Re: [PATCH 2/3] dma: apbh: check for errors when resetting ip core
> > There is nothing a user could do in this case except asking a developer > > what could have happened? And that's the best option here. > > "MXS: Timeout resetting block via register . Please ask the > developer > for a solution" "You can do this by writing an email. Further information can be found here: http://www.wikihow.com/Write-an-Email-to-a-Friend"; Geez, but now we need to explain every browser on every platform... And that should be applied to every error message, oh noes! Jürgen, I certainly support your wish to have proper error messages. Yet, I also think there is a line somewhere to not state too obvious things? -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang| Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
Re: [PATCH 2/3] dma: apbh: check for errors when resetting ip core
Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 09:48:31AM +0100, Juergen Beisert wrote: > > Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 09:29:56AM +0100, Juergen Beisert wrote: > > > > Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang > > > > > --- > > > > > drivers/dma/apbh_dma.c |4 +++- > > > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/apbh_dma.c b/drivers/dma/apbh_dma.c > > > > > index 363878f..d30b8fb 100644 > > > > > --- a/drivers/dma/apbh_dma.c > > > > > +++ b/drivers/dma/apbh_dma.c > > > > > @@ -555,7 +555,9 @@ int mxs_dma_init(void) > > > > > int ret, channel; > > > > > u32 val, reg; > > > > > > > > > > - mxs_reset_block(apbh_regs, 0); > > > > > + ret = mxs_reset_block(apbh_regs, 0); > > > > > + if (ret) > > > > > + return ret; > > > > > > > > In this case the user faces a "MXS: Timeout resetting block via > > > > register ...". Do you think this message is helpful to give the user > > > > a pointer *where* the failure happens? > > > > > > Yes, since it points to the IP core which was used here. Which again, > > > makes clear which driver was trying to reset the IP core. > > > > You mean the reported register offset points to the corresponding IP > > core? > > Yes, sure. Otherwise the error message would be useless :) > > > But also Barebox has more users than developers. > > There is nothing a user could do in this case except asking a developer > what could have happened? And that's the best option here. "MXS: Timeout resetting block via register . Please ask the developer for a solution" :)) jbe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Juergen Beisert | Linux Solutions for Science and Industry | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | ___ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
Re: [PATCH 2/3] dma: apbh: check for errors when resetting ip core
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 09:48:31AM +0100, Juergen Beisert wrote: > Wolfram Sang wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 09:29:56AM +0100, Juergen Beisert wrote: > > > Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang > > > > --- > > > > drivers/dma/apbh_dma.c |4 +++- > > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/apbh_dma.c b/drivers/dma/apbh_dma.c > > > > index 363878f..d30b8fb 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/dma/apbh_dma.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/dma/apbh_dma.c > > > > @@ -555,7 +555,9 @@ int mxs_dma_init(void) > > > > int ret, channel; > > > > u32 val, reg; > > > > > > > > - mxs_reset_block(apbh_regs, 0); > > > > + ret = mxs_reset_block(apbh_regs, 0); > > > > + if (ret) > > > > + return ret; > > > > > > In this case the user faces a "MXS: Timeout resetting block via register > > > ...". Do you think this message is helpful to give the user a pointer > > > *where* the failure happens? > > > > Yes, since it points to the IP core which was used here. Which again, > > makes clear which driver was trying to reset the IP core. > > You mean the reported register offset points to the corresponding IP core? Yes, sure. Otherwise the error message would be useless :) > But also Barebox has more users than developers. There is nothing a user could do in this case except asking a developer what could have happened? And that's the best option here. -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang| Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
Re: [PATCH 2/3] dma: apbh: check for errors when resetting ip core
Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 09:29:56AM +0100, Juergen Beisert wrote: > > Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang > > > --- > > > drivers/dma/apbh_dma.c |4 +++- > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/apbh_dma.c b/drivers/dma/apbh_dma.c > > > index 363878f..d30b8fb 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/dma/apbh_dma.c > > > +++ b/drivers/dma/apbh_dma.c > > > @@ -555,7 +555,9 @@ int mxs_dma_init(void) > > > int ret, channel; > > > u32 val, reg; > > > > > > - mxs_reset_block(apbh_regs, 0); > > > + ret = mxs_reset_block(apbh_regs, 0); > > > + if (ret) > > > + return ret; > > > > In this case the user faces a "MXS: Timeout resetting block via register > > ...". Do you think this message is helpful to give the user a pointer > > *where* the failure happens? > > Yes, since it points to the IP core which was used here. Which again, > makes clear which driver was trying to reset the IP core. You mean the reported register offset points to the corresponding IP core? Just my 2cents: a generic routine should report a failure to the caller. And the caller should output a valuable failure message which makes clear what the caller had tried to do by calling the generic routine. I think such a message would be more helpful. Your generic message is for developers only. But also Barebox has more users than developers. jbe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Juergen Beisert | Linux Solutions for Science and Industry | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | ___ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
Re: [PATCH 2/3] dma: apbh: check for errors when resetting ip core
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 09:29:56AM +0100, Juergen Beisert wrote: > Wolfram Sang wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang > > --- > > drivers/dma/apbh_dma.c |4 +++- > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/apbh_dma.c b/drivers/dma/apbh_dma.c > > index 363878f..d30b8fb 100644 > > --- a/drivers/dma/apbh_dma.c > > +++ b/drivers/dma/apbh_dma.c > > @@ -555,7 +555,9 @@ int mxs_dma_init(void) > > int ret, channel; > > u32 val, reg; > > > > - mxs_reset_block(apbh_regs, 0); > > + ret = mxs_reset_block(apbh_regs, 0); > > + if (ret) > > + return ret; > > In this case the user faces a "MXS: Timeout resetting block via register > ...". > Do you think this message is helpful to give the user a pointer *where* the > failure happens? Yes, since it points to the IP core which was used here. Which again, makes clear which driver was trying to reset the IP core. -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang| Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
Re: [PATCH 2/3] dma: apbh: check for errors when resetting ip core
Wolfram Sang wrote: > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang > --- > drivers/dma/apbh_dma.c |4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/apbh_dma.c b/drivers/dma/apbh_dma.c > index 363878f..d30b8fb 100644 > --- a/drivers/dma/apbh_dma.c > +++ b/drivers/dma/apbh_dma.c > @@ -555,7 +555,9 @@ int mxs_dma_init(void) > int ret, channel; > u32 val, reg; > > - mxs_reset_block(apbh_regs, 0); > + ret = mxs_reset_block(apbh_regs, 0); > + if (ret) > + return ret; In this case the user faces a "MXS: Timeout resetting block via register ...". Do you think this message is helpful to give the user a pointer *where* the failure happens? jbe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Juergen Beisert | Linux Solutions for Science and Industry | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | ___ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox