietary , confidential and exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. --- Le présent message électronique (y compris les pièces qui y sont annexées, le cas échéant) s'adresse au destinataire indiqué et peut contenir des renseignements de caractère privé ou confidentiel. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire de ce document, nous vous signalons qu'il est strictement interdit de le diffuser, de le distribuer ou de le reproduire. - Original Message - From: Anil [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: axis-user@ws.apache.org Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 4:37 PM Subject: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX Hi, I'm new to Axis2, what is the criteria to choose between POJO, AXIOM, JIBX, ADB or XMLBeans. How do we decide architecture wise. My second question is, is wsdl file mandatory to create stub and skeleton interfaces or can we use just skeleton file to create wsdl file. Thanks. Bored stiff? Loosen up... Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games. http://games.yahoo.com/games/front - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The fish are biting. Get more visitors on your site using Yahoo! Search Marketing. http://searchmarketing.yahoo.com/arp/sponsoredsearch_v2.php -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Axis2--AXIOM-or-JBIX-tf3463792.html#a9674209 Sent from the Axis - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Re: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX
Not exactly. Xmlbeans can generate classes for every possible schema automatically. JiBX only generates both classes and mapping description for a limited set of schemas (for example, no xsd:anyType is allowed). For that schemas you have to define the mapping manually. On 3/26/07, Josh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just for my own knowledge, is this a true statement?: This is because XMLBeans implementation can understand all the XSD (i.e. schema) constructs. Does JiBX have mapping limitations? Regards, Joshua On 3/26/07, Nilesh Ghorpade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, As per my understanding AXIS 2 uses AXIOM API's internally for any XML related activities. Hence as you have mentioned that you are confused to choose between POJO, AXIOM, JIBX, ADB or XMLBeans, the AXIOM is an invalid option here. Secondly in AXIS 2 you can create web services using either the Spring Framework or POJO. JiBX, XMLBeans and ADB are more related to the data binding frameworks which AXIS 2 supports. Hence it depends on your schema on which data binding framework you would want to select. As per my knowledge XMLBeans is the best when it comes to complex schemas. This is because XMLBeans implementation can understand all the XSD ( i.e. schema) constructs. To answer your second question, the answer is YES. If you want to use the wsdl2java command from AXIS2 for generating your stubs and skeletons you will need the WSDL. Generating a WSDL is also not a diccficult task. YOu can have your SEI defined i.e. the Service Endpoint Interface with all the method signatures which you want to expose as web service operations. On executing the java2wsdl command from AXIS2 you would be able to get the WSDL. And using this WSDL you can generate the remaining artifacts of your web service. WSDL is nothing but an interface and hence even if you have defined an interface in Java, you can generate a WSDL from it. Hope that answers your queries. Regards Niles - Original Message From: Martin Gainty [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: axis-user@ws.apache.org Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 3:15:01 AM Subject: Re: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX Anil- I found this whitepaper quite informative SAX2 processes fastest..with DOM bein http://www.mail-archive.com/jibx-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg01044.html FWIW, M-- --- This e-mail message (including attachments, if any) is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, proprietary , confidential and exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. --- Le présent message électronique (y compris les pièces qui y sont annexées, le cas échéant) s'adresse au destinataire indiqué et peut contenir des renseignements de caractère privé ou confidentiel. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire de ce document, nous vous signalons qu'il est strictement interdit de le diffuser, de le distribuer ou de le reproduire. - Original Message - From: Anil [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: axis-user@ws.apache.org Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 4:37 PM Subject: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX Hi, I'm new to Axis2, what is the criteria to choose between POJO, AXIOM, JIBX, ADB or XMLBeans. How do we decide architecture wise. My second question is, is wsdl file mandatory to create stub and skeleton interfaces or can we use just skeleton file to create wsdl file. Thanks. Bored stiff? Loosen up... Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games. http://games.yahoo.com/games/front - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TV dinner still cooling? Check out Tonight's Picks on Yahoo! TV. -- Saludos. José Antonio Sánchez - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX
that answers your queries. Regards Niles - Original Message From: Martin Gainty [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: axis-user@ws.apache.org Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 3:15:01 AM Subject: Re: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX Anil- I found this whitepaper quite informative SAX2 processes fastest..with DOM bein http://www.mail-archive.com/jibx-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg01044.html FWIW, M-- --- This e-mail message (including attachments, if any) is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, proprietary , confidential and exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. --- Le présent message électronique (y compris les pièces qui y sont annexées, le cas échéant) s'adresse au destinataire indiqué et peut contenir des renseignements de caractère privé ou confidentiel. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire de ce document, nous vous signalons qu'il est strictement interdit de le diffuser, de le distribuer ou de le reproduire. - Original Message - From: Anil [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: axis-user@ws.apache.org Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 4:37 PM Subject: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX Hi, I'm new to Axis2, what is the criteria to choose between POJO, AXIOM, JIBX, ADB or XMLBeans. How do we decide architecture wise. My second question is, is wsdl file mandatory to create stub and skeleton interfaces or can we use just skeleton file to create wsdl file. Thanks. Bored stiff? Loosen up... Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games. http://games.yahoo.com/games/front - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TV dinner still cooling? Check out Tonight's Picks on Yahoo! TV. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX
Hi Anil, The Data binding frameworks come into picture when you are generating the Java code artifacts from WSDL. If you observe the wsdl2java command there is a command line argument namely -d with which you can specify the Data binding framework which you want to use. In case u want to use JiBX you would be specifying something like $ wsdl2java -o /outputDir -d jibx -EbindingFile /resources/jibxbindingFile.xml -uri MyWebService.wsdl The above command is just for making things more simpler. Also if there are no schema references in the WSDL or if the WSDL is not having any schema types then the Data binding framework would not be coming into picture. (Others Please correct me if I am wrong.) You would just be deciding which Data binding framework you should be using. AXIS 2 would internally be using the same and generating the Java classes for you. Do not get confused by the approach which you are choosing to build the web service and the data binding framework. The data binding framework is just to map the schema which is defined in the WSDL to Java classes. Thats the only purpose of the data binding framework. Using POJO's for web services means you would be writing a POJO class which would be capturing all the information you need for invoking the particular web service operation. For example if you see the AddressBookService in the AXIS 2 samples you can see that the addEntry method takes in a POJO as its input parameter namely Entry. Regarding your second question I am not able to understand it correctly. Also the flow which you have mentioned from the Client to the Service is correct and it would remain the same for any Web service for that matter i.e. not only AXIS 2 but any web service which is developed using any other framework. Hope that answers your queries. Regards Nilesh - Original Message From: Anil VVNN [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: axis-user@ws.apache.org Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 7:56:35 PM Subject: Re: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX Hi Niles, Thanks for answering my questions. As I said I'm a beginner, I have few more questions related to previous one. (1) When exactly do we use Binding frameworks (JIBX, ADB or XMLBeans) ? For instance, the examples given in Axis2 website (i.e. StockQuoteService) referring to simple method call, client calling WS for getPrice/update operations but there's no XSD involved, I think this kind of operations can be easily accomplished using POJO option. But I'm confused when to use POJO or anyother Binding framework(JIBX). (2) What is the difference between XML Processing Model and SOAP Processing Model, when do we use these models independently. To my understanding, this is the typical flow of Axis2 services, Client calls--- Stub (generated by wsdl2java) calls[SOAP request]--- Skeleton Interface (generated by wsdl2java) --Business Logic And this SOAP request can be handled using any transport (eg. TCP, JMS etc.) Please correct me if I'm wrong. Thanks. - Anil Nilesh Ghorpade wrote: Hi, As per my understanding AXIS 2 uses AXIOM API's internally for any XML related activities. Hence as you have mentioned that you are confused to choose between POJO, AXIOM, JIBX, ADB or XMLBeans, the AXIOM is an invalid option here. Secondly in AXIS 2 you can create web services using either the Spring Framework or POJO. JiBX, XMLBeans and ADB are more related to the data binding frameworks which AXIS 2 supports. Hence it depends on your schema on which data binding framework you would want to select. As per my knowledge XMLBeans is the best when it comes to complex schemas. This is because XMLBeans implementation can understand all the XSD (i.e. schema) constructs. To answer your second question, the answer is YES. If you want to use the wsdl2java command from AXIS2 for generating your stubs and skeletons you will need the WSDL. Generating a WSDL is also not a diccficult task. YOu can have your SEI defined i.e. the Service Endpoint Interface with all the method signatures which you want to expose as web service operations. On executing the java2wsdl command from AXIS2 you would be able to get the WSDL. And using this WSDL you can generate the remaining artifacts of your web service. WSDL is nothing but an interface and hence even if you have defined an interface in Java, you can generate a WSDL from it. Hope that answers your queries. Regards Niles - Original Message From: Martin Gainty [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: axis-user@ws.apache.org Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 3:15:01 AM Subject: Re: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX Anil- I found this whitepaper quite informative SAX2 processes fastest..with DOM bein http://www.mail-archive.com/jibx-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg01044.html FWIW, M-- --- This e-mail message (including attachments, if any) is intended for the use of the individual
[Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX
Hi, I'm new to Axis2, what is the criteria to choose between POJO, AXIOM, JIBX, ADB or XMLBeans. How do we decide architecture wise. My second question is, is wsdl file mandatory to create stub and skeleton interfaces or can we use just skeleton file to create wsdl file. Thanks. Bored stiff? Loosen up... Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games. http://games.yahoo.com/games/front - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX
Anil- I found this whitepaper quite informative SAX2 processes fastest..with DOM bein http://www.mail-archive.com/jibx-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg01044.html FWIW, M-- --- This e-mail message (including attachments, if any) is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, proprietary , confidential and exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. --- Le présent message électronique (y compris les pièces qui y sont annexées, le cas échéant) s'adresse au destinataire indiqué et peut contenir des renseignements de caractère privé ou confidentiel. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire de ce document, nous vous signalons qu'il est strictement interdit de le diffuser, de le distribuer ou de le reproduire. - Original Message - From: Anil [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: axis-user@ws.apache.org Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 4:37 PM Subject: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX Hi, I'm new to Axis2, what is the criteria to choose between POJO, AXIOM, JIBX, ADB or XMLBeans. How do we decide architecture wise. My second question is, is wsdl file mandatory to create stub and skeleton interfaces or can we use just skeleton file to create wsdl file. Thanks. Bored stiff? Loosen up... Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games. http://games.yahoo.com/games/front - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
