Re: [Bacula-users] Fedora 16 - RHEL 5/6 Bacula RPM repository
Hello,
please have a look at the readme file at:
http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula/README.txt
there's this note:
** The included /usr/share/doc/bacula-common-%{version}/README.Fedora contains
quick installation instructions and notes **
You'll find your quick answer by reading it.
Regards,
--Simone
On 23 January 2012 08:24, tonyalbers bacula-fo...@backupcentral.com wrote:
Hi all,
Simone, are the RHEL 6 packages compiled with mysql support? Whenever I try
to start the director, i get this message in the log file:
22-Jan 17:43 bacula-dir JobId 0: Fatal error: postgresql.c:241 Unable to
connect to PostgreSQL server. Database=bacula User=bacula
Possible causes: SQL server not running; password incorrect; max_connections
exceeded.
But I'm running mysql, and it is working as it should be. Should I specify
which database server I want to use somewhere?
/tony
+--
|This was sent by tony.alb...@gmail.com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
+--
--
Try before you buy = See our experts in action!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
--
You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose
sight of the shore (R. W. Emerson).
--
Try before you buy = See our experts in action!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Fedora 16 - RHEL 5/6 Bacula RPM repository
Hello Simone, just to give you a feedback: I've tried again on a i386 CentOS 5.7 box and the problem persists: *[root@ptiap yum.repos.d]# yum --enablerepo epel update Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Determining fastest mirrors * epel: mirror.symnds.com base | 1.1 kB 00:00 base/primary | 961 kB 00:00 base 2705/2705 epel | 3.7 kB 00:00 epel/primary_db | 3.2 MB 00:08 epel-bacula | 2.9 kB 00:00 epel-bacula/primary_db| 9.4 kB 00:00 http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula/epel-5/i386/repodata/896d43a07a0d4bdce72f22ccf315af1a5f179920599a9a9a9b9e278a12a91754-primary.sqlite.gz: [Errno -3] Error performing checksum Trying other mirror. epel-bacula/primary_db| 9.4 kB 00:00 http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula/epel-5/i386/repodata/896d43a07a0d4bdce72f22ccf315af1a5f179920599a9a9a9b9e278a12a91754-primary.sqlite.gz: [Errno -3] Error performing checksum Trying other mirror. Error: failure: repodata/896d43a07a0d4bdce72f22ccf315af1a5f179920599a9a9a9b9e278a12a91754-primary.sqlite.gz from epel-bacula: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try.* Just strange, and apparently it does not happens on a CentOS 6 box... Anyway, thanks again for you contribution, I'm installing using the .rpm directly. Em 29 de dezembro de 2011 16:10, Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.comescreveu: Hello, I've checked the checksums on the files and everything seems correct. The weird thing is the second message you get, Error: file is encrypted or is not a database; I''ve never seen that message. The next thing is that appears after updates/primary_db; so it doesn't seem related to the bacula repository. Can you please try to run yum clean all and then trying updating again? I'm on holiday now and I don't have any rhel 5 platform at hand at the moment to check that the repo is working. Regards, --Simone On 29 December 2011 12:56, Rodrigo Renie Braga rodrigore...@gmail.com wrote: Simone, I'm trying to use your repository on a CentOS 5.7 adm64 machine, and yum update returns the following: Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Determining fastest mirrors addons | 951 B 00:00 addons/primary | 204 B 00:00 base | 1.1 kB 00:00 base/primary | 1.2 MB 00:00 base 3566/3566 epel-bacula | 2.9 kB 00:00 epel-bacula/primary_db | 9.3 kB 00:00 http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula/epel-5/x86_64/repodata/2c522829a11dc7d0e4cc27c9f76a4f72a0243255ff2bc4c078a139f4d220c754-primary.sqlite.gz : [Errno -3] Error performing checksum Trying other mirror. epel-bacula/primary_db | 9.3 kB 00:00 http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula/epel-5/x86_64/repodata/2c522829a11dc7d0e4cc27c9f76a4f72a0243255ff2bc4c078a139f4d220c754-primary.sqlite.gz : [Errno -3] Error performing checksum Trying other mirror. Error: failure: repodata/2c522829a11dc7d0e4cc27c9f76a4f72a0243255ff2bc4c078a139f4d220c754-primary.sqlite.gz from epel-bacula: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try. Then, after trying yum update again: Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile extras | 2.1 kB 00:00 extras/primary_db | 175 kB 00:00 updates | 1.9 kB 00:00 updates/primary_db | 510 kB 00:00 Error: file is encrypted or is not a database The weird thing is that on a CentOS 6.2 amd64 machine, your repo worked perfectly. Do you have any idea of what's going on? I've tried yum clean all and trying again several times, but it always come back to the same problem. Thanks again! Em 6 de dezembro de 2011 14:06, Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com escreveu: Hello, the company I was working for has been a Bacula customer for some years and went through many iterations with the Bacula developer themselves to fix and change the Enterprise Edition behaviour when we moved away from the Community Version. Their support was awesome. Now I've changed job and I've been recently accepted as Bacula co-mantainer in Fedora. I've given a spin to the current Bacula packages in rawhide and rebuilt them for RHEL 5/6 and Fedora 16. So far, compared to the last packages in Fedora (5.0.3) this is what is implemented: - Nagios plugin. - Removal of bwxconsole, gnome-console and tray-monitor. - Removal of sqlite2. - Added html docs. - Reduced the number of patches. - Made bat compile only on platforms that provide QT = 4.6.2 (this and systemd are the ifs for building on all releases). - Enablement of bpipe-fd.so. - Converged all the storage backends thanks to the work introduced in 5.2. - Fix some file layout and dependency by moving files between packages. - POSIX.1e capabilities. - Enablement of
Re: [Bacula-users] Fedora 16 - RHEL 5/6 Bacula RPM repository
I'm installing a RHEL 4 and 5 vm right now for spotting problems. Thanks, --Simone On 2 January 2012 12:47, Rodrigo Renie Braga rodrigore...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Simone, just to give you a feedback: I've tried again on a i386 CentOS 5.7 box and the problem persists: *[root@ptiap yum.repos.d]# yum --enablerepo epel update Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Determining fastest mirrors * epel: mirror.symnds.com base | 1.1 kB 00:00 base/primary | 961 kB 00:00 base 2705/2705 epel | 3.7 kB 00:00 epel/primary_db | 3.2 MB 00:08 epel-bacula | 2.9 kB 00:00 epel-bacula/primary_db| 9.4 kB 00:00 http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula/epel-5/i386/repodata/896d43a07a0d4bdce72f22ccf315af1a5f179920599a9a9a9b9e278a12a91754-primary.sqlite.gz: [Errno -3] Error performing checksum Trying other mirror. epel-bacula/primary_db| 9.4 kB 00:00 http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula/epel-5/i386/repodata/896d43a07a0d4bdce72f22ccf315af1a5f179920599a9a9a9b9e278a12a91754-primary.sqlite.gz: [Errno -3] Error performing checksum Trying other mirror. Error: failure: repodata/896d43a07a0d4bdce72f22ccf315af1a5f179920599a9a9a9b9e278a12a91754-primary.sqlite.gz from epel-bacula: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try.* Just strange, and apparently it does not happens on a CentOS 6 box... Anyway, thanks again for you contribution, I'm installing using the .rpm directly. Em 29 de dezembro de 2011 16:10, Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.comescreveu: Hello, I've checked the checksums on the files and everything seems correct. The weird thing is the second message you get, Error: file is encrypted or is not a database; I''ve never seen that message. The next thing is that appears after updates/primary_db; so it doesn't seem related to the bacula repository. Can you please try to run yum clean all and then trying updating again? I'm on holiday now and I don't have any rhel 5 platform at hand at the moment to check that the repo is working. Regards, --Simone On 29 December 2011 12:56, Rodrigo Renie Braga rodrigore...@gmail.com wrote: Simone, I'm trying to use your repository on a CentOS 5.7 adm64 machine, and yum update returns the following: Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Determining fastest mirrors addons | 951 B 00:00 addons/primary | 204 B 00:00 base | 1.1 kB 00:00 base/primary | 1.2 MB 00:00 base 3566/3566 epel-bacula | 2.9 kB 00:00 epel-bacula/primary_db | 9.3 kB 00:00 http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula/epel-5/x86_64/repodata/2c522829a11dc7d0e4cc27c9f76a4f72a0243255ff2bc4c078a139f4d220c754-primary.sqlite.gz : [Errno -3] Error performing checksum Trying other mirror. epel-bacula/primary_db | 9.3 kB 00:00 http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula/epel-5/x86_64/repodata/2c522829a11dc7d0e4cc27c9f76a4f72a0243255ff2bc4c078a139f4d220c754-primary.sqlite.gz : [Errno -3] Error performing checksum Trying other mirror. Error: failure: repodata/2c522829a11dc7d0e4cc27c9f76a4f72a0243255ff2bc4c078a139f4d220c754-primary.sqlite.gz from epel-bacula: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try. Then, after trying yum update again: Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile extras | 2.1 kB 00:00 extras/primary_db | 175 kB 00:00 updates | 1.9 kB 00:00 updates/primary_db | 510 kB 00:00 Error: file is encrypted or is not a database The weird thing is that on a CentOS 6.2 amd64 machine, your repo worked perfectly. Do you have any idea of what's going on? I've tried yum clean all and trying again several times, but it always come back to the same problem. Thanks again! Em 6 de dezembro de 2011 14:06, Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com escreveu: Hello, the company I was working for has been a Bacula customer for some years and went through many iterations with the Bacula developer themselves to fix and change the Enterprise Edition behaviour when we moved away from the Community Version. Their support was awesome. Now I've changed job and I've been recently accepted as Bacula co-mantainer in Fedora. I've given a spin to the current Bacula packages in rawhide and rebuilt them for RHEL 5/6 and Fedora 16. So far, compared to the last packages in Fedora (5.0.3) this is what is implemented: - Nagios plugin. - Removal of bwxconsole, gnome-console and tray-monitor. - Removal of sqlite2. - Added html docs. - Reduced the number of patches. - Made bat compile only on platforms that provide QT = 4.6.2 (this and systemd are the ifs for building on all releases). - Enablement of bpipe-fd.so.
Re: [Bacula-users] Fedora 16 - RHEL 5/6 Bacula RPM repository
It is now working for RHEL 5; it was a problem of the different default algorithm used by yum: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2010-January/365300.html Please type the following as root and try again: rm -fr /var/cache/yum/epel-bacula/ Thanks, --Simone On 2 January 2012 13:14, Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com wrote: I'm installing a RHEL 4 and 5 vm right now for spotting problems. Thanks, --Simone On 2 January 2012 12:47, Rodrigo Renie Braga rodrigore...@gmail.comwrote: Hello Simone, just to give you a feedback: I've tried again on a i386 CentOS 5.7 box and the problem persists: *[root@ptiap yum.repos.d]# yum --enablerepo epel update Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Determining fastest mirrors * epel: mirror.symnds.com base | 1.1 kB 00:00 base/primary | 961 kB 00:00 base 2705/2705 epel | 3.7 kB 00:00 epel/primary_db | 3.2 MB 00:08 epel-bacula | 2.9 kB 00:00 epel-bacula/primary_db| 9.4 kB 00:00 http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula/epel-5/i386/repodata/896d43a07a0d4bdce72f22ccf315af1a5f179920599a9a9a9b9e278a12a91754-primary.sqlite.gz: [Errno -3] Error performing checksum Trying other mirror. epel-bacula/primary_db| 9.4 kB 00:00 http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula/epel-5/i386/repodata/896d43a07a0d4bdce72f22ccf315af1a5f179920599a9a9a9b9e278a12a91754-primary.sqlite.gz: [Errno -3] Error performing checksum Trying other mirror. Error: failure: repodata/896d43a07a0d4bdce72f22ccf315af1a5f179920599a9a9a9b9e278a12a91754-primary.sqlite.gz from epel-bacula: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try.* Just strange, and apparently it does not happens on a CentOS 6 box... Anyway, thanks again for you contribution, I'm installing using the .rpm directly. Em 29 de dezembro de 2011 16:10, Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.comescreveu: Hello, I've checked the checksums on the files and everything seems correct. The weird thing is the second message you get, Error: file is encrypted or is not a database; I''ve never seen that message. The next thing is that appears after updates/primary_db; so it doesn't seem related to the bacula repository. Can you please try to run yum clean all and then trying updating again? I'm on holiday now and I don't have any rhel 5 platform at hand at the moment to check that the repo is working. Regards, --Simone On 29 December 2011 12:56, Rodrigo Renie Braga rodrigore...@gmail.com wrote: Simone, I'm trying to use your repository on a CentOS 5.7 adm64 machine, and yum update returns the following: Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Determining fastest mirrors addons | 951 B 00:00 addons/primary | 204 B 00:00 base | 1.1 kB 00:00 base/primary | 1.2 MB 00:00 base 3566/3566 epel-bacula | 2.9 kB 00:00 epel-bacula/primary_db | 9.3 kB 00:00 http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula/epel-5/x86_64/repodata/2c522829a11dc7d0e4cc27c9f76a4f72a0243255ff2bc4c078a139f4d220c754-primary.sqlite.gz : [Errno -3] Error performing checksum Trying other mirror. epel-bacula/primary_db | 9.3 kB 00:00 http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula/epel-5/x86_64/repodata/2c522829a11dc7d0e4cc27c9f76a4f72a0243255ff2bc4c078a139f4d220c754-primary.sqlite.gz : [Errno -3] Error performing checksum Trying other mirror. Error: failure: repodata/2c522829a11dc7d0e4cc27c9f76a4f72a0243255ff2bc4c078a139f4d220c754-primary.sqlite.gz from epel-bacula: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try. Then, after trying yum update again: Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile extras | 2.1 kB 00:00 extras/primary_db | 175 kB 00:00 updates | 1.9 kB 00:00 updates/primary_db | 510 kB 00:00 Error: file is encrypted or is not a database The weird thing is that on a CentOS 6.2 amd64 machine, your repo worked perfectly. Do you have any idea of what's going on? I've tried yum clean all and trying again several times, but it always come back to the same problem. Thanks again! Em 6 de dezembro de 2011 14:06, Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com escreveu: Hello, the company I was working for has been a Bacula customer for some years and went through many iterations with the Bacula developer themselves to fix and change the Enterprise Edition behaviour when we moved away from the Community Version. Their support was awesome. Now I've changed job and I've been recently accepted as Bacula co-mantainer in Fedora. I've given a spin to the current Bacula packages in rawhide and rebuilt them for RHEL 5/6 and Fedora 16. So far, compared to the last packages in Fedora (5.0.3)
Re: [Bacula-users] Fedora 16 - RHEL 5/6 Bacula RPM repository
Hello, I've checked the checksums on the files and everything seems correct. The weird thing is the second message you get, Error: file is encrypted or is not a database; I''ve never seen that message. The next thing is that appears after updates/primary_db; so it doesn't seem related to the bacula repository. Can you please try to run yum clean all and then trying updating again? I'm on holiday now and I don't have any rhel 5 platform at hand at the moment to check that the repo is working. Regards, --Simone On 29 December 2011 12:56, Rodrigo Renie Braga rodrigore...@gmail.com wrote: Simone, I'm trying to use your repository on a CentOS 5.7 adm64 machine, and yum update returns the following: Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Determining fastest mirrors addons | 951 B 00:00 addons/primary | 204 B 00:00 base | 1.1 kB 00:00 base/primary | 1.2 MB 00:00 base 3566/3566 epel-bacula | 2.9 kB 00:00 epel-bacula/primary_db | 9.3 kB 00:00 http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula/epel-5/x86_64/repodata/2c522829a11dc7d0e4cc27c9f76a4f72a0243255ff2bc4c078a139f4d220c754-primary.sqlite.gz: [Errno -3] Error performing checksum Trying other mirror. epel-bacula/primary_db | 9.3 kB 00:00 http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula/epel-5/x86_64/repodata/2c522829a11dc7d0e4cc27c9f76a4f72a0243255ff2bc4c078a139f4d220c754-primary.sqlite.gz: [Errno -3] Error performing checksum Trying other mirror. Error: failure: repodata/2c522829a11dc7d0e4cc27c9f76a4f72a0243255ff2bc4c078a139f4d220c754-primary.sqlite.gz from epel-bacula: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try. Then, after trying yum update again: Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile extras | 2.1 kB 00:00 extras/primary_db | 175 kB 00:00 updates | 1.9 kB 00:00 updates/primary_db | 510 kB 00:00 Error: file is encrypted or is not a database The weird thing is that on a CentOS 6.2 amd64 machine, your repo worked perfectly. Do you have any idea of what's going on? I've tried yum clean all and trying again several times, but it always come back to the same problem. Thanks again! Em 6 de dezembro de 2011 14:06, Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com escreveu: Hello, the company I was working for has been a Bacula customer for some years and went through many iterations with the Bacula developer themselves to fix and change the Enterprise Edition behaviour when we moved away from the Community Version. Their support was awesome. Now I've changed job and I've been recently accepted as Bacula co-mantainer in Fedora. I've given a spin to the current Bacula packages in rawhide and rebuilt them for RHEL 5/6 and Fedora 16. So far, compared to the last packages in Fedora (5.0.3) this is what is implemented: - Nagios plugin. - Removal of bwxconsole, gnome-console and tray-monitor. - Removal of sqlite2. - Added html docs. - Reduced the number of patches. - Made bat compile only on platforms that provide QT = 4.6.2 (this and systemd are the ifs for building on all releases). - Enablement of bpipe-fd.so. - Converged all the storage backends thanks to the work introduced in 5.2. - Fix some file layout and dependency by moving files between packages. - POSIX.1e capabilities. - Enablement of libtool. Right now I'm still doing some cleanup. The next things I would like to implement are: - QT tray monitor packaging. - Additional cleanup (i.e. the nagios plugin needs only a library, not all bacula-common files, commands and directories). - Provide a simple but still secure configuration by default. - Fix all the logging by putting /var/log/bacula where appropriate. I'm hosting the repository at: http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula/ The following architectures are supported: RHEL5/ppc RHEL5/x86_64 RHEL5/i386 RHEL6/ppc64 RHEL6/x86_64 RHEL6/i386 Fedora-16/i386 Fedora-16/x86_64 I'm happy to address all the package issues people might encounter and I'm available to ideas or constructive criticism regarding choices or features missing. When I will get enough feedback that the approach used inside the package is right I will try to see if some patches could be integrated in the base code by pushing them to the bacula-devel mailing list. Thanks regards, --Simone -- You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of the shore (R. W. Emerson). -- Cloud Services Checklist: Pricing and Packaging Optimization This white paper is intended to serve as a reference, checklist and point of discussion for anyone considering optimizing the pricing and packaging model of a cloud services business. Read Now! http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51491232/ ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Re: [Bacula-users] Fedora 16 - RHEL 5/6 Bacula RPM repository
Simone, I'm trying to use your repository on a CentOS 5.7 adm64 machine, and yum update returns the following: Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Determining fastest mirrors addons | 951 B 00:00 addons/primary | 204 B 00:00 base | 1.1 kB 00:00 base/primary | 1.2 MB 00:00 base 3566/3566 epel-bacula | 2.9 kB 00:00 epel-bacula/primary_db | 9.3 kB 00:00 http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula/epel-5/x86_64/repodata/2c522829a11dc7d0e4cc27c9f76a4f72a0243255ff2bc4c078a139f4d220c754-primary.sqlite.gz: [Errno -3] Error performing checksum Trying other mirror. epel-bacula/primary_db | 9.3 kB 00:00 http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula/epel-5/x86_64/repodata/2c522829a11dc7d0e4cc27c9f76a4f72a0243255ff2bc4c078a139f4d220c754-primary.sqlite.gz: [Errno -3] Error performing checksum Trying other mirror. Error: failure: repodata/2c522829a11dc7d0e4cc27c9f76a4f72a0243255ff2bc4c078a139f4d220c754-primary.sqlite.gz from epel-bacula: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try. Then, after trying yum update again: Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile extras | 2.1 kB 00:00 extras/primary_db | 175 kB 00:00 updates | 1.9 kB 00:00 updates/primary_db | 510 kB 00:00 Error: file is encrypted or is not a database The weird thing is that on a CentOS 6.2 amd64 machine, your repo worked perfectly. Do you have any idea of what's going on? I've tried yum clean all and trying again several times, but it always come back to the same problem. Thanks again! Em 6 de dezembro de 2011 14:06, Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.comescreveu: Hello, the company I was working for has been a Bacula customer for some years and went through many iterations with the Bacula developer themselves to fix and change the Enterprise Edition behaviour when we moved away from the Community Version. Their support was awesome. Now I've changed job and I've been recently accepted as Bacula co-mantainer in Fedora. I've given a spin to the current Bacula packages in rawhide and rebuilt them for RHEL 5/6 and Fedora 16. So far, compared to the last packages in Fedora (5.0.3) this is what is implemented: - Nagios plugin. - Removal of bwxconsole, gnome-console and tray-monitor. - Removal of sqlite2. - Added html docs. - Reduced the number of patches. - Made bat compile only on platforms that provide QT = 4.6.2 (this and systemd are the ifs for building on all releases). - Enablement of bpipe-fd.so. - Converged all the storage backends thanks to the work introduced in 5.2. - Fix some file layout and dependency by moving files between packages. - POSIX.1e capabilities. - Enablement of libtool. Right now I'm still doing some cleanup. The next things I would like to implement are: - QT tray monitor packaging. - Additional cleanup (i.e. the nagios plugin needs only a library, not all bacula-common files, commands and directories). - Provide a simple but still secure configuration by default. - Fix all the logging by putting /var/log/bacula where appropriate. I'm hosting the repository at: http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula/ The following architectures are supported: RHEL5/ppc RHEL5/x86_64 RHEL5/i386 RHEL6/ppc64 RHEL6/x86_64 RHEL6/i386 Fedora-16/i386 Fedora-16/x86_64 I'm happy to address all the package issues people might encounter and I'm available to ideas or constructive criticism regarding choices or features missing. When I will get enough feedback that the approach used inside the package is right I will try to see if some patches could be integrated in the base code by pushing them to the bacula-devel mailing list. Thanks regards, --Simone -- You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of the shore (R. W. Emerson). -- Cloud Services Checklist: Pricing and Packaging Optimization This white paper is intended to serve as a reference, checklist and point of discussion for anyone considering optimizing the pricing and packaging model of a cloud services business. Read Now! http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51491232/ ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users -- Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Fedora 16 - RHEL 5/6 Bacula RPM repository
Ah, thanks, I'd missed that you had updated the RPMs on fedorapeople.org. __Martin On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 23:16:29 +0100, Simone Caronni said: Hello, fedora-usermgmt adds 33 + the baseuid defined in his config files, the latest RPM without it uses 133 as a static uid. Regards, --Simone On Dec 20, 2011 8:53 PM, Martin Simmons mar...@lispworks.com wrote: I'm probably confused, but why is the rpm adding user/group 33, rather than 133? __Martin On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 13:56:15 +0100, Simone Caronni said: Sorry, those are the basis for fedora-usermgmt generation, the static uids associated with services can be found inside the setup package on any system. i.e. on my Fedora system: [slaanesh@3zpc0560 ~]$ rpm -qd setup /usr/share/doc/setup-2.8.36/COPYING /usr/share/doc/setup-2.8.36/uidgid [slaanesh@3zpc0560 ~]$ cat /usr/share/doc/setup-2.8.36/uidgid | grep bacula bacula133 133 /var/spool/bacula /sbin/nologin bacula Regards, --Simone On 19 December 2011 09:29, Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, what do you mean it is a pratical joke or a time bomb? In the links I've pasted there's also the Fedora user registry for uids/gids, it is at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageUserRegistry Remember this is a Fedora package and not a package for everyone, so it follows those guidelines. I will come back here in the next days if I'm allowed to remove the fedora-usermgmt requirements in the package. Regards, --Simone On 17 December 2011 16:10, Geert Stappers geert.stapp...@vanadgroup.com wrote: Op 20111215 om 16:40 schreef Joseph L. Casale: It is not a requirement but a recommendation inside the Fedora packaging guidelines: Right:) Not EL requirements. I could try to remove that and put standard useradd / userdel commands, but I need to assess the change with the other Bacula mantainers and good reasons to do so. Is there any particular requirement on why you would like to avoid using fedora-usermgmt? Mainly for the reason that as an EL shop, its a tough sale to 'suggest' as we haven't ever used those packages, now we should. I'd be pretty surprised if any el shop uses any fedora packages even if it is only wrappers like these. We are talking about } } /usr/sbin/fedora-groupadd 33 -r bacula /dev/null || : } } /usr/sbin/fedora-useradd 33 -r -s /sbin/nologin -d /var/spool/bacula -M \ } } -c 'Bacula Backup System' -g bacula bacula /dev/null || : } } } } It is used to create predictable user / group assignment + some other } } features like logging, etc. I'm sure of it is a pratical joke or a time bomb. The information I miss, is where id 33 is reserved / claimed / registered. Any package could do /usr/sbin/fedora-groupadd 33 -r anotherpackagename /dev/null || : So at which central place are user id and group ids for packages documented? Groeten Geert Stappers -- Learn Windows Azure Live! Tuesday, Dec 13, 2011 Microsoft is holding a special Learn Windows Azure training event for developers. It will provide a great way to learn Windows Azure and what it provides. You can attend the event by watching it streamed LIVE online. Learn more at http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-windowsazure ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users -- You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of the shore (R. W. Emerson). -- You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of the shore (R. W. Emerson). -- Write once. Port to many. Get the SDK and tools to simplify cross-platform app development. Create new or port existing apps to sell to consumers worldwide. Explore the Intel AppUpSM program developer opportunity. appdeveloper.intel.com/join http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-appdev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users -- Write once. Port to many. Get the SDK and tools to simplify cross-platform app development. Create new or port existing apps to sell to consumers worldwide. Explore the Intel AppUpSM program developer opportunity. appdeveloper.intel.com/join http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-appdev ___
Re: [Bacula-users] Fedora 16 - RHEL 5/6 Bacula RPM repository
Sorry, those are the basis for fedora-usermgmt generation, the static uids associated with services can be found inside the setup package on any system. i.e. on my Fedora system: [slaanesh@3zpc0560 ~]$ rpm -qd setup /usr/share/doc/setup-2.8.36/COPYING /usr/share/doc/setup-2.8.36/uidgid [slaanesh@3zpc0560 ~]$ cat /usr/share/doc/setup-2.8.36/uidgid | grep bacula bacula 133 133 /var/spool/bacula /sbin/nologin bacula Regards, --Simone On 19 December 2011 09:29, Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, what do you mean it is a pratical joke or a time bomb? In the links I've pasted there's also the Fedora user registry for uids/gids, it is at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageUserRegistry Remember this is a Fedora package and not a package for everyone, so it follows those guidelines. I will come back here in the next days if I'm allowed to remove the fedora-usermgmt requirements in the package. Regards, --Simone On 17 December 2011 16:10, Geert Stappers geert.stapp...@vanadgroup.com wrote: Op 20111215 om 16:40 schreef Joseph L. Casale: It is not a requirement but a recommendation inside the Fedora packaging guidelines: Right:) Not EL requirements. I could try to remove that and put standard useradd / userdel commands, but I need to assess the change with the other Bacula mantainers and good reasons to do so. Is there any particular requirement on why you would like to avoid using fedora-usermgmt? Mainly for the reason that as an EL shop, its a tough sale to 'suggest' as we haven't ever used those packages, now we should. I'd be pretty surprised if any el shop uses any fedora packages even if it is only wrappers like these. We are talking about } } /usr/sbin/fedora-groupadd 33 -r bacula /dev/null || : } } /usr/sbin/fedora-useradd 33 -r -s /sbin/nologin -d /var/spool/bacula -M \ } } -c 'Bacula Backup System' -g bacula bacula /dev/null || : } } } } It is used to create predictable user / group assignment + some other } } features like logging, etc. I'm sure of it is a pratical joke or a time bomb. The information I miss, is where id 33 is reserved / claimed / registered. Any package could do /usr/sbin/fedora-groupadd 33 -r anotherpackagename /dev/null || : So at which central place are user id and group ids for packages documented? Groeten Geert Stappers -- Learn Windows Azure Live! Tuesday, Dec 13, 2011 Microsoft is holding a special Learn Windows Azure training event for developers. It will provide a great way to learn Windows Azure and what it provides. You can attend the event by watching it streamed LIVE online. Learn more at http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-windowsazure ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users -- You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of the shore (R. W. Emerson). -- You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of the shore (R. W. Emerson). -- Write once. Port to many. Get the SDK and tools to simplify cross-platform app development. Create new or port existing apps to sell to consumers worldwide. Explore the Intel AppUpSM program developer opportunity. appdeveloper.intel.com/join http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-appdev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Fedora 16 - RHEL 5/6 Bacula RPM repository
I'm probably confused, but why is the rpm adding user/group 33, rather than 133? __Martin On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 13:56:15 +0100, Simone Caronni said: Sorry, those are the basis for fedora-usermgmt generation, the static uids associated with services can be found inside the setup package on any system. i.e. on my Fedora system: [slaanesh@3zpc0560 ~]$ rpm -qd setup /usr/share/doc/setup-2.8.36/COPYING /usr/share/doc/setup-2.8.36/uidgid [slaanesh@3zpc0560 ~]$ cat /usr/share/doc/setup-2.8.36/uidgid | grep bacula bacula133 133 /var/spool/bacula /sbin/nologin bacula Regards, --Simone On 19 December 2011 09:29, Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, what do you mean it is a pratical joke or a time bomb? In the links I've pasted there's also the Fedora user registry for uids/gids, it is at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageUserRegistry Remember this is a Fedora package and not a package for everyone, so it follows those guidelines. I will come back here in the next days if I'm allowed to remove the fedora-usermgmt requirements in the package. Regards, --Simone On 17 December 2011 16:10, Geert Stappers geert.stapp...@vanadgroup.com wrote: Op 20111215 om 16:40 schreef Joseph L. Casale: It is not a requirement but a recommendation inside the Fedora packaging guidelines: Right:) Not EL requirements. I could try to remove that and put standard useradd / userdel commands, but I need to assess the change with the other Bacula mantainers and good reasons to do so. Is there any particular requirement on why you would like to avoid using fedora-usermgmt? Mainly for the reason that as an EL shop, its a tough sale to 'suggest' as we haven't ever used those packages, now we should. I'd be pretty surprised if any el shop uses any fedora packages even if it is only wrappers like these. We are talking about } } /usr/sbin/fedora-groupadd 33 -r bacula /dev/null || : } } /usr/sbin/fedora-useradd 33 -r -s /sbin/nologin -d /var/spool/bacula -M \ } } -c 'Bacula Backup System' -g bacula bacula /dev/null || : } } } } It is used to create predictable user / group assignment + some other } } features like logging, etc. I'm sure of it is a pratical joke or a time bomb. The information I miss, is where id 33 is reserved / claimed / registered. Any package could do /usr/sbin/fedora-groupadd 33 -r anotherpackagename /dev/null || : So at which central place are user id and group ids for packages documented? Groeten Geert Stappers -- Learn Windows Azure Live! Tuesday, Dec 13, 2011 Microsoft is holding a special Learn Windows Azure training event for developers. It will provide a great way to learn Windows Azure and what it provides. You can attend the event by watching it streamed LIVE online. Learn more at http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-windowsazure ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users -- You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of the shore (R. W. Emerson). -- You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of the shore (R. W. Emerson). -- Write once. Port to many. Get the SDK and tools to simplify cross-platform app development. Create new or port existing apps to sell to consumers worldwide. Explore the Intel AppUpSM program developer opportunity. appdeveloper.intel.com/join http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-appdev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users -- Write once. Port to many. Get the SDK and tools to simplify cross-platform app development. Create new or port existing apps to sell to consumers worldwide. Explore the Intel AppUpSM program developer opportunity. appdeveloper.intel.com/join http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-appdev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Fedora 16 - RHEL 5/6 Bacula RPM repository
Hello, fedora-usermgmt adds 33 + the baseuid defined in his config files, the latest RPM without it uses 133 as a static uid. Regards, --Simone On Dec 20, 2011 8:53 PM, Martin Simmons mar...@lispworks.com wrote: I'm probably confused, but why is the rpm adding user/group 33, rather than 133? __Martin On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 13:56:15 +0100, Simone Caronni said: Sorry, those are the basis for fedora-usermgmt generation, the static uids associated with services can be found inside the setup package on any system. i.e. on my Fedora system: [slaanesh@3zpc0560 ~]$ rpm -qd setup /usr/share/doc/setup-2.8.36/COPYING /usr/share/doc/setup-2.8.36/uidgid [slaanesh@3zpc0560 ~]$ cat /usr/share/doc/setup-2.8.36/uidgid | grep bacula bacula133 133 /var/spool/bacula /sbin/nologin bacula Regards, --Simone On 19 December 2011 09:29, Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, what do you mean it is a pratical joke or a time bomb? In the links I've pasted there's also the Fedora user registry for uids/gids, it is at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageUserRegistry Remember this is a Fedora package and not a package for everyone, so it follows those guidelines. I will come back here in the next days if I'm allowed to remove the fedora-usermgmt requirements in the package. Regards, --Simone On 17 December 2011 16:10, Geert Stappers geert.stapp...@vanadgroup.com wrote: Op 20111215 om 16:40 schreef Joseph L. Casale: It is not a requirement but a recommendation inside the Fedora packaging guidelines: Right:) Not EL requirements. I could try to remove that and put standard useradd / userdel commands, but I need to assess the change with the other Bacula mantainers and good reasons to do so. Is there any particular requirement on why you would like to avoid using fedora-usermgmt? Mainly for the reason that as an EL shop, its a tough sale to 'suggest' as we haven't ever used those packages, now we should. I'd be pretty surprised if any el shop uses any fedora packages even if it is only wrappers like these. We are talking about } } /usr/sbin/fedora-groupadd 33 -r bacula /dev/null || : } } /usr/sbin/fedora-useradd 33 -r -s /sbin/nologin -d /var/spool/bacula -M \ } } -c 'Bacula Backup System' -g bacula bacula /dev/null || : } } } } It is used to create predictable user / group assignment + some other } } features like logging, etc. I'm sure of it is a pratical joke or a time bomb. The information I miss, is where id 33 is reserved / claimed / registered. Any package could do /usr/sbin/fedora-groupadd 33 -r anotherpackagename /dev/null || : So at which central place are user id and group ids for packages documented? Groeten Geert Stappers -- Learn Windows Azure Live! Tuesday, Dec 13, 2011 Microsoft is holding a special Learn Windows Azure training event for developers. It will provide a great way to learn Windows Azure and what it provides. You can attend the event by watching it streamed LIVE online. Learn more at http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-windowsazure ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users -- You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of the shore (R. W. Emerson). -- You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of the shore (R. W. Emerson). -- Write once. Port to many. Get the SDK and tools to simplify cross-platform app development. Create new or port existing apps to sell to consumers worldwide. Explore the Intel AppUpSM program developer opportunity. appdeveloper.intel.com/join http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-appdev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users -- Write once. Port to many. Get the SDK and tools to simplify cross-platform app development. Create new or port existing apps to sell to consumers worldwide. Explore the Intel AppUpSM program developer opportunity. appdeveloper.intel.com/join http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-appdev___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Fedora 16 - RHEL 5/6 Bacula RPM repository
Hello, what do you mean it is a pratical joke or a time bomb? In the links I've pasted there's also the Fedora user registry for uids/gids, it is at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageUserRegistry Remember this is a Fedora package and not a package for everyone, so it follows those guidelines. I will come back here in the next days if I'm allowed to remove the fedora-usermgmt requirements in the package. Regards, --Simone On 17 December 2011 16:10, Geert Stappers geert.stapp...@vanadgroup.com wrote: Op 20111215 om 16:40 schreef Joseph L. Casale: It is not a requirement but a recommendation inside the Fedora packaging guidelines: Right:) Not EL requirements. I could try to remove that and put standard useradd / userdel commands, but I need to assess the change with the other Bacula mantainers and good reasons to do so. Is there any particular requirement on why you would like to avoid using fedora-usermgmt? Mainly for the reason that as an EL shop, its a tough sale to 'suggest' as we haven't ever used those packages, now we should. I'd be pretty surprised if any el shop uses any fedora packages even if it is only wrappers like these. We are talking about } } /usr/sbin/fedora-groupadd 33 -r bacula /dev/null || : } } /usr/sbin/fedora-useradd 33 -r -s /sbin/nologin -d /var/spool/bacula -M \ } } -c 'Bacula Backup System' -g bacula bacula /dev/null || : } } } } It is used to create predictable user / group assignment + some other } } features like logging, etc. I'm sure of it is a pratical joke or a time bomb. The information I miss, is where id 33 is reserved / claimed / registered. Any package could do /usr/sbin/fedora-groupadd 33 -r anotherpackagename /dev/null || : So at which central place are user id and group ids for packages documented? Groeten Geert Stappers -- Learn Windows Azure Live! Tuesday, Dec 13, 2011 Microsoft is holding a special Learn Windows Azure training event for developers. It will provide a great way to learn Windows Azure and what it provides. You can attend the event by watching it streamed LIVE online. Learn more at http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-windowsazure ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users -- You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of the shore (R. W. Emerson). -- Learn Windows Azure Live! Tuesday, Dec 13, 2011 Microsoft is holding a special Learn Windows Azure training event for developers. It will provide a great way to learn Windows Azure and what it provides. You can attend the event by watching it streamed LIVE online. Learn more at http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-windowsazure ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Fedora 16 - RHEL 5/6 Bacula RPM repository
Op 20111215 om 16:40 schreef Joseph L. Casale: It is not a requirement but a recommendation inside the Fedora packaging guidelines: Right:) Not EL requirements. I could try to remove that and put standard useradd / userdel commands, but I need to assess the change with the other Bacula mantainers and good reasons to do so. Is there any particular requirement on why you would like to avoid using fedora-usermgmt? Mainly for the reason that as an EL shop, its a tough sale to 'suggest' as we haven't ever used those packages, now we should. I'd be pretty surprised if any el shop uses any fedora packages even if it is only wrappers like these. We are talking about } } /usr/sbin/fedora-groupadd 33 -r bacula /dev/null || : } } /usr/sbin/fedora-useradd 33 -r -s /sbin/nologin -d /var/spool/bacula -M \ } } -c 'Bacula Backup System' -g bacula bacula /dev/null || : } } } } It is used to create predictable user / group assignment + some other } } features like logging, etc. I'm sure of it is a pratical joke or a time bomb. The information I miss, is where id 33 is reserved / claimed / registered. Any package could do /usr/sbin/fedora-groupadd 33 -r anotherpackagename /dev/null || : So at which central place are user id and group ids for packages documented? Groeten Geert Stappers -- Learn Windows Azure Live! Tuesday, Dec 13, 2011 Microsoft is holding a special Learn Windows Azure training event for developers. It will provide a great way to learn Windows Azure and what it provides. You can attend the event by watching it streamed LIVE online. Learn more at http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-windowsazure ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Fedora 16 - RHEL 5/6 Bacula RPM repository
I'm happy to address all the package issues people might encounter and I'm available to ideas or constructive criticism regarding choices or features missing. When I will get enough feedback that the approach used inside the package is right I will try to see if some patches could be integrated in the base code by pushing them to the bacula-devel mailing list. Simone, Thanks for doing this and one question, why the dependency on fedora-usermgmt? First I have seen of bacula packages needing it so I find it hard to believe Its genuinely important? -- 10 Tips for Better Server Consolidation Server virtualization is being driven by many needs. But none more important than the need to reduce IT complexity while improving strategic productivity. Learn More! http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sdnl/114/51507609/ ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Fedora 16 - RHEL 5/6 Bacula RPM repository
Hello, I've updated the package on top of what is currently in Fedora. In there we have this post scriptlet: %pre common /usr/sbin/fedora-groupadd 33 -r bacula /dev/null || : /usr/sbin/fedora-useradd 33 -r -s /sbin/nologin -d /var/spool/bacula -M \ -c 'Bacula Backup System' -g bacula bacula /dev/null || : It is used to create predictable user / group assignment + some other features like logging, etc. It is not a requirement but a recommendation inside the Fedora packaging guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/UserCreation http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageUserCreation The package itself is in Fedora and Epel as well, so adding Bacula should not be a problem: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=1716 I could try to remove that and put standard useradd / userdel commands, but I need to assess the change with the other Bacula mantainers and good reasons to do so. Is there any particular requirement on why you would like to avoid using fedora-usermgmt? Thanks, --Simone On 15 December 2011 15:42, Joseph L. Casale jcas...@activenetwerx.com wrote: I'm happy to address all the package issues people might encounter and I'm available to ideas or constructive criticism regarding choices or features missing. When I will get enough feedback that the approach used inside the package is right I will try to see if some patches could be integrated in the base code by pushing them to the bacula-devel mailing list. Simone, Thanks for doing this and one question, why the dependency on fedora-usermgmt? First I have seen of bacula packages needing it so I find it hard to believe Its genuinely important? -- 10 Tips for Better Server Consolidation Server virtualization is being driven by many needs. But none more important than the need to reduce IT complexity while improving strategic productivity. Learn More! http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sdnl/114/51507609/ ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users -- You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of the shore (R. W. Emerson). -- 10 Tips for Better Server Consolidation Server virtualization is being driven by many needs. But none more important than the need to reduce IT complexity while improving strategic productivity. Learn More! http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sdnl/114/51507609/ ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Fedora 16 - RHEL 5/6 Bacula RPM repository
It is not a requirement but a recommendation inside the Fedora packaging guidelines: Right:) Not EL requirements. I could try to remove that and put standard useradd / userdel commands, but I need to assess the change with the other Bacula mantainers and good reasons to do so. Is there any particular requirement on why you would like to avoid using fedora-usermgmt? Mainly for the reason that as an EL shop, its a tough sale to 'suggest' as we haven't ever used those packages, now we should. I'd be pretty surprised if any el shop uses any fedora packages even if it is only wrappers like these. Anyway, thanks again! jlc -- 10 Tips for Better Server Consolidation Server virtualization is being driven by many needs. But none more important than the need to reduce IT complexity while improving strategic productivity. Learn More! http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sdnl/114/51507609/ ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Fedora 16 - RHEL 5/6 Bacula RPM repository
On 06.12.2011 18:06, Simone Caronni wrote: Hello, the company I was working for has been a Bacula customer for some years and went through many iterations with the Bacula developer themselves to fix and change the Enterprise Edition behaviour when we moved away from the Community Version. Their support was awesome. Now I've changed job and I've been recently accepted as Bacula co-mantainer in Fedora. I've given a spin to the current Bacula packages in rawhide and rebuilt them for RHEL 5/6 and Fedora 16. So far, compared to the last packages in Fedora (5.0.3) this is what is implemented: - Nagios plugin. - Removal of bwxconsole, gnome-console and tray-monitor. - Removal of sqlite2. - Added html docs. - Reduced the number of patches. - Made bat compile only on platforms that provide QT = 4.6.2 (this and systemd are the ifs for building on all releases). - Enablement of bpipe-fd.so. - Converged all the storage backends thanks to the work introduced in 5.2. - Fix some file layout and dependency by moving files between packages. - POSIX.1e capabilities. - Enablement of libtool. Right now I'm still doing some cleanup. The next things I would like to implement are: - QT tray monitor packaging. - Additional cleanup (i.e. the nagios plugin needs only a library, not all bacula-common files, commands and directories). - Provide a simple but still secure configuration by default. - Fix all the logging by putting /var/log/bacula where appropriate. I'm hosting the repository at: http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula/ The following architectures are supported: RHEL5/ppc RHEL5/x86_64 RHEL5/i386 RHEL6/ppc64 RHEL6/x86_64 RHEL6/i386 Fedora-16/i386 Fedora-16/x86_64 I'm happy to address all the package issues people might encounter and I'm available to ideas or constructive criticism regarding choices or features missing. When I will get enough feedback that the approach used inside the package is right I will try to see if some patches could be integrated in the base code by pushing them to the bacula-devel mailing list. Thanks regards, --Simone Hi Simone! First of all, thank you for the repository! I'm trying to use epel-5 repository on Centos 5.2, but I get this error: http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula/epel-5/i386/repodata/2472fc8e3db92dc60426193ee172a9e6c7c0d6619f980d1ed5f16d79cc10b48a-primary.sqlite.gz: [Errno -3] Error performing checksum I am not an über yum master, but googling about it turned out something about the checksum algorithm. Is there something I can do in my server? -- Silver -- Cloud Computing - Latest Buzzword or a Glimpse of the Future? This paper surveys cloud computing today: What are the benefits? Why are businesses embracing it? What are its payoffs and pitfalls? http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sdnl/114/51425149/ ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Fedora 16 - RHEL 5/6 Bacula RPM repository
I'm trying to use epel-5 repository on Centos 5.2, but I get this error: http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula/epel-5/i386/repodata/2472fc8e3db92dc60426193ee172a9e6c7c0d6619f980d1ed5f16d79cc10b48a-primary.sqlite.gz: [Errno -3] Error performing checksum I am not an über yum master, but googling about it turned out something about the checksum algorithm. Is there something I can do in my server? Hello, I cannot reproduce the problem, I tested the repository and it works for me. Repository metadata is generated automatically, so there's not much I can do. Have you tried issuing a yum clean all and retrying? 5.2 is very old and unsupported even by the 5.2.z channel upstream, I think you might need to update to at least 5.3 to get the sha256sums used in the new (from 2009 onwards) createrepo that's in RHEL: http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.3 http://skvidal.wordpress.com/2009/02/19/yum-createrepo-hashlib-rhel5centos5-and-sha256sums/ I suggest you to upgrade to 5.7, but if you want to update yum/rpm only just follow the first steps in the CentOS 5.3 release notes. BTW; I made a few changes to the repository, they are in the changelogs. Regards, --Simone -- You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of the shore (R. W. Emerson). -- Cloud Computing - Latest Buzzword or a Glimpse of the Future? This paper surveys cloud computing today: What are the benefits? Why are businesses embracing it? What are its payoffs and pitfalls? http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sdnl/114/51425149/ ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Fedora 16 - RHEL 5/6 Bacula RPM repository
On 14.12.2011 11:50, Simone Caronni wrote: I'm trying to use epel-5 repository on Centos 5.2, but I get this error: http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula/epel-5/i386/repodata/2472fc8e3db92dc60426193ee172a9e6c7c0d6619f980d1ed5f16d79cc10b48a-primary.sqlite.gz: [Errno -3] Error performing checksum I am not an über yum master, but googling about it turned out something about the checksum algorithm. Is there something I can do in my server? Hello, I cannot reproduce the problem, I tested the repository and it works for me. Repository metadata is generated automatically, so there's not much I can do. Have you tried issuing a yum clean all and retrying? 5.2 is very old and unsupported even by the 5.2.z channel upstream, I think you might need to update to at least 5.3 to get the sha256sums used in the new (from 2009 onwards) createrepo that's in RHEL: http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.3 http://skvidal.wordpress.com/2009/02/19/yum-createrepo-hashlib-rhel5centos5-and-sha256sums/ I suggest you to upgrade to 5.7, but if you want to update yum/rpm only just follow the first steps in the CentOS 5.3 release notes. BTW; I made a few changes to the repository, they are in the changelogs. Regards, --Simone I installed python-hashlib, but now I get some error about compression. I just downloaded the individual packages and installed them that way. Additionally I had to download fedora-usermgmt-* from elsewhere. Thanks anyway! -- Silver -- Cloud Computing - Latest Buzzword or a Glimpse of the Future? This paper surveys cloud computing today: What are the benefits? Why are businesses embracing it? What are its payoffs and pitfalls? http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sdnl/114/51425149/ ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Fedora 16 - RHEL 5/6 Bacula RPM repository
On 06/12/11 17:06, Simone Caronni wrote: I'm hosting the repository at: http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula/ I have no permission to http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula/RPM-GPG-KEY-slaanesh so I can't install the packages. Could you please correct it. -- Erik. -- Cloud Computing - Latest Buzzword or a Glimpse of the Future? This paper surveys cloud computing today: What are the benefits? Why are businesses embracing it? What are its payoffs and pitfalls? http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sdnl/114/51425149/ ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Fedora 16 - RHEL 5/6 Bacula RPM repository
Fixed, sorry. You can anyway pass --disablegpg to yum to avoid the key checking. Regards, --Simone On 14 December 2011 16:27, Erik P. Olsen epod...@gmail.com wrote: On 06/12/11 17:06, Simone Caronni wrote: I'm hosting the repository at: http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula/ I have no permission to http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula/RPM-GPG-KEY-slaanesh so I can't install the packages. Could you please correct it. -- Erik. -- You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of the shore (R. W. Emerson). -- Cloud Computing - Latest Buzzword or a Glimpse of the Future? This paper surveys cloud computing today: What are the benefits? Why are businesses embracing it? What are its payoffs and pitfalls? http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sdnl/114/51425149/ ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Fedora 16 - RHEL 5/6 Bacula RPM repository
You're welcome! I'm updating right now RHEL 6 packages and I've added RHEL 4 packages. Let me know if you have any issue. Regards, --Simone On 7 December 2011 14:48, Rodrigo Renie Braga rodrigore...@gmail.comwrote: This is AWESOME, thank you very much! 2011/12/6 Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com Hello, the company I was working for has been a Bacula customer for some years and went through many iterations with the Bacula developer themselves to fix and change the Enterprise Edition behaviour when we moved away from the Community Version. Their support was awesome. Now I've changed job and I've been recently accepted as Bacula co-mantainer in Fedora. I've given a spin to the current Bacula packages in rawhide and rebuilt them for RHEL 5/6 and Fedora 16. So far, compared to the last packages in Fedora (5.0.3) this is what is implemented: - Nagios plugin. - Removal of bwxconsole, gnome-console and tray-monitor. - Removal of sqlite2. - Added html docs. - Reduced the number of patches. - Made bat compile only on platforms that provide QT = 4.6.2 (this and systemd are the ifs for building on all releases). - Enablement of bpipe-fd.so. - Converged all the storage backends thanks to the work introduced in 5.2. - Fix some file layout and dependency by moving files between packages. - POSIX.1e capabilities. - Enablement of libtool. Right now I'm still doing some cleanup. The next things I would like to implement are: - QT tray monitor packaging. - Additional cleanup (i.e. the nagios plugin needs only a library, not all bacula-common files, commands and directories). - Provide a simple but still secure configuration by default. - Fix all the logging by putting /var/log/bacula where appropriate. I'm hosting the repository at: http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula/ The following architectures are supported: RHEL5/ppc RHEL5/x86_64 RHEL5/i386 RHEL6/ppc64 RHEL6/x86_64 RHEL6/i386 Fedora-16/i386 Fedora-16/x86_64 I'm happy to address all the package issues people might encounter and I'm available to ideas or constructive criticism regarding choices or features missing. When I will get enough feedback that the approach used inside the package is right I will try to see if some patches could be integrated in the base code by pushing them to the bacula-devel mailing list. Thanks regards, --Simone -- You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of the shore (R. W. Emerson). -- Cloud Services Checklist: Pricing and Packaging Optimization This white paper is intended to serve as a reference, checklist and point of discussion for anyone considering optimizing the pricing and packaging model of a cloud services business. Read Now! http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51491232/ ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users -- You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of the shore (R. W. Emerson). -- Cloud Services Checklist: Pricing and Packaging Optimization This white paper is intended to serve as a reference, checklist and point of discussion for anyone considering optimizing the pricing and packaging model of a cloud services business. Read Now! http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51491232/___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
