Re: House of Justice legislation

2006-04-21 Thread smaneck
> I recall reading somewhere -- the Priceless Pearl?  That when 
> Shoghi Effendi became the Guardian, the first thing he did was to 
> sit down and read all of the Writings at the World Centre.

Dear Brent, 

The only thing I recall along those lines is that Shoghi Effendi read 
all the sources in sight when he was composing God Passes By. That's a 
very different thing. 
> 
> I would not be surprised to learn that when new members are 
> elected to the House of Justice, there is a protocol for them to 
> become familiar with the unpublished Texts as well as with the 
> ongoing activities of the House of Justice.


I've never heard anyone suggest that there was such a protocol. 

  I assume that one of 
> the functions of the Research Department is to not only translate 
> the Writings, but as a preliminary, to summarize the Writings that 
> aren't yet translated; and that House members can request that 
> Department for a full translation when needed.  

I think Taherzadeh already gave us a summary. ;-} 

warmest, Susan 






 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") 
is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be 
confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The 
information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts 
or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and 
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: House of Justice legislation

2006-04-20 Thread Brent Poirier
I recall reading somewhere -- the Priceless Pearl?  That when Shoghi Effendi 
became the Guardian, the first thing he did was to sit down and read all of the 
Writings at the World Centre.

I would not be surprised to learn that when new members are elected to the 
House of Justice, there is a protocol for them to become familiar with the 
unpublished Texts as well as with the ongoing activities of the House of 
Justice.  I assume that one of the functions of the Research Department is to 
not only translate the Writings, but as a preliminary, to summarize the 
Writings that aren't yet translated; and that House members can request that 
Department for a full translation when needed.  

Moojan Momen's mother works in that Department; maybe he can shed some light on 
this.  

Brent

 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") 
is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be 
confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The 
information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts 
or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and 
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: House of Justice legislation

2006-04-18 Thread smaneck
"Well, not necessarily.  But it would be an enormous 
inconvenience for new members who didn't know the languages"

Dear David, 

I don't think you comprehend the difficulty in acquiring these 
languages. First off, this is a task best done when one is young and 
becomes increasingly difficult to do the older one gets. How old are 
most members of the House of Justice? After years of studying Arabic 
and Persian I am still nowhere near fluent and need a dictionary in 
hand to read just about anything. I only know one House member who was 
not a native speaker who learned to read these languages and that was 
Hooper Dunbar. He studied them while he was a pioneer in Argentina. 
Their workload could not possibly allow them to do this once they are 
elected. 

warmest, Susan 


 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") 
is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be 
confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The 
information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts 
or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and 
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: House of Justice legislation

2006-04-17 Thread David Friedman







Dear Susan,
>If they were required to do this wouldn't only those Baha'is who know>Persian and Arabic be eligible for membership on the Universal House>of Justice.Well, not necessarily.  But it would be an enormous inconvenience for new members who didn't know the languages!

>  "In not doing this I would think surely the possibility is opened up>for making wrong decisions because of potential errors from the>fallible research department.">>Have you been following our previous discussions? Some of us don't>think infallibility is about propositional inerrancy to begin with. It>is about making decisions in accord with spiritual principles. If the>Research Department fails to bring some passage to the House's>attention any believer is free to do so.I don't think my position on inerrancy is different to yours.  I believe that the House needs correct information to make its decisions and that not having this can change their advice.  I don't think this has any impact on their infallibility.
>:Also, someone on the list told us that the House of Justice,>even today, still gets sent new Tablets and such from believers. >Since the House is not a prophetic body, could they not make a>decision, only to find later that some previously unseen part of the>Writings contradicted this decision?">>Yes, and then they are free to change that decision.Agreed.
Regards,DavidBecome a fitness fanatic with  XtraMSN Health & Fitness! 




 
 

The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.



 
 

__



 



You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com

Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st

Baha'i Studies is available through the following:

Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu

Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st

News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st

Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist

Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net

New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu









Re: House of Justice legislation

2006-04-16 Thread Scott Saylors
David writes: " I originally assumed that House of Justice members would be required to undertake the onerous task of familiarising themselves with everything in the Writings, included all that is untranslated, in order to make their decisions.  For a reason I do not understand they are obviously not required to do this. "         David,  I am sure you have read Shoghi Effendi's comments on what the qualifications are to be elected to Baha`i office - including the House. If Shoghi Effendit did not require such massive knowledge, why should we?     Regards,  ScottDavid Friedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:  There's a question I've asked before, which
 I'm considering asking the House of Justice about.  I thought I'd pose it here again to see what answers I might get this time and whether people think my question is a good one to ask.  I was at a talk by Ali Nakhjavani a couple days ago, and he explained how the House makes decisions.  He said that the research department finds all passages in the Writings that have direct or indirect bearing on a question.  These passages are often going to be from untranslated Writings, which House of Justice members are not familiar with.  As we know, the Universal House of Justice is not a prophetic body, and their ability to make the right decision is dependent on getting the right information.  I originally assumed that House of Justice members would be required to undertake the onerous task of familiarising themselves with everything in the Writings, included all that is untranslated, in order to make their decisions.  For a reason
 I do not understand they are obviously not required to do this.  In not doing this I would think surely the possibility is opened up for making wrong decisions because of potential errors from the fallible research department.  Since the research department are not infallible, why couldn't they accidentally forget to include certain critical passages from the Writings on a subject the House asked them for information on, thus resulting in the House either making a ruling that IS revealed in the book or an incorrect ruling?  Certainly this would not make the House of Justice fallible, but I don't see why this couldn't happen?  Also, someone on the list told us that the House of Justice, even today, still gets sent new Tablets and such from believers.  Since the House is not a prophetic body, could they not make a decision, only to find later that some previously unseen part of the Writings contradicted this decision?  How does the House of
 Justice know that they are making a decision on something not outwardly revealed in the Book, given that "the Book" isn't, and never will be, entirely in their possession?     Regards,  DavidNeed a new job? Check out XtraMSN Careers         The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that
 retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.         __      You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the
 message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu 
As human beings, we are endowed with freedom of choice, and we cannot shuffle off our responsibility upon the shoulders of God or nature. We must shoulder it ourselves. It is our responsibility. Arnold J. Toynbee 
__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http:/

Re: House of Justice legislation

2006-04-16 Thread smaneck
"I was at a talk by Ali Nakhjavani a couple days ago, and he explained 
how the House makes decisions.  He said that the research 
department finds all passages in the Writings that have direct or 
indirect bearing on a question.  These passages are often 
going to be from untranslated Writings, which House of Justice members 
are not familiar with.  As we know, the Universal House of 
Justice is not a prophetic body, and their ability to make the 
right;decision is dependent on getting the right information.  I 
originally assumed that House of Justice members would be required 
to undertake the onerous task of familiarising themselves with 
everything in the Writings, included all that is untranslated, in 
order to make their decisions."

Dear David, 

How can anyone possibly know *everything* that is in the Writings? 

"For a reason I do not understand they are obviously not required to 
do this."

If they were required to do this wouldn't only those Baha'is who know 
Persian and Arabic be eligible for membership on the Universal House 
of Justice. 

 "In not doing this I would think surely the possibility is opened up 
for making wrong decisions because of potential errors from the 
fallible research department."

Have you been following our previous discussions? Some of us don't 
think infallibility is about propositional inerrancy to begin with. It 
is about making decisions in accord with spiritual principles. If the 
Research Department fails to bring some passage to the House's 
attention any believer is free to do so. 

:Also, someone on the list told us that the House of Justice, 
even today, still gets sent new Tablets and such from believers.  
Since the House is not a prophetic body, could they not make a 
decision, only to find later that some previously unseen part of the 
Writings contradicted this decision?"

Yes, and then they are free to change that decision. 

warmest, Susan 


 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") 
is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be 
confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The 
information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts 
or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and 
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


House of Justice legislation

2006-04-16 Thread David Friedman






There's a question I've asked before, which I'm considering asking the House of Justice about.  I thought I'd pose it here again to see what answers I might get this time and whether people think my question is a good one to ask.  I was at a talk by Ali Nakhjavani a couple days ago, and he explained how the House makes decisions.  He said that the research department finds all passages in the Writings that have direct or indirect bearing on a question.  These passages are often going to be from untranslated Writings, which House of Justice members are not familiar with.  As we know, the Universal House of Justice is not a prophetic body, and their ability to make the right decision is dependent on getting the right information.  I originally assumed that House of Justice members would be required 
to undertake the onerous task of familiarising themselves with everything in the Writings, included all that is untranslated, in order to make their decisions.  For a reason I do not understand they are obviously not required to do this.  In not doing this I would think surely the possibility is opened up for making wrong decisions because of potential errors from the fallible research department.  Since the research department are not infallible, why couldn't they accidentally forget to include certain critical passages from the Writings on a subject the House asked them for information on, thus resulting in the House either making a ruling that IS revealed in the book or an incorrect ruling?  Certainly this would not make the House of Justice fallible, but I don't see why this couldn't happen?  Also, someone on the list told us that the House of Justice, 
even today, still gets sent new Tablets and such from believers.  Since the House is not a prophetic body, could they not make a decision, only to find later that some previously unseen part of the Writings contradicted this decision?  How does the House of Justice know that they are making a decision on something not outwardly revealed in the Book, given that "the Book" isn't, and never will be, entirely in their possession?
 
Regards,
DavidNeed a new job? Check out  XtraMSN Careers 




 
 

The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.



 
 

__



 



You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com

Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st

Baha'i Studies is available through the following:

Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu

Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st

News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st

Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist

Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net

New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu