Re: [BackupPC-users] How does BackupPC 4.1.1 calculate Pools size?
Based upon my observations when testing it appears these are temporary files prior to being added to the pool. Craig - any input? Cheers! mph On 2017-05-05 10:29, Dieter Fauth wrote: > Hi Ray, > I have similar files in cpool. ~60GB in 6 files. > I suspected they were created in my experiments with archive host. At > least the file date would fit. > But that was a wild guess. > > Anybody else seeing such files? > > On Fri, 05 May 2017 18:15:23 +0200, Ray Frush> wrote: > >> I spotted two file stored in the cpool totaling 23.5GB, which is about >> the >> same as the discrepancy between the pool size that BackupPC reports and >> what I'm counting on the file system. >> >> ... >> drwxr-x---. 130 backuppc backuppc 8.0K May 4 01:00 18 >> -rw-rw. 1 backuppc backuppc 16G Apr 27 14:38 19524.1398.0 >> -rw-rw. 1 backuppc backuppc 7.5G Apr 27 14:44 19524.1399.0 >> drwxr-x---. 130 backuppc backuppc 8.0K May 4 01:00 1a >> drwxr-x---. 130 backuppc backuppc 8.0K May 4 01:00 1c >> ... >> >> Can you help me understand what these files are for?-- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
Re: [BackupPC-users] How does BackupPC 4.1.1 calculate Pools size?
Hi Ray, I have similar files in cpool. ~60GB in 6 files. I suspected they were created in my experiments with archive host. At least the file date would fit. But that was a wild guess. Anybody else seeing such files? On Fri, 05 May 2017 18:15:23 +0200, Ray Frushwrote: > I spotted two file stored in the cpool totaling 23.5GB, which is about > the > same as the discrepancy between the pool size that BackupPC reports and > what I'm counting on the file system. > > ... > drwxr-x---. 130 backuppc backuppc 8.0K May 4 01:00 18 > -rw-rw. 1 backuppc backuppc 16G Apr 27 14:38 19524.1398.0 > -rw-rw. 1 backuppc backuppc 7.5G Apr 27 14:44 19524.1399.0 > drwxr-x---. 130 backuppc backuppc 8.0K May 4 01:00 1a > drwxr-x---. 130 backuppc backuppc 8.0K May 4 01:00 1c > ... > > Can you help me understand what these files are for? > > > -- Many regards, Dieter Fauth :-) -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
Re: [BackupPC-users] How does BackupPC 4.1.1 calculate Pools size?
I spotted two file stored in the cpool totaling 23.5GB, which is about the same as the discrepancy between the pool size that BackupPC reports and what I'm counting on the file system. ... drwxr-x---. 130 backuppc backuppc 8.0K May 4 01:00 18 -rw-rw. 1 backuppc backuppc 16G Apr 27 14:38 19524.1398.0 -rw-rw. 1 backuppc backuppc 7.5G Apr 27 14:44 19524.1399.0 drwxr-x---. 130 backuppc backuppc 8.0K May 4 01:00 1a drwxr-x---. 130 backuppc backuppc 8.0K May 4 01:00 1c ... Can you help me understand what these files are for? -- Time flies like an arrow, but fruit flies like a banana. -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
Re: [BackupPC-users] Multiple issues on newly installed 4.1.0.
Hello again Craig, On Thu, 4 May 2017, Craig Barratt wrote: > ...I just pushed a fix (maybe not the final one) to git. > > Could you please test that change? ... Confirmed the infinite loop problem here is fixed: http://www.jubileegroup.co.uk/JOS/misc/week14.png http://www.jubileegroup.co.uk/JOS/misc/week18.png In case it's of interest I replaced BackupPC_tarExtract manually, no other change. I didn't have to edit the 'use lib' line as I have the installation in /usr/local/BackupPC/. Perhaps you missed the first paragraph of the OP in this thread. Any comments I might make on this list are intended to provide information which is hopefully helpful in making a good package better. In your reply to me of 9th April you asked > Are you sure you want to use SCGI? I wasn't exactly expecting that question. No, I'm not sure I want to use it, but it's what you told me to do in the documentation when I read it (Step 9: CGI interface). Until I read the three choices in the installation documentation I had never heard of SCGI. I have no interest in it whatever other than running BackupPC. The other two choices offered - running a second Apache on the same box or running something with a very reduced performance - seem to me to be inferior options. The point is I think now moot, however, as it was not SCGI which was spinning. There seem to be no other replies to your test request in this thread. You'd have had this present information nearly two weeks sooner if the 'daily' digest, to which I'm subscribed, came out more frequently than every couple of weeks. In the spirit of not making complaints I only mentioned that issue twice, about eight or nine years ago, and I have since then settled into a routine of setting aside some time to skim the 80 or so list posts in a typical digest. However if you'd like to have the problem fixed, if you give me the necessary access I'm sure I can do that for you. It would certainly help me. -- 73, Ged. -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/