[Bacula-users] Ver 2.4.4 not associating mounted tapes with any pool
Since I upgraded my Debian etch to Lenny and a resultant bacula upgrade,
a problem has emerged with bacula. It is failing to associate a existing
tape with its pool.
Particularly applies to a tape sitting in the drive when DIR is
started/restarted. It reads the label correctly, but then has no
knowledge of the pool it belongs to.
Nothing short of physical removal and reload will correct this.
Is there some reason for this change?
--
Terry Collins {:-)}
Bicycles, Appropriate Technology, Natural Environment, Welding
--
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Ver 2.4.4 not associating mounted tapes with any pool
Since I upgraded my Debian etch to Lenny and a resultant bacula upgrade, a problem has emerged with bacula. It is failing to associate a existing tape with its pool. Particularly applies to a tape sitting in the drive when DIR is started/restarted. It reads the label correctly, but then has no knowledge of the pool it belongs to. You are talking about the status storage screen? If so that is harmless. The first mount should pick up the correct pool. There were threads about this 2 years ago when 2.0.X came out to most linux distributions. John -- ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Ver 2.4.4 not associating mounted tapes with any pool
John Drescher wrote:
You are talking about the status storage screen?
Yes, and more
If so that is harmless. The first mount should pick up the correct
pool.
That is the problem as it doesn't. Requires a physical removal of the
tape from the drive.
--
Terry Collins {:-)}
Bicycles, Appropriate Technology, Natural Environment, Welding
--
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
