Re: [Bacula-users] RHEL 4/5/6 - Fedora 16 Bacula RPM repository
On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 16:31 +0100, Simone Caronni wrote: Hello, I'm in the process of updating the repository with the latest changes from rawhide. Apart from small tweaks and updates I do _NOT_ plan to make any additional change to the repository in the immediate future; so this could be a safe upgrade for Enterprise distributions. The repository is at: http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula/ The main difference from before are the following items: - RHEL 4 support (i386/x86_64/ppc). - Addition of README.fedora in bacula-common with quick install procedures for PostgreSQL and notes. - Removal of bacula-director-backend package in favour of a unified bacula-director package - The libbaccats alternatives are set up inside the bacula-libs package so bscan can reside in the bacula-storage package. snip hi simone, just a quick question -- i installed your rpms (updating a 5.0.3 mysql based install) and noticed that the director is failing to start as it is requesting postgresql: bacula-dir: message.c:482-0 Close_msg jcr=0 bacula-dir: message.c:502-0 ===Begin close msg resource at 10e51a8 bacula-dir: message.c:586-0 Done walking message chain. bacula-dir: message.c:593-0 ===End close msg resource bacula-dir: message.c:325-0 Copy message resource 10e8778 to 1112ca8 bacula-dir: priv.c:60-0 uname=NONE gname=NONE bacula-dir: postgresql.c:1113-0 db_init_database first time is there a directive to tell bacula to only use mysql? thanks m -- Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Disk backup strategy advice / help
On 04/01/2012 21:52, Adrian Reyer wrote: On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 12:16:55PM +, keith wrote: 460M Dec 29 23:19 Full-0001 26.3G Dec 30 23:52 Full-0003 702MDec 24 23:05 Inc-0001 10.0GDec 30 01:54 Inc-0002 2.3G Dec 31 00:06 Inc-0004 3.1G Dec 31 00:56 Inc-0005 611MDec 31 00:56 Inc-0006 Is the 10G on 24th mostly additional, changed or moved data? Are these compressed backups? Hi Adrian, The 10G was just a new additional client being introduced into the Bacula. Now that the backups seems to be working I need to figure out how to implement an offsite strategy, I want to use a combination of removable disks and rsync to do this. I think bacula is not the ideal tool for running additional offsite backups. And very likely rsync is not a good way if you use bacula. Oh ok I have 3 possibilities in mind: 1. If you are not talking about windows clients, I'd consider using rsync (e.g. via rsnapshot) to run the complete offsite backup unrelated to bacula. Run one rsync/rsnapshot job per client and the 'new' client will just run longer, independent of the others except the shared bandwidth. Via rsnapshot you only need to do 1 full backup per client, changed files just lead to new full backupsets, but only the difference needs to be transferred. We do that on several locations and wrote a wrapper round rsnapshot (which is a wrapper round rsync), debian packages are available at deb http://ftp.lihas.de/debian stable main package rsnapshot-backup. If you add some file unification tool, you get away with far less used diskspace. + only changes need to be transferred + initial backup can easily be transferred on external media to save bandwidth - no bacula, no bacula indexes - no backup of windows clients / anything that doesn't have rsync We have some Unix servers but the bulk of our servers are Windows. Our old/current backup strategy is to do full backups nightly and these are about 450G Compressed. If I could I would like to do some type of copy jobs where I copy the Incremental files to another place on the server and then get rsync to down these files knowing that they were just the incrementals. 2. Alternatively you can use the normal bacula backup + a copy job. As copy jobs only work on same bacula-sd, you could e.g. NFS-mount some external server and store the target pools there. The copy full pool is to local disks on individual mountpoints. Move the volumes to the remote location and replace it with links to remote NFS. + works with all clients - regularily transporting volumes offsite is required Only just read about Migration / Copy jobs last night (I am slowly getting through the Bacula manual) and will probably try to get one of these jobs working later today. I plan to have one dedicated bacula-fd server and have also planned to put the removable disks (Offsite Backup) into this server. If I can get Bacula manage my offsite disks and to also know whats on these disk will be great. 3. Run a complete seperate job instance to the remote site using a bacula-sd installed there. Use virtual full backups to create the fulls from the full/diff/inc backups. Initially a full backup has to pass the remote connection. + works with all clients 0 initial full might be expensive in bandwidth Currently I use 1. and 2. myself. With 3. I ran into trouble selecting the correct pools in my environment and virtual full in general including a tape changer with a single drive. There are network / firewall issue outwith my control that would make remote Bacula backups an issue. If I add a new server to be backed up to Bacula midweek it does a full backup in the INC pool. This might be a big backup and screw-up my Rsync job. Does this seem like a good idea and goes anyone know how keep Full backups out of the INC or DIFF pool Just do a manual initial full backup on the new client. As I assume they don't appear magically in your backup setup. Regards, Adrian Your right, they shouldn't just be appearing but they are while I play with Bacula :) But in the future when adding new clients in then it makes sense to manually kick off a full backup. Adrian, thanks for the detailed answers. I give the copy jobs a try and see how I get on. Cheers Keith. -- Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] RHEL 4/5/6 - Fedora 16 Bacula RPM repository
Hello, the same question/answer were exactly in the mail before, please read the README.Fedora file in bacula-common. There are notes regarding this matter and a quick installation guide. Remember to update the database as well as in 5.2.3 it is different. --Simone 2012/1/5 mayak-cq ma...@australsat.com ** On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 16:31 +0100, Simone Caronni wrote: Hello, I'm in the process of updating the repository with the latest changes from rawhide. Apart from small tweaks and updates I do _NOT_ plan to make any additional change to the repository in the immediate future; so this could be a safe upgrade for Enterprise distributions. The repository is at: http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula/ The main difference from before are the following items: - RHEL 4 support (i386/x86_64/ppc). - Addition of README.fedora in bacula-common with quick install procedures for PostgreSQL and notes. - Removal of bacula-director-backend package in favour of a unified bacula-director package - The libbaccats alternatives are set up inside the bacula-libs package so bscan can reside in the bacula-storage package. snip hi simone, just a quick question -- i installed your rpms (updating a 5.0.3 mysql based install) and noticed that the director is failing to start as it is requesting postgresql: bacula-dir: message.c:482-0 Close_msg jcr=0 bacula-dir: message.c:502-0 ===Begin close msg resource at 10e51a8 bacula-dir: message.c:586-0 Done walking message chain. bacula-dir: message.c:593-0 ===End close msg resource bacula-dir: message.c:325-0 Copy message resource 10e8778 to 1112ca8 bacula-dir: priv.c:60-0 uname=NONE gname=NONE bacula-dir: postgresql.c:1113-0 db_init_database first time is there a directive to tell bacula to only use mysql? thanks m -- Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users -- You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of the shore (R. W. Emerson). -- Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[Bacula-users] socket problem during label barcode with HP 1x8 G2 AutoLdr
Hi Folks, We are using CentOS 6 64bits with a 8 tapes robot with 1 drive. It is a HP model 1x8 G2 AutoLDR. [5:0:0:0]storage HP P212 3.66 - [5:2:0:0]tapeHP Ultrium 4-SCSI U55W /dev/st0 [5:2:0:1]mediumx HP 1x8 G2 AUTOLDR 3.10 /dev/sch0 Bacula version: Version: 5.2.2 All tapes are LTO4 with their labels in place. The tapes are in place and the system setup is OK. Although, when we try the command label barcode, in bconsole, the robot put the tapes, one-by-one, into the drive, but the process is not concluded, locking bconsole. /var/log/messages says: Jan 4 19:17:55 Xx bacula-sd: bsock.c:335 Socket has errors=1 on call to client:10.x.y.z:36643 Any tip ? Thanks, -- Isamar Maia Cel. VIVO SSA: (55) 71-9146-8575 Cel. TIM SSA: (55) 71-9185-5264 Fixo: (55) 71-4062-8688 日本: +81-(0)3-4550-1212 Skype ID: isamar.maia -- Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[Bacula-users] Is Bacula volumes capable to handle up to 400GB of data
hi.. all Every day, I have more than 375GB to backup. for the movement i do the backups by breaking then into different volumes. ( one volume might have maximum of 150GB of data) below is list volumes out put that you can see.. Now what i am going to do is write all the backups for a day into one single volume so there is going to be 7 volumes and one single volume going to have up to 400GB of data. Is Bacula volumes capable to handle that much of data. or is it good to have small volumes like 150GB Is it ok to have up to 400GB in a bacula volume... on a file storage device.. will it be a problem when restoring the backups..??? Pool: Default +-+-+---+-++--+--+-+--+---+---+-+ | MediaId | VolumeName | VolStatus | Enabled | VolBytes | VolFiles | VolRetention | Recycle | Slot | InChanger | MediaType | LastWritten | +-+-+---+-++--+--+-+--+---+---+-+ | 29 | NAVol-mobilepicdump | Append| 1 | 28,748,431,845 |6 |1,123,200 | 1 |0 | 0 | File | 2012-01-03 20:30:10 | +-+-+---+-++--+--+-+--+---+---+-+ Pool: DailyMon +-+--+---+-+-+--+--+-+--+---+---+-+ | MediaId | VolumeName | VolStatus | Enabled | VolBytes| VolFiles | VolRetention | Recycle | Slot | InChanger | MediaType | LastWritten | +-+--+---+-+-+--+--+-+--+---+---+-+ | 5 | MonTape-0005 | Used | 1 | 194,974,166,016 | 207 |1,123,200 | 1 |0 | 0 | LTO-4 | 2011-12-26 05:55:52 | | 11 | MonTape-0011 | Append| 1 | 236,947,286,016 | 251 |1,123,200 | 1 |0 | 0 | LTO-4 | 2012-01-02 07:01:29 | +-+--+---+-+-+--+--+-+--+---+---+-+ Pool: DailyTue +-+--+---+-+-+--+--+-+--+---+---+-+ | MediaId | VolumeName | VolStatus | Enabled | VolBytes| VolFiles | VolRetention | Recycle | Slot | InChanger | MediaType | LastWritten | +-+--+---+-+-+--+--+-+--+---+---+-+ | 6 | TueTape-0006 | Used | 1 | 19,275,024,384 | 21 |1,123,200 | 1 |0 | 0 | LTO-4 | 2011-12-13 16:12:15 | | 13 | TueTape-0013 | Append| 1 | 143,484,816,384 | 158 |1,123,200 | 1 |0 | 0 | LTO-4 | 2012-01-03 11:34:12 | +-+--+---+-+-+--+--+-+--+---+---+-+ Pool: DailyWed +-+--+---+-+-+--+--+-+--+---+---+-+ | MediaId | VolumeName | VolStatus | Enabled | VolBytes| VolFiles | VolRetention | Recycle | Slot | InChanger | MediaType | LastWritten | +-+--+---+-+-+--+--+-+--+---+---+-+ | 8 | WedTape-00 | Used | 1 | 488,936,448 |2 |1,123,200 | 1 |0 | 0 | LTO-4 | 2011-12-28 15:55:42 | | 24 | WedTape-0023 | Used | 1 | 142,854,018,048 | 155 |1,123,200 | 1 |0 | 0 | LTO-4 | 2011-12-21 05:41:14 | +-+--+---+-+-+--+--+-+--+---+---+-+ Pool: DailyThu +-+--+---+-+-+--+--+-+--+---+---+-+ | MediaId | VolumeName | VolStatus | Enabled | VolBytes| VolFiles | VolRetention | Recycle | Slot | InChanger | MediaType | LastWritten | +-+--+---+-+-+--+--+-+--+---+---+-+ | 3 | ThuTape-0003 | Used | 1 | 81,746,638,848 | 94 |1,123,200 | 1 |0 | 0 | LTO-4 | 2011-12-22 05:43:59 | | 9 | ThuTape-0009 | Append
Re: [Bacula-users] Disk backup strategy advice / help
Hello, I have managed my offsite backup setup so that only bacula volumes get rsync-ed and it works fine for half a year. Total backup size is about 500Gb, nightly amount of data rsync-ed is between 1 and 10Gb (so my home adsl connection with 10Mbit/s downstream is OK to keep offsite backups at home). This is in an assumption that you need offsite backup only when you've totally lost onsite one. In this case bacula server has to be restored/reinstalled first (or better in advance, to be able to test restoration) and database has to be restored before using offsite backup. Additionally I encrypt the bacula volumes on the fly while remotely rsync-ing them (on the fly by means of fuse encfs). Regards, Alex Ehrlich -- Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Is Bacula volumes capable to handle up to 400GB of data
2012/1/5 Rushdhi Mohamed zmrush...@gmail.com: hi.. all Every day, I have more than 375GB to backup. for the movement i do the backups by breaking then into different volumes. ( one volume might have maximum of 150GB of data) below is list volumes out put that you can see.. Now what i am going to do is write all the backups for a day into one single volume so there is going to be 7 volumes and one single volume going to have up to 400GB of data. Is Bacula volumes capable to handle that much of data. or is it good to have small volumes like 150GB Is it ok to have up to 400GB in a bacula volume... on a file storage device.. Yes. I have some tapes (LTO2) at work with over 1 TB of data on them however most of my 100+ tapes average around 300 GB of data since I get about 1.5:1 compression on average depending on the job and client since compression (hw in this case) varies depending on the fileset. John -- Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Is Bacula volumes capable to handle up to 400GB of data
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 9:25 AM, John Drescher dresche...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Rushdhi Mohamed zmrush...@gmail.com wrote: thanks john.. but.. Sorry i made a mistake in my problem... im not going to use tapes any more... to store backups. i brought a new NAS with 7TB.. so only the copy jobs will be stored in the tapes.. my question is can Bacula handle up to 400GB of data (it may grow up till 500GB within a year) in a single volume on a file storage device.. if it is possible i am going to store all the backups for a day in a single volume. if not i can break it and store.. in this case i am going to store the backups for a day in to 3 volumes. each around 150GB can you pls tel me what is efficient.. sorry if my English is not clear For file based volumes I recommend much smaller volumes. However bacula will handle 400GB disk volumes. John -- John M. Drescher -- Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Is Bacula volumes capable to handle up to 400GB of data
On 01/05/12 08:42, John Drescher wrote: 2012/1/5 Rushdhi Mohamed zmrush...@gmail.com: Is it ok to have up to 400GB in a bacula volume... on a file storage device.. Not a problem whatsoever. I have several almost-1TB volumes on my Bacula file storage. babylon4:root:~:4 # ls -lhS /spool/bacula/ | head -4 total 3.1T -rw-r- 1 root root 916G Dec 5 10:31 FULL-20111205-04:30 -rw-r- 1 root root 902G Nov 7 10:42 FULL-2007-04:30 -rw-r- 1 root root 901G Nov 5 05:47 FULL-2004-15:18 -- Phil Stracchino, CDK#2 DoD#299792458 ICBM: 43.5607, -71.355 ala...@caerllewys.net ala...@metrocast.net p...@co.ordinate.org Renaissance Man, Unix ronin, Perl hacker, SQL wrangler, Free Stater It's not the years, it's the mileage. -- Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[Bacula-users] how to recover in case a Bacula volume corrupted
hi.. are there any possibilities to Bacula volume get corrupt. how to recover in case a Bacula volume corrupted. Thanks in Advance.. -- Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[Bacula-users] is it make any sense if i backups Bacula volumes
hi...all pls see the output of ls for the folder where a NAS is mounted.. backup-server01:/opt/NASBackup # ls Defu-vol2 NASDailyVol-0012 NASDailyVol-0017 NASDailyVol-0021 NAVol-mobilepicdump RAC2ARCHVol-0027 RAC2ARCHVol-0035 RAC2ARCHVol-0041 lost+found NASDailyVol-0014 NASDailyVol-0018 NASDailyVol-0031 RAC2ARCHVol-0022 RAC2ARCHVol-0028 RAC2ARCHVol-0036 RAC2ARCHVol-0067 MOBPICPVol-0030 NASDailyVol-0015 NASDailyVol-0019 NASDailyVol-0033 RAC2ARCHVol-0025 RAC2ARCHVol-0032 RAC2ARCHVol-0038 TCSAPPVol-0068 MOBPICPVol-0051 NASDailyVol-0016 NASDailyVol-0020 NASDailyVol-0040 RAC2ARCHVol-0026 RAC2ARCHVol-0034 RAC2ARCHVol-0039 if i copy the Bacula volumes to tape after all the backups are done ... i mean copy the path /opt/NASBackup to tape.. is it make any sense? Is it possible to restore if i do like that... And what if i run a job that backups this folder path (means backups the whole NAS) to tape .. in this case all these Bacula volumes going to be stored inside another large Bacula volume in tape.. is that make any sense.. Is it possible to restore in this case..?? pls can anyone help me? -- Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] is it make any sense if i backups Bacula volumes
Le 06/01/2012 05:39, Rushdhi Mohamed a crit: hi...all pls see the output of "ls" for the folder where a NAS is mounted.. backup-server01:/opt/NASBackup # ls Defu-vol2 NASDailyVol-0012 NASDailyVol-0017 NASDailyVol-0021 NAVol-mobilepicdump RAC2ARCHVol-0027 RAC2ARCHVol-0035 RAC2ARCHVol-0041 lost+found NASDailyVol-0014 NASDailyVol-0018 NASDailyVol-0031 RAC2ARCHVol-0022 RAC2ARCHVol-0028 RAC2ARCHVol-0036 RAC2ARCHVol-0067 MOBPICPVol-0030 NASDailyVol-0015 NASDailyVol-0019 NASDailyVol-0033 RAC2ARCHVol-0025 RAC2ARCHVol-0032 RAC2ARCHVol-0038 TCSAPPVol-0068 MOBPICPVol-0051 NASDailyVol-0016 NASDailyVol-0020 NASDailyVol-0040 RAC2ARCHVol-0026 RAC2ARCHVol-0034 RAC2ARCHVol-0039 if i copy the Bacula volumes to tape after all the backups are done ... i mean copy the path "/opt/NASBackup" to tape.. is it make any sense? Well, if you also *consistantly* backups your catalogs... It can make sense. But if you consider it does, maybe you should also backup the backups of your volumes too ;). Note that raw volume (without catalog) can be used to re-create catalogs entries but this a time consumming process, that make your backups less (quickly) usable. Is it possible to restore if i do like that... As I said aboce, not directly, you need to first recover the catalog. And what if i run a job that backups this folder path (means backups the whole NAS) to tape .. in this case all these Bacula volumes going to be stored inside another large Bacula volume in tape.. is that make any sense.. Is it possible to restore in this case..?? I think this is a generally a bad idea, unless you use it in disaster situation only. pls can anyone help me? -- Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users -- Alexandre Chapellon Ingnierie des systmes open sources et rseaux. Follow me on twitter: @alxgomz -- Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] how to recover in case a Bacula volume corrupted
In case of hardware (tape or disk) failure... Don't really know how to recover from such situation. For tapes, bacula should instruct you when a tape should be changed... I don't know how bacula decides a tape has to be changed however. regards Le 06/01/2012 05:28, Rushdhi Mohamed a crit: hi.. are there any possibilities to Bacula volume get corrupt. how to recover in case a Bacula volume corrupted. Thanks in Advance.. -- Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users -- Alexandre Chapellon Ingnierie des systmes open sources et rseaux. Follow me on twitter: @alxgomz -- Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
