RE: Doc/literal Wrapped
A follow-up to this. Changing the Operation name to something other than the Input message name fixes the problem of the beans not being generated in Eclipse. I don't think this is the way it should work. My understanding of Doc/literal wrapped is that the operation name and the input message should be the same. markg -Original Message- From: Griffin, Mark Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 8:36 AM To: axis-user@ws.apache.org Subject: Doc/literal Wrapped Has anyone run into issues with doc/literal wrapped using Eclipse 3.1 with the new WTP 1.0 toolset. It uses Axis which supports doc/literal wrapped but for some reason it doesn't seem to work within the tool. It works fine from the command line using Axis 1.3. Basically its not generating the beans for the input and output messages. I posted this over in the WTP discussion group but no response. Just curious if anyone else has seen it. I attached the WSDL I using to test. Thanks. service.wsdl markg Mark E. Griffin Developer Services Progress Energy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Doc/literal Wrapped
In the wrapped convention, the message input element local name must be the same as the operation name (element=ns:operation-name). It doesn't matter what you call the input message. Most people name the input message operationRequest. AnneOn 2/21/06, Griffin, Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A follow-up to this.Changing the Operation name to something otherthan the Input message name fixes the problem of the beans not beinggenerated in Eclipse. I don't think this is the way it should work. Myunderstanding of Doc/literal wrapped is that the operation name and the input message should be the same.markg-Original Message-From: Griffin, MarkSent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 8:36 AMTo: axis-user@ws.apache.org Subject: Doc/literal WrappedHas anyone run into issues with doc/literal wrapped using Eclipse 3.1with the new WTP 1.0 toolset.It uses Axis which supports doc/literalwrapped but for some reason it doesn't seem to work within the tool. It works fine from the command line using Axis 1.3.Basically its notgenerating the beans for the input and output messages.I posted thisover in the WTP discussion group but no response.Just curious ifanyone else has seen it.I attached the WSDL I using to test. Thanks. service.wsdlmarkgMark E. GriffinDeveloper ServicesProgress Energy[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Doc/literal Wrapped
Title: Message Agreed but Eclipse is notsupporting that although Axis is. Kind of strange since they are using Axis. markg -Original Message-From: Anne Thomas Manes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 6:59 PMTo: axis-user@ws.apache.orgSubject: Re: Doc/literal WrappedIn the wrapped convention, the message input element local name must be the same as the operation name (element="ns:operation-name"). It doesn't matter what you call the input message. Most people name the input message "operationRequest". Anne On 2/21/06, Griffin, Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A follow-up to this.Changing the Operation name to something otherthan the Input message name fixes the problem of the beans not beinggenerated in Eclipse. I don't think this is the way it should work. Myunderstanding of Doc/literal wrapped is that the operation name and the input message should be the same.markg-Original Message-From: Griffin, MarkSent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 8:36 AMTo: axis-user@ws.apache.org Subject: Doc/literal WrappedHas anyone run into issues with doc/literal wrapped using Eclipse 3.1with the new WTP 1.0 toolset.It uses Axis which supports doc/literalwrapped but for some reason it doesn't seem to work within the tool. It works fine from the command line using Axis 1.3.Basically its notgenerating the beans for the input and output messages.I posted thisover in the WTP discussion group but no response.Just curious ifanyone else has seen it.I attached the WSDL I using to test. Thanks. service.wsdlmarkgMark E. GriffinDeveloper ServicesProgress Energy[EMAIL PROTECTED] service.wsdl Description: service.wsdl
Re: Doc/literal Wrapped
Talk to the folks at Eclipse...On 2/21/06, Griffin, Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Agreed but Eclipse is notsupporting that although Axis is. Kind of strange since they are using Axis. markg -Original Message-From: Anne Thomas Manes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 6:59 PMTo: axis-user@ws.apache.org Subject: Re: Doc/literal WrappedIn the wrapped convention, the message input element local name must be the same as the operation name (element=ns:operation-name). It doesn't matter what you call the input message. Most people name the input message operationRequest. Anne On 2/21/06, Griffin, Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A follow-up to this.Changing the Operation name to something otherthan the Input message name fixes the problem of the beans not beinggenerated in Eclipse. I don't think this is the way it should work. Myunderstanding of Doc/literal wrapped is that the operation name and the input message should be the same.markg-Original Message-From: Griffin, MarkSent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 8:36 AMTo: axis-user@ws.apache.org Subject: Doc/literal WrappedHas anyone run into issues with doc/literal wrapped using Eclipse 3.1with the new WTP 1.0 toolset.It uses Axis which supports doc/literalwrapped but for some reason it doesn't seem to work within the tool. It works fine from the command line using Axis 1.3.Basically its notgenerating the beans for the input and output messages.I posted thisover in the WTP discussion group but no response.Just curious ifanyone else has seen it.I attached the WSDL I using to test. Thanks. service.wsdlmarkgMark E. GriffinDeveloper ServicesProgress Energy[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Doc/literal Wrapped
Title: Message Yep i'm trying, just thought i would give the axis folks a try. more responsive. :) Thanks. markg -Original Message-From: Anne Thomas Manes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 7:14 PMTo: axis-user@ws.apache.orgSubject: Re: Doc/literal WrappedTalk to the folks at Eclipse... On 2/21/06, Griffin, Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Agreed but Eclipse is notsupporting that although Axis is. Kind of strange since they are using Axis. markg -Original Message-From: Anne Thomas Manes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 6:59 PMTo: axis-user@ws.apache.org Subject: Re: Doc/literal Wrapped In the wrapped convention, the message input element local name must be the same as the operation name (element="ns:operation-name"). It doesn't matter what you call the input message. Most people name the input message "operationRequest". Anne On 2/21/06, Griffin, Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A follow-up to this.Changing the Operation name to something otherthan the Input message name fixes the problem of the beans not beinggenerated in Eclipse. I don't think this is the way it should work. Myunderstanding of Doc/literal wrapped is that the operation name and the input message should be the same.markg-Original Message-From: Griffin, MarkSent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 8:36 AMTo: axis-user@ws.apache.org Subject: Doc/literal WrappedHas anyone run into issues with doc/literal wrapped using Eclipse 3.1with the new WTP 1.0 toolset.It uses Axis which supports doc/literalwrapped but for some reason it doesn't seem to work within the tool. It works fine from the command line using Axis 1.3.Basically its notgenerating the beans for the input and output messages.I posted thisover in the WTP discussion group but no response.Just curious ifanyone else has seen it.I attached the WSDL I using to test. Thanks. service.wsdlmarkgMark E. GriffinDeveloper ServicesProgress Energy[EMAIL PROTECTED]
