[BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: Weiss Salzburg MS

2007-01-05 Thread Roman Turovsky
I have just heroically looked through 260 pages of the Ms. It appears 
neither in the incipit list nor in the music itself.
RT


 Your list doesn't include this a minor Partita. Is it new then?

 DS


 On Friday, January 05, 2007, at 09:29AM, Roman Turovsky 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If anyone is interested in the Salzburg MIII25 inventory:
http://polyhymnion.org/swv/SalzburgLautencodesMIII25.html
RT


 The latest music supplement to the Lute News (UK Lute Society) has a
 Partita in a minor by Weis from the Lautencodex M III 25 in
 Salzburg. The editor said it was first in a series of pieces by Weiss
 unique to the manuscript and that further info will come in later
 installments.

 Does anyone know more about these pieces? Is this newly discovered
 Weiss or has this been kicking around for awhile? The bit that I have
 played certainly sounds like real Weiss and best of all is
 technically on the easier end of the Weiss spectrum.

 DS



 To get on or off this list see list information at
 http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html





 





[BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: Weiss Salzburg MS

2007-01-05 Thread Roman Turovsky
PS. Having played through it just now I notice a few errors in the original 
Ms. (uncorrected in the typesetting):
Bar 30: second beat should have been the inversion of D major as a lead-in 
to G in 31.
BAr 32: the bass notes should have been F then E, rather than [F]F,
off the bat.
RT

- Original Message - 
From: Roman Turovsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mathias Rösel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Daniel Shoskes [EMAIL PROTECTED]; baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 10:17 AM
Subject: Re: [BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: Weiss Salzburg MS


I stand corrected, as #XX has been sitting below the bottom edge of my 
monitor.
 RT


 - Original Message - 
 From: Mathias Rösel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Roman Turovsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: Daniel Shoskes [EMAIL PROTECTED]; baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
 Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 10:12 AM
 Subject: [BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: Weiss Salzburg MS


 That directory should be double-checked.

 # 5 is in B flat major. It contains an Aria on the 2nd place, the
 bourree is the 4th movement

 # 8 My handwritten copy does not contain the courante and bourree; are
 they there?

 # 20 in A minor actually is entry # 20:a and it's the suite that was
 edited in the Lute News supplement

 # 35 is in C minor
 -- 
 Best,

 Mathias


 Roman Turovsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
 I have just heroically looked through 260 pages of the Ms. It appears
 neither in the incipit list nor in the music itself.

  Your list doesn't include this a minor Partita. Is it new then?

 If anyone is interested in the Salzburg MIII25 inventory:
 http://polyhymnion.org/swv/SalzburgLautencodesMIII25.html

  The latest music supplement to the Lute News (UK Lute Society) has a
  Partita in a minor by Weis from the Lautencodex M III 25 in
  Salzburg. The editor said it was first in a series of pieces by 
  Weiss
  unique to the manuscript and that further info will come in later
  installments.
 
  Does anyone know more about these pieces? Is this newly discovered
  Weiss or has this been kicking around for awhile? The bit that I 
  have
  played certainly sounds like real Weiss and best of all is
  technically on the easier end of the Weiss spectrum.
 
  DS
 
 
 
  To get on or off this list see list information at
  http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
 
 
 
 
 
 





 --


 





[BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: A query from Bob Barto

2007-01-05 Thread Jorge Torres
In the 17th century LeSage de Richee (1695), a self-proclaimed student of
Mouton, uses  three dots to indicate the right hand ring finger, but that's
a 13-course instrument.  None of the printed French sources prior to 1700
(Gault I and II, Gallot, Perinne, or Mouton) use the ring finger.

Jorge

On 1/5/07 10:27 AM, Roman Turovsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 (sent through RT, due to transient comp. problems)
 heading: French baroque RH fingerings
 
 Dear lute friends,
 
 Has anyone seen a fingering in the 11-course French lute repertoire which
 indicate that the ring finger of the right hand was ever used?
 
 I have noticed the occasional ring finger sign in the theobo music in
 Saizenay, but not in the lute music anywhere.
 
 Thanks,
 
 Robert
 
 
 
 
 To get on or off this list see list information at
 http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html





[BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: A query from Bob Barto

2007-01-05 Thread Jorge Torres
Sorry, the designation I mentioned is from a MS for 13 course with
instructions by LeSage, noted in Doug Smith and Peter Danner's article How
Beginners...Should Proceed, JLSA, 1976.

Jorge 

  

On 1/5/07 12:14 PM, Mathias Rösel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Jorge Torres [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
 In the 17th century LeSage de Richee (1695), a self-proclaimed student of
 Mouton, uses  three dots to indicate the right hand ring finger, but that's
 a 13-course instrument.
 
 LeSage 1695 is for 11c lute, and the author only signifies RH forefinger
 and thumb (middle finger isn't pasticularly signified). No use of RH
 ring finger, indeed.





To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: A query from Bob Barto

2007-01-05 Thread Markus Lutz
Hi Jorge,
as far as I know, Mathias is right.
There are even in later mss only few hints that the ringfinger was used 
at all - but there are only few RH fingerings at all.
Although I think that Falkenhagen etc. were using the ringfinger, there 
are to my knowledge no direct RH fingerings at all.
Weiss seems to have used it at least in some ending arpeggios, but if he 
did use it more regularily isn´t clear at all.

Best
Markus

Mathias Rösel schrieb:
 Jorge Torres [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
   
 Sorry, the designation I mentioned is from a MS for 13 course with
 instructions by LeSage, noted in Doug Smith and Peter Danner's article How
 Beginners...Should Proceed, JLSA, 1976.
 

 Please forgive me I'm picky, but neither the instructions of LeSage 1695
 include anything about RH ringfinger. Dot beneath letter means
 forefinger, small vertical line beneath letter means thumb, no sign
 means middle finger; that's it.
   



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: A query from Bob Barto

2007-01-05 Thread Bernd Haegemann


 Sorry, the designation I mentioned is from a MS for 13 course with
 instructions by LeSage, noted in Doug Smith and Peter Danner's article How

 I think Jorge is speaking about a manuscript that contains the
instructions by Lesage de R. but different music (for 13c. lute).
In that music appear signs for the RH 3rd finger, perhaps.

best wishes
Bernd



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: A query from Bob Barto

2007-01-05 Thread Jorge Torres
List:

The Burwell informant makes it clear that the ring finger is not used:

For the forefinger of the right hand we mark one dot; for the second
finger, two dots.  The two other fingers we do not use.  (Dart, 31)

This is in line with the printed French sources prior to 1700 (Gault I and
II, Gallot, Perinne, or Mouton), which like Mace, never mention the ring
finger.

Nevertheless, as Robert mentioned with the theorbo, along with my earlier
post regarding the use of the ring finger (triple dot) in the angelique
notation from Monin (1664), there appears to have been some use of the ring
finger in the performance of plucked strings in 17th and very early
18th-century France, although not at all present in any of the surviving
lute sources.  It almost appears that the French lutenists did everything
they could to avoid using the ring finger.

So what about the ring finger in the later German (18th century) repertory?
Is there a French or an English connection?  Are Weiss and Baron emulating a
similar style of French lute music that Bittner inherited from chez
Gaultier?  

To me Bittner is reminiscent of the Germans that flourished in Paris in the
last half of the 17th century who worked as copyists for Lully and who were
responsible for bringing French style to Germany (Muffat, Bleyer, JKF
Fisher, Schmierer, etc).  I always thought it was kind of cool that
Blancrocher (Charles Fleury) was pals with Froberger, (he breathed his last
breath in the latter's arms after falling down the stairs).  The keyboardist
was certainly musically indebted to his Parisian associates.

Cheers,
Jorge   




To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html