Re: [Bacula-users] SQLite - no longer supported

[Dan Langille]

On 2/24/2011 10:08 AM, C M Reinehr wrote:
> On Wed 23 February 2011 10:30:11 pm Dan Langille wrote:
>> A recent bug report (http://bugs.bacula.org/view.php?id=1688) which
>> indicated that we are no longer supporting SQLite.
>>
>> I feel it's safe to stop regression testing against it.
>
> I'm sorry to hear that. I've been using SQLite for the entire time that I've
> been using Bacula -- ten years or so -- with absolutely no difficulty.
> Admitedly, my needs are limited -- three servers&  eight pc's -- but it's
> been simple to administer&  troubleshoot and reliable.

What version of Bacula are you using now?  What version of SQLite?

-- 
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/

--
Free Software Download: Index, Search & Analyze Logs and other IT data in 
Real-Time with Splunk. Collect, index and harness all the fast moving IT data 
generated by your applications, servers and devices whether physical, virtual
or in the cloud. Deliver compliance at lower cost and gain new business 
insights. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-dev2dev 
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

[Bacula-users] Fwd: Tape label errors from dmesg

[John Drescher]

-- Forwarded message --
From: John Drescher 
Date: Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 8:08 PM
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Tape label errors from dmesg
To: jerry lowry 


> hello,  I had an interesting development today.  I labeled a dlt IV tape (
> standalone tape drive) for a new backup using bconsole.  It took sometime to
> return, so I went out and started looking at  logs.   It completed
> successfully.  The message log did not have anything in it but when I did a
> 'dmesg', it listed a number of errors.  I have attached them.  Should I be
> concerned with this or is it fixed in one of the new updates.
>

This is a kernel or hardware problem and has nothing to do with
bacula. Try a more recent kernel like 2.6.37 if it is not too
difficult to do.

John



-- 
John M. Drescher

--
Free Software Download: Index, Search & Analyze Logs and other IT data in 
Real-Time with Splunk. Collect, index and harness all the fast moving IT data 
generated by your applications, servers and devices whether physical, virtual
or in the cloud. Deliver compliance at lower cost and gain new business 
insights. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-dev2dev 
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

[Bacula-users] Tape label errors from dmesg

[jerry lowry]

hello,  I had an interesting development today.  I labeled a dlt IV tape 
( standalone tape drive) for a new backup using bconsole.  It took 
sometime to return, so I went out and started looking at  logs.   It 
completed successfully.  The message log did not have anything in it but 
when I did a 'dmesg', it listed a number of errors.  I have attached 
them.  Should I be concerned with this or is it fixed in one of the new 
updates.


I am running 5.0.1 on FC 12 ( director, storage), FC13 (storage server) 
and all clients ( windows, linux, solaris)


thanks,

jerry
--

---
Jerold Lowry
IT Manager / Software Engineer
Engineering Design Team (EDT), Inc. a HEICO company
1400 NW Compton Drive, Suite 315
Beaverton, Oregon 97006 (U.S.A.)
Phone: 503-690-1234 / 800-435-4320
Fax: 503-690-1243
Web: _www.edt.com _


-- dmesg output during label of tape on storage server

st0: Block limits 2 - 16777214 bytes.
INFO: task bacula-sd:6631 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
bacula-sd D 88004b049760 0  6631  1 0x0080
 8800298d9af8 0086  8800d1a8c900
 8800d1a8c908 0086 8800298d9fd8 8800298d9fd8
 88004b049b38 f980 00015740 88004b049b38
Call Trace:
 [] ? scsi_done+0x0/0x17
 [] schedule_timeout+0x36/0xe3
 [] ? kobject_put+0x47/0x4b
 [] ? put_device+0x17/0x19
 [] wait_for_common+0xd6/0x131
 [] ? default_wake_function+0x0/0x14
 [] ? __generic_unplug_device+0x32/0x37
 [] wait_for_completion+0x1d/0x1f
 [] st_do_scsi.clone.0+0x30b/0x33c [st]
 [] st_int_ioctl+0x626/0xa40 [st]
 [] st_int_ioctl+0x3ab/0xa40 [st]
 [] ? sock_aio_write+0xc0/0xd4
 [] ? try_get_mem_cgroup_from_mm+0x39/0x49
 [] st_ioctl+0xb3d/0xea8 [st]
 [] vfs_ioctl+0x22/0x87
 [] do_vfs_ioctl+0x47b/0x4c1
 [] ? fsnotify_modify+0x6c/0x74
 [] sys_ioctl+0x56/0x79
 [] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
bat[4471]: segfault at 101c42780 ip 0091c06e sp 7fff8c5cb0c8 error 
4 in bat[40+7e5000]
INFO: task bacula-sd:19803 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
bacula-sd D 880086dc1760 0 19803  1 0x0080
 880024909b98 0086  88003c788000
 88003c788008 0086 880024909fd8 880024909fd8
 880086dc1b38 f980 00015740 880086dc1b38
Call Trace:
 [] ? scsi_done+0x0/0x17
 [] schedule_timeout+0x36/0xe3
 [] ? kobject_put+0x47/0x4b
 [] ? put_device+0x17/0x19
 [] wait_for_common+0xd6/0x131
 [] ? default_wake_function+0x0/0x14
 [] ? __generic_unplug_device+0x32/0x37
 [] wait_for_completion+0x1d/0x1f
 [] st_do_scsi.clone.0+0x30b/0x33c [st]
 [] st_int_ioctl+0x626/0xa40 [st]
 [] ? sock_aio_write+0xc0/0xd4
 [] st_ioctl+0xb3d/0xea8 [st]
 [] vfs_ioctl+0x22/0x87
 [] do_vfs_ioctl+0x47b/0x4c1
 [] ? fsnotify_modify+0x6c/0x74
 [] sys_ioctl+0x56/0x79
 [] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
INFO: task bacula-sd:20120 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
bacula-sd D 880007e44620 0 20120  1 0x0080
 880020bd3b98 0086  880090c50500
 880090c50508 0086 880020bd3fd8 880020bd3fd8
 880007e449f8 f980 00015740 880007e449f8
Call Trace:
 [] ? scsi_done+0x0/0x17
 [] schedule_timeout+0x36/0xe3
 [] ? kobject_put+0x47/0x4b
 [] ? put_device+0x17/0x19
 [] wait_for_common+0xd6/0x131
 [] ? default_wake_function+0x0/0x14
 [] ? __generic_unplug_device+0x32/0x37
 [] wait_for_completion+0x1d/0x1f
 [] st_do_scsi.clone.0+0x30b/0x33c [st]
 [] st_int_ioctl+0x626/0xa40 [st]
 [] ? sock_aio_write+0xc0/0xd4
 [] st_ioctl+0xb3d/0xea8 [st]
 [] vfs_ioctl+0x22/0x87
 [] do_vfs_ioctl+0x47b/0x4c1
 [] ? fsnotify_modify+0x6c/0x74
 [] sys_ioctl+0x56/0x79
 [] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
INFO: task bacula-sd:26563 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
bacula-sd D 8800d26c8000 0 26563  1 0x0080
 880007f0bb98 0086  8800ab196100
 8800ab196108 0086 880007f0bfd8 880007f0bfd8
 8800d26c83d8 f980 00015740 8800d26c83d8
Call Trace:
 [] ? scsi_done+0x0/0x17
 [] schedule_timeout+0x36/0xe3
 [] ? kobject_put+0x47/0x4b
 [] ? put_device+0x17/0x19
 [] wait_for_common+0xd6/0x131
 [] ? default_wake_function+0x0/0x14
 [] ? __generic_unplug_device+0x32/0x37
 [] wait_for_completion+0x1d/0x1f
 [] st_do_scsi.clone.0+0x30b/0x33c [st]
 [] st_int_ioctl+0x626/0xa40 [st]
 [] ? sock_aio_write+0xc0/0xd4
 [] st_ioctl+0xb3d/0xea8 [st]
 [] vfs_ioctl+0x22/0x87
 [] do_vfs_ioctl+0x47b/0x4c1
 [] ? fsnotify_modify+0x6c/0x74
 [] sys_ioctl+0x56/0x79
 [] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
bat[27072]: se

Re: [Bacula-users] Job running Jobs

[Francisco Javier Funes Nieto]

Maybe with COPY JOBS?

http://www.bacula.org/5.0.x-manuals/en/main/main/New_Features_in_3_0_0.html#SECTION0082



2011/2/24 João Alberto Kuchnier :
> Hi everyone!
>
> I need some help to enable a new backup procedure here.
>
> Every month, I have to store a backup tape externally with data from all
> my 30 servers. Today, I would have to manually run each backup without
> scheduling. Is there any way to create a work that runs several other
> jobs successively on a single tape?
>
> I would appreciate any other solution.
>
> Thanks for your help!
>
> João K.
>
> --
> Free Software Download: Index, Search & Analyze Logs and other IT data in
> Real-Time with Splunk. Collect, index and harness all the fast moving IT data
> generated by your applications, servers and devices whether physical, virtual
> or in the cloud. Deliver compliance at lower cost and gain new business
> insights. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-dev2dev
> ___
> Bacula-users mailing list
> Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
>



-- 
_

Francisco Javier Funes Nieto [esen...@gmail.com]
CANONIGOS
Servicios Informáticos para PYMES.
Cl. Cruz 2, 1º Oficina 7
Tlf: 958.536759 / 661134556
Fax: 958.521354
GRANADA - 18002

--
Free Software Download: Index, Search & Analyze Logs and other IT data in 
Real-Time with Splunk. Collect, index and harness all the fast moving IT data 
generated by your applications, servers and devices whether physical, virtual
or in the cloud. Deliver compliance at lower cost and gain new business 
insights. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-dev2dev 
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Job running Jobs

[John Drescher]

2011/2/24 João Alberto Kuchnier :
> Hi everyone!
>
> I need some help to enable a new backup procedure here.
>
> Every month, I have to store a backup tape externally with data from all
> my 30 servers. Today, I would have to manually run each backup without
> scheduling. Is there any way to create a work that runs several other
> jobs successively on a single tape?
>
> I would appreciate any other solution.
>
How about an Admin job that echos commands to bconsole which starts
the other jobs.

John

--
Free Software Download: Index, Search & Analyze Logs and other IT data in 
Real-Time with Splunk. Collect, index and harness all the fast moving IT data 
generated by your applications, servers and devices whether physical, virtual
or in the cloud. Deliver compliance at lower cost and gain new business 
insights. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-dev2dev 
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

[Bacula-users] Job running Jobs

[João Alberto Kuchnier]

Hi everyone!

I need some help to enable a new backup procedure here.

Every month, I have to store a backup tape externally with data from all 
my 30 servers. Today, I would have to manually run each backup without 
scheduling. Is there any way to create a work that runs several other 
jobs successively on a single tape?

I would appreciate any other solution.

Thanks for your help!

João K.

--
Free Software Download: Index, Search & Analyze Logs and other IT data in 
Real-Time with Splunk. Collect, index and harness all the fast moving IT data 
generated by your applications, servers and devices whether physical, virtual
or in the cloud. Deliver compliance at lower cost and gain new business 
insights. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-dev2dev 
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Extremely long restore times.

[Erik P. Olsen]

On 24/02/11 16:12, Jan Lentfer wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 12:08:43 +0100, "Erik P. Olsen"
> wrote:
>> Since I moved to version 5.0.3 I have experienced extemely long restore
>> times.
>> The time is mostly spend in the building of directory trees. The time
> used
>> to be
>> measured in minutes, now it is hours.
>>
>> My system is Fedora 14, bacula 5.0.3, mysql 5.1.55, backup media is a 1
> TB
>> external HD with e-sata interface only used with bacula.
>>
>> Backup is swift so I don't understand why building of directory trees
>> should
>> take so long time. When the directory trees have been build, the restore
>> is as
>> swift as the backup.
>>
>> I suspect problems with the mysql database but have no idea of what I
>> could/should do to correct the problem.
>>
>> Thanks in advance for any advice that might lead me to a solution.
>
>> From which version of bacula have you upgraded? Check the updates to the
> database scheme, maybe some index was not created?

I moved from bacula 3.0.3 to 5.0.3. It was not an upgrade, it was a new 
install. 
However, the database was copied from the old system to the new after a version 
upgrade.

Unfortunately I am unable to check if the indexes have been created correctly. 
I 
simply don't know how to do it.

-- 
Erik

--
Free Software Download: Index, Search & Analyze Logs and other IT data in 
Real-Time with Splunk. Collect, index and harness all the fast moving IT data 
generated by your applications, servers and devices whether physical, virtual
or in the cloud. Deliver compliance at lower cost and gain new business 
insights. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-dev2dev 
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Centos 5.5 + Bacula + windows 2008 R2 client - nightmare!

[Chris Geegan]

Have you checked your bacula-sd.conf on viper to see what the Address is set
to? A quick test is to see if you can telnet from scorpion to viper on port
9103. A common issue is the SD server being set to address "localhost". At
this setting, clients cannot connect.

On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:48 AM, farmershort <
bacula-fo...@backupcentral.com> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> First off, I should mention that I have spent days trawling the internet
> for answers, including right here at backup central. I have managed to fix
> many of the issue I'd been having along the way, but now... now I've really
> hit a brick wall.
>
> so, I'm fairly new to *nix of any flavour, but I'm hopefully past the stage
> of being a casual web ubuntu user. I have set up a CentOS 5.5 box, and
> installed Bacula from rpms. There were a whole host of teething troubles,
> but I eventually got thos solved. I'm now at the stage where I have a
> bacula-dir.conf file which contains a few include statements, to keep it
> tidy, and that 'bat' runs fine in gnome. I can see the jobs I have created,
> for the most part I can see pools also.
>
> for a while, I was completely baffled as to why the log file was empty. I
> *think* I've worked aroung that issue now. It seems that one of the daemons
> didn't have write access on the log file. I fixed this in a very poor
> fashion (for testing) with chmod 777.
>
> so, now that I have a log file which gets populated (eventually - normall
> on cancelling a job). My core issue is that when I run a job, it says it's
> running, but doesn't actually do anything. The files and bytes counts stay
> at zero - both in bconsole, and bat. I have set my FileStorage location to
> be /backups/bacula. This directory remaind empty! I have also chmod'd the
> backup and bacula directories, incase that was the issue.
>
> the windows server is called scorpion, and the fd is scorpion-fd. the
> bacula centos server is called viper.
>
> so, now for the configs & logs:
> Log file:
>
> 
>
> 24-Feb 15:02 viper-dir JobId 3: Start Backup JobId 3,
> Job=scorpiontest.2011-02-2
> 4_15.02.51_08
> 24-Feb 15:02 viper-dir JobId 3: Using Device "FileStorage"
> 24-Feb 15:03 scorpion-fd JobId 3: Warning:
> /home/kern/bacula/k/bacula/src/lib/bs
> ock.c:128 Could not connect to Storage daemon on viper.oleo.co.uk:9103.
> ERR=The
> operation completed successfully.
>
> Retrying ...
> 24-Feb 15:19 scorpion-fd JobId 3: Warning:
> /home/kern/bacula/k/bacula/src/lib/bs
> ock.c:128 Could not connect to Storage daemon on viper.oleo.co.uk:9103.
> ERR=The
> operation completed successfully.
>
> Retrying ...
> 24-Feb 15:33 scorpion-fd JobId 3: Fatal error:
> /home/kern/bacula/k/bacula/src/li
> b/bsock.c:134 Unable to connect to Storage daemon on viper.oleo.co.uk:9103.
> ERR=
> The operation completed successfully.
>
> 24-Feb 15:33 scorpion-fd JobId 3: Fatal error: Failed to connect to Storage
> daem
> on: viper.oleo.co.uk:9103
> 24-Feb 15:33 viper-dir JobId 3: Fatal error: Bad response to Storage
> command: wa
> nted 2000 OK storage
> , got 2902 Bad storage
>
> 24-Feb 15:33 viper-dir JobId 3: Error: Bacula viper-dir 5.0.3 (30Aug10):
> 24-Feb-
> 2011 15:33:24
>  Build OS:   x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu redhat
>  JobId:  3
>  Job:scorpiontest.2011-02-24_15.02.51_08
>  Backup Level:   Full
>  Client: "scorpion-fd" 5.0.3 (04Aug10)
> Linux,Cross-compile,Win6
> 4
>  FileSet:"winsvr01" 2011-02-24 14:34:13
>  Pool:   "Fullwinsvr01" (From Job FullPool override)
>  Catalog:"MyCatalog" (From Client resource)
>  Storage:"File" (From Job resource)
>  Scheduled time: 24-Feb-2011 15:02:49
>  Start time: 24-Feb-2011 15:02:53
>  End time:   24-Feb-2011 15:33:24
>  Elapsed time:   30 mins 31 secs
>  Priority:   10
>  FD Files Written:   0
>  SD Files Written:   0
>  FD Bytes Written:   0 (0 B)
>  SD Bytes Written:   0 (0 B)
>  Rate:   0.0 KB/s
>  Software Compression:   None
>  VSS:no
>  Encryption: no
>  Accurate:   no
>  Volume name(s):
>  Volume Session Id:  3
>  Volume Session Time:1298558025
>  Last Volume Bytes:  0 (0 B)
>  Non-fatal FD errors:0
>  SD Errors:  0
>  FD termination status:  Error
>  SD termination status:  Waiting on FD
>  Termination:*** Backup Error ***
>
>
> ***
> bconsole outputs:
>
> Status All
>
>
> *status all
> viper-dir Version: 5.0.3 (30 August 2010) x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu redhat
> Daemon started 24-Feb-11 14:33, 3 Jobs run since started.
>  Heap: heap=253,952 smbytes=87,198 max_bytes=120,530 bufs=292 max_bufs=331
>
> Scheduled Jobs:
> Level  Type Pri  Scheduled  Name   Volume
>
> ===
> IncrementalBackup

[Bacula-users] Centos 5.5 + Bacula + windows 2008 R2 client - nightmare!

[farmershort]

Hi All,

First off, I should mention that I have spent days trawling the internet for 
answers, including right here at backup central. I have managed to fix many of 
the issue I'd been having along the way, but now... now I've really hit a brick 
wall.

so, I'm fairly new to *nix of any flavour, but I'm hopefully past the stage of 
being a casual web ubuntu user. I have set up a CentOS 5.5 box, and installed 
Bacula from rpms. There were a whole host of teething troubles, but I 
eventually got thos solved. I'm now at the stage where I have a bacula-dir.conf 
file which contains a few include statements, to keep it tidy, and that 'bat' 
runs fine in gnome. I can see the jobs I have created, for the most part I can 
see pools also.

for a while, I was completely baffled as to why the log file was empty. I 
*think* I've worked aroung that issue now. It seems that one of the daemons 
didn't have write access on the log file. I fixed this in a very poor fashion 
(for testing) with chmod 777.

so, now that I have a log file which gets populated (eventually - normall on 
cancelling a job). My core issue is that when I run a job, it says it's 
running, but doesn't actually do anything. The files and bytes counts stay at 
zero - both in bconsole, and bat. I have set my FileStorage location to be 
/backups/bacula. This directory remaind empty! I have also chmod'd the backup 
and bacula directories, incase that was the issue.

the windows server is called scorpion, and the fd is scorpion-fd. the bacula 
centos server is called viper.

so, now for the configs & logs:
Log file:



24-Feb 15:02 viper-dir JobId 3: Start Backup JobId 3, Job=scorpiontest.2011-02-2
4_15.02.51_08
24-Feb 15:02 viper-dir JobId 3: Using Device "FileStorage"
24-Feb 15:03 scorpion-fd JobId 3: Warning: /home/kern/bacula/k/bacula/src/lib/bs
ock.c:128 Could not connect to Storage daemon on viper.oleo.co.uk:9103. ERR=The
operation completed successfully.

Retrying ...
24-Feb 15:19 scorpion-fd JobId 3: Warning: /home/kern/bacula/k/bacula/src/lib/bs
ock.c:128 Could not connect to Storage daemon on viper.oleo.co.uk:9103. ERR=The
operation completed successfully.

Retrying ...
24-Feb 15:33 scorpion-fd JobId 3: Fatal error: /home/kern/bacula/k/bacula/src/li
b/bsock.c:134 Unable to connect to Storage daemon on viper.oleo.co.uk:9103. ERR=
The operation completed successfully.

24-Feb 15:33 scorpion-fd JobId 3: Fatal error: Failed to connect to Storage daem
on: viper.oleo.co.uk:9103
24-Feb 15:33 viper-dir JobId 3: Fatal error: Bad response to Storage command: wa
nted 2000 OK storage
, got 2902 Bad storage

24-Feb 15:33 viper-dir JobId 3: Error: Bacula viper-dir 5.0.3 (30Aug10): 24-Feb-
2011 15:33:24
  Build OS:   x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu redhat
  JobId:  3
  Job:scorpiontest.2011-02-24_15.02.51_08
  Backup Level:   Full
  Client: "scorpion-fd" 5.0.3 (04Aug10) Linux,Cross-compile,Win6
4
  FileSet:"winsvr01" 2011-02-24 14:34:13
  Pool:   "Fullwinsvr01" (From Job FullPool override)
  Catalog:"MyCatalog" (From Client resource)
  Storage:"File" (From Job resource)
  Scheduled time: 24-Feb-2011 15:02:49
  Start time: 24-Feb-2011 15:02:53
  End time:   24-Feb-2011 15:33:24
  Elapsed time:   30 mins 31 secs
  Priority:   10
  FD Files Written:   0
  SD Files Written:   0
  FD Bytes Written:   0 (0 B)
  SD Bytes Written:   0 (0 B)
  Rate:   0.0 KB/s
  Software Compression:   None
  VSS:no
  Encryption: no
  Accurate:   no
  Volume name(s):
  Volume Session Id:  3
  Volume Session Time:1298558025
  Last Volume Bytes:  0 (0 B)
  Non-fatal FD errors:0
  SD Errors:  0
  FD termination status:  Error
  SD termination status:  Waiting on FD
  Termination:*** Backup Error ***


***
bconsole outputs:

Status All


*status all
viper-dir Version: 5.0.3 (30 August 2010) x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu redhat
Daemon started 24-Feb-11 14:33, 3 Jobs run since started.
 Heap: heap=253,952 smbytes=87,198 max_bytes=120,530 bufs=292 max_bufs=331

Scheduled Jobs:
Level  Type Pri  Scheduled  Name   Volume
===
IncrementalBackup10  24-Feb-11 23:05BackupClient1  *unknown*
Full   Backup11  24-Feb-11 23:10BackupCatalog  *unknown*


Running Jobs:
Console connected at 24-Feb-11 14:52
No Jobs running.


Terminated Jobs:
 JobId  LevelFiles  Bytes   Status   FinishedName

 1  Full  0 0   Cancel   24-Feb-11 14:49 scorpiontest
 2  Full  0 0   Error24-Feb-11 14:52 scorpiontest
 3  Full  

Re: [Bacula-users] SQLite - no longer supported

[C M Reinehr]

On Wed 23 February 2011 10:30:11 pm Dan Langille wrote:
> A recent bug report (http://bugs.bacula.org/view.php?id=1688) which
> indicated that we are no longer supporting SQLite.
>
> I feel it's safe to stop regression testing against it.

I'm sorry to hear that. I've been using SQLite for the entire time that I've 
been using Bacula -- ten years or so -- with absolutely no difficulty. 
Admitedly, my needs are limited -- three servers & eight pc's -- but it's 
been simple to administer & troubleshoot and reliable.

cmr

-- 
Debian 'Lenny' - Registered Linux User #241964

"More laws, less justice." -- Marcus Tullius Ciceroca, 42 BC

--
Free Software Download: Index, Search & Analyze Logs and other IT data in 
Real-Time with Splunk. Collect, index and harness all the fast moving IT data 
generated by your applications, servers and devices whether physical, virtual
or in the cloud. Deliver compliance at lower cost and gain new business 
insights. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-dev2dev 
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Extremely long restore times.

[Jan Lentfer]

On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 12:08:43 +0100, "Erik P. Olsen" 
wrote:
> Since I moved to version 5.0.3 I have experienced extemely long restore
> times. 
> The time is mostly spend in the building of directory trees. The time
used
> to be 
> measured in minutes, now it is hours.
> 
> My system is Fedora 14, bacula 5.0.3, mysql 5.1.55, backup media is a 1
TB 
> external HD with e-sata interface only used with bacula.
> 
> Backup is swift so I don't understand why building of directory trees
> should 
> take so long time. When the directory trees have been build, the restore
> is as 
> swift as the backup.
> 
> I suspect problems with the mysql database but have no idea of what I 
> could/should do to correct the problem.
> 
> Thanks in advance for any advice that might lead me to a solution.

>From which version of bacula have you upgraded? Check the updates to the
database scheme, maybe some index was not created?

Jan

-- 
professional: http://www.oscar-consult.de
private: http://neslonek.homeunix.org/drupal/

--
Free Software Download: Index, Search & Analyze Logs and other IT data in 
Real-Time with Splunk. Collect, index and harness all the fast moving IT data 
generated by your applications, servers and devices whether physical, virtual
or in the cloud. Deliver compliance at lower cost and gain new business 
insights. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-dev2dev 
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users