Re: [BackupPC-users] Need guidance for backing up remote Windows PC

2013-03-22 Thread Jeff Boyce

- Original Message - 
From: Holger Parplies wb...@parplies.de
To: Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com; jbo...@meridianenv.com
Cc: General list for user discussion, questions and support 
backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 3:11 PM
Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Need guidance for backing up remote Windows PC


 Hi,

 Les Mikesell wrote on 2013-03-20 16:19:23 -0500 [Re: [BackupPC-users] Need 
 guidance for backing up remote Windows PC]:
 On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Jeff Boyce jbo...@meridianenv.com 
 wrote:
  [...]
  Local Network
Sequoia = Samba (and WINS server) and OpenVPN server (192.168.112.50)
Taxa = DNSmasq (dns and dhcp server) (192.168.112.51)
Bacteria = BackupPC server (192.168.112.52)
Network IP = 192.168.112.0/24

 ok.

  Remote Windows Box
Computer Name = jks-e6500
Remote LAN IP = unknown
Remote WAN IP = dynamic
OpenVPN Common Name = jkssequoiaclient

 All of these don't matter for the question at hand.

OpenVPN IP = static, 10.9.8.10
OpenVPN routed network

 [...]
 If you manage local dns you can add the target name with the VPN IP
 and everything should work the same as locally.  Alternatively, you
 could set ClientNameAlias to the VPN IP in the backuppc config.

 In particular, you can choose whatever name for the client suits your
 purposes. Usually, you will want to use just one name for one machine, but
 since you've used a different one in the OpenVPN certificate, I thought 
 I'd
 mention it. The name in the certificate is really only used for selecting 
 the
 clients/ file (in OpenVPN), which usually defines the IP used. It does 
 *not*
 magically set up some sort of name resolution for that name. I would have 
 used
 jks-e6500 to match the host name, but it doesn't really make any 
 difference.

 Adding something like

 10.9.8.10 jks-e6500

 to a hosts-type file (/etc/hosts on the BackupPC server or better a hosts 
 file
 served by your DNSmasq server) should do the trick.

 Talking of hosts files, the DHCP flag in BackupPC's hosts file should be 0 
 :-).

  My thinking is that since the remote Windows box can connect and browse 
  the
  Samba shares on Sequoia via the VPN, then obviously Samba knows how to
  communicate with this remote client.

 At the TCP level, the Samba server doesn't really need to know anything.
 There's an incoming connection from an IP it can route reply packets to.
 Fine. Samba itself might require more, in order to determine whether to
 allow access or not. The remote machine might register itself with the
 Samba WINS server. But it's the remote machine that initiates the 
 connection.

 No, that's not entirely obvious unless the backuppc server is also the
 VPN server.   Sometimes VPN servers are configured to NAT to their
 ethernet interfaces to provide LAN connectivity for the remote
 clients.

 That's a good point. If that were the case, you'd need to rethink things.

 In your case you need routing  from the backuppc server to
 the client IP which may or may not be present.  Can you connect with
 smbclient to the 10.9.8.10 IP?

 If your VPN server is not NATting and it's not the default gateway, then 
 you'd
 need either a host or probably better a network route (on your BackupPC
 server):

 # route add -host 10.9.8.10 gw sequoia
 or
 # route add -net 10.9.8.0/24 gw sequoia

 Additionally, if sequoia was not previously routing traffic, you might 
 need to

 # echo 1  /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward

 (on sequoia) which you'd want to do automatically on reboot by adding (or
 uncommenting)

 net.ipv4.ip_forward=1

 in /etc/sysctl.conf. For IPv6, see the comments in sysctl.conf.

 Regards,
 Holger


Greetings -

I have had to move on to some other more pressing issues temporarily, but I 
think the guidance you guys have given me will get me to the next stage of 
implementing this and running some tests. Thanks.

Jeff


--
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar
___
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/


Re: [BackupPC-users] Need guidance for backing up remote Windows PC

2013-03-20 Thread Les Mikesell
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Jeff Boyce jbo...@meridianenv.com wrote:

 I am trying to figure out if my objective is possible.  I want to be able to
 backup a remote Window box that connects to the local network via OpenVPN.
 I have scanned through the archives and have seen some discussion of similar
 things, but nothing that really gives me good overall direction on whether
 it will work, or how to get it to work, with my network configuration.

There's no real difference as long as it is up at a reachable IP address.

 I am
 using BackupPC to backup the local Windows boxes, and would like to add a
 remote one.  I am not that concerned about the time it would take to
 complete a backup over the WAN, as I can configure it to work at night.

 Local Network
   Sequoia = Samba (and WINS server) and OpenVPN server (192.168.112.50)
   Taxa = DNSmasq (dns and dhcp server) (192.168.112.51)
   Bacteria = BackupPC server (192.168.112.52)
   Network IP = 192.168.112.0/24

 Remote Windows Box
   Computer Name = jks-e6500
   Remote LAN IP = unknown
   Remote WAN IP = dynamic
   OpenVPN Common Name = jkssequoiaclient
   OpenVPN IP = static, 10.9.8.10
   OpenVPN routed network

 I have BackupPC configured to connect to the local Window boxes via SMB, as
 I didn't care for the cygwin and rsync implementation on windows when I used
 it in the past.  Besides, I already have Samba configured and running just
 fine, so why not just use it.

The big difference would be bandwidth usage after the initial copy.
Every smb full is going to send all the data.  Another difference is
that smb incrementals are based on the file timestamps and won't track
files added in ways that keep an old timestamp, old files in their new
position under a renamed directory, or deletions.   You might like the
cwrsync or deltacopy variations of rsync - still cygwin based but
packaged in a windows installer.

 I seem to have both DNS and netbios name
 resolution working properly for the local LAN, but don't know how the remote
 box fits into that when it connects to Samba via a VPN network.

If you manage local dns you can add the target name with the VPN IP
and everything should work the same as locally.  Alternatively, you
could set ClientNameAlias to the VPN IP in the backuppc config.

 My thinking is that since the remote Windows box can connect and browse the
 Samba shares on Sequoia via the VPN, then obviously Samba knows how to
 communicate with this remote client.

No, that's not entirely obvious unless the backuppc server is also the
VPN server.   Sometimes VPN servers are configured to NAT to their
ethernet interfaces to provide LAN connectivity for the remote
clients.   In your case you need routing  from the backuppc server to
the client IP which may or may not be present.  Can you connect with
smbclient to the 10.9.8.10 IP?

-- 
   Les Mikesell
 lesmikes...@gmail.com

--
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar
___
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/


Re: [BackupPC-users] Need guidance for backing up remote Windows PC

2013-03-20 Thread Holger Parplies
Hi,

Les Mikesell wrote on 2013-03-20 16:19:23 -0500 [Re: [BackupPC-users] Need 
guidance for backing up remote Windows PC]:
 On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Jeff Boyce jbo...@meridianenv.com wrote:
  [...]
  Local Network
Sequoia = Samba (and WINS server) and OpenVPN server (192.168.112.50)
Taxa = DNSmasq (dns and dhcp server) (192.168.112.51)
Bacteria = BackupPC server (192.168.112.52)
Network IP = 192.168.112.0/24

ok.

  Remote Windows Box
Computer Name = jks-e6500
Remote LAN IP = unknown
Remote WAN IP = dynamic
OpenVPN Common Name = jkssequoiaclient

All of these don't matter for the question at hand.

OpenVPN IP = static, 10.9.8.10
OpenVPN routed network

 [...]
 If you manage local dns you can add the target name with the VPN IP
 and everything should work the same as locally.  Alternatively, you
 could set ClientNameAlias to the VPN IP in the backuppc config.

In particular, you can choose whatever name for the client suits your
purposes. Usually, you will want to use just one name for one machine, but
since you've used a different one in the OpenVPN certificate, I thought I'd
mention it. The name in the certificate is really only used for selecting the
clients/ file (in OpenVPN), which usually defines the IP used. It does *not* 
magically set up some sort of name resolution for that name. I would have used
jks-e6500 to match the host name, but it doesn't really make any difference.

Adding something like

10.9.8.10   jks-e6500

to a hosts-type file (/etc/hosts on the BackupPC server or better a hosts file
served by your DNSmasq server) should do the trick.

Talking of hosts files, the DHCP flag in BackupPC's hosts file should be 0 :-).

  My thinking is that since the remote Windows box can connect and browse the
  Samba shares on Sequoia via the VPN, then obviously Samba knows how to
  communicate with this remote client.

At the TCP level, the Samba server doesn't really need to know anything.
There's an incoming connection from an IP it can route reply packets to.
Fine. Samba itself might require more, in order to determine whether to
allow access or not. The remote machine might register itself with the
Samba WINS server. But it's the remote machine that initiates the connection.

 No, that's not entirely obvious unless the backuppc server is also the
 VPN server.   Sometimes VPN servers are configured to NAT to their
 ethernet interfaces to provide LAN connectivity for the remote
 clients.

That's a good point. If that were the case, you'd need to rethink things.

 In your case you need routing  from the backuppc server to
 the client IP which may or may not be present.  Can you connect with
 smbclient to the 10.9.8.10 IP?

If your VPN server is not NATting and it's not the default gateway, then you'd
need either a host or probably better a network route (on your BackupPC
server):

# route add -host 10.9.8.10 gw sequoia
or
# route add -net 10.9.8.0/24 gw sequoia

Additionally, if sequoia was not previously routing traffic, you might need to

# echo 1  /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward

(on sequoia) which you'd want to do automatically on reboot by adding (or
uncommenting)

net.ipv4.ip_forward=1

in /etc/sysctl.conf. For IPv6, see the comments in sysctl.conf.

Regards,
Holger

--
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar
___
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/