Re: [backstage] DOGs on the BBC TV online streams?

2009-01-20 Thread Robert (Jamie) Munro
Andrew Bowden wrote:
 I've just got Freesat HD, and it's amazing to see the best 
 picture quality that the BBC broadcast. But then they go and 
 spoil it with a DOG in the corner. It's almost worth 
 reverting to watching the program on BBC 1.
 If they must have a logo, do it with MHEG and enable the exit 
 button (like how it says Press Red).
 
 As a wise man once said to me - the problem with allowing you to turn
 such things off, is that people will switch them off!
 
 There's some stuff on the BBC Internet blog about BBC HD's DOG
 http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/bbcinternet/2008/10/dogs_on_the_blog.html

Congratulations on not putting a DOG on BBC HD during the presidential
inauguration, even though there was one (saying LIVE Washington) on BBC
One! An unusual but welcome reversal.

It was a bit strange that at the end, when they showed a mini-highlights
of the day, it was not only SD, it was 4:3. Was that package provided by
the US network or something, where AFAIK, 16:9 always means HD?

Robert (Jamie) Munro

P.s. What would be handy is an also available on HD DOG on the SD
version of simulcasts. In fact, couldn't the MHEG program detect an HDTV
 receiver and switch channel automatically?




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [backstage] DOGs on the BBC TV online streams?

2009-01-20 Thread Martin Deutsch
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 6:32 PM, Robert (Jamie) Munro rjmu...@arjam.net wrote:

 Congratulations on not putting a DOG on BBC HD during the presidential
 inauguration, even though there was one (saying LIVE Washington) on BBC
 One! An unusual but welcome reversal.

 It was a bit strange that at the end, when they showed a mini-highlights
 of the day, it was not only SD, it was 4:3. Was that package provided by
 the US network or something, where AFAIK, 16:9 always means HD?

The pool feed was in HD; everything else in the programme was upscaled
SD. We're not sure why, but the gallery in the BBC bureau in
Washington (who produced quite a large part of the programme) were
working with 4:3 material, which is why the highlights package was
presented in this way.. During the preamble, BBC HD did cut away to
the pool feed more often than the News Channel.

 - martin
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] DOGs on the BBC TV online streams?

2009-01-19 Thread Gavin Johnson



On 14/01/2009 18:53, Brian Butterworth briant...@freeview.tv wrote:

 2009/1/14 Gavin Johnson gavin.john...@bbc.co.uk
 This thread reminds me of our ongoing debate about use of the internal
 network in relation to the position of digital kit and broadcast sources. The
 centralist view is that you put all your encoders in a big data centre and
 route all the analogue through.
 
 route all the analogue through - I seem to remember spending a happy few
 years in the 1990s ripping out everything analogue and replacing them with
 fibre optic systems.  Perhaps you are referring to uncompressed digital
 video (or broadcast quality), not analogue?

Yep, I was forgetting about the subterranean codecs. Anything my browser
can't see must be analogue ;-).

G


-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] DOGs on the BBC TV online streams?

2009-01-19 Thread Brian Butterworth
2009/1/19 Gavin Johnson gavin.john...@bbc.co.uk




 On 14/01/2009 18:53, Brian Butterworth briant...@freeview.tv wrote:

  2009/1/14 Gavin Johnson gavin.john...@bbc.co.uk
  This thread reminds me of our ongoing debate about use of the internal
  network in relation to the position of digital kit and broadcast
 sources. The
  centralist view is that you put all your encoders in a big data centre
 and
  route all the analogue through.
 
  route all the analogue through - I seem to remember spending a happy
 few
  years in the 1990s ripping out everything analogue and replacing them
 with
  fibre optic systems.  Perhaps you are referring to uncompressed digital
  video (or broadcast quality), not analogue?

 Yep, I was forgetting about the subterranean codecs. Anything my browser
 can't see must be analogue ;-).


Someone told me the other day that they had an analogue Sky digibox!




 G


 -
 Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please
 visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
  Unofficial list archive:
 http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/




-- 

Brian Butterworth

follow me on twitter: http://twitter.com/briantist
web: http://www.ukfree.tv - independent digital television and switchover
advice, since 2002


RE: [backstage] DOGs on the BBC TV online streams?

2009-01-14 Thread Andrew Bowden
   Oh yeah, and that leads me to another gripe - the BBC Three, 
 BBC Four, BBC Parliament, CBeebies etc... DOGs on TV. Why are they
 in the 4:3 safe zone?!

Don't know if you've been watching anything on T4 but they have a
delightful one for their showings of The Simpsons.

Previously they just put the T4 logo in the top left corner but some
time ago they moved it - someone is clearly working on the assumption
that everyone is watching the Simpsons in 4:3, stretched out to 16:9.
So they've positioned the logo in what would be the correct
positioning if you then took it and did a 4:3 centre cut out (in other
words, the same spot the BBC puts its logos)

The only logic behind it I can think of is that they always want their
logo in the same place in the screen regardless of the aspect ratio, but
of course if only works if you watch the Simspons in the wrong aspect
ratio.  Which sadly a lot of people probably do.

Roll on when everyone has HD TVs/boxes - programmes might get viewed
properly then!  

http://www.bbc.co.uk/
This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal 
views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system.
Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on 
it and notify the sender immediately.
Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received.
Further communication will signify your consent to this.


-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] DOGs on the BBC TV online streams?

2009-01-14 Thread Jim Tonge

I've grown to love the BBC logo we've burned into our plasma.

jim

-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] DOGs on the BBC TV online streams?

2009-01-14 Thread Helen Watson
There is an easy solution to the screen burn problem  Don't watch
as much TV.

:-)

H.

On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 12:23 AM, Jim Tonge jim_d_to...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
 I've grown to love the BBC logo we've burned into our plasma.

 jim

 -
 Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please
 visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
  Unofficial list archive:
 http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/

-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] DOGs on the BBC TV online streams?

2009-01-14 Thread Richard Lockwood
That's a pretty extreme form of tattooing - where'd you get it done?

Cheers,

Rich.


On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 12:23 AM, Jim Tonge jim_d_to...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
 I've grown to love the BBC logo we've burned into our plasma.

 jim


-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] DOGs on the BBC TV online streams?

2009-01-14 Thread ryan
 If you ever find yourself watching BBC Channel Island news at 6.30pm
or 10.25 (I think Sky 988) you'll see the old BBC Spotlight Channel
Islands logo burned pretty deep into the studio plasma screen behind
the presenter.
 Not sure what I think about DOGs though - never really notice them
to be honest.
 On Wed 14/01/09 11:18 AM , Richard Lockwood
richard.lockw...@gmail.com sent:
 That's a pretty extreme form of tattooing - where'd you get it done?
 Cheers,
 Rich.
 On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 12:23 AM, Jim Tonge  wrote:
  I've grown to love the BBC logo we've burned into our plasma.
 
  jim
 
 
 -
 Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe,
please visit
http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. 
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/
[2]backst...@lists.bbc.co.uk [3]/


Links:
--
[1] mailto:jim_d_to...@yahoo.co.uk
[2] http://www.mail-archive.com/
[3] mailto:backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk


Re: [backstage] DOGs on the BBC TV online streams?

2009-01-14 Thread Brian Butterworth
I guess it would cost the viewers about £1 each to get BBC CI a new
plasma...

On 14 Jan 2009, 11:39 AM, r...@upyourego.com wrote:

If you ever find yourself watching BBC Channel Island news at 6.30pm or
10.25 (I think Sky 988) you'll see the old BBC Spotlight Channel Islands
logo burned pretty deep into the studio plasma screen behind the presenter.

Not sure what I think about DOGs though - never really notice them to be
honest.


On Wed 14/01/09 11:18 AM , Richard Lockwood richard.lockw...@gmail.comsent:

  That's a pretty extreme form of tattooing - where'd you get it done?  
Cheers,   Rich.   ...


Re: [backstage] DOGs on the BBC TV online streams?

2009-01-14 Thread ryan
 
 lol yeah something like that
 There are no official viewing figures for Channel Islands but the
last survey the BBC did showed that 50% watched the BBC’s Spotlight
Channel Islands at 6.30pm compared to 40% who watched ITV’s Channel
report at 6.00pm.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/jersey/content/articles/2008/03/04/spotlight_figures_feature.shtml
 With a population area of approx: 130,000 (or 80 thousand homes)
thats about 40 thousand watching at 6.30.
 I think the idea will be to swap the one from the newsroom and put
it in the studio - who knows.
 Anyway - DOGs :)
 On Wed 14/01/09 12:17 PM , Brian Butterworth briant...@freeview.tv
sent:
I guess it would cost the viewers about £1 each to get BBC CI a new
plasma... 

On 14 Jan 2009, 11:39 AM,   wrote:
 If you ever find yourself watching BBC Channel Island news at 6.30pm
or 10.25 (I think Sky 988) you'll see the old BBC Spotlight Channel
Islands logo burned pretty deep into the studio plasma screen behind
the presenter.
 Not sure what I think about DOGs though - never really notice them
to be honest.
 On Wed 14/01/09 11:18 AM , Richard Lockwood
richard.lockw...@gmail.com [2] sent:
  That's a pretty extreme form of tattooing - where'd you get it
done?   Cheers,   Rich.   ...


Links:
--
[1] mailto:r...@upyourego.com
[2] mailto:richard.lockw...@gmail.com


Re: [backstage] DOGs on the BBC TV online streams?

2009-01-14 Thread Gavin Johnson
This thread reminds me of our ongoing debate about use of the internal
network in relation to the position of digital kit and broadcast sources.
The centralist view is that you put all your encoders in a big data centre
and route all the analogue through. That's great when you want to make an
enterprise level change to reflect latest blah codec being released, but
becomes bandwidth-challenging if you need to double-up and have clean feeds
for everything (cheaper to let the DOGs in, particularly if people don¹t
notice they¹re there).

The devolved view is that you stash your encoders as close to your broadcast
sources as possible. DOGs are a powerful argument in favour of the devolved
approach because devolution favours the ability of the online broadcaster to
provide streams that are unique and distinctive (rights permitting).

The halcyon solution of course, is that broadcast sources become the point
of digitisation.

Gavin

On 14/01/2009 12:17, Brian Butterworth briant...@freeview.tv wrote:

 I guess it would cost the viewers about £1 each to get BBC CI a new plasma...
 
 On 14 Jan 2009, 11:39 AM,  r...@upyourego.com wrote:
 
 If you ever find yourself watching BBC Channel Island news at 6.30pm or 10.25
 (I think Sky 988) you'll see the old BBC Spotlight Channel Islands logo
 burned pretty deep into the studio plasma screen behind the presenter.
 
 Not sure what I think about DOGs though - never really notice them to be
 honest.
  
 
 On Wed 14/01/09 11:18 AM , Richard Lockwood richard.lockw...@gmail.com
 sent:
 
   That's a pretty extreme form of tattooing - where'd you get it done? 
  Cheers,   Rich.   ...
 



Re: [backstage] DOGs on the BBC TV online streams?

2009-01-14 Thread Brian Butterworth
2009/1/14 Gavin Johnson gavin.john...@bbc.co.uk

  This thread reminds me of our ongoing debate about use of the internal
 network in relation to the position of digital kit and broadcast sources.
 The centralist view is that you put all your encoders in a big data centre
 and route all the analogue through.


route all the analogue through - I seem to remember spending a happy few
years in the 1990s ripping out everything analogue and replacing them with
fibre optic systems.  Perhaps you are referring to uncompressed digital
video (or broadcast quality), not analogue?


 That's great when you want to make an enterprise level change to reflect
 latest blah codec being released, but becomes bandwidth-challenging if you
 need to double-up and have clean feeds for everything (cheaper to let the
 DOGs in, particularly if people don't notice they're there).

 The devolved view is that you stash your encoders as close to your
 broadcast sources as possible. DOGs are a powerful argument in favour of the
 devolved approach because devolution favours the ability of the online
 broadcaster to provide streams that are unique and distinctive (rights
 permitting).

 The halcyon solution of course, is that broadcast sources become the point
 of digitisation.

 Gavin


 On 14/01/2009 12:17, Brian Butterworth briant...@freeview.tv wrote:

 I guess it would cost the viewers about £1 each to get BBC CI a new
 plasma...

 On 14 Jan 2009, 11:39 AM,  r...@upyourego.com wrote:

 If you ever find yourself watching BBC Channel Island news at 6.30pm or
 10.25 (I think Sky 988) you'll see the old BBC Spotlight Channel Islands
 logo burned pretty deep into the studio plasma screen behind the presenter.

 Not sure what I think about DOGs though - never really notice them to be
 honest.


 *On Wed 14/01/09 11:18 AM , Richard Lockwood 
 richard.lockw...@gmail.com*sent:

   That's a pretty extreme form of tattooing - where'd you get it done? 
  Cheers,   Rich.   ...





-- 

Brian Butterworth

follow me on twitter: http://twitter.com/briantist
web: http://www.ukfree.tv - independent digital television and switchover
advice, since 2002


Re: [backstage] DOGs on the BBC TV online streams?

2009-01-13 Thread Brian Butterworth
2009/1/13 Christopher Woods chris...@infinitus.co.uk

 I've noticed that BBC One's online stream has a BBC One DOG on it, the same
 going for BBC Two. Isn't this one of the most impractical applications of a
 channel graphic ever? (and a waste of bits)


It is certainly treating the public as if they were stupid.  I thought they
were there just for testing, I must admit I prefer to use TVCatchup to watch
BBC channels as they are DOGless.




 -
 Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please
 visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
  Unofficial list archive:
 http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/




-- 

Brian Butterworth

follow me on twitter: http://twitter.com/briantist
web: http://www.ukfree.tv - independent digital television and switchover
advice, since 2002


Re: [backstage] DOGs on the BBC TV online streams?

2009-01-13 Thread Robert (Jamie) Munro
Christopher Woods wrote:
 I've noticed that BBC One's online stream has a BBC One DOG on it, the same
 going for BBC Two. Isn't this one of the most impractical applications of a
 channel graphic ever? (and a waste of bits)

I've just got Freesat HD, and it's amazing to see the best picture
quality that the BBC broadcast. But then they go and spoil it with a DOG
in the corner. It's almost worth reverting to watching the program on BBC 1.

If they must have a logo, do it with MHEG and enable the exit button
(like how it says Press Red).

Robert (Jamie) Munro




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


RE: [backstage] DOGs on the BBC TV online streams?

2009-01-13 Thread Andrew Bowden
 I've just got Freesat HD, and it's amazing to see the best 
 picture quality that the BBC broadcast. But then they go and 
 spoil it with a DOG in the corner. It's almost worth 
 reverting to watching the program on BBC 1.
 If they must have a logo, do it with MHEG and enable the exit 
 button (like how it says Press Red).

As a wise man once said to me - the problem with allowing you to turn
such things off, is that people will switch them off!

There's some stuff on the BBC Internet blog about BBC HD's DOG
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/bbcinternet/2008/10/dogs_on_the_blog.html


But on a purely technical level, we wouldn't be able to use the same
mechanism to provide the DOG as we use for the press RED on Sky and
Virgin as, IIRC, you can only have one graphic up at a time, and that
would mean we wouldn't be able to do press reds [1], or things like
Press Green to set reminders.  And as the video comes from the same
underlying data source for all four TV platforms, you couldn't easily
make them turnoffable on Freesat and Freeview, and not on Sky and Virign


[1] some would say this is a good thing.  Personally I couldn't possibly
comment...

-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] DOGs on the BBC TV online streams?

2009-01-13 Thread Robert (Jamie) Munro
Andrew Bowden wrote:
 I've just got Freesat HD, and it's amazing to see the best 
 picture quality that the BBC broadcast. But then they go and 
 spoil it with a DOG in the corner. It's almost worth 
 reverting to watching the program on BBC 1.
 If they must have a logo, do it with MHEG and enable the exit 
 button (like how it says Press Red).
 
 As a wise man once said to me - the problem with allowing you to turn
 such things off, is that people will switch them off!

But they are only on to aid changing channels. It would appear every
time to change channels to BBC HD until you press exit on your remote.
It could reappear during the continuity announcement between programmes
- I don't think most people would mind having to press exit once per
program.

 There's some stuff on the BBC Internet blog about BBC HD's DOG
 http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/bbcinternet/2008/10/dogs_on_the_blog.html
 
 But on a purely technical level, we wouldn't be able to use the same
 mechanism to provide the DOG as we use for the press RED on Sky and
 Virgin as, IIRC, you can only have one graphic up at a time, and that
 would mean we wouldn't be able to do press reds [1], or things like
 Press Green to set reminders.  And as the video comes from the same
 underlying data source for all four TV platforms, you couldn't easily
 make them turnoffable on Freesat and Freeview, and not on Sky and Virign

Just make it a single graphic that says:
+-+
| BBC HD|
|Press Red|
+-+

You could even be clever and have the first press of the exit key remove
the press red, and the second remove the whole thing.

Robert (Jamie) Munro



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


RE: [backstage] DOGs on the BBC TV online streams?

2009-01-13 Thread Christopher Woods
  I've just got Freesat HD, and it's amazing to see the best picture 
  quality that the BBC broadcast. But then they go and spoil 
 it with a 
  DOG in the corner. It's almost worth reverting to watching 
 the program 
  on BBC 1.
  If they must have a logo, do it with MHEG and enable the 
 exit button 
  (like how it says Press Red).
 
 As a wise man once said to me - the problem with allowing you 
 to turn such things off, is that people will switch them off!


A year or so ago, it was discovered by some clever bod (who had a Sky box
and too much free time) that if you pressed the red button to start the red
button features loading, then pressed Back Up quickly, it would kill the
MHEG/interactive layer... But best of all, until you changed channels,
nothing else would appear on your screen in the way of interactive overlays,
red button icons or win a car/win
£100,000/competition/pressmepressmepressme icons.


This little unintentional bug proved exceptionally popular in my household,
as I suspect it did in other households across the UK - even my technophobe
mum learnt how to do it very quickly, and delighted at the lack of on-screen
litter forced into her field of vision. That was, until Sky 'fixed the
problem' with a software update.


The problem with allowing people to turn such things off is that people soon
realise that there really IS no reason for having them in the first place.
My golden rule is if something doesn't improve what's already there, it's
entirely unnecessary. (Channel DOGs fall into this category as well.)


-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] DOGs on the BBC TV online streams?

2009-01-13 Thread Brian Butterworth
It wouldn't be so bad if the DOG was at the corner of the 16:9 frame as you
can't do a centre-cut-out with the player.

2009/1/13 Christopher Woods chris...@infinitus.co.uk

 I've noticed that BBC One's online stream has a BBC One DOG on it, the same
 going for BBC Two. Isn't this one of the most impractical applications of a
 channel graphic ever? (and a waste of bits)

 -
 Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please
 visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
  Unofficial list archive:
 http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/




-- 

Brian Butterworth

follow me on twitter: http://twitter.com/briantist
web: http://www.ukfree.tv - independent digital television and switchover
advice, since 2002


Re: [backstage] DOGs on the BBC TV online streams?

2009-01-13 Thread backstage
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 07:22:30AM -, Christopher Woods wrote:
 I've noticed that BBC One's online stream has a BBC One DOG on it, the same
 going for BBC Two. Isn't this one of the most impractical applications of a
 channel graphic ever? (and a waste of bits)

Just so you know, it's taken me lots of googling to find out what
a DOG is... although I now know plenty about interactive dog toys!

http://www.bbc.co.uk/commissioning/tvbranding/restrictions.shtml
for anyone else who is quietly confused.

(And yes, it annoys me too!)
-- 
Flash Bristow -Web Design  Mastery -07939 579090
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Work: www.wdam.co.uk  Personal: www.gorge.org
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


RE: [backstage] DOGs on the BBC TV online streams?

2009-01-13 Thread Christopher Woods
 


  _  

From: owner-backst...@lists.bbc.co.uk
[mailto:owner-backst...@lists.bbc.co.uk] On Behalf Of Brian Butterworth
Sent: 13 January 2009 17:45
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: Re: [backstage] DOGs on the BBC TV online streams?


It wouldn't be so bad if the DOG was at the corner of the 16:9 frame as you
can't do a centre-cut-out with the player. 
 

Oh yeah, and that leads me to another gripe - the BBC Three, BBC Four, BBC
Parliament, CBeebies etc... DOGs on TV. Why are they in the 4:3 safe zone?!
 
Even Sky has realised that it's pointless and shuffled them over to the edge
of the 16:9 frame for Sky1, Sky2 and Sky3. Their logos are now also far less
obtrusive (read: not pink like one channel's logo!) and don't happen to
imprint themselves upon peoples' foreheads or onto the middle of objects in
the foreground or background... This is an amusing read which highlights
just how poor it can get (from BBC Three):
 
http://reviews.cnet.co.uk/ianmorris/0,139101819,49299905,00.htm 
 
I wish the Beeb would be bold and retire the DOGs! One press of a button to
bring up the search and scan banner will confirm which channel it is (or
just wait until the idents come on!)... But I doubt it'll happen.
 


[backstage] DOGs on the BBC TV online streams?

2009-01-12 Thread Christopher Woods
I've noticed that BBC One's online stream has a BBC One DOG on it, the same
going for BBC Two. Isn't this one of the most impractical applications of a
channel graphic ever? (and a waste of bits)

-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/