Re: [BackupPC-users] RefCntFsck

[Gandalf Corvotempesta]

Ok, so this is expected.
Thank you.

2017-09-19 14:39 GMT+02:00 Craig Barratt via BackupPC-users
:
> If a backup fails or is aborted, BackupPC_refCntUpdate is run on the last
> two backups, independent of the $Conf{RefCntFsck} setting.
>
> Craig
>
>
> On Tuesday, September 19, 2017, Gandalf Corvotempesta
>  wrote:
>>
>> refCnt is also run on backup #1 (that in my case is the incremental
>> that i've aborted).
>>
>> is this correct ? I had a similiar issue with the alpha version, where
>> an fsck was always executed, but AFAIK this bug was fixed when BPC 4
>> was released as stable.
>>
>> 2017-09-19 14:11 GMT+02:00 Gandalf Corvotempesta
>> :
>> > Can someone explain me the meaning of $Conf{RefCntFsck} = 1; ?
>> >
>> > If I understood properly, based on docs, $Conf{RefCntFsck} = 1 will
>> > run a refCnt process if the latest backup is full.
>> >
>> > In my case, I have a single full backup and i've aborted an
>> > incremental one, then refCnt is run on the full backup.
>> >
>> > Why? I've aborted an incremental, refCnt was already executed on the
>> > full backup when I did that some days ago. Why BPC is still running
>> > refCnt ?
>>
>>
>> --
>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>> ___
>> BackupPC-users mailing list
>> BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
>> Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
>> Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
>
>
> --
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> ___
> BackupPC-users mailing list
> BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
> Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
> Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
>

--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/

Re: [BackupPC-users] RefCntFsck

[Craig Barratt via BackupPC-users]

If a backup fails or is aborted, BackupPC_refCntUpdate is run on the last
two backups, independent of the $Conf{RefCntFsck} setting.

Craig

On Tuesday, September 19, 2017, Gandalf Corvotempesta <
gandalf.corvotempe...@gmail.com> wrote:

> refCnt is also run on backup #1 (that in my case is the incremental
> that i've aborted).
>
> is this correct ? I had a similiar issue with the alpha version, where
> an fsck was always executed, but AFAIK this bug was fixed when BPC 4
> was released as stable.
>
> 2017-09-19 14:11 GMT+02:00 Gandalf Corvotempesta
> >:
> > Can someone explain me the meaning of $Conf{RefCntFsck} = 1; ?
> >
> > If I understood properly, based on docs, $Conf{RefCntFsck} = 1 will
> > run a refCnt process if the latest backup is full.
> >
> > In my case, I have a single full backup and i've aborted an
> > incremental one, then refCnt is run on the full backup.
> >
> > Why? I've aborted an incremental, refCnt was already executed on the
> > full backup when I did that some days ago. Why BPC is still running
> > refCnt ?
>
> 
> --
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> ___
> BackupPC-users mailing list
> BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net 
> List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
> Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
> Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
>
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/

Re: [BackupPC-users] RefCntFsck

[Gandalf Corvotempesta]

refCnt is also run on backup #1 (that in my case is the incremental
that i've aborted).

is this correct ? I had a similiar issue with the alpha version, where
an fsck was always executed, but AFAIK this bug was fixed when BPC 4
was released as stable.

2017-09-19 14:11 GMT+02:00 Gandalf Corvotempesta
:
> Can someone explain me the meaning of $Conf{RefCntFsck} = 1; ?
>
> If I understood properly, based on docs, $Conf{RefCntFsck} = 1 will
> run a refCnt process if the latest backup is full.
>
> In my case, I have a single full backup and i've aborted an
> incremental one, then refCnt is run on the full backup.
>
> Why? I've aborted an incremental, refCnt was already executed on the
> full backup when I did that some days ago. Why BPC is still running
> refCnt ?

--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/