Re: [Bacula-users] Alternating two usb disks
hi,
-Original Message-
From: Fabrizio Reale [mailto:fabrizio.re...@redomino.com]
Sent: Tue 9/22/2009 10:03 AM
To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Bacula-users] Alternating two usb disks
Hi all,
I would like to store my volumes on two usb disks in order to keep one disk
in a safe place.
I want to exchange the disks once per week.
I set up my storage in this way:
by defining Use Volume Once = yes in the matching pool
configuration you can force bacula to create a new
backupfile with every job.
here is a configuration snipplet i use:
Pool {
Name = Main-Pool
Pool Type = Backup
Recycle = no
AutoPrune = no
Volume Retention = 365 days
Use Volume Once = yes
Maximum Volume Bytes = 4831838208
LabelFormat =
${Client}_${Job}_${Level}_${Year}-${Month:p/2/0/r}-${Day:p/2/0/r}_${Hour:p/2/0/r}:${Minute:p/2/0/r}:${Second
:p/2/0/r}
}
lg
gerald
Device {
Name = FileStorage
Device Type = File
Media Type = File
Archive Device = /opt/bacula/disk
LabelMedia = yes; # lets Bacula label unlabeled media
Random Access = Yes;
AutomaticMount = yes; # when device opened, read it
RemovableMedia = yes
AlwaysOpen = no
RequiresMount = Yes
Mount Point = /opt/bacula/disk
Mount Command = /bin/mount /opt/bacula/disk
Unmount Command = /bin/umount /opt/bacula/disk
}
But when I switch the disks Bacula looks for the last Volume which is still
appendable.
I would like it could start with a new Volume without asking anything.
Is that possible?
Thank you,
Fabrizio
--
Come build with us! The BlackBerryreg; Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
--
Come build with us! The BlackBerryreg; Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9#45;12, 2009. Register now#33;
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] allways full even if incremental
hi, On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 19:56 +0100, Martin Simmons wrote: On Tue, 08 Sep 2009 14:05:19 +0200, Gerald Leier said: hello, i noticed some strange behaviour when backing up one of our linux hosts with bacula. bacula allways backs up everything. if i run it 3 times in a row it allways produces the same amount of files (Incremental backup) at first i thought it may be because of some timestamps missing.. but the mount options are the same on hosts that dont do a allways full never incremental even if incremental backup. any suggestions how to debug that, or any ideas what can cause that behaviour? bacula version is 3.0.1 the filesystem taht makes trouble: / type ext3 (rw,acl,user_xattr) kernel: 2.6.16.60 Does Bacula upgrade all of the jobs to Full or is it running them as Incremental? The log output shows this. it is running them as incremental. Are you using the same fileset for working and broken hosts? yes its the same fileset for the other linux hosts. gerald __Martin -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users -- -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[Bacula-users] allways full even if incremental
hello, i noticed some strange behaviour when backing up one of our linux hosts with bacula. bacula allways backs up everything. if i run it 3 times in a row it allways produces the same amount of files (Incremental backup) at first i thought it may be because of some timestamps missing.. but the mount options are the same on hosts that dont do a allways full never incremental even if incremental backup. any suggestions how to debug that, or any ideas what can cause that behaviour? bacula version is 3.0.1 the filesystem taht makes trouble: / type ext3 (rw,acl,user_xattr) kernel: 2.6.16.60 lg gerald -- -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[Bacula-users] failing to build a statically linked bacula-fd (3.0.1)
Hello,
I am having problems compiling a statically linked bacula-fd
suitable for putting on a rescue/recovery installation.
cd bacula-3.0.1
make clean
./configure --prefix=/usr/bacula \
--sbindir=/usr/bacula/bin \
--sysconfdir=/usr/bacula/bin \
--with-scriptdir=/usr/bacula/bin \
--enable-smartalloc \
--enable-client-only \
--enable-static-fd
make ; make install
ldd /usr/bacula/bin/bacula-fd
linux-gate.so.1 = (0xe000)
libz.so.1 = /lib/libz.so.1 (0xb7fb2000)
libbacfind.so.1 = /usr/bacula/lib/libbacfind.so.1 (0xb7fa6000)
libbacpy.so.1 = /usr/bacula/lib/libbacpy.so.1 (0xb7fa4000)
libbaccfg.so.1 = /usr/bacula/lib/libbaccfg.so.1 (0xb7f9d000)
libbac.so.1 = /usr/bacula/lib/libbac.so.1 (0xb7f53000)
libstdc++.so.6 = /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0xb7e6f000)
libgcc_s.so.1 = /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0xb7e64000)
libpthread.so.0 = /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0xb7e4f000)
libdl.so.2 = /lib/libdl.so.2 (0xb7e4b000)
libssl.so.0.9.8 = /usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8 (0xb7e0e000)
libcrypto.so.0.9.8 = /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.8 (0xb7ce5000)
libm.so.6 = /lib/libm.so.6 (0xb7cc)
libc.so.6 = /lib/libc.so.6 (0xb7b9e000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb7fd4000)
i assumed that there should be no dependencies on any shared libs with a
statically built bacula.
has anyone an idea what i do wrong?
thanks
gerald
below is the output after a successfull ./configure run
Configuration on Mon Jun 15 06:50:56 EDT 2009:
Host:i686-pc-linux-gnu -- suse 10
Bacula version: Bacula 3.0.1 (30 April 2009)
Source code location:.
Install binaries:/usr/bacula/bin
Install libraries: /usr/bacula/lib
Install config files:/usr/bacula/bin
Scripts directory: /usr/bacula/bin
Archive directory:
Working directory: /usr/bacula/var/bacula/working
PID directory: /var/run
Subsys directory:/var/lock/subsys
Man directory: ${datarootdir}/man
Data directory: /usr/bacula/share
Plugin directory:/usr/bacula/lib
C Compiler: gcc 4.1.2
C++ Compiler:/usr/bin/g++ 4.1.2
Compiler flags: -g -O2 -Wall -fno-strict-aliasing
-fno-exceptions -fno-rtti
Linker
flags:
Libraries: -lpthread
-ldl
Statically Linked Tools:
no
Statically Linked FD:
yes
Statically Linked SD:
no
Statically Linked DIR:
no
Statically Linked CONS:
no
Database type:
None
Database
port:
Database
lib:
Database name:
bacula
Database user:
bacula
Job Output Email:r...@localhost
Traceback Email: r...@localhost
SMTP Host Address: localhost
Director Port: 9101
File daemon Port:9102
Storage daemon Port: 9103
Director User:
Director Group:
Storage Daemon User:
Storage DaemonGroup:
File Daemon User:
File Daemon Group:
SQL binaries Directory
Large file support: yes
Bacula conio support:yes -lncurses
readline support:no
TCP Wrappers support:no
TLS support: yes
Encryption support: yes
ZLIB support:yes
enable-smartalloc: yes
enable-lockmgr: no
bat support: no
enable-gnome:no
enable-bwx-console: no
enable-tray-monitor: no
client-only: yes
build-dird: yes
build-stored:yes
ACL support: no
XATTR support: yes
Python support: no
Batch insert enabled:no
Re: [Bacula-users] failing to build a statically linked bacula-fd (3.0.1)
: no
XATTR support: yes
Python support: no
Batch insert enabled:no
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 13:02 +0200, Gerald Leier wrote:
Hello,
I am having problems compiling a statically linked bacula-fd
suitable for putting on a rescue/recovery installation.
cd bacula-3.0.1
make clean
./configure --prefix=/usr/bacula \
--sbindir=/usr/bacula/bin \
--sysconfdir=/usr/bacula/bin \
--with-scriptdir=/usr/bacula/bin \
--enable-smartalloc \
--enable-client-only \
--enable-static-fd
make ; make install
ldd /usr/bacula/bin/bacula-fd
linux-gate.so.1 = (0xe000)
libz.so.1 = /lib/libz.so.1 (0xb7fb2000)
libbacfind.so.1 = /usr/bacula/lib/libbacfind.so.1 (0xb7fa6000)
libbacpy.so.1 = /usr/bacula/lib/libbacpy.so.1 (0xb7fa4000)
libbaccfg.so.1 = /usr/bacula/lib/libbaccfg.so.1 (0xb7f9d000)
libbac.so.1 = /usr/bacula/lib/libbac.so.1 (0xb7f53000)
libstdc++.so.6 = /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0xb7e6f000)
libgcc_s.so.1 = /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0xb7e64000)
libpthread.so.0 = /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0xb7e4f000)
libdl.so.2 = /lib/libdl.so.2 (0xb7e4b000)
libssl.so.0.9.8 = /usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8 (0xb7e0e000)
libcrypto.so.0.9.8 = /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.8 (0xb7ce5000)
libm.so.6 = /lib/libm.so.6 (0xb7cc)
libc.so.6 = /lib/libc.so.6 (0xb7b9e000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb7fd4000)
i assumed that there should be no dependencies on any shared libs with a
statically built bacula.
has anyone an idea what i do wrong?
thanks
gerald
below is the output after a successfull ./configure run
Configuration on Mon Jun 15 06:50:56 EDT 2009:
Host:i686-pc-linux-gnu -- suse 10
Bacula version: Bacula 3.0.1 (30 April 2009)
Source code location:.
Install binaries:/usr/bacula/bin
Install libraries: /usr/bacula/lib
Install config files:/usr/bacula/bin
Scripts directory: /usr/bacula/bin
Archive directory:
Working directory: /usr/bacula/var/bacula/working
PID directory: /var/run
Subsys directory:/var/lock/subsys
Man directory: ${datarootdir}/man
Data directory: /usr/bacula/share
Plugin directory:/usr/bacula/lib
C Compiler: gcc 4.1.2
C++ Compiler:/usr/bin/g++ 4.1.2
Compiler flags: -g -O2 -Wall -fno-strict-aliasing
-fno-exceptions -fno-rtti
Linker
flags:
Libraries: -lpthread
-ldl
Statically Linked Tools:
no
Statically Linked FD:
yes
Statically Linked SD:
no
Statically Linked DIR:
no
Statically Linked CONS:
no
Database type:
None
Database
port:
Database
lib:
Database name:
bacula
Database user:
bacula
Job Output Email:r...@localhost
Traceback Email: r...@localhost
SMTP Host Address: localhost
Director Port: 9101
File daemon Port:9102
Storage daemon Port: 9103
Director User:
Director Group:
Storage Daemon User:
Storage DaemonGroup:
File Daemon User:
File Daemon Group:
SQL binaries Directory
Large file support: yes
Bacula conio support:yes -lncurses
readline support:no
TCP Wrappers support:no
TLS support: yes
Encryption support: yes
ZLIB support:yes
enable-smartalloc: yes
enable-lockmgr: no
bat support: no
enable-gnome:no
enable-bwx-console: no
enable-tray-monitor
Re: [Bacula-users] failing to build a statically linked bacula-fd (3.0.1)
hi,
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 14:52 +0200, Thomas wrote:
hi,
my first try was:
./configure --enable-static-fd --enable-client-only
configure-output
Statically Linked FD:yes
make
.
Linking bacula-fd ...
/home/thomas/bacula-3.0.1/libtool --silent --tag=CXX --mode=link
/usr/lib/ccache/g++ -L../lib
-L../findlib
..
and the result was a dynamically linked bacula-fd.
contrary to some documentation out there in the wild i think
it may not be possible to statically build bacula-fd at all!
just read something about the impossibility to use dlopen with a
statically linked libstdc++.so.6 libgcc_s.so.1.
( http://www.trilithium.com/johan/2005/06/static-libstdc/ )
can someone please verify that static bacula-fd builds are impossible?
its not that big of a problem to not use a statically built bacula-fd.
the only benefit for me would be that i have to put less files on
my rescue filesystem.
thanks
gerald
in the configure script i found:
--enable-libtoolenable building using GNU libtool [default=yes]
and ~23.000 lines deeper:
if test ${enable_static_fd+set} = set; then
enableval=$enable_static_fd;
if test x$enableval = xyes; then
if test x$use_libtool = xyes; then
echo Libtool is enabled, not compatible with static tools, please
rerun configure with
--disable-libtool
exit 1
so i tried to compile with
./configure --enable-static-fd --enable-client-only --enable-libtool=no
now the gcc tries to build a static binary, but it fails:
Linking bacula-fd ...
/usr/lib/ccache/g++ -L../lib -L../findlib -o bacula-fd filed.o
authenticate.o acl.o backup.o
estimate.o fd_plugins.o accurate.o filed_conf.o heartbeat.o job.o pythonfd.o
restore.o status.o
verify.o verify_vol.o xattr.o \
-lacl -lz -lbacfind -lbacpy -lbaccfg -lbac -lm
-lpthread -ldl \
-lssl -lcrypto
/usr/lib/ccache/g++ -static -L../lib -L../findlib -o static-bacula-fd
filed.o authenticate.o
acl.o backup.o estimate.o fd_plugins.o accurate.o filed_conf.o heartbeat.o
job.o pythonfd.o
restore.o status.o verify.o verify_vol.o xattr.o \
-lacl -lz -lbacfind -lbacpy -lbaccfg -lbac -lm
-lpthread -ldl \
-lssl -lcrypto
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lz
collect2: ld gab 1 als Ende-Status zurück
make[1]: *** [static-bacula-fd] Fehler 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/thomas/bacula-3.0.1/src/filed'
so, i think this is a bug in the configure-script.
Gerald Leier schrieb:
hello,
i just tried with some extended options (disabled openssl, set global
static flag)
./configure --prefix=/usr/bacula \
--sbindir=/usr/bacula/bin \
--sysconfdir=/usr/bacula/bin \
--with-scriptdir=/usr/bacula/bin \
--enable-smartalloc \
--enable-client-only \
--enable-static-fd \
--enable-static \
--with-openssl=no
but still no static binary:
sles10-i386:/usr/src/bacula-3.0.1 # ldd /usr/bacula/bin/bacula-fd
linux-gate.so.1 = (0xe000)
libz.so.1 = /lib/libz.so.1 (0xb7f9b000)
libbacfind.so.1 = /usr/bacula/lib/libbacfind.so.1 (0xb7f8f000)
libbacpy.so.1 = /usr/bacula/lib/libbacpy.so.1 (0xb7f8d000)
libbaccfg.so.1 = /usr/bacula/lib/libbaccfg.so.1 (0xb7f86000)
libbac.so.1 = /usr/bacula/lib/libbac.so.1 (0xb7f43000)
libstdc++.so.6 = /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0xb7e5f000)
libgcc_s.so.1 = /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0xb7e54000)
libpthread.so.0 = /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0xb7e3f000)
libdl.so.2 = /lib/libdl.so.2 (0xb7e3b000)
libm.so.6 = /lib/libm.so.6 (0xb7e16000)
libc.so.6 = /lib/libc.so.6 (0xb7cf3000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb7fbd000)
sles10-i386:/usr/src/bacula-3.0.1 # ldd /usr/bacula/bin/static-bacula-fd
linux-gate.so.1 = (0xe000)
libz.so.1 = /lib/libz.so.1 (0xb7f1a000)
libstdc++.so.6 = /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0xb7e36000)
libgcc_s.so.1 = /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0xb7e2b000)
libpthread.so.0 = /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0xb7e16000)
libdl.so.2 = /lib/libdl.so.2 (0xb7e11000)
libm.so.6 = /lib/libm.so.6 (0xb7dec000)
libc.so.6 = /lib/libc.so.6 (0xb7cca000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb7f3c000)
Configuration on Mon Jun 15 07:30:23 EDT 2009:
Host:i686-pc-linux-gnu -- suse 10
Bacula version: Bacula 3.0.1 (30 April 2009)
Source code location:.
Install binaries:/usr/bacula/bin
Install libraries: /usr/bacula/lib
Install config files:/usr/bacula/bin
Scripts directory: /usr/bacula/bin
Archive directory:
Working directory: /usr
Re: [Bacula-users] failing to build a statically linked bacula-fd(3.0.1)
hello, On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 16:37 +0200, Arno Lehmann wrote: Hi, --- Originalnachricht --- Von: Gerald Leier gerald.le...@lixto.com An: Thomas tho...@ic3s.de Gesendet: 15.6.09, 15.31 Betreff: Re: [Bacula-users] failing to build a statically linked bacula-fd(3.0.1) hi, On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 14:52 +0200, Thomas wrote: hi, my first try was: ./configure --enable-static-fd --enable-client-only configure-output Statically Linked FD:yes make . Linking bacula-fd ... /home/thomas/bacula-3.0.1/libtool --silent --tag=CXX --mode=link /usr/lib/ccache/g++ -L../lib -L../findlib .. and the result was a dynamically linked bacula-fd. contrary to some documentation out there in the wild i think it may not be possible to statically build bacula-fd at all! Well, ... ok, i take my first statement back and replace it with: contrary to some documentation out there in the wild i think it may not be possible to statically build bacula-fd at all - on a modern gnu linux platform :) just read something about the impossibility to use dlopen with a statically linked libstdc++.so.6 libgcc_s.so.1. ( http://www.trilithium.com/johan/2005/06/static-libstdc/ ) That's one reason. As far as I know, there a others like some libraries that Bacula needs only being available as dynamically shared objects. jepp, i read on a little on it, seems there are a lot of chickenegg problems barried within that hole. can someone please verify that static bacula-fd builds are impossible? At least under current linux systems - other OSes and older versions of linux / glibc / etc. allow static builds. its not that big of a problem to not use a statically built bacula-fd. the only benefit for me would be that i have to put less files on my rescue filesystem. Given that most rescue systems require a load of dsos already, it's not that bad, I think. you are right. bye gerald Arno thanks gerald -- -- Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing server and web deployment. http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] wildfile, wilddir and exclude pattern examples(that work with 2.4.4)
hi,
On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 12:41 +0100, Stefan Sorin Nicolin wrote:
On 09.03.2009, at 11:20, Gerald Leier wrote:
Hello,
Hi,
Is there some kind of archive containing valid
bacula FileSet configurations available somewhere?
You might want to check out the wiki:
http://wiki.bacula.org/doku.php?id=sample_configs
very tape scentric but gave me a few clous. thanks.
Even sniplets like for example exclude patterns
would be very helpfull in figuring out how to do
it right.
The following example is something that looks
ok to me but doesnt work at all and makes bacula
barf about allmost every line contained within
the exclude options.(the ones containing wild*)
Also im a little confused about Exclude{} and
Exclude=yes... comparing rel-bacula.pdf with
the provided default configurations and the
few google hits just made that worse.
i use bacula 2.4.4.
---
FileSet {
Name = WinxpFull
Enable VSS = yes
Include {
Options {
signature = SHA1
compression=GZIP
ignore case = yes
}
File = c:/
File = d:/
}
Exclude {
File = c:/temp
File = d:/temp
wilddir = c:/windows/temp*
wilddir = *temporary internet files*
wildfile = *pagefile.sys
wildfile = *.log
wildfile = *system32/perflib*.dat
}
}
---
bacula-dir -t
Config error: Keyword wilddir not permitted in this resource
any hints would be very appreciated.
If you include exclude = yes in your Exclude {} block then all Files
and/or directories selected would be excluded. If you leave out the
exclude=yes statement then everything will be _included_ (seems weird
to me since the block is clearly called Exclude...)
First of all a Exclude {} block accepts only File directives. If you
want to exclude files and/or directories based on wildcards or regexps
than you have to put these insind an Options {} block. If you include
exclude = yes in your Options {} block then all Files and/or
directories selected would be excluded. If you leave out the
exclude=yes statement then everything will be _included_
Following your example the FileSet should look like this:
FileSet {
Name = WinxpFull
Enable VSS = yes
Include {
Options {
wilddir = c:/windows/temp/*
wilddir = *temporary internet files*
wildfile = *pagefile.sys
wildfile = *.log
wildfile = *system32/perflib*.dat
exclude = yes
}
Options {
signature = SHA1
compression=GZIP
ignore case = yes
}
File = c:/
File = d:/
}
Exclude {
File = c:/temp
File = d:/temp
}
}
Note that if you put something inside an Exclude {} block it will be
completely ignored (the whole directory). If you have to restore your
system then there will be no temp dir on you disks.
thanky you very much. i think i got it now. its been a little
confusing at the start but makes some sense now.
sincerely yours
gerald
sincerely yours
Gerald
--
--
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San
Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the
Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source
participation
-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source
code: SFAD
http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
regards,
Stefan Sorin Nicolin
http://nicolinux.org/timr
---
Unix guy, Mac head, Rails wannabe,
iPhone Dev-ious, Computer Science
alumnus, usability guesspert and
overall big time visionary
--
--
Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are
powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and
easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development
software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging.
Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
