Re: wsdl2java generate abstract class rather than skeleton
Axis2 Crew, Amila's suggestion worked great. My only comment is that I had to use -ss and -ssi to get it to work. The first thing I tried was to replace -ss with -ssi; that did not work. My next minor irritation is that the name of the generated class is *Skeleton.java. I don't really care for that name because once I fill it in, it is no longer a skeleton, it is a full service. That is a pretty minor complaint because the end users never see that name, but I am wondering if there is a way for me to specify what I want for the class name. I poked a around just a bit and it looks like all I would have to do is change the name of the class in the services file, but because I am making hundreds of services it would be easier and more reliable if wsdl2java had an option to just generate service.xml with the name I specify. -- Michael Potter On 10/14/07, Amila Suriarachchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: you can generate an interface to your skelton using -ssi option. here the problem is wsdl2java should know the implementation class name to put in the services.xml. you can keep your correct implementation class some where and always replace the generated one with it. Amila. On 10/13/07, Michael Potter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Axis2 crew, I use wsdl2java to generate java code and then modify the skeleton.java file to meet my needs. This is a bit awkward because if I change my .wsdl file and then regenerate, my hand modified skeleton with be wiped out (or out of date). What I think would be better is if wsdl2java were to generate an abstract class. I could code my own class that would extend the abstract class. I would get a compile error if my class did not match the abstract class after a fresh run of wsdl2java. I am new to axis2 so I am hoping someone thinks this is a good idea and has already done it, or someone thinks this is a bad idea because they have a better technique to deal with regenerating the java code with wsdl2java. Thank you, -- Michael Potter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Amila Suriarachchi, WSO2 Inc. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: wsdl2java generate abstract class rather than skeleton
you can generate an interface to your skelton using -ssi option. here the problem is wsdl2java should know the implementation class name to put in the services.xml. you can keep your correct implementation class some where and always replace the generated one with it. Amila. On 10/13/07, Michael Potter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Axis2 crew, I use wsdl2java to generate java code and then modify the skeleton.java file to meet my needs. This is a bit awkward because if I change my .wsdl file and then regenerate, my hand modified skeleton with be wiped out (or out of date). What I think would be better is if wsdl2java were to generate an abstract class. I could code my own class that would extend the abstract class. I would get a compile error if my class did not match the abstract class after a fresh run of wsdl2java. I am new to axis2 so I am hoping someone thinks this is a good idea and has already done it, or someone thinks this is a bad idea because they have a better technique to deal with regenerating the java code with wsdl2java. Thank you, -- Michael Potter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Amila Suriarachchi, WSO2 Inc.
wsdl2java generate abstract class rather than skeleton
Axis2 crew, I use wsdl2java to generate java code and then modify the skeleton.java file to meet my needs. This is a bit awkward because if I change my .wsdl file and then regenerate, my hand modified skeleton with be wiped out (or out of date). What I think would be better is if wsdl2java were to generate an abstract class. I could code my own class that would extend the abstract class. I would get a compile error if my class did not match the abstract class after a fresh run of wsdl2java. I am new to axis2 so I am hoping someone thinks this is a good idea and has already done it, or someone thinks this is a bad idea because they have a better technique to deal with regenerating the java code with wsdl2java. Thank you, -- Michael Potter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
