Re: [backstage] Google Developer Day
There are a few extra places released if your quick. http://services.google.com/events/developerday_rsvp-en_GB Adam Mr I Forrester wrote: Damm I missed it! Wow they really cranked this up a notch this year!!! Ian Adam Leach wrote: Not sure if anyone has mentioned, but Google is planning a Developer day on 31st May. Spaces are limited, but you can sign up at http://www.google.com/events/developerday/en_GB/details.html Adam - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/ - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/ - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
Re: [backstage] Google Developer Day
Likewise. Yay! (I think) On 4/16/07, Ian Forrester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I registered and I think was accepted. Ian Forrester || backstage.bbc.co.uk || cubicgarden.com || geekdinner.co.uk
Re: [backstage] Google Developer Day
I've sent an email to the Developer Day address asking if that thank you for your RSVP email means that I've been accepted. There's only a few cheap train tickets left, but I'd like to make sure I'm confirmed before booking! -- Tom Squiggle . wrote: Likewise. Yay! (I think) On 4/16/07, Ian Forrester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I registered and I think was accepted. Ian Forrester || backstage.bbc.co.uk || cubicgarden.com || geekdinner.co.uk - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
Re: [backstage] [Fwd: Fwd: Twitter Fever]
On 12 Apr 2007, at 02:12, Nic James Ferrier wrote: Mr I Forrester [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I did talk to the twitter guys about this issue. I think from there point of view, they never said twitter was meant to be a real time system. It just behaved like that from the start. They're winding you up. Have you noticed the tricks they're putting in to make you think your updates are going live? When you post the post is added to your list on the client side. It's async-ajaxed to the backend as well. But if you refresh and it hasn't got back yet it disappears from your list. Whoops. I think they know perfectly well how interactive it should be but they've built it wrong and are now playing catch up. Nic, sorry, but this is just wrong. The ajax updates are there to reduce page compute time, not to try and 'trick people' into thinking that it's 'faster'. They really did intend for it to be a status update tool, something people would update 2-3 times a day. However people are using it real time - and a number of bots are posting super frequently (eg, the beeb feeds). So yes, it was architected badly in the first place, but this doesn't mean that they knew what was going to happen - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
Re: [backstage] [Fwd: Fwd: Twitter Fever]
I think you'll find that's designed... /personal bugbear Cheers, Rich. So yes, it was architected badly in the first place, but this doesn't mean that they knew what was going to happen - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
Re: [backstage] [Fwd: Fwd: Twitter Fever]
On 16 Apr 2007, at 15:23, Richard Lockwood wrote: I think you'll find that's designed... /personal bugbear So yes, it was architected badly in the first place, but this doesn't mean that they knew what was going to happen and how would you define those terms? - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
Re: [backstage] [Fwd: Fwd: Twitter Fever]
I don't need to define any terms. Architecht is not a verb. An architecht designs things. Cheers, Rich. I think you'll find that's designed... /personal bugbear So yes, it was architected badly in the first place, but this doesn't mean that they knew what was going to happen and how would you define those terms? - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/ - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
Re: [backstage] Backstage Podcast number 2
Bruce Schneier was invited last month to give the keynote at LSE for our annual Social Study of ICT workshop (SSIT7). You can view the video here: http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/informationSystems/newsAndEvents/2007events /schneier.htm I think that it would be much refreshing to have somebody like the people from last.fm which have a completely different business model. Stefan Glaenzer could be the most suitable. Best, Jose-Carlos on 16/4/07 5:57, Ian Forrester at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok Agreed, but the chances of getting Bruce Schneier (whose blog I read daily) is very low indeed. I can but try, but even if we got him in or he agreed to a phone in. Who else would we have to counter balance Bruce? I was generally thinking people in the community who you might know who (agreed again) know what there talking about :) Cheers Ian Forrester || backstage.bbc.co.uk || cubicgarden.com || geekdinner.co.uk - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/ * Email confidentiality notice * This message is private and confidential. If you have received this message in error, please notify us and remove it from your system. The London School of Economics and Political Science (the School) is a company limited by guarantee, registered in England and Wales, under registered number 00070527, and having its registered office at 10th Floor, Tower One, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE. The inclusion of this information does not of itself make this email a business document of the School and, to the maximum extent permitted by law, the School accepts no liability for the content and opinions in any non-business emails. - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
RE: [backstage] Backstage Podcast number 2 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
A discussion (even if it's a short one) on watermarking as a anti-piracy approach for video would be good. The EMI deal is a bit of a breakthrough for music, but video is not really affected. At the EMI-Apple announcement Jobs seemed to rather heavily dismiss the idea of dropping DRM for video anytime soon. Watermarking isn't something I am very familiar with, it would be good to hear some knowledgeable people discussing it in a wider context. Cheers, David Gill Australian Communication and Media Authority 03 9963 6871 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Ok Agreed, but the chances of getting Bruce Schneier (whose blog I read daily) is very low indeed. I can but try, but even if we got him in or he agreed to a phone in. Who else would we have to counter balance Bruce? I was generally thinking people in the community who you might know who (agreed again) know what there talking about :) Cheers Ian Forrester || backstage.bbc.co.uk || cubicgarden.com || geekdinner.co.uk - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/ - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
