Re: [Bacula-users] Compatibility table
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 John Drescher escribió: > On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Matias Banchoff > wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >> >> Hello, we're backing up some servers, and we ended up with >> different Bacula versions. Our dir and sd is 2.4.2, and the >> clients are 1.36.3, 1.38.7, 1.38.11, 2.0.0, 2.2.8, 2.4.1 and >> 2.4.4 :-) We are planning a migration, and I was looking for a >> table showing compatibility issues between every version. Is >> there such a table? >> > > I do not know of any. > > 2.4 servers should not have problems with 1.38.X clients since I > have had a mix of these in the production environment for over 1 > year. I have no 1.36.X or lower clients anymore (that I know of) so > I can not comment on that. > > John > We do have a 1.36 client, and it's working fine. But I don't know if it's going to work with version 3.0. Because one thing is to upgrade dir and sd, but something different is to upgrade all our clients because they don't support sd/dir with version 3.0. Anyway, I'll keep reading and testing :-) Bye! -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkus1t8ACgkQlK18JQ6L0qIixgCgiRa3BTVzYjvuVY03Thnyb0Tv AjkAniq0YG5A02zs53nVhfMZO6truqcL =rbbu -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Compatibility table
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Matias Banchoff wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hello, > we're backing up some servers, and we ended up with different Bacula > versions. Our dir and sd is 2.4.2, and the clients are 1.36.3, 1.38.7, > 1.38.11, 2.0.0, 2.2.8, 2.4.1 and 2.4.4 :-) > We are planning a migration, and I was looking for a table showing > compatibility issues between every version. Is there such a table? > I do not know of any. 2.4 servers should not have problems with 1.38.X clients since I have had a mix of these in the production environment for over 1 year. I have no 1.36.X or lower clients anymore (that I know of) so I can not comment on that. John -- Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[Bacula-users] Compatibility table
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, we're backing up some servers, and we ended up with different Bacula versions. Our dir and sd is 2.4.2, and the clients are 1.36.3, 1.38.7, 1.38.11, 2.0.0, 2.2.8, 2.4.1 and 2.4.4 :-) We are planning a migration, and I was looking for a table showing compatibility issues between every version. Is there such a table? Bye! -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkusrkcACgkQlK18JQ6L0qK6SwCgoch+vdV0gb4DlfBDpvdpPlLd eGkAn3iYH4diJ3ys6UUE8LSBf9tH5wGa =Nanh -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
