RE: [axis1] more stable version of axis
thanks for all, it help us a lot Michel Lequim -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cyrille Le Clerc Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 1:41 PM To: axis-user@ws.apache.org Subject: Re: [axis1] more stable version of axis Hello Michel, I confirm you client side timeouts work as expected in Axis 1.4 . To set client side socket timeouts, you have to invoke "myStub.setTimeout(x)" (in millis). Note that you retrieve your stub calling MyServiceLocator.getMyBinding() and note that setTimeout(x) is implemented by (org.apache.axis.client.Stub). This stub.setTimeout(millis) is used to both set the socket.setSotimeout(x) and the socket.connect (endpoint, timeoutInMillis) The default sender (HTTPSender) implements the previously described configuration settings. The CommonsHTTPSender (based on Jakarta Commons HTTP Client) implements the previous confiiguration settings but you can also globally define timeouts as defined on the wiki : http://wiki.apache.org/ws/FrontPage/Axis/AxisCommonsHTTP . Sample : HelloWorldBindingStub binding = (HelloWorldBindingStub) new HelloWorldServiceLocator().gethelloWorldBinding(); // Time out after a minute binding.setTimeout(6); Hope this helps, Cyrille -- Cyrille Le Clerc [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] +33 6.61.33.69.86 On 6/19/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > thanks, > > I think I will use the 1.4 then, > I need just to be sure that the time out configuration works for client, > could you please confirm ? > > Michel Lequim > > > > From: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of Anne Thomas Manes > Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 7:11 PM > To: axis-user@ws.apache.org > Subject: Re: [axis1] more stable version of axis > > > The formal release came out quite recently, but the build was produced quite > a while ago, and it's the one used in Geronimo. > > > On 6/16/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > yes but axis 1.4 was released very recently, in april 2006, it is not too > risky to use it in production ? > > > > > > Michel Lequim > > > > > > > From: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > ] On Behalf Of Anne Thomas Manes > > Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 2:22 AM > > To: axis-user@ws.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [axis1] more stable version of axis > > > > > > > > Axis 1.4 fixes a number of array bugs. I recommend it over 1.2. > > > > > > On 6/15/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear axis users, > > > > > > we are to plan here to use axis in production but we are not sure about > the version we will use, I hope > > > someone can help us. We think axis 2 is not enough stable, too recent > release and some bugs are still found (by example > > > for the timeout configuration which is a feature we really need). We > then hesitate between axis 1.2 to 1.4, > > > axis 1.4 seems to be also very recent so we plan to use axis 1.3. > > > > > > Do you think it is a good choice ? > > > > > > thanks in advance > > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Fortis Bank disclaimer : http://www.fortisbank.be/legal/disclaimer.htm Fortis Bank privacy policy : http://www.fortisbank.be/legal/privacy_policy.htm = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [axis1] more stable version of axis
Hello Michel, I confirm you client side timeouts work as expected in Axis 1.4 . To set client side socket timeouts, you have to invoke "myStub.setTimeout(x)" (in millis). Note that you retrieve your stub calling MyServiceLocator.getMyBinding() and note that setTimeout(x) is implemented by (org.apache.axis.client.Stub). This stub.setTimeout(millis) is used to both set the socket.setSotimeout(x) and the socket.connect (endpoint, timeoutInMillis) The default sender (HTTPSender) implements the previously described configuration settings. The CommonsHTTPSender (based on Jakarta Commons HTTP Client) implements the previous confiiguration settings but you can also globally define timeouts as defined on the wiki : http://wiki.apache.org/ws/FrontPage/Axis/AxisCommonsHTTP . Sample : HelloWorldBindingStub binding = (HelloWorldBindingStub) new HelloWorldServiceLocator().gethelloWorldBinding(); // Time out after a minute binding.setTimeout(6); Hope this helps, Cyrille -- Cyrille Le Clerc [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] +33 6.61.33.69.86 On 6/19/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: thanks, I think I will use the 1.4 then, I need just to be sure that the time out configuration works for client, could you please confirm ? Michel Lequim From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anne Thomas Manes Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 7:11 PM To: axis-user@ws.apache.org Subject: Re: [axis1] more stable version of axis The formal release came out quite recently, but the build was produced quite a while ago, and it's the one used in Geronimo. On 6/16/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > yes but axis 1.4 was released very recently, in april 2006, it is not too risky to use it in production ? > > > Michel Lequim > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] On Behalf Of Anne Thomas Manes > Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 2:22 AM > To: axis-user@ws.apache.org > Subject: Re: [axis1] more stable version of axis > > > > Axis 1.4 fixes a number of array bugs. I recommend it over 1.2. > > > On 6/15/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dear axis users, > > > > we are to plan here to use axis in production but we are not sure about the version we will use, I hope > > someone can help us. We think axis 2 is not enough stable, too recent release and some bugs are still found (by example > > for the timeout configuration which is a feature we really need). We then hesitate between axis 1.2 to 1.4, > > axis 1.4 seems to be also very recent so we plan to use axis 1.3. > > > > Do you think it is a good choice ? > > > > thanks in advance > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [axis1] more stable version of axis
thanks, I think I will use the 1.4 then, I need just to be sure that the time out configuration works for client, could you please confirm ? Michel Lequim From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anne Thomas ManesSent: Friday, June 16, 2006 7:11 PMTo: axis-user@ws.apache.orgSubject: Re: [axis1] more stable version of axis The formal release came out quite recently, but the build was produced quite a while ago, and it's the one used in Geronimo. On 6/16/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: yes but axis 1.4 was released very recently, in april 2006, it is not too risky to use it in production ? Michel Lequim From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] On Behalf Of Anne Thomas ManesSent: Friday, June 16, 2006 2:22 AMTo: axis-user@ws.apache.orgSubject: Re: [axis1] more stable version of axis Axis 1.4 fixes a number of array bugs. I recommend it over 1.2. On 6/15/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Dear axis users, we are to plan here to use axis in production but we are not sure about the version we will use, I hope someone can help us. We think axis 2 is not enough stable, too recent release and some bugs are still found (by example for the timeout configuration which is a feature we really need). We then hesitate between axis 1.2 to 1.4, axis 1.4 seems to be also very recent so we plan to use axis 1.3. Do you think it is a good choice ? thanks in advance -To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Fortis Bank disclaimer : http://www.fortisbank.be/legal/disclaimer.htm Fortis Bank privacy policy : http://www.fortisbank.be/legal/privacy_policy.htm = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [axis1] more stable version of axis
The formal release came out quite recently, but the build was produced quite a while ago, and it's the one used in Geronimo.On 6/16/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: yes but axis 1.4 was released very recently, in april 2006, it is not too risky to use it in production ? Michel Lequim From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] On Behalf Of Anne Thomas ManesSent: Friday, June 16, 2006 2:22 AMTo: axis-user@ws.apache.orgSubject: Re: [axis1] more stable version of axis Axis 1.4 fixes a number of array bugs. I recommend it over 1.2. On 6/15/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Dear axis users, we are to plan here to use axis in production but we are not sure about the version we will use, I hope someone can help us. We think axis 2 is not enough stable, too recent release and some bugs are still found (by example for the timeout configuration which is a feature we really need). We then hesitate between axis 1.2 to 1.4, axis 1.4 seems to be also very recent so we plan to use axis 1.3. Do you think it is a good choice ? thanks in advance -To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [axis1] more stable version of axis
yes but axis 1.4 was released very recently, in april 2006, it is not too risky to use it in production ? Michel Lequim From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anne Thomas ManesSent: Friday, June 16, 2006 2:22 AMTo: axis-user@ws.apache.orgSubject: Re: [axis1] more stable version of axis Axis 1.4 fixes a number of array bugs. I recommend it over 1.2. On 6/15/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Dear axis users, we are to plan here to use axis in production but we are not sure about the version we will use, I hope someone can help us. We think axis 2 is not enough stable, too recent release and some bugs are still found (by example for the timeout configuration which is a feature we really need). We then hesitate between axis 1.2 to 1.4, axis 1.4 seems to be also very recent so we plan to use axis 1.3. Do you think it is a good choice ? thanks in advance -To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Fortis Bank disclaimer : http://www.fortisbank.be/legal/disclaimer.htm Fortis Bank privacy policy : http://www.fortisbank.be/legal/privacy_policy.htm = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [axis1] more stable version of axis
Axis 1.4 fixes a number of array bugs. I recommend it over 1.2.On 6/15/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Dear axis users, we are to plan here to use axis in production but we are not sure about the version we will use, I hope someone can help us. We think axis 2 is not enough stable, too recent release and some bugs are still found (by example for the timeout configuration which is a feature we really need). We then hesitate between axis 1.2 to 1.4, axis 1.4 seems to be also very recent so we plan to use axis 1.3. Do you think it is a good choice ? thanks in advance -To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
