Re: [Bacula-users] Win32 FD / Write error sending N bytes to Storage daemon

2011-06-10 Thread Blake Dunlap
$20 you have the other bacula comm channel failing due to timeout of the
state on a forwarding device. Dropping spool sizes is only increasing the
frequency of communication across that path. You will likely see this
problem solved completely by setting a short duration keepalive in your
bacula configs.

-Blake

On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 20:48, Mike Seda  wrote:

> I just encountered a similar error in RHEL 6 using 5.0.3 (on the server
> and client) with Data Spooling enabled:
> 10-Jun 02:06 srv084 JobId 43: Error: bsock.c:393 Write error sending
> 65536 bytes to Storage daemon:srv010.nowhere.us:9103: ERR=Broken pipe
> 10-Jun 02:06 srv084 JobId 43: Fatal error: backup.c:1024 Network send
> error to SD. ERR=Broken pipe
>
> The way that I made it go away was to decrease "Maximum Spool Size" from
> 200G to 2G. I also received the same error at 100G and 50G. I ended up
> just disabling data spooling completely on this box since small spool
> sizes almost defeat the point of spooling at all.
>
> I've also been seeing some sporadic tape drive errors recently, too. So
> that may be part of the problem. I will be running the vendor-suggested
> diags on the library (Dell TL4000 with 2 x LTO-4 FC drives) in the next
> couple of days.
>
> Plus, this is a temporary SD instance that I will eventually migrate to
> new hardware and add large/fast SAN disk to for spooling. This should
> explain the reason for the small spool size settings... This box only
> has a 2 x 300 GB drive SAS 10K RAID 1.
>
> It'd be nice to see if anyone else has received this error on a similar
> HW/SW configuration.
>
> Mike
>
>
> On 06/07/2011 09:48 AM, Yann Cézard wrote:
> > Le 07/06/2011 18:10, Josh Fisher a écrit :
> >> Another problem I see with Windows 7 clients is too aggressive power
> >> management turning off the Ethernet interface even though it is in use
> >> by bacula-fd. Apparently there is some Windows system call that a
> >> service (daemon) must make to tell Windows not to do power management
> >> while it is busy. I don't know what versions of Windows do that, other
> >> than 7 and Vista, but it is a potential problem.
> > There is no power management on our servers :-D
> >
> > I just ran some tests this afternoon, I create a new bacula server
> > with lenny / bacula 2.4.4, and downgrade the client to 2.4.4, to
> > be sure that all was fine with the same fileset, etc.
> > The test was OK, no problem, the job ran fine.
> > Than I tested again with our production server (5.0.3) and
> > the 2.4.4 client =>  network error, failed job
> > I upgraded the test bacula server to squeeze / bacula 5.0.2,
> > and still the 2.4.4 fd on the client =>  No problem !
> >
> > So it seems that the problem is clearly in "network hardware" on the
> > server side.
> >
> > We will do some more tests on the network side (change
> > switch port, change wire, see if no firmware update is available...),
> > but now I really doubt that the problem is in bacula, nor it can be
> > resolved in it.
> >
> > The strange thing is that the problems are only observed with win32
> > clients. Perhaps the Windows (2003) TCP/IP stack is less fault tolerant
> than
> > the linux one in some very special case ?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
>
>
> --
> EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
> authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
> Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev
> ___
> Bacula-users mailing list
> Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
>
--
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] Win32 FD / Write error sending N bytes to Storage daemon

2011-06-10 Thread Mike Seda
I just encountered a similar error in RHEL 6 using 5.0.3 (on the server 
and client) with Data Spooling enabled:
10-Jun 02:06 srv084 JobId 43: Error: bsock.c:393 Write error sending 
65536 bytes to Storage daemon:srv010.nowhere.us:9103: ERR=Broken pipe
10-Jun 02:06 srv084 JobId 43: Fatal error: backup.c:1024 Network send 
error to SD. ERR=Broken pipe

The way that I made it go away was to decrease "Maximum Spool Size" from 
200G to 2G. I also received the same error at 100G and 50G. I ended up 
just disabling data spooling completely on this box since small spool 
sizes almost defeat the point of spooling at all.

I've also been seeing some sporadic tape drive errors recently, too. So 
that may be part of the problem. I will be running the vendor-suggested 
diags on the library (Dell TL4000 with 2 x LTO-4 FC drives) in the next 
couple of days.

Plus, this is a temporary SD instance that I will eventually migrate to 
new hardware and add large/fast SAN disk to for spooling. This should 
explain the reason for the small spool size settings... This box only 
has a 2 x 300 GB drive SAS 10K RAID 1.

It'd be nice to see if anyone else has received this error on a similar 
HW/SW configuration.

Mike


On 06/07/2011 09:48 AM, Yann Cézard wrote:
> Le 07/06/2011 18:10, Josh Fisher a écrit :
>> Another problem I see with Windows 7 clients is too aggressive power
>> management turning off the Ethernet interface even though it is in use
>> by bacula-fd. Apparently there is some Windows system call that a
>> service (daemon) must make to tell Windows not to do power management
>> while it is busy. I don't know what versions of Windows do that, other
>> than 7 and Vista, but it is a potential problem.
> There is no power management on our servers :-D
>
> I just ran some tests this afternoon, I create a new bacula server
> with lenny / bacula 2.4.4, and downgrade the client to 2.4.4, to
> be sure that all was fine with the same fileset, etc.
> The test was OK, no problem, the job ran fine.
> Than I tested again with our production server (5.0.3) and
> the 2.4.4 client =>  network error, failed job
> I upgraded the test bacula server to squeeze / bacula 5.0.2,
> and still the 2.4.4 fd on the client =>  No problem !
>
> So it seems that the problem is clearly in "network hardware" on the
> server side.
>
> We will do some more tests on the network side (change
> switch port, change wire, see if no firmware update is available...),
> but now I really doubt that the problem is in bacula, nor it can be
> resolved in it.
>
> The strange thing is that the problems are only observed with win32
> clients. Perhaps the Windows (2003) TCP/IP stack is less fault tolerant than
> the linux one in some very special case ?
>
> Regards,
>

--
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] bacula IPv6 status (unofficially)

2011-06-10 Thread James Harper
> Hi,
> 
> just a short note to say that I've been testing Bacula's IPv6 support
of
> late and have generally found it to be good.
> 

Not really directly bacula related, but one of the concerns I have with
switching to IPv6 for LAN scale traffic is the performance of the
various offload features in the network adapters. Did you do any
throughput testing?

James


--
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula and ZFS

2011-06-10 Thread Chris Hoogendyk
On 6/10/11 3:18 PM, Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
> I understand this may sound a bit wary, but: what are the benefits of using 
> Bacula on a ZFS storage
> rather than using Amanda or ZFS send bare utilities?
>
> I know Bacula supports ZFS acls, but we also understand the faster option of 
> zfs sending.
> We also know zfs sending is not optimal for single file data recovery.
>
> So, what is the status of Bacula with ZFS snapshots? How it compares to other 
> solutions?

ZFS is a peculiar animal. I don't mean that in a disparaging way, I love it. 
But it may require 
rethinking backup.

As you say, ZFS send/receive doesn't provide for single file recovery. However, 
ZFS snapshots do. 
Using rolling ZFS snapshots takes very little space, even when kept over a long 
span of time. When 
I've asked the question you are asking in a couple of different forums, I've 
been told, use ZFS 
snapshots for single file recovery and use send/receive for protection against 
major failures.

Being a backup nut, I still feel I need a traditional backup system with a long 
cycle of tapes. In 
one case I have a multi-TB raidz2 array with a couple of years of daily 
snapshots, but still do 
traditional backups. I should clean out the snapshots, but space hasn't become 
an issue yet.

One hangup I ran into recently was with a sort of hierarchical backup approach. 
Workstations doing 
rsync style rolling snapshots to the server, so the backup space on the server 
is loaded with huge 
numbers of hard links. On the server side, gnu tar chokes on all that. ZFS 
send/receive doesn't give 
me the individual file recovery. But ufsdump handles the situation nicely, so 
maybe that drive gets 
reverted from ZFS back to ufs, at least until the ZFS tools evolve some more.

Amanda, by the way, will work with any of those, but doesn't, in and of itself, 
have anything to do 
with acls. You choose the appropriate underlying native tool and plug it in.

-- 
---

Chris Hoogendyk

-
O__   Systems Administrator
   c/ /'_ --- Biology&  Geology Departments
  (*) \(*) -- 140 Morrill Science Center
~~ - University of Massachusetts, Amherst



---

Erdös 4



--
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] Backup-To-Files / Multiple Concurrent Jobs

2011-06-10 Thread John Drescher
>> You have "Maximum Volume Jobs = 1" in your pool. If you intend to
>> use a single storage device and this pool you can only run 1 job
>> at a time on this pool since only 1 job can be written to a volume
>> a storage device can only load 1 volume at a time.
>
> I think we had "Maximum Volume Jobs = 1" so that we get a new file on the 
> storage daemon for each job that runs.
>
> Is there any way to keep the one-file-per-job feature and also allow multiple 
> concurrent jobs to the device?

You need more than 1 storage device to have more than 1 volume loaded
at the same time. I would take a look at bacula-vchanger. It can help
you get around this limitation by creating a virtual autochanger of
disk volumes that you can access with more than 1 storage device but
still schedule all jobs to the autochanger device and let the software
handle the details.


http://sourceforge.net/projects/vchanger/


John

--
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] Backup-To-Files / Multiple Concurrent Jobs

2011-06-10 Thread Tim Gustafson
> You have "Maximum Volume Jobs = 1" in your pool. If you intend to
> use a single storage device and this pool you can only run 1 job 
> at a time on this pool since only 1 job can be written to a volume
> a storage device can only load 1 volume at a time.

I think we had "Maximum Volume Jobs = 1" so that we get a new file on the 
storage daemon for each job that runs.

Is there any way to keep the one-file-per-job feature and also allow multiple 
concurrent jobs to the device?

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Tim Gustafsont...@soe.ucsc.edu
Baskin School of Engineering 831-459-5354
UC Santa Cruz Baskin Engineering 317B
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

--
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


[Bacula-users] Bacula and ZFS

2011-06-10 Thread Gabriele Bulfon
I understand this may sound a bit wary, but: what are the benefits of using 
Bacula on a ZFS storage
rather than using Amanda or ZFS send bare utilities?
I know Bacula supports ZFS acls, but we also understand the faster option of 
zfs sending.
We also know zfs sending is not optimal for single file data recovery.
So, what is the status of Bacula with ZFS snapshots? How it compares to other 
solutions?
Thanks :)
Gabriele.
--
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] Backup-To-Files / Multiple Concurrent Jobs

2011-06-10 Thread John Drescher
2011/6/10 Tim Gustafson :
> Whoops, I forgot to attach the config files.  Here they are!
>
Pool {
  Name = www-01-pool
  Pool Type = Backup
  Volume Retention = 2 Months
  Maximum Volume Jobs = 1
  Maximum Volumes = 50
  Label Format = www-01-
}

You have "Maximum Volume Jobs = 1" in your pool. If you intend to use
a single storage device and this pool you can only run 1 job at a time
on this pool since only 1 job can be written to a volume a storage
device can only load 1 volume at a time.

John

--
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] Backup-To-Files / Multiple Concurrent Jobs

2011-06-10 Thread John Drescher
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Tim Gustafson  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have Bacula configured to backup to file.  I'm attaching the relevant 
> snippets of my director, storage daemon and file daemon configuration files.
>
> When we run jobs that are configured to go to the same storage device, the 
> first job runs and then all the subsequent jobs queue up with a message like 
> this:
>
> www-01.2011-06-10_08.56.15_06 is waiting on Storage bacula-02-bsoe-02
>
> I'm sure that I'm just missing some switch somewhere - what am I doing wrong 
> that is preventing more than one job from running at once?

If you have your concurrency set correctly (there are 5 or so places
were you enable concurrency in bacula-dir.conf) You probably have your
jobs going to different pools or volumes and since a storage device
can only load 1 volume at a time it can not process more than 1 job at
at time..

John

--
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] Backup-To-Files / Multiple Concurrent Jobs

2011-06-10 Thread Tim Gustafson
Whoops, I forgot to attach the config files.  Here they are!

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Tim Gustafsont...@soe.ucsc.edu
Baskin School of Engineering 831-459-5354
UC Santa Cruz Baskin Engineering 317B
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Client {
  Name = www-01-fd
  Address = www-01
  FDPort = 9102
  Catalog = MyCatalog
  Password = password
  File Retention = 2 Months
  Job Retention = 2 Months
  Maximum Concurrent Jobs = 10
}

FileSet {
  Name = www-01-files
  Include {
Options {
  Accurate = mcs
  Verify = mcs
  Onefs = Yes
  Sparse = Yes
}
File = /
  }
  Exclude {
File = /tmp
File = /var/tmp
File = /usr/src
File = /usr/obj
File = /usr/ports
  }
}

Pool {
  Name = www-01-pool
  Pool Type = Backup
  Volume Retention = 2 Months
  Maximum Volume Jobs = 1
  Maximum Volumes = 50
  Label Format = www-01-
}

Job {
  JobDefs = DefaultJob
  Name = www-01
  Client = www-01-fd
  FileSet = www-01-files
  Messages = www-01-messages
  Schedule = default
  Pool = www-01-pool
  Storage = bacula-02-bsoe-02
  Maximum Concurrent Jobs = 10
}

Storage {
  Name = bacula-02-bsoe-02
  Address = bacula-02
  SDPort = 9103
  Password = password
  Device = bsoe-02
  Media Type = File
  Maximum Concurrent Jobs = 10
  AllowCompression = Yes
}
Storage {
  Name = bacula-02-dir
  WorkingDirectory = /var/db/bacula
  Pid Directory = /var/run
  Maximum Concurrent Jobs = 10
}

Device {
  Name = bsoe-02
  Media Type = File
  Archive Device = /bacula/bsoe
  LabelMedia = Yes
  Random Access = Yes
  AutomaticMount = Yes
  RemovableMedia = No
  AlwaysOpen = No
  Maximum Concurrent Jobs = 10
}

Director {
  Name = bacula-dir-dir
  Password = password
}

FileDaemon {
  Name = www-01-fd
  FDport = 9102
  WorkingDirectory = /var/db/bacula
  Pid Directory = /var/run
  Maximum Concurrent Jobs = 10
  Maximum Network Buffer Size = 65536
}

--
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


[Bacula-users] Backup-To-Files / Multiple Concurrent Jobs

2011-06-10 Thread Tim Gustafson
Hi,

We have Bacula configured to backup to file.  I'm attaching the relevant 
snippets of my director, storage daemon and file daemon configuration files.

When we run jobs that are configured to go to the same storage device, the 
first job runs and then all the subsequent jobs queue up with a message like 
this:

www-01.2011-06-10_08.56.15_06 is waiting on Storage bacula-02-bsoe-02

I'm sure that I'm just missing some switch somewhere - what am I doing wrong 
that is preventing more than one job from running at once?

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Tim Gustafsont...@soe.ucsc.edu
Baskin School of Engineering 831-459-5354
UC Santa Cruz Baskin Engineering 317B
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


--
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] Why doesn't Bacula use the whole tape?

2011-06-10 Thread John Drescher
2011/6/10 "Stefan Günther" :
> Hello,
>
> we are use an Autochanger with 8 Ultrium-LTO 3 tapes: seven for everyday and 
> the last one is a cleaning tape
> +-++---+-+-+--+--+-+--+---+--+-+
> | MediaId | VolumeName | VolStatus | Enabled | VolBytes        | VolFiles | 
> VolRetention | Recycle | Slot | InChanger | MediaType    | LastWritten        
>  |
> +-++---+-+-+--+--+-+--+---+--+-+
> |      20 | TestVol1   | Full      |       1 | 223,467,181,056 |      224 |   
>    604,800 |       1 |    1 |         1 | Ultrium-LTO3 | 2011-06-10 12:04:53 |
> +-++---+-+-+--+--+-+--+---+--+-+
>
> TestVol1 belongs to a pool where we defined "Maximum Volumes Bytes = 0".
>
> Nevertheless Bacula complains that it needs a new volume:
>
> 10-Jun 12:06 bacula-sd JobId 106: Job Storage08.2011-06-10_09.14.16_23 is 
> waiting. Cannot find any appendable volumes.
> Please use the "label" command to create a new Volume for:
>    Storage:      "Drive-1" (/dev/st0)
>    Pool:         TestPool
>
>
> Any idea what's going wrong?
>
Are these LTO3 or LTO2 tapes?
When bacula hits any kind of tape error it assumes the tape is full.
Check your dmesg.

John

--
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


[Bacula-users] Why doesn't Bacula use the whole tape?

2011-06-10 Thread Stefan Günther
Hello,

we are use an Autochanger with 8 Ultrium-LTO 3 tapes: seven for everyday and 
the last one is a cleaning tape
+-++---+-+-+--+--+-+--+---+--+-+
| MediaId | VolumeName | VolStatus | Enabled | VolBytes| VolFiles | 
VolRetention | Recycle | Slot | InChanger | MediaType| LastWritten |
+-++---+-+-+--+--+-+--+---+--+-+
|  20 | TestVol1   | Full  |   1 | 223,467,181,056 |  224 | 
 604,800 |   1 |1 | 1 | Ultrium-LTO3 | 2011-06-10 12:04:53 |
+-++---+-+-+--+--+-+--+---+--+-+

TestVol1 belongs to a pool where we defined "Maximum Volumes Bytes = 0".

Nevertheless Bacula complains that it needs a new volume:

10-Jun 12:06 bacula-sd JobId 106: Job Storage08.2011-06-10_09.14.16_23 is 
waiting. Cannot find any appendable volumes.
Please use the "label" command to create a new Volume for:
Storage:  "Drive-1" (/dev/st0)
Pool: TestPool


Any idea what's going wrong?

Thanks for any suggestions or hints,

Stefan
Media type:   Ultrium-LTO3


___
Schon gehört? WEB.DE hat einen genialen Phishing-Filter in die
Toolbar eingebaut! http://produkte.web.de/go/toolbar

--
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] bacula IPv6 status (unofficially)

2011-06-10 Thread Craig Van Tassle
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:57:38 +0100
Gavin McCullagh  wrote:

> On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Gavin McCullagh wrote:
> 
> > just a short note to say that I've been testing Bacula's IPv6
> > support of late and have generally found it to be good.
> 
> PS: well done to all the developers involved :-)
> 
> Gavin
> 

I have to agree there. I have been using IPv6 on my home systems (work
does not have IPv6 yet) and it's actually been faster then IPv4 to the
same systems.

-- 
Craig Van Tassle
HUBzero.org
System Administrator
YONG 1006
Desk Phone : (765)496-6413

--
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] bacula IPv6 status (unofficially)

2011-06-10 Thread Gavin McCullagh
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Gavin McCullagh wrote:

> just a short note to say that I've been testing Bacula's IPv6 support of
> late and have generally found it to be good.

PS: well done to all the developers involved :-)

Gavin



--
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula admin tool and bacula services version

2011-06-10 Thread Radosław Korzeniewski
Hello,

W dniu 10 czerwca 2011 13:55 użytkownik  napisał:

>
> Good morning Radoslaw,
>
> I have several different versions... so I can't say you nothing as a
> rule so you think any major version of bat can be used to access any
> minor of bacula-dir?
>

I.E. if you have a Bacula 3.0.3 then you should use b.a.t. at version 3.x.
If you have Bacula 5.0.3 then you should use b.a.t. from version 5.x. I have
never had problems with using b.a.t. when only patchlevel was changed, i.e.
5.0.0 - 5.0.3.

best regards

-- 
Radosław Korzeniewski
rados...@korzeniewski.net
--
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


[Bacula-users] bacula IPv6 status (unofficially)

2011-06-10 Thread Gavin McCullagh
Hi,

just a short note to say that I've been testing Bacula's IPv6 support of
late and have generally found it to be good.

We have:

 - consoles connecting to the director over IPv6
 - director talking to SD and FD over IPv6
 - FD talking to SD over IPv6

As you might expect, if you configure Bacula to connect to a FQDN and
there's no  record, you just get an IPv4 connection.  If there is a
 record available, and a suitable IPv6 route, Bacula will generally try
to connect over IPv6 first and then if it gets a TCP reset (the far end
isn't listening on IPv6) or a timeout (maybe a firewall blocking the
connection), Bacula retries using IPv4 and life proceeds as normal.

A couple of things worth noting:


== Daemon Address Config ==

Thus far, we've found the best thing to do is to use the multiple address
configs with an explicit IPv4 and IPv6 record, eg (for the FD):

  FDAddresses  = {
ipv4 = { addr = my.fq.dn; }
ipv6 = { addr = my.fq.dn; }
  }

If you just use ip = {}, I've found that it only binds to the IPv4 address,
you need to explicitly have an ipv6 entry.  The same applies to the
director and storage daemon.  I'm open to better suggestions.

I think Bacula usually listens on 0.0.0.0 (all IPv4 addresses) by default,
but doesn't listen on :: (all IPv6 addresses).  I'm not sure if this is by
design, but I guess perhaps it's arguably sensible to only listen on IPv6
where it's explicitly enabled for now.  The main point is that it can be
enabled.

With IPv6 addresses, if you use SLAAC (stateless address auto-config), the
host's IP address is based on its MAC address, so it doesn't change.  If
the host uses privacy addresses the address may change.  On Windows 7, as I
understand it there are two addresses, one is initially created randomly
when you plug into that network but it stays constant on that network (this
is the one you expect to receive connections on and which usually goes in
the DNS).  A second address is for outgoing connections and changes at each
reboot (or every 24 hours on Windows Vista apparently).


== TCP wrappers ==

In my experience at least, if you use TCP Wrappers on Linux, you need to
enter the IPv6 address of the Bacula daemons which will be connecting.
Although a FQDN will allow an IPv4 host in, you seem to need the IPv6
address.  At a guess, this probably has more to do with tcp wrappers than
Bacula though.

This is one situation where Bacula will fail over IPv6 and not revert to
IPv4 which might still work.  This is because it's not a connection
failure, it's an authentication failure, so that makes some sense.

Gavin



--
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] LTO2 get filled at 136GB or 85GB

2011-06-10 Thread Marcello Romani
Il 10/06/2011 12:02, James Harper ha scritto:
>> hi,
>>
>> i am running Bacula 5.0.2 on Debian Lenny amd64 with a Certance LTO2 
>> streamer.
>>
>> since a while my backupjobs does not get finished, as bacula says
>>
>>
>> 10-Jun 06:54 lx01-sd JobId 2422: Despooling elapsed time = 00:00:51, Transfer
>> rate = 22.89 M Bytes/second
>> 10-Jun 06:56 lx01-sd JobId 2422: Writing spooled data to Volume. Despooling
>> 1,167,755,347 bytes ...
>> 10-Jun 06:57 lx01-sd JobId 2422: Despooling elapsed time = 00:00:48, Transfer
>> rate = 24.32 M Bytes/second
>> 10-Jun 06:58 lx01-sd JobId 2422: Writing spooled data to Volume. Despooling
>> 1,167,755,351 bytes ...
>> 10-Jun 06:59 lx01-sd JobId 2422: End of Volume "LX03DO01" at 159:2982 on
>> device "Certlto2" (/dev/nst0). Write of 64512 bytes got -1.
>> 10-Jun 06:59 lx01-sd JobId 2422: Re-read of last block succeeded.
>> 10-Jun 06:59 lx01-sd JobId 2422: End of medium on Volume "LX03DO01"
>> Bytes=158,745,581,568 Blocks=2,460,713 at 10-Jun-2011 06:59.
>>
>> LTO2 should be able to store 200GB on a media?
>>
>
> 158GB is probably a bit low. 85GB is definitely a problem. Is this something 
> that has been getting worse over time? How old are the tapes?
>
> Does your tape drive vendor provide any drive assessment tools? Eg HP provide 
> Library&  Tape Tools.
>
> LTO is pretty smart and the heads are organised so that immediately after the 
> media passes under the write head it passes under the read head and the data 
> just written is read. If there is a problem reading it the data is rewritten. 
> Obviously every time a block has to be rewritten the effective capacity of 
> the tape is reduced. The drive assessment tools should tell you how much this 
> is happening (margin, I think) and otherwise report the condition of the 
> drive and the tapes.
>
> Some of our tapes are down to about 175GB capacity. Curiously it is the set 
> of 5 tapes used on Fridays that are suffering from this problem which is 
> strange as they are used about 5 times less than the other tapes.
>
> James
> --
> EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
> authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
> Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev
> ___
> Bacula-users mailing list
> Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

I suggest trying a btape fill test command.

Just my 2 cents.

-- 
Marcello Romani

--
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] What does verify = i mean?

2011-06-10 Thread Ansgar Konermann
Am 10.06.2011 08:03, schrieb Radosław Korzeniewski:
> Hi,
>
> 2011/6/10 Ansgar Konermann  >
>
> >>> i compare the inodes
>
> Does the 'i' code for "verify=" mean:
> a) a shortcut for "compare all inode data, without respect to their
> semantics, just do a byte-by-byte compare" (this is what I would guess
> from the description given in the current manual) -- if so, would this
> also compare the block numbers inside the inode?
> b) compare the inode number -- why would one want this?
> c) something completely different (if so, what?)
>
> I really can't make any sense of the 'i' code. Please enlighten me :-)
>
>
> The correct answer is "b". Any awards in this quiz? :)
A lot of fame :-)
>
> You ask, why one want this? - an answer is very simple. Lets imagine
> you can use Bacula verify feature as a some kind of IDS software.
> Something like tripwire. Then you probably want to check if someone
> replaced your very important binaries with new one.
Ah okay, my mindset was a little too limited here ;-) I'm relatively new
to Bacula and did not have this feature in mind.

Nevertheless, IMHO the documentation could be a little more precise
here, and say "compare inode number" instead of "compare inode".

Thanks a lot.

Best regards

Ansgar
>
> bye
>
> -- 
> Radosław Korzeniewski
> rados...@korzeniewski.net 

--
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] LTO2 get filled at 136GB or 85GB

2011-06-10 Thread James Harper
> hi,
> 
> i am running Bacula 5.0.2 on Debian Lenny amd64 with a Certance LTO2 streamer.
> 
> since a while my backupjobs does not get finished, as bacula says
> 
> 
> 10-Jun 06:54 lx01-sd JobId 2422: Despooling elapsed time = 00:00:51, Transfer
> rate = 22.89 M Bytes/second
> 10-Jun 06:56 lx01-sd JobId 2422: Writing spooled data to Volume. Despooling
> 1,167,755,347 bytes ...
> 10-Jun 06:57 lx01-sd JobId 2422: Despooling elapsed time = 00:00:48, Transfer
> rate = 24.32 M Bytes/second
> 10-Jun 06:58 lx01-sd JobId 2422: Writing spooled data to Volume. Despooling
> 1,167,755,351 bytes ...
> 10-Jun 06:59 lx01-sd JobId 2422: End of Volume "LX03DO01" at 159:2982 on
> device "Certlto2" (/dev/nst0). Write of 64512 bytes got -1.
> 10-Jun 06:59 lx01-sd JobId 2422: Re-read of last block succeeded.
> 10-Jun 06:59 lx01-sd JobId 2422: End of medium on Volume "LX03DO01"
> Bytes=158,745,581,568 Blocks=2,460,713 at 10-Jun-2011 06:59.
> 
> LTO2 should be able to store 200GB on a media?
> 

158GB is probably a bit low. 85GB is definitely a problem. Is this something 
that has been getting worse over time? How old are the tapes?

Does your tape drive vendor provide any drive assessment tools? Eg HP provide 
Library & Tape Tools.

LTO is pretty smart and the heads are organised so that immediately after the 
media passes under the write head it passes under the read head and the data 
just written is read. If there is a problem reading it the data is rewritten. 
Obviously every time a block has to be rewritten the effective capacity of the 
tape is reduced. The drive assessment tools should tell you how much this is 
happening (margin, I think) and otherwise report the condition of the drive and 
the tapes.

Some of our tapes are down to about 175GB capacity. Curiously it is the set of 
5 tapes used on Fridays that are suffering from this problem which is strange 
as they are used about 5 times less than the other tapes.

James
--
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula admin tool and bacula services version

2011-06-10 Thread egoitz
 On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 09:43:27 +0200, Radosław Korzeniewski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2011/6/10
>
>>    Thanks a lot for you're response. So, it's not recommended to
>> use a
>>  version of bat with inferior or superior version bacula
>> services?. It's
>>  better to use the own shipped version with each source version?.
>
> What Bacula version do you use - 2.x, 3.x, 4.x, 5.x - all, some, only
> one?
>
> I believe that you can use bat for the same major and any minor
> version of Bacula.
>
> best regards

 Good morning Radoslaw,

 I have several different versions... so I can't say you nothing as a 
 rule so you think any major version of bat can be used to access any 
 minor of bacula-dir?

--
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula admin tool and bacula services version

2011-06-10 Thread Radosław Korzeniewski
Hi,

2011/6/10 

>Thanks a lot for you're response. So, it's not recommended to use a
>  version of bat with inferior or superior version bacula services?. It's
>  better to use the own shipped version with each source version?.
>
>
What Bacula version do you use - 2.x, 3.x, 4.x, 5.x - all, some, only one?

I believe that you can use bat for the same major and any minor version of
Bacula.

best regards

-- 
Radosław Korzeniewski
rados...@korzeniewski.net
--
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula admin tool and bacula services version

2011-06-10 Thread egoitz
 On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 11:54:19 -0400, John Drescher wrote:
>>  Wich Bat (bacula admin tool) should I have for use with each 
>> bacula-dir
>>  (isn't it the service it connects to?)?. Is there a matrix of
>>  compatibilities or similar?. I have had some problems compiling bat 
>> in
>>  Solaris for example... so I'm planning having one central BAT for
>>  accessing all bacula servers... but I'd need to know wich version 
>> of
>>  them is compatible with the other one.
>>
>
> I would use 5.0.3 for bat and all servers until 5.1 is released this
> summer. This will be the most stable. I do not believe a newer bat is
> backward compatible with older servers, I believe there were some
> protocol changes that make this not work.
>
> John


 Hi John,

 Thanks a lot for you're response. So, it's not recommended to use a 
 version of bat with inferior or superior version bacula services?. It's 
 better to use the own shipped version with each source version?.

 Thanks a lot.
 Bye!

--
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


[Bacula-users] LTO2 get filled at 136GB or 85GB

2011-06-10 Thread Thomas Stegbauer
hi, 

i am running Bacula 5.0.2 on Debian Lenny amd64 with a Certance LTO2 streamer. 

since a while my backupjobs does not get finished, as bacula says 

10-Jun 06:54 lx01-sd JobId 2422: Despooling elapsed time = 00:00:51, Transfer 
rate = 22.89 M Bytes/second
10-Jun 06:56 lx01-sd JobId 2422: Writing spooled data to Volume. Despooling 
1,167,755,347 bytes ...
10-Jun 06:57 lx01-sd JobId 2422: Despooling elapsed time = 00:00:48, Transfer 
rate = 24.32 M Bytes/second
10-Jun 06:58 lx01-sd JobId 2422: Writing spooled data to Volume. Despooling 
1,167,755,351 bytes ... 
10-Jun 06:59 lx01-sd JobId 2422: End of Volume "LX03DO01" at 159:2982 on device 
"Certlto2" (/dev/nst0). Write of 64512 bytes got -1.
10-Jun 06:59 lx01-sd JobId 2422: Re-read of last block succeeded.
10-Jun 06:59 lx01-sd JobId 2422: End of medium on Volume "LX03DO01" 
Bytes=158,745,581,568 Blocks=2,460,713 at 10-Jun-2011 06:59. 
LTO2 should be able to store 200GB on a media? 

best regards 
thomas 
--
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] Central control remote storage

2011-06-10 Thread Radosław Korzeniewski
2011/5/2 John Drescher 

> Bacula does not have a central director concept.
>

I definitely disagree. Bacula do have a central director concept. It means
that you can realize central backup system in your datacenter. What you only
need is a _one_ (central) director and infinite number of clients, storage
daemons even catalog databases and consoles.
Or am I misunderstood your comment?

best regards

-- 
Radosław Korzeniewski
rados...@korzeniewski.net
--
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] parallel jobs problem

2011-06-10 Thread Radosław Korzeniewski
Hi,

2011/5/3 Robert Kromoser 

>  Hi everybody.
>
>
>
> I am not able to run 2 bacula jobs from 2 different clients at the same
> time.
>
> As described in the bacula concepts documentation I created for both
> clients
>
> an own device in the sd.conf files.
>
> Then I created for both client an own storage and an own pool in the
> dir.conf files and in the
>
> Pool I use different volume label formats.
>
>
>
> When I start the first job on the first client (ccrm0004) it’s getting the
> status R (running).
>
> But if I start immediately a second job from the second client (ccrmtest),
> then bacula sets
>
> the status to C (Created, but not running).
>
>
>
> Does anyone know what I did wrong?
>
>
Check if you have a Max Jobs parameter set for more then "1" for all:
director, clients, storage daemon.
You can check it by console command: show director, show client, show
storage

best regards

-- 
Radosław Korzeniewski
rados...@korzeniewski.net
--
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users