Re: [Bacula-users] backup for a new machine way too small

2009-11-20 Thread Bruno Friedmann
Forget to say that if your image are uncompressed tif for example they can be 
compressed 10/12 times.
So 3GB could become something aroud 300MB ...

Toni Mueller wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I just added a new machine to my backup set and tried to run a full
> backup. The machine is basically configured like any other, in terms of
> what Bacula has to say, but the "compression ratio" was _much_ too good
> to be true (~250MB instead of 3 GB, most of it being images). Bacula
> claimed that the backup ran OK.
> 
> My backups go to disk, with one job = one file, roughly named
> "__".
> 
> I didn't manage to find out what files are actually in a given backup
> file, like outlined above. It would be sufficient for me to be able to
> use something like 'restore' from the ufsdump package, but I didn't
> find my way around 'bconsole' to achieve something similar. I also
> tried 'bat', but when I clicked on what I thought was the FileSet
> explorer (?), it simply hung after some 15-20 minutes (?), with
> three windows in solid grey (no buttons, diagrams, nothing).
> 
> These are two Debian/Lenny machines with bacula 2.4.4.
> 


-- 

 Bruno Friedmann


--
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] backup for a new machine way too small

2009-11-20 Thread Bruno Friedmann
Toni Mueller wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I just added a new machine to my backup set and tried to run a full
> backup. The machine is basically configured like any other, in terms of
> what Bacula has to say, but the "compression ratio" was _much_ too good
> to be true (~250MB instead of 3 GB, most of it being images). Bacula
> claimed that the backup ran OK.
> 
> My backups go to disk, with one job = one file, roughly named
> "__".
> 
> I didn't manage to find out what files are actually in a given backup
> file, like outlined above. It would be sufficient for me to be able to
> use something like 'restore' from the ufsdump package, but I didn't
> find my way around 'bconsole' to achieve something similar. I also
> tried 'bat', but when I clicked on what I thought was the FileSet
> explorer (?), it simply hung after some 15-20 minutes (?), with
> three windows in solid grey (no buttons, diagrams, nothing).
> 
> These are two Debian/Lenny machines with bacula 2.4.4.
> 
> 
> Kind regards,
> --Toni++
Hi Toni, I think your right about the compression.

Find your way as like this
bconsole
restore
choose choice 5
select your client
and it will build the tree backuped.
so you can navigate inside to see what's have been saved without really restore 
data.
cd ls etc .. are your friends

-- 

 Bruno Friedmann


--
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users