Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Fwd: Broken 2.2.6 source rpm in Sourceforge
This sounds like the same issue I had today building 2.2.7 on Fedora 8. I had to do the following: export QTDIR=/usr/lib/qt4;export PATH=/usr/lib/qt4/bin:$PATH;rpmbuild blah... On Tue, 2007-11-20 at 16:46 -0500, Jeff Dickens wrote: > Was a build with Bat enabled on CentOS 5 expected to work ? > > I couldn't get it to work. I had various problems around finding qt4 > and/or qwt.Even building without rpmbuild it couldn't find qmake > until I tweaked the path and then it didn't install the bat binary. > > If you want I can clean up and try it again and send you a log. > > Scott Barninger wrote: > > Hello All, > > > > I see from SF stats that there have been 92 downloads since I re-posted > > the SRPM last Friday. Can I assume all of the issues noted have been > > addressed? I ask because later this week I intend to post a special > > 2.2.6 to the beta-rpm section for upgrade from sqlite to sqlite3 for > > testing. > > > > Regards, > > Scott > > > > > > - > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ > > ___ > > Bacula-users mailing list > > Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users > > > - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Fwd: Broken 2.2.6 source rpm in Sourceforge
> Hello All, > > I see from SF stats that there have been 92 downloads since I re-posted > the SRPM last Friday. Can I assume all of the issues noted have been > addressed? I ask because later this week I intend to post a special > 2.2.6 to the beta-rpm section for upgrade from sqlite to sqlite3 for > testing. > > Regards, > Scott > > > The most current version compiled fine and has been working fine for about a week for me (Centos 4.5). - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Fwd: Broken 2.2.6 source rpm in Sourceforge
Hello All, I see from SF stats that there have been 92 downloads since I re-posted the SRPM last Friday. Can I assume all of the issues noted have been addressed? I ask because later this week I intend to post a special 2.2.6 to the beta-rpm section for upgrade from sqlite to sqlite3 for testing. Regards, Scott - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Fwd: Broken 2.2.6 source rpm in Sourceforge
On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 07:35 +0200, Timo Neuvonen wrote: > "Scott Barninger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> kirjoitti viestissä > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sorry for the delay but I have been out of town until this evening. Not > > sure what went wrong with the release but I have re-uploaded the srpm > > now. It should be available now and the file size looks correct. > > > > Yes, the size looks correct now... but this time I keep getting this message > when trying to build binaries on FC6 and CentOS5: > > error: syntax error in expression > error: /usr/src/redhat/SPECS/bacula.spec:298: parseExpressionBoolean > returns -1 > error: Package has no %description: bacula I have replaced the file on sourceforge. > > > Regards, > Timo > > > > - > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ > ___ > Bacula-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel > - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Fwd: Broken 2.2.6 source rpm in Sourceforge
What command string are you using to build? On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 07:35 +0200, Timo Neuvonen wrote: > "Scott Barninger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> kirjoitti viestissä > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sorry for the delay but I have been out of town until this evening. Not > > sure what went wrong with the release but I have re-uploaded the srpm > > now. It should be available now and the file size looks correct. > > > > Yes, the size looks correct now... but this time I keep getting this message > when trying to build binaries on FC6 and CentOS5: > > error: syntax error in expression > error: /usr/src/redhat/SPECS/bacula.spec:298: parseExpressionBoolean > returns -1 > error: Package has no %description: bacula > > > Regards, > Timo > > > > - > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ > ___ > Bacula-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel > - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
