Re: Crucifixion of Jesus Christ

2008-01-18 Thread Brent Poirier Attorney

Gilberto wrote:
But then does it make sense to say that they eventually crucified
that divine Spirit, the Word of God? Wouldn't these terms apply to
the spiritual aspect?

I think that here, the Master is referring to Jesus by these terms, 
rather than only referring to His spiritual aspect; just as Muslims (and 
Baha'u'llah) often refer to Jesus as Ruhullah i.e. The Spirit.


But doesn't the Quran say that Jesus, the Son of Mary was not
crucified? Wouldn't this term apply to the physical part of his body?
The human part?

This is not the only instance in the Muslim, Jewish or Christian 
scriptures where an event seems to be presented physically, where the 
Baha'i Writings say that nonetheless, the intent is entirely spiritual. 
Other examples would be, Moses striking the rock in the wilderness, the 
brothers of Joseph appearing before Him, Jesus raising the widow's son 
from the dead, Jesus giving bread to His disciples after His 
crucifixion.  All of these are presented in the Scriptures as physical 
events, but the Baha'i Writings give an allegorical / spiritual 
interpretation to them; and it is further my understanding that they 
never occurred in the physical sense.


Brent





The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto (e-mail) is sent 
by the Johnson County Community College (JCCC) and is intended to be confidential and 
for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by 
federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message 
is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please 
immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message 
and any attachments thereto. Thank you.


__


You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Crucifixion of Jesus Christ

2008-01-18 Thread Gilberto Simpson
On Jan 18, 2008 4:54 AM, Brent Poirier Attorney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Gilberto wrote:
  But then does it make sense to say that they eventually crucified
 that divine Spirit, the Word of God? Wouldn't these terms apply to
 the spiritual aspect?

 I think that here, the Master is referring to Jesus by these terms,
 rather than only referring to His spiritual aspect; just as Muslims (and
 Baha'u'llah) often refer to Jesus as Ruhullah i.e. The Spirit.

So are you saying that in this passage where it refers to Jesus as
that divine Spirit it is actually refering to Jesus in his physical
aspect?


  But doesn't the Quran say that Jesus, the Son of Mary was not
 crucified? Wouldn't this term apply to the physical part of his body?
 The human part?

 This is not the only instance in the Muslim, Jewish or Christian
 scriptures where an event seems to be presented physically, where the
 Baha'i Writings say that nonetheless, the intent is entirely spiritual.

I didn't think it was really a big issue. Of course, in general,  some
passages are physical, some are spiriual, some are both, etc. But
since this is an example where Christians, Muslims and Bahais will
mostly disagree about which is which, it might be worth studying more
closely and being more careful.

-G


 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto (e-mail) 
is sent by the Johnson County Community College (JCCC) and is intended to be 
confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The 
information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts 
or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and 
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Crucifixion of Jesus Christ

2008-01-18 Thread Gilberto Simpson
On Jan 18, 2008 2:53 PM, firestorm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 gilberto,
  :-)
   after i recalled ur skillset, ur reasoning becomes crystal.

I certainly don't feel understood. I do feel patronized by your
comments about my skillset. I don't think your use of math/techie
analogies is helpful or conducive to communication.

  excuse me if i am replying to the wrong thread, but i would offer u these:


   :Just because there are good decent
 people who are Christian doesn't prove that the Bible is a perfectly
 authentic text.
  that is not the thing being proved.

I really think you should let the other participants of the thread
speak for themselves on what they were trying to prove, especially if
you are wondering whether you are replying to the wrong thread (you
were). Hajir actually did try to argue that The Bible narrative
cannot be wrong.

  the question was is the Book availablenot the Bible. saying Bible = 
 Book has the arrow backwards.
allow me to try it this way.

I'll allow Hajir to speak for himself.

  All of the Book of Algorithm's that people can make operational during that 
 time segment is inside the set of Algorhythms in the Bible.
whether the operations are performed properly is not determined by the 
 Algorhythm, but by the human operator.
the operators in the Algorhythms are proven by having human operators 
 be able to use Them.
   that many humans choose to mis-transcribe them is not evidence abut the 
 Algorthythm.
  the fact that randomly pushing buttons on a t-83 will yield gibberish has 
 nothing to do with whether standard deviation to at least 2s is hardwired 
 into a t83.


I think it makes sense for you to start over with a new thread which
clearly states whatever it is you want to share. I don't think that it
makes sense for you to grab some phrases from a completely different
conversation, rip them from their context, and respond to things I'm
not sure that any of the previous participanats intended. If you
actually read the thread, Hajir was defending the Bible as a source of
propositional truth, specifically about the crucifixion. Not as a
source of algorithms

  thus:
 Those who follow the messenger, the Prophet who can neither read
  nor write, whom they will find described in the Torah and the Gospel (which
  are) with them.
   now, what matters in Torah, Gospel and Qu'ran is what works.
Baha'u'llah, to my poor memory, uses the expression that which is 
 conducive as the name of this metric.


There might be a few restricted situations where I'd be willing to go
along with a pragmatic notion of truth but I don't think this is one
of them. The true nature of the crucifixion isn't something which can
be setlled by the behavior of Christians 2000 years later.


  or another tack:
 the set of equines includes mules. if we attempt to use mules to breed mules 
 we will fail. this says nothing about the set of equines  or the reality of 
 mules, or whether mules are equines.

If you are really trying to communicate something you should put a
little work into saying how you think this analogy applies to the
conversation at hand.


 :I think it is more faithful and more
 appropriate to draw the line between appearance/reality.
   imho that's a false taxonomy.

How?

   euclid's 5th will appear to be reality as long as we have a planee.
   and when we do, the 5th is real.
   when we don;t, it's not.

I don't think we have the same understanding of geometry so I don't
think your analogy is useful. My comment about appearance/reality was
specifically about understanding the crucifixion from an Islamic
perspective. It wasn't meant to be general principle I Would want to
apply willy nilly to everything from Christian theology to Euclidiean
geometry.I also don't think that Euclidean vs. non-Euclidean geometry
is an issue of appearance vs. reality in the way you seem to be taking
it.

-G


 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto (e-mail) 
is sent by the Johnson County Community College (JCCC) and is intended to be 
confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The 
information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts 
or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and 
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:

Re: Crucifixion of Jesus Christ

2008-01-18 Thread firestorm
gilberto,
 :-)
  after i recalled ur skillset, ur reasoning becomes crystal.
 excuse me if i am replying to the wrong thread, but i would offer u these:

  :Just because there are good decent
people who are Christian doesn't prove that the Bible is a perfectly
authentic text.
 that is not the thing being proved.
 the question was is the Book availablenot the Bible. saying Bible = 
Book has the arrow backwards.
   allow me to try it this way.
 All of the Book of Algorithm's that people can make operational during that 
time segment is inside the set of Algorhythms in the Bible.
   whether the operations are performed properly is not determined by the 
Algorhythm, but by the human operator.
   the operators in the Algorhythms are proven by having human operators be 
able to use Them.
  that many humans choose to mis-transcribe them is not evidence abut the 
Algorthythm.
 the fact that randomly pushing buttons on a t-83 will yield gibberish has 
nothing to do with whether standard deviation to at least 2s is hardwired into 
a t83.
 thus:
Those who follow the messenger, the Prophet who can neither read
 nor write, whom they will find described in the Torah and the Gospel (which
 are) with them.
  now, what matters in Torah, Gospel and Qu'ran is what works.
   Baha'u'llah, to my poor memory, uses the expression that which is 
conducive as the name of this metric.
   
 i hear an underlying pov in all this...that something must be right and if 
it isn;t right it's wrong
  and we're back to derrida:-)
  
 or another tack:
the set of equines includes mules. if we attempt to use mules to breed mules we 
will fail. this says nothing about the set of equines  or the reality of mules, 
or whether mules are equines.

:I think it is more faithful and more
appropriate to draw the line between appearance/reality.
  imho that's a false taxonomy.
  euclid's 5th will appear to be reality as long as we have a planee.
  and when we do, the 5th is real.
  when we don;t, it's not.
   now..is the 5th a spiritual principle, a physical event, an appearance, or a 
reality?

  how much is pi? :-)


 
   
   

 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto (e-mail) 
is sent by the Johnson County Community College (JCCC) and is intended to be 
confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The 
information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts 
or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and 
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Crucifixion of Jesus Christ

2008-01-18 Thread Scott Saylors
You can breed a male mule. It's called a Jack. It will be sterile however and 
incapable of breeding anything.

Regards,
Scott

firestorm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: gilberto,
 :-)
  after i recalled ur skillset, ur reasoning becomes crystal.
 excuse me if i am replying to the wrong thread, but i would offer u these:

  :Just because there are good decent
people who are Christian doesn't prove that the Bible is a perfectly
authentic text.
 that is not the thing being proved.
 the question was is the Book availablenot the Bible. saying Bible = 
Book has the arrow backwards.
   allow me to try it this way.
 All of the Book of Algorithm's that people can make operational during that 
time segment is inside the set of Algorhythms in the Bible.
   whether the operations are performed properly is not determined by the 
Algorhythm, but by the human operator.
   the operators in the Algorhythms are proven by having human operators be 
able to use Them.
  that many humans choose to mis-transcribe them is not evidence abut the 
Algorthythm.
 the fact that randomly pushing buttons on a t-83 will yield gibberish has 
nothing to do with whether standard deviation to at least 2s is hardwired into 
a t83.
 thus:
Those who follow the messenger, the Prophet who can neither read
 nor write, whom they will find described in the Torah and the Gospel (which
 are) with them.
  now, what matters in Torah, Gospel and Qu'ran is what works.
   Baha'u'llah, to my poor memory, uses the expression that which is 
conducive as the name of this metric.
   
 i hear an underlying pov in all this...that something must be right and if 
it isn;t right it's wrong
  and we're back to derrida:-)
  
 or another tack:
the set of equines includes mules. if we attempt to use mules to breed mules we 
will fail. this says nothing about the set of equines  or the reality of mules, 
or whether mules are equines.

:I think it is more faithful and more
appropriate to draw the line between appearance/reality.
  imho that's a false taxonomy.
  euclid's 5th will appear to be reality as long as we have a planee.
  and when we do, the 5th is real.
  when we don;t, it's not.
   now..is the 5th a spiritual principle, a physical event, an appearance, or a 
reality?

  how much is pi? :-)


 
   
   

 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto (e-mail) 
is sent by the Johnson County Community College (JCCC) and is intended to be 
confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The 
information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts 
or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and 
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu



Military SF technothriller, Sword of the Dajjal, e-book from 
http://www.booksforabuck.com/sfpages/sf_07/sword_dajjal.html
http://www.fictionwise.com/eBooks/eBook47261.htm?cached (later in the year in 
print)
Erotic paranormal thriller Jars of Doom, out from Blu Phi#39;er 2008.
I BLog!: http://cscottsaylorsbooks.blogspot.com/

 

__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu

re: the needs of the age you live in ?

2008-01-18 Thread firestorm
but..
 but/..

:-)
:-)

 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto (e-mail) 
is sent by the Johnson County Community College (JCCC) and is intended to be 
confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The 
information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts 
or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and 
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Is cremation for animals allowed?

2008-01-18 Thread David Friedman
I had a look at the passages on cremation, and while I can't find anything 
direct it looks to me like the following indicates Baha'is should not cremate 
pets:
 
Concerning your question about cremation, the Baha'i law stipulates burial. The 
instructions of Baha'u'llah contained in His Most Holy book makes this law 
clear. Shoghi Effendi, in a letter written on his behalf to an individual 
believer in 1955, comments that 'Abdu'l-Baha '. . . also explained that burial 
is natural and should be followed.' The explanation of the Master referred to 
by Shoghi Effendi is found in the Tablets revealed by Him. One of those was 
published in Star of the West, Volume XI, No. 19, page 317, from which we 
quote:  
 Thy letter has been received. Due to the scarcity of time, I write the 
answer briefly: The body of man, which has been formed gradually, must 
similarly be decomposed gradually. This is according to the real and natural 
order and Divine Law. If it had been better for it to be burned after death, in 
its very creation it would have been so planned that the body would 
automatically become ignited after death, be consumed and turned into ashes. 
But the divine order formulated by the heavenly ordinance is that after death 
this body shall be transferred from one stage to another different from the 
preceding one, so that according to the relations which exist in the world, it 
may gradually combine and mix with other elements, thus going through stages 
until it arrives in the vegetable kingdom, there turning into plants and 
flowers, developing into trees of the highest paradise, becoming perfumed and 
attaining the beauty of color.  
 Cremation suppresses it speedily from attainment to these 
transformations, the elements becoming so quickly decomposed that 
transformation to these various stages is checked.   
 [Bahá'í Library CD-ROM: National Spiritual Assembly: Dev. Distinctive Baha'i 
Comm. Ch. 18, Page: 4]
 
Going by the argument, since animals do not automatically become ignited when 
they die they should not be cremated.  Thoughts?
 
Regards,
David

 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto (e-mail) 
is sent by the Johnson County Community College (JCCC) and is intended to be 
confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The 
information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts 
or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and 
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
_
 

Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu