Re: [Bacula-users] Slow Performance
> I have seen that in the past like 3 times in 10 years (around 30 > thousand completed jobs) but in no way is that is not normal. I would > look for an updated version of bacula. 5.26 is the current version Am building 5.2.6 by hand now as 5.0.0 was the latest in the Scientific Linux repository. I'll see how I get on. > Turn off software compression or run multiple simultaneous jobs from > different clients. I believe compression is off. Should running multiple jobs help? I'm trying to understand what the cause of the bottleneck is. Is there a way of determining other than trial and error with simultaneous jobs whether the problem is caused at the file daemon end or the storage daemon? > > John Thanks for your helpful suggestions, Graham -- Graham Worley BEng MIET Network Manager School of Ocean Sciences College of Natural Sciences University of Wales BANGOR Askew Street Menai Bridge Anglesey LL59 5EY e-mail : g.wor...@bangor.ac.uk Tel. : 01248 382694 -- Rhif Elusen Gofrestredig / Registered Charity No. 1141565 Gall y neges e-bost hon, ac unrhyw atodiadau a anfonwyd gyda hi, gynnwys deunydd cyfrinachol ac wedi eu bwriadu i'w defnyddio'n unig gan y sawl y cawsant eu cyfeirio ato (atynt). Os ydych wedi derbyn y neges e-bost hon trwy gamgymeriad, rhowch wybod i'r anfonwr ar unwaith a dilëwch y neges. Os na fwriadwyd anfon y neges atoch chi, rhaid i chi beidio â defnyddio, cadw neu ddatgelu unrhyw wybodaeth a gynhwysir ynddi. Mae unrhyw farn neu safbwynt yn eiddo i'r sawl a'i hanfonodd yn unig ac nid yw o anghenraid yn cynrychioli barn Prifysgol Bangor. Nid yw Prifysgol Bangor yn gwarantu bod y neges e-bost hon neu unrhyw atodiadau yn rhydd rhag firysau neu 100% yn ddiogel. Oni bai fod hyn wedi ei ddatgan yn uniongyrchol yn nhestun yr e-bost, nid bwriad y neges e-bost hon yw ffurfio contract rhwymol - mae rhestr o lofnodwyr awdurdodedig ar gael o Swyddfa Cyllid Prifysgol Bangor. www.bangor.ac.uk This email and any attachments may contain confidential material and is solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete this email. If you are not the intended recipient(s), you must not use, retain or disclose any information contained in this email. Any views or opinions are solely those of the sender and do not necessarily represent those of Bangor University. Bangor University does not guarantee that this email or any attachments are free from viruses or 100% secure. Unless expressly stated in the body of the text of the email, this email is not intended to form a binding contract - a list of authorised signatories is available from the Bangor University Finance Office. www.bangor.ac.uk -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Fwd: SD Bug "User specified spool size reached"
Am 28.05.2012 19:21, schrieb John Drescher: > On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Sean Cardus wrote: >>> On a Bacula installation with a CentOS 6.2 (64 bit) server >>> running Bacula 5.2.6 director and SD with an HP LTO3 autoloader >>> and backing up some twenty-odd machines of various platforms, >>> all the jobs report "User specified spool size reached" >>> much too early, currently after 1.45 GB instead of the really >>> specified size of 50 GB. Example log excerpt: >> [..] >>> Scanning the log it looks like the storage daemon decreases its >>> spool size limit every time a backup job crashes. The last time >>> it used the full 50 GB was here: >> >> I've been seeing exactly the same behaviour here (CentOS 4.9, Bacula SD >> 5.0.3) for quite some time. However, until I saw your email I didn't >> correlate the max spool size reducing with each time a job crashes. I can >> also confirm that whenever a job crashes, the max spool size drops. >> >> The only workaround I can see at the moment is restarting the SD... > > I would be interested in seeing why jobs are crashing and possibly > submit bug reports for that. I have run 30 thousand or so jobs at work > and I do not see very many job crashes. That one is easy, and not very interesting actually. The two most frequent causes are: a) network outages (we do some backups over WAN VPN connections) b) clients crashing during backup, either coincidentally or because the additional load from the backup pushes an already flakey machine over the brink. Neither is Bacula's fault, and therefore something that would warrant a Bacula bug report I think. (Although I do sometimes wish Bacula would handle clients disappearing in the middle of a backup more gracefully.) To sum it up: there can be legitimate reasons for a job not terminating successfully, but that shouldn't lead to a diminishing maximum spool size IMHO. T. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] SD Bug "User specified spool size reached"
Am 28.05.2012 17:44, schrieb Alan Brown: > On 28/05/12 14:38, Sean Cardus wrote: > >>> Scanning the log it looks like the storage daemon decreases its >>> spool size limit every time a backup job crashes. The last time >>> it used the full 50 GB was here: >> >> I've been seeing exactly the same behaviour here (CentOS 4.9, Bacula SD >> 5.0.3) for quite some time. However, until I saw your email I didn't >> correlate the max spool size reducing with each time a job crashes. I can >> also confirm that whenever a job crashes, the max spool size drops. >> >> The only workaround I can see at the moment is restarting the SD... > > Have you looked in the spool area to find orphan files? As I already wrote, the spool area contained only two zero-sized files. T. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[Bacula-users] Fwd: SD Bug "User specified spool size reached"
-- Forwarded message -- From: John Drescher Date: Mon, May 28, 2012 at 1:20 PM Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] SD Bug "User specified spool size reached" To: Sean Cardus On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Sean Cardus wrote: > Hi, > >> On a Bacula installation with a CentOS 6.2 (64 bit) server >> running Bacula 5.2.6 director and SD with an HP LTO3 autoloader >> and backing up some twenty-odd machines of various platforms, >> all the jobs report "User specified spool size reached" >> much too early, currently after 1.45 GB instead of the really >> specified size of 50 GB. Example log excerpt: > [..] >> Scanning the log it looks like the storage daemon decreases its >> spool size limit every time a backup job crashes. The last time >> it used the full 50 GB was here: > > I've been seeing exactly the same behaviour here (CentOS 4.9, Bacula SD > 5.0.3) for quite some time. However, until I saw your email I didn't > correlate the max spool size reducing with each time a job crashes. I can > also confirm that whenever a job crashes, the max spool size drops. > > The only workaround I can see at the moment is restarting the SD... > I would be interested in seeing why jobs are crashing and possibly submit bug reports for that. I have run 30 thousand or so jobs at work and I do not see very many job crashes. John -- John M. Drescher -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] ERR=No space left on device
How about deleted files held open by other running processes? I wonder if an open file that was deleted is using up some of your disk space? lsof | grep -i deleted Bryan On May 28, 2012, at 12:18 PM, John Drescher wrote: > On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Bryan Harris wrote: >> I don't think you can do this. You have to restore to the FD not the >> director. If you plug the USB disk into the FD, then mount the disk there. >> Then I think you'll get what you want. >> >> Or else, setup and run another FD on the same server as the director. Then >> restore to the new FD. >> > > The restore location does not have to be on the same machine as the > client you made a backup on. You can set the location when you run the > restore from bconsole. I am not sure of what options any of the GUIs > provide so I can not comment on these. > > John -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] ERR=No space left on device
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Bryan Harris wrote: > I don't think you can do this. You have to restore to the FD not the > director. If you plug the USB disk into the FD, then mount the disk there. > Then I think you'll get what you want. > > Or else, setup and run another FD on the same server as the director. Then > restore to the new FD. > The restore location does not have to be on the same machine as the client you made a backup on. You can set the location when you run the restore from bconsole. I am not sure of what options any of the GUIs provide so I can not comment on these. John -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] ERR=No space left on device
I don't think you can do this. You have to restore to the FD not the director. If you plug the USB disk into the FD, then mount the disk there. Then I think you'll get what you want. Or else, setup and run another FD on the same server as the director. Then restore to the new FD. Bryan On May 28, 2012, at 11:53 AM, Phil Stracchino wrote: > On 05/28/2012 12:44 PM, Luis H. Forchesatto wrote: >> Hi >> >> I'm receiving this message when trying to restore a backup do an USB >> Disk. Space on disk is not the problem, also the disk inodes are 99% >> free. The disk contains an ext3 filesystem and out of bconsole i can >> write/read with no problem. >> >> I'm trying to restore a backup made by bacula to the disk. The director >> is in the machine where the USB Disk is attached and the file daemon is >> in another server at the same network (connection between them are >> fine). Disk is 500gb space. >> >> Any ideas? > > > You have of course made sure the restore path is correct? > > > > -- > Phil Stracchino, CDK#2 DoD#299792458 ICBM: 43.5607, -71.355 > ala...@caerllewys.net ala...@metrocast.net p...@co.ordinate.org > Renaissance Man, Unix ronin, Perl hacker, SQL wrangler, Free Stater > It's not the years, it's the mileage. > > -- > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > ___ > Bacula-users mailing list > Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[Bacula-users] How to restore a tape using a different SD
hi.. I am using Bacula to back up all the servers in my office. That’s automated and works fine.. I am using a NAS and an Autoloader. Nightly backups are write to NAS and then to Tape (copy jobs). Now the problem is, I want to restore the backups in a remote server to check whether the backups are perfect . So I configured the remote server as another SD (in a branch) and connect it with my Bacula-DR at main office, when I try to restore the backups I am getting this error 28-May 22:09 dir-backup01.hnbassurance.com JobId 6114: Start Restore Job RestoreFiles.2012-05-28_22.09.20_39 28-May 22:09 dir-backup01.hnbassurance.com JobId 6114: Using Device "Remote-LTO-4" 28-May 22:09 fd-backup01.hnbassurance.com JobId 6114: Fatal error: job.c:2031 Bad response to Read Data command. Wanted 3000 OK data , got 3000 error 28-May 22:09 dir-backup01.hnbassurance.com JobId 6114: Using Device "NASStore001" 28-May 22:09 fd-backup01.hnbassurance.com JobId 6114: Fatal error: Failed to authenticate Storage daemon. 28-May 22:09 dir-backup01.hnbassurance.com JobId 6114: Fatal error: Bad response to Storage command: wanted 2000 OK storage , got 2902 Bad storage 28-May 22:09 dir-backup01.hnbassurance.com JobId 6114: Error: Bacula dir-backup01.hnbassurance.com 5.0.3 (04Aug10): 28-May-2012 22:09:29 Build OS: x86_64-suse-linux-gnu suse 5.x JobId: 6114 Job:RestoreFiles.2012-05-28_22.09.20_39 Restore Client: fd-backup01.domain.com Start time: 28-May-2012 22:09:22 End time: 28-May-2012 22:09:29 Files Expected: 16 Files Restored: 0 Bytes Restored: 0 Rate: 0.0 KB/s FD Errors: 0 FD termination status: SD termination status: Waiting on FD Termination:*** Restore Error *** 28-May 22:09 dir-backup01.mydomain.com JobId 6114: Error: Bacula dir-backup01.hnbassurance.com 5.0.3 (04Aug10): 28-May-2012 22:09:29 Build OS: x86_64-suse-linux-gnu suse 5.x JobId: 6114 Job:RestoreFiles.2012-05-28_22.09.20_39 Restore Client: fd-backup01.mydomain.com Start time: 28-May-2012 22:09:22 End time: 28-May-2012 22:09:29 Files Expected: 16 Files Restored: 0 Bytes Restored: 0 Rate: 0.0 KB/s FD Errors: 1 FD termination status: SD termination status: Waiting on FD Termination:*** Restore Error *** In a nutshell I copied the backups to tape using the loader connected to SD 1 and I want to restore the backups using another tape loader connected to SD2 here both SD1 and SD2 are connected to Bacula-DR. Is it possible? i can just do the restore using bls and bextract but i think if this is possible i have a GUI to use.. and will be fine. Expecting a good solution please ,,,Thanks in Advance. -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] ERR=No space left on device
On 05/28/2012 12:44 PM, Luis H. Forchesatto wrote: > Hi > > I'm receiving this message when trying to restore a backup do an USB > Disk. Space on disk is not the problem, also the disk inodes are 99% > free. The disk contains an ext3 filesystem and out of bconsole i can > write/read with no problem. > > I'm trying to restore a backup made by bacula to the disk. The director > is in the machine where the USB Disk is attached and the file daemon is > in another server at the same network (connection between them are > fine). Disk is 500gb space. > > Any ideas? You have of course made sure the restore path is correct? -- Phil Stracchino, CDK#2 DoD#299792458 ICBM: 43.5607, -71.355 ala...@caerllewys.net ala...@metrocast.net p...@co.ordinate.org Renaissance Man, Unix ronin, Perl hacker, SQL wrangler, Free Stater It's not the years, it's the mileage. -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[Bacula-users] ERR=No space left on device
Hi I'm receiving this message when trying to restore a backup do an USB Disk. Space on disk is not the problem, also the disk inodes are 99% free. The disk contains an ext3 filesystem and out of bconsole i can write/read with no problem. I'm trying to restore a backup made by bacula to the disk. The director is in the machine where the USB Disk is attached and the file daemon is in another server at the same network (connection between them are fine). Disk is 500gb space. Any ideas? -- Att.* *** -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] SD Bug "User specified spool size reached"
On 28/05/12 14:38, Sean Cardus wrote: >> Scanning the log it looks like the storage daemon decreases its >> spool size limit every time a backup job crashes. The last time >> it used the full 50 GB was here: > > I've been seeing exactly the same behaviour here (CentOS 4.9, Bacula SD > 5.0.3) for quite some time. However, until I saw your email I didn't > correlate the max spool size reducing with each time a job crashes. I can > also confirm that whenever a job crashes, the max spool size drops. > > The only workaround I can see at the moment is restarting the SD... Have you looked in the spool area to find orphan files? -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Slow Performance
> I've just started using Bacula having installed the RPMs from the Scientific > Linux distro. I'm trying to back up several machines to disk file on the > Bacula server and am experiencing two odd problems: > > i) disk volumes created by Bacula are changing their state to Error with the > message that they are a different size to that set in the catalog, is this > normal? > I have seen that in the past like 3 times in 10 years (around 30 thousand completed jobs) but in no way is that is not normal. I would look for an updated version of bacula. 5.26 is the current version > > ii) data throughput is really low The machines are all connected via gigabit > connections yet I'm seeing less than 6MBytes/s transfer to disk, more often > than not it is down to 2 Mbytes/s. The raid array I'm using responds at a > speed of about 70Mbytes/s when i test it with a dd of a few gigabyte from > /dev/zero. Rsync between the same hosts was very quick, generating nearly > 500Mbit/s of network traffic. > > Can any offer any suggestions? > Turn off software compression or run multiple simultaneous jobs from different clients. John -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] SD Bug "User specified spool size reached"
Hi, > On a Bacula installation with a CentOS 6.2 (64 bit) server > running Bacula 5.2.6 director and SD with an HP LTO3 autoloader > and backing up some twenty-odd machines of various platforms, > all the jobs report "User specified spool size reached" > much too early, currently after 1.45 GB instead of the really > specified size of 50 GB. Example log excerpt: [..] > Scanning the log it looks like the storage daemon decreases its > spool size limit every time a backup job crashes. The last time > it used the full 50 GB was here: I've been seeing exactly the same behaviour here (CentOS 4.9, Bacula SD 5.0.3) for quite some time. However, until I saw your email I didn't correlate the max spool size reducing with each time a job crashes. I can also confirm that whenever a job crashes, the max spool size drops. The only workaround I can see at the moment is restarting the SD... Sean -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Slow Performance
Are you doing compression or encryption? And if so which? If the files are large I found that those can really slow down the transfers. ---Guy (via iPhone) On 19 May 2012, at 01:00, Graham Worley wrote: > Hello, > > I've just started using Bacula having installed the RPMs from the Scientific > Linux distro. I'm trying to back up several machines to disk file on the > Bacula server and am experiencing two odd problems: > > i) disk volumes created by Bacula are changing their state to Error with the > message that they are a different size to that set in the catalog, is this > normal? > > ii) data throughput is really low The machines are all connected via gigabit > connections yet I'm seeing less than 6MBytes/s transfer to disk, more often > than not it is down to 2 Mbytes/s. The raid array I'm using responds at a > speed of about 70Mbytes/s when i test it with a dd of a few gigabyte from > /dev/zero. Rsync between the same hosts was very quick, generating nearly > 500Mbit/s of network traffic. > > Can any offer any suggestions? > > Thanks, > Graham > -- > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > ___ > Bacula-users mailing list > Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[Bacula-users] Slow Performance
Hello, I've just started using Bacula having installed the RPMs from the Scientific Linux distro. I'm trying to back up several machines to disk file on the Bacula server and am experiencing two odd problems: i) disk volumes created by Bacula are changing their state to Error with the message that they are a different size to that set in the catalog, is this normal? ii) data throughput is really low The machines are all connected via gigabit connections yet I'm seeing less than 6MBytes/s transfer to disk, more often than not it is down to 2 Mbytes/s. The raid array I'm using responds at a speed of about 70Mbytes/s when i test it with a dd of a few gigabyte from /dev/zero. Rsync between the same hosts was very quick, generating nearly 500Mbit/s of network traffic. Can any offer any suggestions? Thanks, Graham -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Same Bacula SD on Multiple Networks (VLANs)
2012/5/28 Alan Brown > > > I have a similar problem. Setting the non-FQDn IPs required in /etc/hosts > does the trick. > > I though about that at first too, but like I said, there are some VLANs that I have no control of, and also depending on local static configuration of 300+ servers can start to became quite unmanageable in the future... But the solution provided by Bryan on the previous email completely solves this problem and I really recommend doing that. -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Same Bacula SD on Multiple Networks (VLANs)
On 28/05/12 05:28, Rodrigo Renie Braga wrote: > My ideal solution which Bacula, apparently, DOES NOT SUPPORT: make the > "Address" option on the Storage resource optional, meaning that if not > specified, the SD Address that Bacula will send to the FD is the same one > that the Director used to connect on the FD on the first place. That would > be just awesome... > > For now, what's the best solution for my problem? Any thoughts? I have a similar problem. Setting the non-FQDn IPs required in /etc/hosts does the trick. -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
