Re: [Bacula-users] bacula-dir crashing
Hello, On 10 September 2012 01:11, Tim Dunphy bluethu...@gmail.com wrote: I was able to get a more recent version of bacula on my centos 5.6 with advice from Simone on this list. For some reason thinks that I'm using postgres instead of mysql. I tried setting MyCatalog to use mysql instead in the bacula-dir.conf file however that still resulted in the message you see above from the logs I've installed bacula with yum using the following info: http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula/README.txt So in short I just need to know how to tell the current version of bacula to use mysql instead of postgres. you posted the link to the readme file, but did you read it? Here are the last lines of it: To change to a different backend, issue the following command: # alternatives --config libbaccats.so There are 3 programs which provide 'libbaccats.so'. SelectionCommand --- 1 /usr/lib64/libbaccats-mysql.so 2 /usr/lib64/libbaccats-sqlite3.so *+ 3 /usr/lib64/libbaccats-postgresql.so Enter to keep the current selection[+], or type selection number: 1 Regards, --Simone -- You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of the shore (R. W. Emerson). -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] restore with bat - dir tree window remains blank
Am 08.09.2012 22:44, schrieb lst_ho...@kwsoft.de: Zitat von Ralf Brinkmannralf.brinkm...@wemhoener.de: Bat version 5.2.4 - Trying to restore from a single job the dir tree windows (titel: Directories) remains blank. In a second try the mysql database was freshly compacted - but didn't help. Same problem here. It looks like bat i having problems if the number of files per job gets too big. We have 5.2.10 and it looks like the break point is at around a million files. Regards Andreas today I did check the building of the directory tree on 3 different jobs - two smaller ones and the latest full backup of our Samba server - the last job did have 4,109,652 files - no problem with the directory tree building at all - see attached console output. Is there a chance to fix the problem? On the Bacula machine we are useing the predefined MySQL config file for very large (huge) systems - /proc/meminfo: MemTotal: 2059796 kB MemFree: 1090596 kB Connecting to Director 127.0.0.1:9101 1000 OK: wbackup-dir Version: 5.2.4 (18 January 2012) You have selected the following JobId: 5752 You have selected the following JobId: 5752 Building directory tree for JobId(s) 5752 ... Building directory tree for JobId(s) 5752 ... 60,737 files inserted into the tree. 60,737 files inserted into the tree. You are now entering file selection mode where you add (mark) and remove (unmark) files to be restored. No files are initially added, unless you used the all keyword on the command line. Enter done to leave this mode. cwd is: / $ You have selected the following JobId: 5751 You have selected the following JobId: 5751 Building directory tree for JobId(s) 5751 ... Building directory tree for JobId(s) 5751 ... + 659,760 files inserted into the tree. 659,760 files inserted into the tree. You are now entering file selection mode where you add (mark) and remove (unmark) files to be restored. No files are initially added, unless you used the all keyword on the command line. Enter done to leave this mode. cwd is: / $ You have selected the following JobId: 5793 You have selected the following JobId: 5793 Building directory tree for JobId(s) 5793 ... Building directory tree for JobId(s) 5793 ... 4,109,652 files inserted into the tree. 4,109,652 files inserted into the tree. You are now entering file selection mode where you add (mark) and remove (unmark) files to be restored. No files are initially added, unless you used the all keyword on the command line. Enter done to leave this mode. cwd is: / $ -- Ralf Brinkmann DV/Organisation Wemhöner Surface Technologies GmbH Co.KG -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 5.2.10 on Windows 2008 R2 server : 1 MByte/sec transfer rate, very slow
On 6/09/2012 12:02, Paul Van Wambeke wrote: On 5/09/2012 11:21, James Harper wrote: Using iperf I measured following performances : bacula-fd = the windows server 2008 R2 host, 1Gb/sec NIC bacula-dir = a linux ubuntu 10.04 PC, 1 100Mb/sec NIC bacula-sd = a linux ubuntu 10.04 server, 1 Gbite/sec NIC iperf serveriperf clientPerformance --- bacula-fdbacula-dir10 MBytes/sec bacula-fdbacula-sd111 MBytes/sec bacula-dirbacula-fd10 MBytes/sec bacula-sdbacula-fd 26 MBytes/sec So normally the bacula client should be able to write to the bacula storage at 26MBytes/sec ? Any suggestions ? Any crappy computer made in the last 5 years should be able to saturate a gigabit link using iperf. The fact that you are only getting 26Mbytes/second fd-sd is a bit worrying... it's well above the 1Mbit/second that bacula appears to be limited to but it's still an indication of a major problem. I haven't had that much experience with Hyper-V for performance testing but it should be able to approach Xen which easily gets gigabit speeds for Windows VMs. Is your switch up to the job? James - Aucun virus trouve dans ce message. Analyse effectuee par AVG - www.avg.fr Version: 2012.0.2197 / Base de donnees virale: 2437/5249 - Date: 04/09/2012 Probably we could fine tune the switches, but I still believe the main problem resided on the interaction between the bacula-fd and the host server's network config ... We have decided to re-install the windows server, this time without enabling the hyper-v role ... will try again and let you know if this changes something. Kind regards Paul Well, we re-installed the windows servers without hyper-V or any other role : no change in transfer rate. A Windows 7 laptop running bacula-fd 5.2.9 transfers at 35MBytes/sec ... So it seems to be linked to the fact that the server is a W 2008 R2 server ... Am I the only one having this problem, anybody succeeded in backup-up a W2008 R2 server with Bacula at correct transfer speeds ? Kind regards Paul -- Paul VAN WAMBEKE ICT OpenUp! and GPI Projects National Botanic Garden of Belgium Bouchout Domain, Nieuwelaan 38 1860 Meise Tel: ++32 2 260 09 66 Fax: ++32 2 260 09 45 -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 5.2.10 on Windows 2008 R2 server : 1 MByte/sec transfer rate, very slow
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Paul Van Wambeke [mailto:paul.vanwamb...@br.fgov.be] Gesendet: Montag, 10. September 2012 13:38 An: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net; James Harper Betreff: Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 5.2.10 on Windows 2008 R2 server : 1 MByte/sec transfer rate, very slow On 6/09/2012 12:02, Paul Van Wambeke wrote: On 5/09/2012 11:21, James Harper wrote: Using iperf I measured following performances : bacula-fd = the windows server 2008 R2 host, 1Gb/sec NIC bacula-dir = a linux ubuntu 10.04 PC, 1 100Mb/sec NIC bacula-sd = a linux ubuntu 10.04 server, 1 Gbite/sec NIC iperf serveriperf clientPerformance --- bacula-fdbacula-dir10 MBytes/sec bacula-fdbacula-sd111 MBytes/sec bacula-dirbacula-fd10 MBytes/sec bacula-sdbacula-fd 26 MBytes/sec So normally the bacula client should be able to write to the bacula storage at 26MBytes/sec ? Any suggestions ? Any crappy computer made in the last 5 years should be able to saturate a gigabit link using iperf. The fact that you are only getting 26Mbytes/second fd-sd is a bit worrying... it's well above the 1Mbit/second that bacula appears to be limited to but it's still an indication of a major problem. I haven't had that much experience with Hyper-V for performance testing but it should be able to approach Xen which easily gets gigabit speeds for Windows VMs. Is your switch up to the job? James - Aucun virus trouve dans ce message. Analyse effectuee par AVG - www.avg.fr Version: 2012.0.2197 / Base de donnees virale: 2437/5249 - Date: 04/09/2012 Probably we could fine tune the switches, but I still believe the main problem resided on the interaction between the bacula-fd and the host server's network config ... We have decided to re-install the windows server, this time without enabling the hyper-v role ... will try again and let you know if this changes something. Kind regards Paul Well, we re-installed the windows servers without hyper-V or any other role : no change in transfer rate. A Windows 7 laptop running bacula-fd 5.2.9 transfers at 35MBytes/sec ... So it seems to be linked to the fact that the server is a W 2008 R2 server ... Am I the only one having this problem, anybody succeeded in backup-up a W2008 R2 server with Bacula at correct transfer speeds ? Kind regards Paul Hi Paul, I'm backing up a lot of 2008 R2 Servers without speed issues. I've seen cases where a faulty nic driver caused such problems. Have you monitored the network interface and watched what happens (with wireshark for example)? I did not follow this thread - so this might have been suggested: Compression on the fileset may cause slow transfer rates Kind regards Julian -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[Bacula-users] Normal jobs running in parallel to copy jobs
Hi folks
I try to configure Bacula 5.2.5 to run normal jobs in parallel with a
copy job so that if a copy job takes longer, the normal nightly incremental
backup is not affected. Parallel backup jobs (both full and incremential)
work like a charm but when I run a copy job, all other jobs starting after
the copy job are waiting for it to complete.
Jobs are copied from the disk-based Disk1 storage to the Tape
pool. Incremental backups are using the disk-based storage Disk. In my
opinion parallel jobs should work because incremental and copy jobs both
use different storage and pools/volumes
What am I missing? Is it impossible to run other jobs in parallel with a
copy job?
Thanks in advance for your help,
Stefan
I have the following pool configuration:
# Disk Full Backup Pool
Pool {
Name = Disk.Full
Pool Type = Backup
# Defines the pool to copy to.
Next Pool = Tape.Full
Recycle = yes
AutoPrune = yes
Volume Retention = 3 months
Volume Use Duration = 1 month
Label Format = Disk.Full-
Maximum Volumes = 6
Storage = Disk1
}
# Disk Incremential Backup Pool
Pool {
Name = Disk.Inc
Pool Type = Backup
Recycle = yes
AutoPrune = yes
Volume Retention = 1 month
Volume Use Duration = 1 month
Label Format = Disk.Inc-
Maximum Volumes = 4
Storage = Disk
}
# Tape Full Backup Pool
Pool {
Name = Tape.Full
Pool Type = Backup
Recycle = yes
AutoPrune = yes
Volume Retention = 3 months
# Volume Use Duration is 7 days because the tape is only used to copy
# all full backup jobs to it and afterwards its not needed anymore
Volume Use Duration = 7 days
Label Format = Tape.Full-
Maximum Volumes = 4
Storage = Tape
}
The copy job copies the latest full backups from the pool Disk.Full to the
pool Tape
# The copy job should run after the monthly full backup therefore priority
is set to 15
Job {
Name = Copy-LastFull-Tape
Type = Copy
Pool = Disk.Full
Schedule = MonthlyCycleAfterBackup
# For a Copy Job, the parameters “Client” and “FileSet” don’t matter at
all.
# They are just there because the “Job” entry requires them.
Client = backupserver-fd
FileSet = Linux
Messages = Standard
# Select the last full backup of each client from Disk.Full pool to copy
to tape
Selection Type = SQLQuery
Selection Pattern = SELECT MAX(Job.JobId) FROM Job, Pool WHERE Job.Level
= 'F' and Job.Type = 'B' and Job.JobStatus = 'T' and Pool.Name =
'Disk.Full' and Job.PoolId = Pool.PoolId GROUP BY Job.Name ORDER BY
Job.JobId;
# Run after main and catalog backup
Priority = 15
}
Defined storage
# Disk storage (internal disks)
Storage {
Name = Disk
Address = IPAddress
SDPort = 9103
Password = PASSWORD
Device = Disk
Media Type = File
Maximum Concurrent Jobs = 8
}
# Disk storage (internal disks)
Storage {
Name = Disk1
Address = IPAddress
SDPort = 9103
Password = PASSWORD
Device = Disk1
Media Type = File1
Maximum Concurrent Jobs = 8
}
# Tape drive connected to backup server
Storage {
Name = Tape
Address = IPAddress
SDPort = 9103
Password = PASSWORD
Device = Tape
Media Type = LTO-4
Maximum Concurrent Jobs = 8
}
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Fwd: bacula possibly confused about label
Specifically the tape will probably have been removed without being rewound first. We use our tape robots for a variety of functions, ingesting data from clients, backups and archive cycles. This just has never come up before. I am confused. You can not remove an LTO tape without rewinding. The reason is LTO technology is a single reel on the tape and single reel on the drive. If you removed the tape without rewinding the tape would have been destroyed. John -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[Bacula-users] Restore without full path
Hello maybe i'm blind but i failed to see how i can restore files/directory without original full path. For example restore the directory files originally located in d:/test/sec-dir/files/ to g:/restore/ lead to g:/restore/d/test/sec-dir/files/ where g:/restore/files/ is the intended result. Is this possible? Regards Andreas -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 5.2.10 on Windows 2008 R2 server : 1 MByte/sec transfer rate, very slow
Hi Julian I'm happy other user's succeeded in backup of W2008 R2 servers ... Could you give me the versions you are using on the Windows client and on the Linux director ? Thanks Kind regards Paul On 10/09/2012 13:45, Fahrer, Julian wrote: -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Paul Van Wambeke [mailto:paul.vanwamb...@br.fgov.be] Gesendet: Montag, 10. September 2012 13:38 An: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net; James Harper Betreff: Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 5.2.10 on Windows 2008 R2 server : 1 MByte/sec transfer rate, very slow On 6/09/2012 12:02, Paul Van Wambeke wrote: On 5/09/2012 11:21, James Harper wrote: Using iperf I measured following performances : bacula-fd = the windows server 2008 R2 host, 1Gb/sec NIC bacula-dir = a linux ubuntu 10.04 PC, 1 100Mb/sec NIC bacula-sd = a linux ubuntu 10.04 server, 1 Gbite/sec NIC iperf serveriperf clientPerformance --- bacula-fdbacula-dir10 MBytes/sec bacula-fdbacula-sd111 MBytes/sec bacula-dirbacula-fd10 MBytes/sec bacula-sdbacula-fd 26 MBytes/sec So normally the bacula client should be able to write to the bacula storage at 26MBytes/sec ? Any suggestions ? Any crappy computer made in the last 5 years should be able to saturate a gigabit link using iperf. The fact that you are only getting 26Mbytes/second fd-sd is a bit worrying... it's well above the 1Mbit/second that bacula appears to be limited to but it's still an indication of a major problem. I haven't had that much experience with Hyper-V for performance testing but it should be able to approach Xen which easily gets gigabit speeds for Windows VMs. Is your switch up to the job? James - Aucun virus trouve dans ce message. Analyse effectuee par AVG - www.avg.fr Version: 2012.0.2197 / Base de donnees virale: 2437/5249 - Date: 04/09/2012 Probably we could fine tune the switches, but I still believe the main problem resided on the interaction between the bacula-fd and the host server's network config ... We have decided to re-install the windows server, this time without enabling the hyper-v role ... will try again and let you know if this changes something. Kind regards Paul Well, we re-installed the windows servers without hyper-V or any other role : no change in transfer rate. A Windows 7 laptop running bacula-fd 5.2.9 transfers at 35MBytes/sec ... So it seems to be linked to the fact that the server is a W 2008 R2 server ... Am I the only one having this problem, anybody succeeded in backup-up a W2008 R2 server with Bacula at correct transfer speeds ? Kind regards Paul Hi Paul, I'm backing up a lot of 2008 R2 Servers without speed issues. I've seen cases where a faulty nic driver caused such problems. Have you monitored the network interface and watched what happens (with wireshark for example)? I did not follow this thread - so this might have been suggested: Compression on the fileset may cause slow transfer rates Kind regards Julian -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users - Aucun virus trouvé dans ce message. Analyse effectuée par AVG - www.avg.fr Version: 2012.0.2197 / Base de données virale: 2437/5259 - Date: 09/09/2012 -- Paul VAN WAMBEKE ICT OpenUp! and GPI Projects National Botanic Garden of Belgium Bouchout Domain, Nieuwelaan 38 1860 Meise Tel: ++32 2 260 09 66 Fax: ++32 2 260 09 45 -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 5.2.10 on Windows 2008 R2 server : 1 MByte/sec transfer rate, very slow
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Paul Van Wambeke [mailto:paul.vanwamb...@br.fgov.be] Gesendet: Montag, 10. September 2012 17:15 An: Fahrer, Julian Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Betreff: Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 5.2.10 on Windows 2008 R2 server : 1 MByte/sec transfer rate, very slow Hi Julian I'm happy other user's succeeded in backup of W2008 R2 servers ... Could you give me the versions you are using on the Windows client and on the Linux director ? Thanks Kind regards Paul Hmm, I'm running various Version. I just checked two installations and I'm running 5.2.6 (client and director) and 5.2.10 (client and director) on there. I never had any performance issues like that - with no version I used so far. Kind regards Julian -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Restore without full path
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 17:06:26 +0200 lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote: maybe i'm blind but i failed to see how i can restore files/directory without original full path. For example restore the directory files originally located in d:/test/sec-dir/files/ to g:/restore/ lead to g:/restore/d/test/sec-dir/files/ where g:/restore/files/ is the intended result. Is this possible? Use the StripPrefix directive in the Restore job [1]. Be sure to also use the Where or AddPrefix directives to specify the destination point. 1. http://www.bacula.org/manuals/en/install/install/Configuring_Director.html#3353 -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[Bacula-users] backup through firewall - timeout
Hi folks. I've got a problem whereby my email and web servers sometimes fail to backup. These two servers are inside the DMZ and backup to the server inside my LAN. The problem appears to be the inactivity on the connection after the data has been backed up while the database is being updated. Does anyone have any suggestions on what I can do? Gary 22-Aug 19:05 eddie1-dir JobId 15691: shell command: run BeforeJob /etc/bacula/jobcheck.sh ollie-fd 22-Aug 19:05 eddie1-dir JobId 15691: BeforeJob: PING 10.5.1.3 (10.5.1.3) 56 (84) bytes of data. 22-Aug 19:05 eddie1-dir JobId 15691: BeforeJob: 64 bytes from 10.5.1.3: icmp_req=1 ttl=63 time=0.386 ms 22-Aug 19:05 eddie1-dir JobId 15691: BeforeJob: 22-Aug 19:05 eddie1-dir JobId 15691: BeforeJob: --- 10.5.1.3 ping statistics --- 22-Aug 19:05 eddie1-dir JobId 15691: BeforeJob: 1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms 22-Aug 19:05 eddie1-dir JobId 15691: BeforeJob: rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.386/0.386/0.386/0.000 ms 22-Aug 19:05 eddie1-dir JobId 15691: Start Backup JobId 15691, Job=ollie.2012-08-22_19.05.01_30 22-Aug 19:05 eddie1-dir JobId 15691: Using Device LeedsStorage 22-Aug 19:05 ollie-fd JobId 15691: DIR and FD clocks differ by -4 seconds, FD automatically compensating. 22-Aug 19:05 mo-sd JobId 15691: Spooling data ... 22-Aug 19:07 ollie-fd JobId 15691: Could not stat /var/named: ERR=No such file or directory 22-Aug 20:13 mo-sd JobId 15691: Job write elapsed time = 01:08:18, Transfer rate = 660.7 K Bytes/second 22-Aug 20:13 mo-sd JobId 15691: Committing spooled data to Volume leeds1214. Despooling 2,710,694,300 bytes ... 22-Aug 20:13 mo-sd JobId 15691: User defined maximum volume capacity 5,368,709,120 exceeded on device LeedsStorage (/var/bacula/leeds). 22-Aug 20:13 mo-sd JobId 15691: End of medium on Volume leeds1214 Bytes=5,368,704,792 Blocks=83,223 at 22-Aug-2012 20:13. 22-Aug 20:13 eddie1-dir JobId 15691: There are no more Jobs associated with Volume leeds1325. Marking it purged. 22-Aug 20:13 eddie1-dir JobId 15691: All records pruned from Volume leeds1325; marking it Purged 22-Aug 20:13 eddie1-dir JobId 15691: Recycled volume leeds1325 22-Aug 20:13 mo-sd JobId 15691: Labeled new Volume leeds1325 on device LeedsStorage (/var/bacula/leeds). 22-Aug 20:13 mo-sd JobId 15691: Wrote label to prelabeled Volume leeds1325 on device LeedsStorage (/var/bacula/leeds) 22-Aug 20:13 mo-sd JobId 15691: New volume leeds1325 mounted on device LeedsStorage (/var/bacula/leeds) at 22-Aug-2012 20:13. 22-Aug 20:14 mo-sd JobId 15691: Despooling elapsed time = 00:00:52, Transfer rate = 52.12 M Bytes/second 22-Aug 20:14 mo-sd JobId 15691: Sending spooled attrs to the Director. Despooling 396,467 bytes ... 22-Aug 21:18 eddie1-dir JobId 15691: Fatal error: Network error with FD during Backup: ERR=Connection timed out 22-Aug 21:18 eddie1-dir JobId 15691: Fatal error: No Job status returned from FD. 22-Aug 21:18 eddie1-dir JobId 15691: Error: Bacula eddie1-dir 5.0.3 (04Aug10): 22-Aug-2012 21:18:38 Build OS: i386-redhat-linux-gnu redhat JobId: 15691 Job:ollie.2012-08-22_19.05.01_30 Backup Level: Incremental, since=2012-08-22 00:15:44 Client: ollie-fd 5.0.3 (30Aug10) i686-pc-linux-gnu,redhat, FileSet:Linux Full 2012-08-13 19:05:00 Pool: Leeds (From Job resource) Catalog:MyCatalog (From Client resource) Storage:mo-leeds (From Job resource) Scheduled time: 22-Aug-2012 19:05:01 Start time: 22-Aug-2012 19:05:08 End time: 22-Aug-2012 21:18:38 Elapsed time: 2 hours 13 mins 30 secs Priority: 7 FD Files Written: 0 SD Files Written: 1,434 FD Bytes Written: 0 (0 B) SD Bytes Written: 2,707,746,944 (2.707 GB) Rate: 0.0 KB/s Software Compression: None VSS:no Encryption: no Accurate: no Volume name(s): leeds1214|leeds1325 Volume Session Id: 5 Volume Session Time:1345645144 Last Volume Bytes: 2,063,844,654 (2.063 GB) Non-fatal FD errors:0 SD Errors: 0 FD termination status: Error SD termination status: OK Termination:*** Backup Error *** -- Gary Stainburn Group I.T. Manager Ringways Garages http://www.ringways.co.uk -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Re: [Bacula-users] backup through firewall - timeout
Hi folks. I've got a problem whereby my email and web servers sometimes fail to backup. These two servers are inside the DMZ and backup to the server inside my LAN. The problem appears to be the inactivity on the connection after the data has been backed up while the database is being updated. Does anyone have any suggestions on what I can do? Gary Gary, Take a look at the Heartbeat Interval options for the client and storage configurations. More than likely your firewall/router is dropping the connection due to inactivity. How fast it's doing this will depend on the configuration and the network load so you may need to experiment with different interval settings. hope this helps, --tom -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[Bacula-users] spurious message Cannot find any appendable volumes - again
Once again I got the phenomenon I reported on 2012-06-07 12:39. Director messages: 10-Sep 22:05 backup-dir JobId 4068: Start Backup JobId 4068, Job=backup.2012-09-10_22.05.00_03 10-Sep 22:05 backup-dir JobId 4068: There are no more Jobs associated with Volume Daily_1. Marking it purged. 10-Sep 22:05 backup-dir JobId 4068: All records pruned from Volume Daily_1; marking it Purged 10-Sep 22:05 backup-dir JobId 4068: Recycled volume Daily_1 10-Sep 22:05 backup-dir JobId 4068: Using Device LTO-3 10-Sep 22:05 bacula-sd JobId 4068: Job backup.2012-09-10_22.05.00_03 is waiting. Cannot find any appendable volumes. Please use the label command to create a new Volume for: Storage: LTO-3 (/dev/nst0) Pool: Daily Media type: LTO-3 10-Sep 22:10 bacula-sd JobId 4068: 3307 Issuing autochanger unload slot 8, drive 0 command. 10-Sep 22:11 bacula-sd JobId 4068: 3304 Issuing autochanger load slot 3, drive 0 command. 10-Sep 22:11 bacula-sd JobId 4068: 3305 Autochanger load slot 3, drive 0, status is OK. 10-Sep 22:12 bacula-sd JobId 4068: Volume Daily_2 previously written, moving to end of data. 10-Sep 22:12 bacula-sd JobId 4068: Ready to append to end of Volume Daily_2 at file=336. It's annoying because each time the operator mail gets a mail: 10-Sep 22:05 bacula-sd JobId 4068: Job backup.2012-09-10_22.05.00_03 is waiting. Cannot find any appendable volumes. Please use the label command to create a new Volume for: Storage: LTO-3 (/dev/nst0) Pool: Daily Media type: LTO-3 only to find that, once he's looking at the server, it has already sorted it out by its own. Doesn't anyone have an idea what might be causing this? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
