Re: [BackupPC-users] Real Time View of What Is Being Copied
Hi, Yes you could create several rsyncsharename sections for the different folders. Or you could explicit exclude some folders from 1 share and create a seperate share to create a backup. You can even create multiple 'hosts' with each it's own share to backup different shares. In that case you could use the ClientNameAlias to point them to the same server. Met vriendelijke groet, Micha Kersloot [ https://www.kovoks.nl/ ] [ https://www.kovoks.nl/e-mail ] [ https://www.kovoks.nl/ | www.kovoks.nl ] | [ https://www.zimbra-nederland.nl/ | www.zimbra-nederland.nl ] | Volg [ http://twitter.com/kovoks | @kovoks ] op Twitter E [ mailto:mi...@kovoks.nl | mi...@kovoks.nl ] T +31 (0)345 - 53 29 27 / 0345 - 53 29 27 A [ https://goo.gl/maps/MrqmTv442tH2 | Belle van Zuylenlaan 1-5 ] | [ https://goo.gl/maps/MrqmTv442tH2 | 4105 JX Culemborg ] KvK 1104 > Van: "Akibu Flash" > Aan: "KovoKs" , "General list for user discussion, questions > and > support" > Verzonden: Donderdag 3 maart 2022 17:47:53 > Onderwerp: RE: Real Time View of What Is Being Copied > Thanks Micha. > This may be a silly question, but how does one split the backup into several > parts? Does that involve designating certain folders from a particular drive > for backup instead of the entire drive? > From: Micha Kersloot > Sent: Thursday, March 3, 2022 9:28 AM > To: General list for user discussion, questions and support > > Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Real Time View of What Is Being Copied > Hi, > you could try to split the backup in several parts? > Met vriendelijke groet, > Micha Kersloot > [ https://www.kovoks.nl/ ] > [ https://www.kovoks.nl/e-mail ] > [ https://www.kovoks.nl/ | www.kovoks.nl ] | [ > https://www.zimbra-nederland.nl/ > | www.zimbra-nederland.nl ] | Volg [ http://twitter.com/kovoks | @kovoks ] op > Twitter > E [ mailto:mi...@kovoks.nl | mi...@kovoks.nl ] > T +31 (0)345 - 53 29 27 / 0345 - 53 29 27 > A [ https://goo.gl/maps/MrqmTv442tH2 | Belle van Zuylenlaan 1-5 ] | [ > https://goo.gl/maps/MrqmTv442tH2 | 4105 JX Culemborg ] > KvK 1104 >> Van: "Akibu Flash" < [ mailto:akibufl...@outlook.com | >> akibufl...@outlook.com ] >> > >> Aan: "General list for user discussion, questions and support" < [ >> mailto:backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net | >> backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net ] > >> Verzonden: Donderdag 3 maart 2022 15:23:23 >> Onderwerp: Re: [BackupPC-users] Real Time View of What Is Being Copied >> Just bumping this up… any suggestions for a resolution? Thanks. >> From: Akibu Flash < [ mailto:akibufl...@outlook.com | akibufl...@outlook.com >> ] > >> Sent: Monday, February 28, 2022 4:32 PM >> To: [ mailto:BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net | >> BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net ] >> Subject: [BackupPC-users] Real Time View of What Is Being Copied >> Dear All, >> I backup a couple of Windows machines to a linux machine via rsync. However, >> the >> backup for one of the Windows machines never finishes and results in a >> partial >> backup. In the CGI user interface Count column, the backup always seems to >> hang >> at 311941 for hours and hours. Then at some point, the backup apparently >> stops >> and afterwards another backup which by that time has queued up starts anew. >> Never do I get a completed backup only a partial (at least for the last year >> or >> so). >> Is there a way to start a backup from the command line and have the screen >> show >> what in real time is actually being backed up? If so, what would that command >> be? It may be that the BackupPC is somehow getting stuck on a file but that >> is >> only speculation. >> Any other ideas as to what my be happening? >> I decompressed the partial backup log file (backup #884) using the command >> BackupPC_zcat XferLOG.884.z. I have reproduced the bottom portion below. >> Any assistance in helping to track down what is happening is appreciated. I >> do >> see in the log that there is an error message indicating an “error in the >> rsync >> protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(226). >> Thanks in advance. >> Best, Akibu >> G bpc_open(Downloads/Downloads/BackupPC-4.3.2/images/logo.gif, 0x0, 00) -> 3 >> G bpc_read(3 (Downloads/Downloads/BackupPC-4.3.2/images/logo.gif), buf, 1394) >> tmpFd = -1 >> G bpc_close(3 (Downloads/Downloads/BackupPC-4.3.2/images/logo.gif)) >> G bpc_fileDescFree: fdNum = 3, tmpFd = -1, tmpFileName = NULL >> G bpc_lstat(Downloads/Downloads/BackupPC-4.3.2/images/logo320.png) >> G bpc_file_checksum(Dow
Re: [BackupPC-users] Real Time View of What Is Being Copied
Hi, you could try to split the backup in several parts? Met vriendelijke groet, Micha Kersloot [ https://www.kovoks.nl/ ] [ https://www.kovoks.nl/e-mail ] [ https://www.kovoks.nl/ | www.kovoks.nl ] | [ https://www.zimbra-nederland.nl/ | www.zimbra-nederland.nl ] | Volg [ http://twitter.com/kovoks | @kovoks ] op Twitter E [ mailto:mi...@kovoks.nl | mi...@kovoks.nl ] T +31 (0)345 - 53 29 27 / 0345 - 53 29 27 A [ https://goo.gl/maps/MrqmTv442tH2 | Belle van Zuylenlaan 1-5 ] | [ https://goo.gl/maps/MrqmTv442tH2 | 4105 JX Culemborg ] KvK 1104 > Van: "Akibu Flash" > Aan: "General list for user discussion, questions and support" > > Verzonden: Donderdag 3 maart 2022 15:23:23 > Onderwerp: Re: [BackupPC-users] Real Time View of What Is Being Copied > Just bumping this up… any suggestions for a resolution? Thanks. > From: Akibu Flash > Sent: Monday, February 28, 2022 4:32 PM > To: BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: [BackupPC-users] Real Time View of What Is Being Copied > Dear All, > I backup a couple of Windows machines to a linux machine via rsync. However, > the > backup for one of the Windows machines never finishes and results in a partial > backup. In the CGI user interface Count column, the backup always seems to > hang > at 311941 for hours and hours. Then at some point, the backup apparently stops > and afterwards another backup which by that time has queued up starts anew. > Never do I get a completed backup only a partial (at least for the last year > or > so). > Is there a way to start a backup from the command line and have the screen > show > what in real time is actually being backed up? If so, what would that command > be? It may be that the BackupPC is somehow getting stuck on a file but that is > only speculation. > Any other ideas as to what my be happening? > I decompressed the partial backup log file (backup #884) using the command > BackupPC_zcat XferLOG.884.z. I have reproduced the bottom portion below. > Any assistance in helping to track down what is happening is appreciated. I do > see in the log that there is an error message indicating an “error in the > rsync > protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(226). > Thanks in advance. > Best, Akibu > G bpc_open(Downloads/Downloads/BackupPC-4.3.2/images/logo.gif, 0x0, 00) -> 3 > G bpc_read(3 (Downloads/Downloads/BackupPC-4.3.2/images/logo.gif), buf, 1394) > tmpFd = -1 > G bpc_close(3 (Downloads/Downloads/BackupPC-4.3.2/images/logo.gif)) > G bpc_fileDescFree: fdNum = 3, tmpFd = -1, tmpFileName = NULL > G bpc_lstat(Downloads/Downloads/BackupPC-4.3.2/images/logo320.png) > G bpc_file_checksum(Downloads/Downloads/BackupPC-4.3.2/images/logo320.png) > G bpc_open(Downloads/Downloads/BackupPC-4.3.2/images/logo320.png, 0x0, 00) -> > 3 > G bpc_read(3 (Downloads/Downloads/BackupPC-4.3.2/images/logo320.png), buf, > 7814) > tmpFd = -1 > G bpc_close(3 (Downloads/Downloads/BackupPC-4.3.2/images/logo320.png)) > G bpc_fileDescFree: fdNum = 3, tmpFd = -1, tmpFileName = NULL > rsync_bpc: connection unexpectedly closed (23961310 bytes received so far) > [receiver] > R bpc_sysCall_cleanup: doneInit = 1 > Done: 0 errors, 0 filesExist, 0 sizeExist, 0 sizeExistComp, 0 filesTotal, 0 > sizeTotal, 0 filesNew, 0 sizeNew, 0 sizeNewComp, 24467705 inode > Parsing done: nFilesTotal = 0 > rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(226) > [receiver=3.1.3.0] > rsync_bpc: connection unexpectedly closed (24012481 bytes received so far) > [generator] > G bpc_sysCall_cleanup: doneInit = 1 > DoneGen: 0 errors, 0 filesExist, 0 sizeExist, 0 sizeExistComp, 311942 > filesTotal, 569449707538 sizeTotal, 0 filesNew, 0 sizeNew, 0 sizeNewComp, > 24467704 inode > Parsing done: nFilesTotal = 311942 > rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(226) > [generator=3.1.3.0] > rsync_bpc exited with fatal status 12 (3072) (rsync error: error in rsync > protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(226) [generator=3.1.3.0]) > Xfer PIDs are now > Got fatal error during xfer (rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream > (code 12) at io.c(226) [generator=3.1.3.0]) > Backup aborted (rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at > io.c(226) [generator=3.1.3.0]) > BackupFailCleanup: nFilesTotal = 311942, type = full, BackupCase = 4, inPlace > = > 0, lastBkupNum = 883 > Removing prior partial backup #883 > Xfer PIDs are now 38440 > BackupPC_backupDelete: removing #883 > BackupPC_backupDelete: Merge into backup 327 > mergeDir: name = attrib, path = . > bpc_attrib_backwardCompat: WriteOldStyleAttribFile = 0, KeepOldAttribFiles = 0 > mergeDir: skipping name = refCnt, path = ./refCnt > me
[BackupPC-users] Difference between BackupPC 4.4.0 data usage and disk space.
Hi, I lost half my disk capacity? Or is there something else? I'm running BackupPC 4.4.0 now with around 100 clients to be backupped via rsync. At the moment only pool v4 is active. Status page says for several months, this kind of figures: Pool is 4152.10GiB comprising 20752385 files and 12384 directories (as of 2021-06-11 03:09), But disk is: Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/loods4--vg-home 9.7T 9.4T 352G 97% /var/lib/backuppc And: --- /var/lib/backuppc 9.1TiB [##] /cpool I did a ncdu scan and the storage seems to be distributed over the folders in cpool and not 1 folder is an obvious problem. I really would like to recover the 4TB of lost space (or be sure the correct usage is 9.4T then I know to add disks. Met vriendelijke groet, Micha Kersloot [ https://www.kovoks.nl/ ] [ https://www.kovoks.nl/e-mail ] [ https://www.kovoks.nl/ | www.kovoks.nl ] | [ https://www.zimbra-nederland.nl/ | www.zimbra-nederland.nl ] | Volg [ http://twitter.com/kovoks | @kovoks ] op Twitter E [ mailto:mi...@kovoks.nl"; | mi...@kovoks.nl ] T [ tel:+31 (0)345 - 53 29 27 | +31 (0)345 - 53 29 27 ] / 0345 - 53 29 27 A [ https://goo.gl/maps/MrqmTv442tH2 | Belle van Zuylenlaan 1-5 ] | [ https://goo.gl/maps/MrqmTv442tH2 | 4105 JX Culemborg ] KvK 1104 ___ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki:https://github.com/backuppc/backuppc/wiki Project: https://backuppc.github.io/backuppc/
Re: [BackupPC-users] Incremental backups succeed, full backups fail.
Num = 3, tmpFd = -1, tmpFileName = NULL
G bpc_lstat(C)
G bpc_lstat(C)
G bpc_opendir(C)
G
bpc_attrib_dirRead(/var/lib/backuppc/pc/win01.kovoks.nl/764/f%2fcygdrive%2fc%2fShadow/fC/attrib);
dirPath = /var/lib/backuppc/pc/win01.kovoks.nl/764, attribFilePath =
f%2fcygdrive%2fc%2fShadow/fC/attrib, attribFileName = attrib
G bpc_attrib_dirRead: Got attrib file attrib_e1b2fd86dfa439223f93b9b6e8841940:
digest = e1b2fd86dfa439223f93b9b6e8841940, len = 16
G bpc_readdir -> .
G bpc_readdir -> ..
G bpc_readdir -> $Recycle.Bin
G bpc_lstat(C/$Recycle.Bin)
G bpc_readdir -> Users
G bpc_lstat(C/Users)
G bpc_readdir -> Documents and Settings
G bpc_lstat(C/Documents and Settings)
G bpc_readlink(C/Documents and Settings, buf, 4095)
G bpc_readdir -> PerfLogs
G bpc_lstat(C/PerfLogs)
G bpc_readdir -> cygwin64
G bpc_lstat(C/cygwin64)
G bpc_readdir -> bootmgr
G bpc_lstat(C/bootmgr)
G bpc_readdir -> MSOCache
G bpc_lstat(C/MSOCache)
G bpc_readdir -> localsymbols
Met vriendelijke groet,
Micha Kersloot
- Original Message -
> From: "General list for user discussion, questions and support"
>
> To: "General list for user discussion, questions and support"
>
> Cc: "Craig Barratt"
> Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2018 6:05:50 PM
> Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Incremental backups succeed, full backups fail.
> Please email me the entire XferLOG file (or the first ~100 lines if it's too
> big).
> Please also tell me your settings for $Conf{XferMethod}, $Conf{RsyncArgs},
> $Conf{RsyncFullArgsExtra}, $Conf{RsyncClientPath}, $Conf{RsyncSshArgs}, and
> $Conf{RsyncArgsExtra}. What is your client's rsync version?
> Craig
> On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 5:54 AM, Micha Kersloot < [ mailto:mi...@kovoks.nl |
> mi...@kovoks.nl ] > wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I'm using BackupPC for several years now (upgraded to 4.1.5, but the problem
>> existed before), but lately full backups of 2 servers started to fail. We are
>> using rsync over ssh for all backups. Mainly Linux servers and some Windows
>> server where we installed Cygwin sshd and rsync to facilitate the backup. We
>> run little scripts to create a disk shadow before we start the backup and
>> clear
>> it when the backup is finished. I've moved one of the client servers to
>> another
>> BackupPC server and the backup runs without any problems on that server. I
>> can
>> use the second failing server to try to debug why the backup fails.
>> So far I've upgraded the server from 3.xxx to 4.1.5, but that didn't change
>> anything.
>> Incremental backups always succeed.
>> I've created a new 'server' in backuppc to have a clean starting point, but
>> that
>> full backup also never succeeded.
>> I've changed the XferLogLevel to 7 to see if it shows anything, but the only
>> error I can find is:
>> rsync_bpc: connection unexpectedly closed (5560630 bytes received so far)
>> [receiver]
>> rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(629)
>> [receiver=3.0.9.12]
>> rsync_bpc: connection unexpectedly closed (342 bytes received so far)
>> [generator]
>> How can I debug this further to find the real problem?
>> Any help is appreciated.
>> Kind regards,
>> Micha Kersloot
>> Chat with us via [ http://t.me/kovoksbot | Telegram ]
>> [ https://www.kovoks.nl/ ]
>> [ https://www.kovoks.nl/e-mail ]
>> [ https://www.kovoks.nl/ | www.kovoks.nl ] | [ https://www.mailcasa.eu/ |
>> www.mailcasa.eu ] | Follow [ http://twitter.com/kovoks | @kovoks ] on Twitter
>> E [ mailto:mi...@kovoks.nl%22 | mi...@kovoks.nl ]
>> T [ tel:+31%20(0)345%20-%2053%2029%2027 | +31 (0)345 - 53 29 27 ]
>> A [ https://goo.gl/maps/MrqmTv442tH2 | Belle van Zuylenlaan 1-5 ] | [
>> https://goo.gl/maps/MrqmTv442tH2 | 4105 JX Culemborg | The Netherlands ]
>> KvK 1104
>> --
>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! [ http://sdm.link/slashdot |
>> http://sdm.link/slashdot ]
>> ___
>> BackupPC-users mailing list
>> [ mailto:BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net |
>> BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net ]
>> List: [ https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users |
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users ]
>> Wiki: [ http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net/ |
>> http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net ]
>> Project: [ http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/ |
>> http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/ ]
> --
[BackupPC-users] Incremental backups succeed, full backups fail.
Hi, I'm using BackupPC for several years now (upgraded to 4.1.5, but the problem existed before), but lately full backups of 2 servers started to fail. We are using rsync over ssh for all backups. Mainly Linux servers and some Windows server where we installed Cygwin sshd and rsync to facilitate the backup. We run little scripts to create a disk shadow before we start the backup and clear it when the backup is finished. I've moved one of the client servers to another BackupPC server and the backup runs without any problems on that server. I can use the second failing server to try to debug why the backup fails. So far I've upgraded the server from 3.xxx to 4.1.5, but that didn't change anything. Incremental backups always succeed. I've created a new 'server' in backuppc to have a clean starting point, but that full backup also never succeeded. I've changed the XferLogLevel to 7 to see if it shows anything, but the only error I can find is: rsync_bpc: connection unexpectedly closed (5560630 bytes received so far) [receiver] rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(629) [receiver=3.0.9.12] rsync_bpc: connection unexpectedly closed (342 bytes received so far) [generator] How can I debug this further to find the real problem? Any help is appreciated. Kind regards, Micha Kersloot Chat with us via [ http://t.me/kovoksbot | Telegram ] [ https://www.kovoks.nl/ ] [ https://www.kovoks.nl/e-mail ] [ https://www.kovoks.nl/ | www.kovoks.nl ] | [ https://www.mailcasa.eu/ | www.mailcasa.eu ] | Follow [ http://twitter.com/kovoks | @kovoks ] on Twitter E [ mailto:mi...@kovoks.nl%22 | mi...@kovoks.nl ] T [ tel:+31 (0)345 - 53 29 27 | +31 (0)345 - 53 29 27 ] A [ https://goo.gl/maps/MrqmTv442tH2 | Belle van Zuylenlaan 1-5 ] | [ https://goo.gl/maps/MrqmTv442tH2 | 4105 JX Culemborg | The Netherlands ] KvK 1104 smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
Re: [BackupPC-users] Data integrity checks
Hi, as far as I understood it is the full backup that compares the files on the backuppc server and the client machine. Checksums will be calculated on both sides and compared. http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/faq/BackupPC.html#Rsync-checksum-caching Met vriendelijke groet, Micha Kersloot www.kovoks.nl | www.mailcasa.eu | Volg @kovoks op Twitter E mi...@kovoks.nl T +31 (0)345 - 53 29 27 A Belle van Zuylenlaan 1-5 | 4105 JX Culemborg KvK 1104 > From: "Jan Stransky" > To: "General list for user discussion, questions and support" > > Sent: Monday, 2 January, 2017 14:06:22 > Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Data integrity checks > Hi, > I have asked, because I have learnt about a tool, which calculates and store > checksums of individual files as extended attributes. The basic idea was to > check after a data transfer easily. I could imagine that similar concept could > help track nasty things happening on both backuppc side and client side. Like > checking sums of files which shouldn't change etc. The point is, when one > instance of hardlink is corrupted, all others are too. > I believe, that ZFS can help with that, ZFS is not always possible. Something > like mentioned above would make it less dependet on filesystem. > Jan > On 01/02/2017 01:47 PM, Andreas Piening wrote: >> Hi Jan, >> the file based deduplication is based on checksums, so if a new file is >> stored >> with the same name and file-size it will only be stored as a new file if the >> checksum is different. If the checksum is different, a hard link will be used >> to point at the already existing copy. >> But these checksums are used for deduplication only and as far as I know >> there >> is no additional integrity check, for example on a restore. >> Honestly I don’t think it is really needed. I’m using a ZFS volume for >> backuppc >> which has build in block level checksums for integrity. >> Probably this is an option for you? >> Kind regards >> Andreas >>> Am 02.01.2017 um 12:29 schrieb Jan Stransky < jan.stransky.c...@gmail.com >: >>> Hi, >>> does backuppc do some data integrity checks on stored files or files >>> to-be-stored? Something like regular md5sum checks. >>> Jan >> -- >> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most >> engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot >> ___ >> BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List: >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki: >> http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: >> http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/ > -- > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > ___ > BackupPC-users mailing list > BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net > List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users > Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net > Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/ -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
Re: [BackupPC-users] access backups created by different server
Hi, the configuration is in /etc/backuppc there is a hosts file which defines the active hosts. It could be enough to add the host you wish to restore to this file. Met vriendelijke groet, Micha Kersloot www.kovoks.nl | www.mailcasa.eu | Volg @kovoks op Twitter E mi...@kovoks.nl T +31 (0)345 - 53 29 27 A Bellweg 36 | 4104 BJ Culemborg KvK 1104 - Oorspronkelijk bericht - > Van: "Michele Zarri" > Aan: backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Verzonden: Woensdag 7 september 2016 18:37:42 > Onderwerp: [BackupPC-users] access backups created by different server > Hello, > > Is it possible to access backups created with a different machine? > > My backuppc server died, but /var/lib/backuppc was on a different disk > so I still have full backups of localhost. > Ideally I would like to restore the full system but it would already be > very good to recover the mysql databases and selected system > configuration files. > > I reinstalled ubuntu, reinstalled backuppc, relinked /var/lib/backuppc but > - No joy with the GUI (old backups do not show) > - No joy using the command line. > > (as backuppc user) > $ /usr/share/backuppc/bin/BackupPC_tarCreate -h localhost -n 224 -s '/' > /var/lib/mysql > /tmp/dbs.tar > /usr/share/backuppc/bin/BackupPC_tarCreate: bad backup number 224 for > host localhost > > - BackupPC_zcat works but I have not figured out how to restore > user:group and permissions > > Is there a way to get the GUI to read the backups (I am lazy)? If not is > there a way to trick BackupPC_tarCreate? > > Note that when I re-installed backuppc it probably wrote new files in > /var/lib/backuppc/pc/ and I do not have backups of those. > > Cheers, > > Michele > > -- > ___ > BackupPC-users mailing list > BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net > List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users > Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net > Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/ -- ___ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
Re: [BackupPC-users] samba backup operation
Ah my mistake, although I do not use the smb backup solution, I found that the incremental smbclient command uses a -TcN $timeStampFile which should only backup the files newer than the $timeStampFile. It looks like it is really an incremental backup to me. Met vriendelijke groet, Micha Kersloot __ www.kovoks.nl | www.mailcasa.eu | Twitter.com/kovoks E i...@kovoks.nl T +31 (0)345 - 53 29 27 A Bellweg 36 | 4104 BJ Culemborg KvK Tiel 1104 __ > Van: "Philip Parsons (Velindre - Medical Physics)" > > Aan: "KovoKs" , "General list for user discussion, questions > and > support" > Verzonden: Donderdag 24 december 2015 14:31:17 > Onderwerp: RE: samba backup operation > Micha, > Thanks, but I was specifically interested in the differences for SMB. > Thanks, > Phil. > From: Micha Kersloot [mailto:mi...@kovoks.nl] > Sent: 24 December 2015 12:08 > To: General list for user discussion, questions and support > Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] samba backup operation > Hi, > The difference is the usage of the -ignore-times function of rsync which is > used > in the full backup run. > Met vriendelijke groet, > Micha Kersloot > __ > www.kovoks.nl | www.mailcasa.eu | Twitter.com/kovoks > E i...@kovoks.nl > T +31 (0)345 - 53 29 27 > A Bellweg 36 | 4104 BJ Culemborg > KvK Tiel 1104 > __ >> Van: "Philip Parsons (Velindre - Medical Physics)" < >> philip.pars...@wales.nhs.uk >> > >> Aan: backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net >> Verzonden: Donderdag 24 december 2015 12:24:53 >> Onderwerp: [BackupPC-users] samba backup operation >> Hi all, >> Thanks in advance for your help. >> It seems to me that for an rsyncd backup the incremental backups use the file >> attributes to check which files need to be backed up, but for the full backup >> this is turned off and block checksums are used to check the file >> differences. >> However, I can’t see what the differences are between incremental and full >> for >> smb backups. Can anyone help me? >> Thank, >> Phil. >> -- >> ___ >> BackupPC-users mailing list >> BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net >> List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users >> Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net >> Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/ -- ___ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
Re: [BackupPC-users] samba backup operation
Hi, The difference is the usage of the -ignore-times function of rsync which is used in the full backup run. Met vriendelijke groet, Micha Kersloot __ www.kovoks.nl | www.mailcasa.eu | Twitter.com/kovoks E i...@kovoks.nl T +31 (0)345 - 53 29 27 A Bellweg 36 | 4104 BJ Culemborg KvK Tiel 1104 __ > Van: "Philip Parsons (Velindre - Medical Physics)" > > Aan: backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Verzonden: Donderdag 24 december 2015 12:24:53 > Onderwerp: [BackupPC-users] samba backup operation > Hi all, > Thanks in advance for your help. > It seems to me that for an rsyncd backup the incremental backups use the file > attributes to check which files need to be backed up, but for the full backup > this is turned off and block checksums are used to check the file differences. > However, I can’t see what the differences are between incremental and full for > smb backups. Can anyone help me? > Thank, > Phil. > -- > ___ > BackupPC-users mailing list > BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net > List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users > Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net > Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/ -- ___ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
Re: [BackupPC-users] R: Re: FullKeepCnt
Hi,
Is BackPC deleting backups? As in do you have constantly 2 full backups and 1
incr.? And if you view a incr. backup it says in the top which backup sessions
it is using to create the view, maybe that will give some clues. And what about
that Partial backup? Do you know the reason for that one?
Met vriendelijke groet,
Micha Kersloot
__
www.kovoks.nl | www.mailcasa.eu | Twitter.com/kovoks
E i...@kovoks.nl
T +31 (0)345 - 53 29 27
A Bellweg 36 | 4104 BJ Culemborg
KvK Tiel 1104
__
> From: "absolutely free"
> To: backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Sent: Monday, 7 December, 2015 09:33:05
> Subject: [BackupPC-users] R: Re: FullKeepCnt
> Hi Micha,
> sorry for my delay, actually I have (in order)
> 1. FULL backup
> 2. FULL backup
> 3. INCREMENTAL backup
> 4. PARTIAL backup
> So I wondering why I have TWO full backup one after another.
> Thank you!
>> Messaggio originale
>> Da: mi...@kovoks.nl
>> Data: 02/12/2015 11.29
>> A: "absolutely free", "General list for user
>> discussion, questions and support"
>> Ogg: Re: [BackupPC-users] FullKeepCnt
>> Hi,
>> I guess that if the incremental depends on one full and the new full backup
>> is
>> made you'll end up with two full backups and 1 incremental depending on the
>> oldest full backup. But! BackupPC is very good at deduplicating data on disk,
>> so full backups and incremental backups do not differ in the amount of space
>> that is used on disk. The main difference between a full and an incremental
>> backup is that a full backup will compare all data on the client with the
>> data
>> on the backup server and incremental wil only look for changes on the client.
>> We've found it is probably only necessary to limit the number of backups when
>> you are dealing with large (binary) blobs that change every day. For example
>> database dumps.
>> Met vriendelijke groet,
>> Micha Kersloot
>> __
>> www.kovoks.nl | www.mailcasa.eu | Twitter.com/kovoks
>> E i...@kovoks.nl
>> T +31 (0)345 - 53 29 27
>> A Bellweg 36 | 4104 BJ Culemborg
>> KvK Tiel 1104
>> __
>>> From: "absolutely free"
>>> To: backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> Sent: Wednesday, December 2, 2015 9:05:09 AM
>>> Subject: [BackupPC-users] FullKeepCnt
>>> Hi,
>>> in order to save space, I set:
>>> $Conf{FullKeepCnt} = [ '1' ];
>>> $Conf{FullKeepCntMin} = '1';
>>> on a specific host.
>>> Some days later, I checked and I still have 2 full backups, 1 incremental
>>> and 1
>>> partial.
>>> Should I wait more?
>>> I attach some relevant config (global, I mean /etc/backuppc/config.pl)
>>> $Conf{MaxBackupPCNightlyJobs} = '2';
>>> $Conf{BackupPCNightlyPeriod} = '8';
>>> $Conf{FullPeriod} = '6.97';
>>> $Conf{IncrPeriod} = '0.97';
>>> $Conf{FullKeepCnt} = [
>>> '2'
>>> ];
>>> $Conf{FullKeepCntMin} = '2';
>>> $Conf{FullAgeMax} = '15';
>>> $Conf{IncrKeepCnt} = '6';
>>> $Conf{IncrKeepCntMin} = '1';
>>> $Conf{IncrAgeMax} = '15';
>>> $Conf{IncrLevels} = [
>>> '1'
>>> ];
>>> thank you
>>> --
>>> Go from Idea to Many App Stores Faster with Intel(R) XDK
>>> Give your users amazing mobile app experiences with Intel(R) XDK.
>>> Use one codebase in this all-in-one HTML5 development environment.
>>> Design, debug & build mobile apps & 2D/3D high-impact games for multiple
>>> OSs.
>>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=254741911&iu=/4140
>>> ___
>>> BackupPC-users mailing list
>>> BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
>>> Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
>>> Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
> --
> Go from Idea to Many App Stores Faster with Intel(R) XDK
> Give your users amazing mobile app experiences with Intel(R) XDK.
> Use one codebase in this all-in-one HTML5 development environment.
> Design, debug & build mo
Re: [BackupPC-users] FullKeepCnt
Hi,
I guess that if the incremental depends on one full and the new full backup is
made you'll end up with two full backups and 1 incremental depending on the
oldest full backup. But! BackupPC is very good at deduplicating data on disk,
so full backups and incremental backups do not differ in the amount of space
that is used on disk. The main difference between a full and an incremental
backup is that a full backup will compare all data on the client with the data
on the backup server and incremental wil only look for changes on the client.
We've found it is probably only necessary to limit the number of backups when
you are dealing with large (binary) blobs that change every day. For example
database dumps.
Met vriendelijke groet,
Micha Kersloot
__
www.kovoks.nl | www.mailcasa.eu | Twitter.com/kovoks
E i...@kovoks.nl
T +31 (0)345 - 53 29 27
A Bellweg 36 | 4104 BJ Culemborg
KvK Tiel 1104
__
> From: "absolutely free"
> To: backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Sent: Wednesday, December 2, 2015 9:05:09 AM
> Subject: [BackupPC-users] FullKeepCnt
> Hi,
> in order to save space, I set:
> $Conf{FullKeepCnt} = [ '1' ];
> $Conf{FullKeepCntMin} = '1';
> on a specific host.
> Some days later, I checked and I still have 2 full backups, 1 incremental and
> 1
> partial.
> Should I wait more?
> I attach some relevant config (global, I mean /etc/backuppc/config.pl)
> $Conf{MaxBackupPCNightlyJobs} = '2';
> $Conf{BackupPCNightlyPeriod} = '8';
> $Conf{FullPeriod} = '6.97';
> $Conf{IncrPeriod} = '0.97';
> $Conf{FullKeepCnt} = [
> '2'
> ];
> $Conf{FullKeepCntMin} = '2';
> $Conf{FullAgeMax} = '15';
> $Conf{IncrKeepCnt} = '6';
> $Conf{IncrKeepCntMin} = '1';
> $Conf{IncrAgeMax} = '15';
> $Conf{IncrLevels} = [
> '1'
> ];
> thank you
> --
> Go from Idea to Many App Stores Faster with Intel(R) XDK
> Give your users amazing mobile app experiences with Intel(R) XDK.
> Use one codebase in this all-in-one HTML5 development environment.
> Design, debug & build mobile apps & 2D/3D high-impact games for multiple OSs.
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=254741911&iu=/4140
> ___
> BackupPC-users mailing list
> BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
> Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
> Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
--
Go from Idea to Many App Stores Faster with Intel(R) XDK
Give your users amazing mobile app experiences with Intel(R) XDK.
Use one codebase in this all-in-one HTML5 development environment.
Design, debug & build mobile apps & 2D/3D high-impact games for multiple OSs.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=254741911&iu=/4140___
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
Re: [BackupPC-users] Feature request: remote pools (was: Is it possible to split a large pool?)
Hi, - Original Message - > From: "higuita" > To: "Russell Poyner" > Cc: backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Sent: Friday, November 13, 2015 1:03:11 AM > Subject: [BackupPC-users] Feature request: remote pools (was: Is it possible > to split a large pool?) > One can make backups of different kind of machines or remote > branches or expand the backup pool to several machines. This also > allow one to "migrate" backups by reconfiguring a host from one pool to > another and wait some days to have new backups on the new pool and expire > old backups on the old pool. Yes, this would require a new full total > backup on the new pool, but any server migration always require a full > read© of the data, one way or another. This is more or less the way we move machines to another backup server. If a server is getting somewhat full, we buy a new server, backup some of the client servers to this new backup server and after a while remove the backups from the old server. So that is already possible with the current version of BackupPC. The only thing that seems to be solved in your proposal is that the management can be done from one server instead of managing multiple servers. I think that is not the biggest problem. Our problem is that we lose the history when moving a client backup to another backup server. The only thing we could come up with to solve this a little bit is to implement a new server long before the old one is really full and then let the backup run on this new server for a longer time to create a new history before deleting it from the old server. If it can help anyone, here is our procedure. 1. If backup server is > 70% full, request new server. 2. Backup some of the clients on new server, hold backup on the old server. 3. Let the backup on the new server run for > 3 months 4. Delete backup from old server and hope there are no restore request for data older than 3 months. It's a bit of a hassle, but BackupPC is totally worth it! Greetings, Micha Kersloot __ www.kovoks.nl | www.mailcasa.eu | Twitter.com/kovoks E i...@kovoks.nl T +31 (0)345 - 53 29 27 A Bellweg 36 | 4104 BJ Culemborg KvK Tiel 1104 __ -- ___ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
Re: [BackupPC-users] Usage of BackupPC in large environment
Hi, Using it here for the same amount of servers, both in the datacenter and remote. Because of the high load on the storage devices in the machine, we've choosen to split the backups over multiple smaller backuppc servers. We still experience a load > 10 during backup season, but as the server is not used for interactive session, we just accept that. Met vriendelijke groet, Micha Kersloot Blijf op de hoogte en ontvang de laatste tips over Zimbra/KovoKs Contact: http://twitter.com/kovoks KovoKs B.V. is ingeschreven onder KvK nummer: 1104 - Original Message - > From: "Andreas Schnederle-Wagner - Futureweb.at" > To: backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 9:26:18 AM > Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Usage of BackupPC in large environment > Hello Andrea, > > we are using BackupPC for ~60 Servers with a total (deduped) Capacity of 6 TB > - > and no problems so far ... > > > 375 full backups of total size 15200.45GB (prior to pooling and > compression), > 758 incr backups of total size 6682.27GB (prior to pooling and > compression). > > > But you definately want a fast Storage for BackupPC ... we got a RAID 5 with > about 8 HDDs - and often got very high IO-Load on the Backup Server ... > > > Hope those Infos will help you, bye from Austria > Andreas > > > > Andreas Schnederle-Wagner > Futureweb OG > Innsbrucker Str. 4 > 6380 St. Johann > > schnede...@futureweb.at > www.futureweb.at > www.ortsinfo.at > > Fon: +43 (0) 5352 65335-0 > Fax: +43 (0) 5352 65335-777 > Gratis über Skype anrufen | Skype-ID: futureweb > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Andrea Carpani [mailto:andrea.carp...@dnshosting.it] > Gesendet: Freitag, 27. Februar 2015 09:15 > An: backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Betreff: [BackupPC-users] Usage of BackupPC in large environment > > Hello, > > I'm currently evaluating BackupPC as a backup solution and I have some > questions > to begin with. > > My main concern is about the environment we're going to backup: we have > ~100 shared hosting servers. > This means that each server has: > ~ 400 users > ~ 300Gb /home partition > ~ 8M files on each server > > I know the pimary target for BackupPC is laptops and desktops: has anyone ever > tried this software in such environment? > > Regards, > > -- > .a.c. > Andrea Carpani > andrea.carp...@dnshosting.it > +39 329 722 1309 > > > -- > Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored > by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all > things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to > news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the > conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ > ___ > BackupPC-users mailing list > BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net > List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users > Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net > Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/ > > -- > Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored > by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all > things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to > news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the > conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ > ___ > BackupPC-users mailing list > BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net > List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users > Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net > Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/ -- Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ ___ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
Re: [BackupPC-users] Child exited prematurely
Hi, I guess you are using the rsync over ssh option to make backups? it's quite hard to debug this, but 9 out of 10 times its the ssh / rsync connection that is failing. Login on the backuppc server, become the backuppc user and try to make an connection manualy via f.e. ssh Met vriendelijke groet, Micha Kersloot Blijf op de hoogte en ontvang de laatste tips over Zimbra/KovoKs Contact: http://twitter.com/kovoks KovoKs B.V. is ingeschreven onder KvK nummer: 1104 - Original Message - > From: "absolutely free" > To: backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Sent: Friday, October 3, 2014 9:54:35 AM > Subject: [BackupPC-users] Child exited prematurely > > Hi, > I got this error: > > The following hosts had an error that is probably caused by a > misconfiguration. Please fix these hosts: > - server.domain.com (Child exited prematurely) > > Regards, > PC Backup Genie > > I am sure that is it not a configuration issue (I never changed conf file). > Through BackupPC web interface I got this: > > [ skipped 864487 lines ] > Parent read EOF from child: fatal error! > Done: 0 files, 0 bytes > Got fatal error during xfer (Child exited prematurely) > Backup aborted (Child exited prematurely) > Not saving this as a partial backup since it has fewer files than the prior > one (got 11 and 0 files versus 11) > > How can I determine what caused this problem? > > Thank you > > -- > Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer > Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports > Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper > Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > ___ > BackupPC-users mailing list > BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net > List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users > Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net > Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/ > -- Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk ___ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
[BackupPC-users] Mail missed backup only after 30 days
Hi, we're using backuppc for several Linux machines. If a server is unavailable we get a message that the backup failed which is perfect. But for one server we got the message only when the backup failed for 30 days so we where not aware of the problem, but after 30 days. I've tried to find any info on how this can happened, but so far I've found almost no info on how to debug this problem or on which mail is sent when. Another server which is unavailable regularly does trigger the mails and all other messages seem to be sent. Anybody knows where to start debugging this problem? Met vriendelijke groet, Micha Kersloot Blijf op de hoogte en ontvang de laatste tips over Zimbra/KovoKs Contact: http://twitter.com/kovoks KovoKs B.V. is ingeschreven onder KvK nummer: 1104 -- "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free." http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs___ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd full backup
Hi, You could also go from raid1 to raid10. Met vriendelijke groet, Micha Kersloot Blijf op de hoogte en ontvang de laatste tips over Zimbra/KovoKs Contact: http://twitter.com/kovoks KovoKs B.V. is ingeschreven onder KvK nummer: 1104 - Oorspronkelijk bericht - > Van: "Adam Goryachev" > Aan: "General list for user discussion, questions and support" > > Verzonden: Donderdag 31 oktober 2013 04:13:42 > Onderwerp: Re: [BackupPC-users] rsyncd full backup > > On 31/10/13 13:56, Sharuzzaman Ahmat Raslan wrote: > > Hi Adam, > > > > The low I/O is when the machine is under load. > > > > Thank you for suggesting to use SSD. I have been thinking about that > > as well, but currently, the storage of BackupPC is using a 1TB disk, > > with about 80% utilization. > > > > Changing to 1TB SSD might be a little bit overkill on the customer's > > budget :) > > > Sure, 2 x 480GB SSD in linear RAID is still relatively expensive :) > though it certainly is a huge performance improvement. BTW, FYI, I get > 2.5GB/s read and 1.5GB/s write performance from my RAID5... > > > Maybe I should look at bcache for Linux :) > > > > https://lwn.net/Articles/497024/ > > http://bcache.evilpiepirate.org/ > > > I've seen that also, but I'm not sure it is a good (stable) solution for > real use (at least, I'm not prepared to use that for a server yet, your > tolerance might be different). In addition, it probably won't help the > backup work load, since you need to read the entire disk, and the entire > disk won't fit into the cache > > Regards, > Adam > > -- > Adam Goryachev > Website Managers > P: +61 2 8304 a...@websitemanagers.com.au > F: +61 2 8304 0001 www.websitemanagers.com.au > > > -- > Adam Goryachev Website Managers www.websitemanagers.com.au > > -- > Android is increasing in popularity, but the open development platform that > developers love is also attractive to malware creators. Download this white > paper to learn more about secure code signing practices that can help keep > Android apps secure. > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=65839951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > ___ > BackupPC-users mailing list > BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net > List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users > Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net > Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/ > -- Android is increasing in popularity, but the open development platform that developers love is also attractive to malware creators. Download this white paper to learn more about secure code signing practices that can help keep Android apps secure. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=65839951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk ___ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
Re: [BackupPC-users] Running backuppc on a raspberry pi - possible ?
Hi, I'm not sure if there is a port, but you can run out of memory, depending on which protocol you want to use. I'm running BackupPC on a 1GB EEE PC and the OOM killer kicks in now and then. Met vriendelijke groet, Micha Kersloot Altijd en overal bij je belangrijkste gegevens? http://www.exchange-alternatief.com/ KovoKs B.V. is ingeschreven onder KvK nummer: 1104 - Original Message - > From: "Poul Nielsen" > To: backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2012 9:27:45 PM > Subject: [BackupPC-users] Running backuppc on a raspberry pi - possible ? > > I am considering using a raspberry pi which is a very low power, low > spec linux unit. > > > http://www.raspberrypi.org/ > CPU: 700 MHz ARM11 ARM1176JZF-S core > Memory (SDRAM)iB 256 MiB > USB 2.0 ports:2 (via integrated USB hub) > > > Wanted: > - home use > - versioned backup from a number of PCs and devices > - speed is not essential > - using rsync where possible > > rsync might need more memory than the max 192 Mb available? > > Any experience ? > > > -- > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. > Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in > malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > ___ > BackupPC-users mailing list > BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net > List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users > Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net > Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/ > -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
Re: [BackupPC-users] RE : Rsync mkdir restore errors
Hi, In that case, you need 'sudo ' to run the command with the administrator rights. Because everything is done by rsync, then when you trust your backuppc server, it maybe easier to connect as root and not as backup user. Met vriendelijke groet, Micha Kersloot Altijd en overal bij je belangrijkste gegevens? http://www.exchange-alternatief.com/ KovoKs B.V. is ingeschreven onder KvK nummer: 1104 - Oorspronkelijk bericht - > Van: "Yannick REIN" > Aan: "Micha Kersloot" , "General list for user discussion, > questions and support" > > Verzonden: Maandag 27 februari 2012 14:17:17 > Onderwerp: RE : [BackupPC-users] Rsync mkdir restore errors > > Hi, > > I use the default user backup (debian6), > > Linux debian 2.6.32-5-686 #1 SMP Mon Jan 16 16:04:25 UTC 2012 i686 > GNU/Linux > > cat /etc/sudoers on client : > > # User privilege specification > rootALL=(ALL) ALL > backup ALL=NOPASSWD: /usr/bin/rsync > backup ALL=NOPASSWD: /bin/mkdir # Rights to create folders > > Thanks! > > De : Micha Kersloot [mi...@kovoks.nl] > Date d'envoi : lundi 27 février 2012 14:02 > À : General list for user discussion, questions and support > Objet : Re: [BackupPC-users] Rsync mkdir restore errors > > Hi, > > as what user are you connecting to the server where you want to > restore the backup? Does that user have enough rigths to create the > folders? > > Met vriendelijke groet, > > Micha Kersloot > > Altijd en overal bij je belangrijkste gegevens? > http://www.exchange-alternatief.com/ > > KovoKs B.V. is ingeschreven onder KvK nummer: 1104 > > - Oorspronkelijk bericht - > > Van: "Yannick REIN" > > Aan: backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > > Verzonden: Maandag 27 februari 2012 12:47:03 > > Onderwerp: [BackupPC-users] Rsync mkdir restore errors > > > > Hi all, > > > > I have a problem with my backuppc, when i make a restore from a > > backup. > > > > When i try to restore a backup, the following error occured : > > > > Remote[1]: rsync: recv_generator: mkdir "/FOLDER" failed: > > Permission > > denied (13) > > Remote[1]: *** Skipping any contents from this failed directory *** > > > > So i decided to create the Folder on the remote server, and the > > same > > error appared. > > I make a "chmod 777" on the folder and then it works!!! > > > > I have search on google for this error and several answer says : > > "make a mkdir -p" > > > > That's great but for the Rsync in Backuppc how can i make this? > > > > Thank you!! > > > > -- > > Try before you buy = See our experts in action! > > The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft > > developers > > is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, > > MVC3, > > Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe > > now! > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2 > > ___ > > BackupPC-users mailing list > > BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net > > List: > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users > > Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net > > Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/ > > > > -- > Try before you buy = See our experts in action! > The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft > developers > is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, > MVC3, > Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2 > ___ > BackupPC-users mailing list > BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net > List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users > Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net > Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/ > -- Try before you buy = See our experts in action! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2 ___ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
Re: [BackupPC-users] Rsync mkdir restore errors
Hi, as what user are you connecting to the server where you want to restore the backup? Does that user have enough rigths to create the folders? Met vriendelijke groet, Micha Kersloot Altijd en overal bij je belangrijkste gegevens? http://www.exchange-alternatief.com/ KovoKs B.V. is ingeschreven onder KvK nummer: 1104 - Oorspronkelijk bericht - > Van: "Yannick REIN" > Aan: backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Verzonden: Maandag 27 februari 2012 12:47:03 > Onderwerp: [BackupPC-users] Rsync mkdir restore errors > > Hi all, > > I have a problem with my backuppc, when i make a restore from a > backup. > > When i try to restore a backup, the following error occured : > > Remote[1]: rsync: recv_generator: mkdir "/FOLDER" failed: Permission > denied (13) > Remote[1]: *** Skipping any contents from this failed directory *** > > So i decided to create the Folder on the remote server, and the same > error appared. > I make a "chmod 777" on the folder and then it works!!! > > I have search on google for this error and several answer says : > "make a mkdir -p" > > That's great but for the Rsync in Backuppc how can i make this? > > Thank you!! > > -- > Try before you buy = See our experts in action! > The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft > developers > is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, > MVC3, > Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2 > ___ > BackupPC-users mailing list > BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net > List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users > Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net > Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/ > -- Try before you buy = See our experts in action! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2 ___ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
Re: [BackupPC-users] The famous Backup aborted (Unable to read 4 bytes) error
Hi All, all is fixed now, 3 days working in a row. Thank you all for your support! Met vriendelijke groet, Micha Kersloot Altijd en overal bij je belangrijkste gegevens? http://www.exchange-alternatief.com/ KovoKs B.V. is ingeschreven onder KvK nummer: 1104 - Oorspronkelijk bericht - > Van: "Micha Kersloot" > Aan: backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Verzonden: Vrijdag 24 februari 2012 10:51:18 > Onderwerp: Re: [BackupPC-users] The famous Backup aborted (Unable to read 4 > bytes) error > > Hi, > > - Oorspronkelijk bericht - > > Van: "on horseback through Eurasia" > > Aan: i...@kovoks.nl > > Cc: backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net, i...@kovoks.nl > > Verzonden: Donderdag 23 februari 2012 18:55:24 > > Onderwerp: Re: [BackupPC-users] The famous Backup aborted (Unable > > to read 4 bytes) error > > > > Check your ssh login > > r, > > Michel > > You seem to be right. It looks like there is a firewall which blocks > traffic when you try to setup to many connections in a short period > of time. So, the two pings with nc on port 22 , ssh connection, then > again two pings in such a short time-frame triggered this rule. > > The sad thing is, that in de meanwhile I deleted the authorized_hosts > file and forgot to rebuild it for all known hosts, so now I have to > wait another day to see if I really fixed the problem, but I have a > good feeling about it. > > Thank you all for your help and support!! > > Met vriendelijke groet, > > Micha Kersloot > > Altijd en overal bij je belangrijkste gegevens? > http://www.exchange-alternatief.com/ > > KovoKs B.V. is ingeschreven onder KvK nummer: 1104 > > -- > Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning > Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing > also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service. > http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/ > ___ > BackupPC-users mailing list > BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net > List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users > Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net > Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/ > -- Try before you buy = See our experts in action! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2 ___ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
Re: [BackupPC-users] The famous Backup aborted (Unable to read 4 bytes) error
Hi, - Oorspronkelijk bericht - > Van: "on horseback through Eurasia" > Aan: i...@kovoks.nl > Cc: backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net, i...@kovoks.nl > Verzonden: Donderdag 23 februari 2012 18:55:24 > Onderwerp: Re: [BackupPC-users] The famous Backup aborted (Unable to read 4 > bytes) error > > Check your ssh login > r, > Michel You seem to be right. It looks like there is a firewall which blocks traffic when you try to setup to many connections in a short period of time. So, the two pings with nc on port 22 , ssh connection, then again two pings in such a short time-frame triggered this rule. The sad thing is, that in de meanwhile I deleted the authorized_hosts file and forgot to rebuild it for all known hosts, so now I have to wait another day to see if I really fixed the problem, but I have a good feeling about it. Thank you all for your help and support!! Met vriendelijke groet, Micha Kersloot Altijd en overal bij je belangrijkste gegevens? http://www.exchange-alternatief.com/ KovoKs B.V. is ingeschreven onder KvK nummer: 1104 -- Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/ ___ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
Re: [BackupPC-users] The famous Backup aborted (Unable to read 4 bytes) error
Hi, - Oorspronkelijk bericht - > Van: "Till Hofmann" > Aan: "Micha Kersloot" , "General list for user > discussion, questions and support" > > Verzonden: Donderdag 23 februari 2012 14:45:50 > Onderwerp: Re: [BackupPC-users] The famous Backup aborted (Unable to > read 4 bytes) error > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Micha Kersloot < mi...@kovoks.nl > > wrote: > > Hi, > > > sadly the error appeared this night and the logfiles don't give any > > more information I think. In one session I get a part that is > > succeeded and the next part failed: > > Inhoud van bestand /var/lib/backuppc/pc/ > > stable03.covide.nl/XferLOG.bad.z , gewijzigd 2012-02-23 05:03:21 > It's weird there is nothing added in the log, usually rsync -vv tells > you everything you might wanna know... maybe backup pc filters the > output. > did you check the normal xfer log (not xfer errors)? it's more > talkative. I can only find the XferLOG.bad.z file. I can't find a XferLog.x.z file with the correct timestamp, is there any other logfile I could look for? Another strange thing is that on the host that needs to be backupped there is only 1 login in that timeframe: Feb 23 05:00:02 covidestable03 sshd[31018]: Did not receive identification string from 62.58.198.2 Feb 23 05:00:02 covidestable03 sshd[31019]: Did not receive identification string from 62.58.198.2 Feb 23 05:00:02 covidestable03 sshd[31020]: Accepted publickey for root from 62.58.198.2 port 48515 ssh2 Feb 23 05:00:02 covidestable03 sshd[31020]: pam_unix(sshd:session): session opened for user root by (uid=0) Feb 23 05:03:21 covidestable03 sshd[31078]: Did not receive identification string from 62.58.198.2 Feb 23 05:03:21 covidestable03 sshd[31079]: Did not receive identification string from 62.58.198.2 So there seems to be a ping, but no login after that... Met vriendelijke groet, Micha Kersloot Altijd en overal bij je belangrijkste gegevens? http://www.exchange-alternatief.com/ KovoKs B.V. is ingeschreven onder KvK nummer: 1104 -- Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/ ___ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
Re: [BackupPC-users] The famous Backup aborted (Unable to read 4 bytes) error
fully someone has an idea how to debug this further. Met vriendelijke groet, Micha Kersloot Altijd en overal bij je belangrijkste gegevens? http://www.exchange-alternatief.com/ KovoKs B.V. is ingeschreven onder KvK nummer: 1104 - Oorspronkelijk bericht - > Van: "Micha Kersloot" > Aan: "General list for user discussion, questions and support" > > Verzonden: Woensdag 22 februari 2012 15:28:14 > Onderwerp: Re: [BackupPC-users] The famous Backup aborted (Unable to read 4 > bytes) error > > Hi, > > I've added the -vv flag to rsync and guess what. All backups > succeeded this night. Let's see if increasing the loglevel solves > the problem ;-) > > Met vriendelijke groet, > > Micha Kersloot > > Altijd en overal bij je belangrijkste gegevens? > http://www.exchange-alternatief.com/ > > KovoKs B.V. is ingeschreven onder KvK nummer: 1104 > > - Oorspronkelijk bericht - > > Van: "Micha Kersloot" > > Aan: "Till Hofmann" > > Cc: korndoer...@crelux.com, "Micha Kersloot" , > > "General list for user discussion, questions and > > support" > > Verzonden: Dinsdag 21 februari 2012 16:55:33 > > Onderwerp: Re: [BackupPC-users] The famous Backup aborted (Unable > > to read 4 bytes) error > > > > Hi Till, > > > > - Oorspronkelijk bericht - > > > > > Van: "Till Hofmann" > > > Aan: "Micha Kersloot" , "General list for user > > > discussion, questions and support" > > > > > > Cc: korndoer...@crelux.com > > > Verzonden: Dinsdag 21 februari 2012 16:49:56 > > > Onderwerp: Re: [BackupPC-users] The famous Backup aborted (Unable > > > to > > > read 4 bytes) error > > > > > > > add -vv to the rsync arguments and then check the log file again. > > > It > > > should tell you a lot more and probably it will tell you what the > > > error was. > > > > I've added this to the RsyncArgs hopefully it will make things > > clear. > > > > Met vriendelijke groet, > > > > Micha Kersloot > > > > Altijd en overal bij je belangrijkste gegevens? > > http://www.exchange-alternatief.com/ > > > > KovoKs B.V. is ingeschreven onder KvK nummer: 1104 > > > > -- > Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning > Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing > also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service. > http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/ > ___ > BackupPC-users mailing list > BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net > List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users > Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net > Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/ > -- Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/ ___ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
Re: [BackupPC-users] The famous Backup aborted (Unable to read 4 bytes) error
Hi, I've added the -vv flag to rsync and guess what. All backups succeeded this night. Let's see if increasing the loglevel solves the problem ;-) Met vriendelijke groet, Micha Kersloot Altijd en overal bij je belangrijkste gegevens? http://www.exchange-alternatief.com/ KovoKs B.V. is ingeschreven onder KvK nummer: 1104 - Oorspronkelijk bericht - > Van: "Micha Kersloot" > Aan: "Till Hofmann" > Cc: korndoer...@crelux.com, "Micha Kersloot" , "General list > for user discussion, questions and > support" > Verzonden: Dinsdag 21 februari 2012 16:55:33 > Onderwerp: Re: [BackupPC-users] The famous Backup aborted (Unable to read 4 > bytes) error > > Hi Till, > > - Oorspronkelijk bericht - > > > Van: "Till Hofmann" > > Aan: "Micha Kersloot" , "General list for user > > discussion, questions and support" > > > > Cc: korndoer...@crelux.com > > Verzonden: Dinsdag 21 februari 2012 16:49:56 > > Onderwerp: Re: [BackupPC-users] The famous Backup aborted (Unable > > to > > read 4 bytes) error > > > > add -vv to the rsync arguments and then check the log file again. > > It > > should tell you a lot more and probably it will tell you what the > > error was. > > I've added this to the RsyncArgs hopefully it will make things clear. > > Met vriendelijke groet, > > Micha Kersloot > > Altijd en overal bij je belangrijkste gegevens? > http://www.exchange-alternatief.com/ > > KovoKs B.V. is ingeschreven onder KvK nummer: 1104 > -- Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/ ___ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
Re: [BackupPC-users] The famous Backup aborted (Unable to read 4 bytes) error
Hi Till, - Oorspronkelijk bericht - > Van: "Till Hofmann" > Aan: "Micha Kersloot" , "General list for user > discussion, questions and support" > > Cc: korndoer...@crelux.com > Verzonden: Dinsdag 21 februari 2012 16:49:56 > Onderwerp: Re: [BackupPC-users] The famous Backup aborted (Unable to > read 4 bytes) error > add -vv to the rsync arguments and then check the log file again. It > should tell you a lot more and probably it will tell you what the > error was. I've added this to the RsyncArgs hopefully it will make things clear. Met vriendelijke groet, Micha Kersloot Altijd en overal bij je belangrijkste gegevens? http://www.exchange-alternatief.com/ KovoKs B.V. is ingeschreven onder KvK nummer: 1104 -- Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d ___ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
Re: [BackupPC-users] The famous Backup aborted (Unable to read 4 bytes) error
Hi Ingo, The complete logfile of the failure is: incr backup started back to 2012-02-19 10:00:00 (backup #72) for directory /etc Running: /usr/bin/ssh -q -x -l root trunk01.covide.nl rsync --server --sender --numeric-ids --perms --owner --group -D --links --hard-links --times --block-size=2048 --recursive . /etc/ Xfer PIDs are now 3705 Read EOF: Connection reset by peer Tried again: got 0 bytes Done: 0 files, 0 bytes Got fatal error during xfer (Unable to read 4 bytes) Backup aborted (Unable to read 4 bytes) A backup started from the webinterface: incr backup started back to 2012-02-19 10:00:00 (backup #72) for directory /etc Running: /usr/bin/ssh -q -x -l root trunk01.covide.nl rsync --server --sender --numeric-ids --perms --owner --group -D --links --hard-links --times --block-size=2048 --recursive . /etc/ Xfer PIDs are now 8325 Got remote protocol 30 Negotiated protocol version 28 Xfer PIDs are now 8325,8326 create d 755 0/04096 . Met vriendelijke groet, Micha Kersloot Altijd en overal bij je belangrijkste gegevens? http://www.exchange-alternatief.com/ KovoKs B.V. is ingeschreven onder KvK nummer: 1104 - Oorspronkelijk bericht - > Van: "Ingo P. Korndoerfer" > Aan: "Micha Kersloot" > Verzonden: Dinsdag 21 februari 2012 16:09:44 > Onderwerp: Re: [BackupPC-users] The famous Backup aborted (Unable to read 4 > bytes) error > > and NOTHING at all before that in the log file ? > > just asking because at the time it took me a while to look 4 lines > above ... > > ingo > > On 21.02.2012 14:54, Micha Kersloot wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've got the Backup aborted (Unable to read 4 bytes) error for some > > weeks now. It was working allright for a year or two, but lately > > those errors come up every night. The problem is that if I start a > > backup manualy via the CLI commands, or by the webinterface it all > > works like a charm. So 'only' the automatic started backups seem > > to suffer from this problem. Is there any way to debug this in > > BackupPC? > > > > Met vriendelijke groet, > > > > Micha Kersloot > > > > Altijd en overal bij je belangrijkste gegevens? > > http://www.exchange-alternatief.com/ > > > > KovoKs B.V. is ingeschreven onder KvK nummer: 1104 > > > > > > -- > > Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow! > > The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft > > developers > > is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, > > MVC3, > > Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe > > now! > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d > > ___ > > BackupPC-users mailing list > > BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net > > List: > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users > > Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net > > Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/ > > > > > -- > CRELUX GmbH > > Dr. Ingo Korndoerfer > Head of Crystallography > > Am Klopferspitz 19a > 82152 Martinsried > Germany > > Phone: +49 89 700760210 > Fax: +49 89 700760222 > korndoer...@crelux.com > www.crelux.com > > Amtsgericht München HRB 165552 - Managing Directors: Dr. Michael > Schäffer, Dr. Ismail Moarefi > > This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. > If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail > in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this > e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the > material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden. > Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte > Informationen. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese > E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den > Absender und vernichten Sie diese Mail. Das unerlaubte Kopieren > sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser Mail ist nicht gestattet. > > > > -- Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d ___ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
Re: [BackupPC-users] The famous Backup aborted (Unable to read 4 bytes) error
Hi Michel, Thank you for your time. Yes I can login. And, the strange thing is, when I click the 'Start Backup' button in the webinterface the backup runs without any problems. Met vriendelijke groet, Micha Kersloot Altijd en overal bij je belangrijkste gegevens? http://www.exchange-alternatief.com/ KovoKs B.V. is ingeschreven onder KvK nummer: 1104 - Oorspronkelijk bericht - > Van: "Michel Jacobs" > Aan: backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Verzonden: Dinsdag 21 februari 2012 15:42:23 > Onderwerp: Re: [BackupPC-users] The famous Backup aborted (Unable to > read 4 bytes) error > check your ssh settings. > can backuppc login without password as root on the target machine? > -- > website: te paard naar sint Petersburg > mail: majac...@xs4all.nl > skype: michel.jacobs1 > phone: +31204090046 > cell: +31626030879 > facsimile: +31878704476 > -- > Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow! > The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft > developers > is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, > MVC3, > Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d > ___ > BackupPC-users mailing list > BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net > List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users > Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net > Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/ -- Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d___ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
[BackupPC-users] The famous Backup aborted (Unable to read 4 bytes) error
Hi, I've got the Backup aborted (Unable to read 4 bytes) error for some weeks now. It was working allright for a year or two, but lately those errors come up every night. The problem is that if I start a backup manualy via the CLI commands, or by the webinterface it all works like a charm. So 'only' the automatic started backups seem to suffer from this problem. Is there any way to debug this in BackupPC? Met vriendelijke groet, Micha Kersloot Altijd en overal bij je belangrijkste gegevens? http://www.exchange-alternatief.com/ KovoKs B.V. is ingeschreven onder KvK nummer: 1104 -- Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d ___ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
Re: [BackupPC-users] Preferred network for backup
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Larry Bernstone schreef: > Has anyone set up a system where they have a preferred network for > backups? I have laptops that connect to wireless and wired subnets on > my network. I’d like for the wired network to be used if available, but > since DNS gives out seemingly random results to a hostname lookup, it > behaves really screwy, is difficult to script, and will often choose the > wireless connection over the wired. Anyone come up with a good config > for this? Not really a backup question, but I can think of two solutions, depending on the OS on the laptops and the server. 1. If the OS on the laptop is Linux, you can script DCHP-client so it sends a hostname depending on several variables, for example the network card. 2. You can setup the DHCP server to fix ip numbers to mac addresses. In that case you are always certain about the connection type in use. - -- With kind regards, Micha Kersloot http://www.own-it.nl -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHJj+QLG2Seh5hGQ4RAmGqAJ407d/Nmylm7hlPYfzsNeIgnVAKSwCdEUU4 5txDlwJ0WtvjTvQiIy6ByLA= =cPY7 -END PGP SIGNATURE- - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ ___ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
[BackupPC-users] PreUserCmd not working?
Hi list,
I've got a problem with the PreUserCmd command on a archive host.
OS: Fedora Core 6
BackPC version: 3.0.0
The configuration was done with the webinterface:
dat36gb.pl
$Conf{ArchiveDest} = '/backup3/BackupPC/archive';
$Conf{XferMethod} = 'archive';
$Conf{ArchivePostUserCmd} = 'touch ~backuppc/ditwaseentest.txt';
$Conf{ArchivePreUserCmd} = 'touch ~backuppc/ditiseentest.txt';
The thing is that both commands never ran and at the moment i've got no
clue where to start looking. The archives itself are created every night
without any problems. Someone an idea?
--
Met vriendelijke groet,
Micha Kersloot
Controleer uw eigen IT.
http://www.own-it.nl/
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
___
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
