> A quick skimming of RFC 7298 suggests the PC is indeed intended to be
> per-interface without taking the {mult,un}icast bit into account. Is this
> an oversight in the spec?Hi Daniel, I've just given a talk about this issue, and while reviewing our correspondence while preparing the talk, I've realised that in your initial mail you gave us the solution that we finally implemented and are in the process of normalising. You are currently acknowledged in the draft¹, but only as the person who noticed the issue. My apologies for the oversight. Please be assured that I'll change this before publication so as to properly credit you as suggesting the solution. ¹ https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-babel-mac-relaxed-02.html#name-acknowledgments Sorry for the oversight, -- Juliusz _______________________________________________ Babel-users mailing list Babel-users@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
