Re: Release Roadmap

[Brian Frick]

LIKE.

Software by democracy = open source.  
--
Brian

On Aug 29, 2014, at 9:06 AM, Rich Siegel  wrote:

> On Friday, August 29, 2014, Rick Yentzer  wrote:
> 
>> But I understand it's not my app, I just use it to make a living.
> 
> So do I.
> 
> R.
> -- 
> Rich Siegel Bare Bones Software, Inc.
>   
> 
> Someday I'll look back on all this and laugh... until they sedate me.
> 
> -- 
> This is the BBEdit Talk public discussion group. If you have a 
> feature request or would like to report a problem, please email
> "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group.
> Follow @bbedit on Twitter: 
> 
> --- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "BBEdit Talk" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com.



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: Path of last open file

[Brian Frick]

I reported a bug to Apple regarding 10.8's ability to lose file paths.  See 
Apple bug report #12376530.  This was reported on October 9, 2012.  I first 
noticed this bug when I was navigating my server's file structure -- if I 
connected to my server and used specifically column view, navigated into some 
folders, and then changed my view to any other and back to column view, I would 
be kicked back to the root of the server directories.  This problem also occurs 
on my local machine -- ONLY with column view, as far as I can tell.

My guess is that BBEdit uses a snippet of code for the file path that is 
causing this same bug in the Finder.
--
Brian Frick
brianfr...@gmail.com



On Jan 4, 2013, at 6:46 AM, Jens Walter  wrote:

> This seems to be a MacOS 10.8 only issue. Some applications have fixed this, 
> but BBEdit still has that error. When you open a new file dialog it has 
> forgotten where you were at the last time you opened a file.
> 
> -- 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
> "BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups.
> To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> <http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en>
> If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
> please email "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group.
> Follow @bbedit on Twitter: <http://www.twitter.com/bbedit>
>  
>  
>  

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
"BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
<http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en>
If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
please email "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group.
Follow @bbedit on Twitter: <http://www.twitter.com/bbedit>

Re: Does anybody what happened to the unsaved dot from <10.5 BBEdit?

[Brian Frick]

Do we all really need to wax poetic about the "little black dot"?  I mean, it's 
to the point where no one wants to RTFM anymore.  When a change is made, 1/3 of 
you complain, 1/3 of you whole-heartedly embrace it, and 1/3 of you delve into 
the metaphysical ramifications of the change and how it'll "devastate your 
workflow".

Really!!  RTFM.  Upgrade (or don't).  If you did and you don't like it, 
downgrade (or don't).

Enough already.

My undying thanks to the Barebones team who somehow are able to create software 
that doesn't suck while pragmatically dealing with all of the complainers.  
BBEdit -- in all its forms -- makes my job easier.  Period.
--
Brian Frick
brianfr...@gmail.com



On Dec 14, 2012, at 2:51 AM, Mike Conley  wrote:

> 
> 
> On Thursday, December 13, 2012 7:49:09 PM UTC, eremita wrote:
> 
> I say, to the devil with Apple’s innovations.  I stick with BBEdit 
> because it is grounded in a tradition that predates all this nonsense, 
> not because I am dying for it to jump on the “really really great” 
> self-congratulatory band-wagon. 
> 
> This.
> 
> (Though I think London Transport is not quite so bad.) 
> 
> -- 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
> "BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups.
> To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> <http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en>
> If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
> please email "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group.
> Follow @bbedit on Twitter: <http://www.twitter.com/bbedit>
>  
>  
>  

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
"BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
<http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en>
If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
please email "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group.
Follow @bbedit on Twitter: <http://www.twitter.com/bbedit>

Re: Web hosting recommendations

[Brian Frick]

pair Networks, Pittsburgh, PA.
--
Brian Frick
brianfr...@gmail.com



On Dec 4, 2012, at 7:17 PM, blinde  wrote:

> i almost just moved all of my accounts (personal + client = 100+) to 
> bluehost, until i stumbled upon bluehostsucks.com
> 
> they apparently come down hard on any script that uses more than 10% of the 
> cpu its on, by killing the account instead of just the script.
> 
> there are a number of other problems cited, all of which made me very nervous.
> 
> if you're interested in a vps account, i'm finding eboundhost (outside of 
> chicago) a most excellent option... fast, responsive service, very 
> competitive pricing.
> 
> just sayin'
> 
> thanks,
> bruce
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Tuesday, May 1, 2012 6:51:41 PM UTC-7, Eric wrote:
> I've been using BlueHost.com for years and the've been pretty good as shared 
> host provider. They don't have bandwidth limits, just throttle boxes down to 
> handle spikes in usage. 
> 
> http://www.bluehost.com/
> 
> $3.95/mo for extended contract
> the only gripe I've had is they are not on PHP 5.3 yet, still at 5.2
> 
> -Eric
> 
> 
> On May 1, 2012, at 2:31 PM, bobembry wrote:
> 
>> I'm looking for a new web host. 
>> 
>> Anybody have suggestions
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> Bob
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
>> "BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups.
>> To post to this group, send email to bbe...@googlegroups.com
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> bbedit+un...@googlegroups.com
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> <http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en>
>> If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
>> please email "sup...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group.
>> Follow @bbedit on Twitter: <http://www.twitter.com/bbedit>
> 
> 
> -- 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
> "BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups.
> To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> <http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en>
> If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
> please email "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group.
> Follow @bbedit on Twitter: <http://www.twitter.com/bbedit>
>  
>  
>  

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
"BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
<http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en>
If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
please email "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group.
Follow @bbedit on Twitter: <http://www.twitter.com/bbedit>

Re: Unable To Scroll Horizontally In HTML Document

[Brian Frick]

If it's stored on your local machine, then you should be able to check a 
back-up of the file from Time Machine, if you're using it.  See if the problem 
exists in a previous version of the file.  If not, try opening it in another 
text editor (TextEdit.app).
--
Brian Frick
brianfr...@gmail.com



On Nov 6, 2012, at 11:45 PM, WordWeaver  wrote:

> Greetings,
> 
> I have just encountered a very unusual problem. While I was able to do so 
> only hours ago, for some odd reason, I am suddenly unable to scroll 
> horizontally in the index.html file for my website. Vertical scroll works 
> just fine.
> 
> I thought that it might have something to do with the fact that I just 
> installed the latest pre-release build -- 10.5 (3227) -- about an hour ago. 
> However, only this one index.html file -- and a copy of the same -- have this 
> problem. If I open other HTML docs on my site, I don't have this problem. 
> Both vertical and horizontal scrolling work just fine.
> 
> Please note that these are files on my local hard drive. I am not trying to 
> edit them via FTP or anything like that.
> 
> I even tried copying the contents of the index.html file into a new document 
> and saving it, but the problem is likewise carried over to the newly-created 
> file as well.
> 
> I also tried zapping gremlins, but that didn't help either.
> 
> Any ideas why this would suddenly happen?
> 
> Also, even if I use command-right arrow key, the cursor will not advance to 
> the end of the line . . . or at least I can't see it, because the horizontal 
> scrolling has stopped working.
> 
> I need to get this fixed ASAP, because now I have an HTML tag in my 
> index.html which I can't remove -- because I can't access it at the end of 
> the line -- and it is messing up the format of my site's home page.
> 
> Thanks to whoever can offer some assistance.
> 
> -- 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
> "BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups.
> To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> <http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en>
> If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
> please email "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group.
> Follow @bbedit on Twitter: <http://www.twitter.com/bbedit>
> 
> 
> 



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: [ANN] BBEdit 10.5 (3215) pre-release

[Brian Frick]

As it says in the docs accompanying Rich's notice:  CVS has been removed.
--
Brian Frick
brianfr...@gmail.com



On Oct 1, 2012, at 10:32 AM, Rod Buchanan  wrote:

> On Sep 30, 2012, at 9:00 PM, Rich Siegel wrote:
> 
>> Good { morning, afternoon, evening },
>> 
>> We've been busy. :-) A new version is in the works, with a whole bunch of 
>> new features, refinements, and improvements. We're happy to make a 
>> pre-release build available to the list, so that you have a little extra 
>> time to play with it before the rest of the world gets hold of the goodies. 
>> :-)
> 
> I installed this version and lost the CVS option in the menubar.  Anyone else 
> seen this and found a fix before I notify support?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -- 
> Rod Buchanan
> 
> -- 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
> "BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups.
> To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> <http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en>
> If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
> please email "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group.
> Follow @bbedit on Twitter: <http://www.twitter.com/bbedit>
> 
> 
> 

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
"BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
<http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en>
If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
please email "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group.
Follow @bbedit on Twitter: <http://www.twitter.com/bbedit>

Re: BBEdit, Preview PHP

[Brian Frick]

Could have fooled me!  I thought you guys run on a caffeine drip.
--
Brian Frick
brianfr...@gmail.com



On Aug 6, 2012, at 7:34 AM, Patrick Woolsey  wrote:

> Sorry, however, you just wrote to support Saturday evening:
> 
>  Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2012 23:25:29 +0200 (aka 17:27 US EST)
> 
> and we do occasionally sleep, etc. :-)
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Patrick Woolsey
> ==
> Bare Bones Software, Inc.  <http://www.barebones.com>
> P.O. Box 1048, Bedford, MA 01730-1048

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
"BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
<http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en>
If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
please email "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group.
Follow @bbedit on Twitter: <http://www.twitter.com/bbedit>

Re: possible to set upper case tags as the default?

[Brian Frick]

You're right, HTML5 allows for AnYtHiNg.  I had forgotten about that, even 
though I remember reading it in the "rules"...  Thanks, Kerri!
--
Brian

On Sep 30, 2011, at 12:26 PM, Kerri Hicks wrote:

> 
> 
> On Sep 30, 8:36 am, Brian Frick  wrote:
>> As of HTML 4 (1999), the W3C (the group that dictates HTML standards) 
>> recommended lowercase tags; HTML5 and XHTML require
>> lowercase tags to validate. There's nothing stopping you from using 
>> uppercase tags in HTML, but if validation is needed, you shouldn't.
> 
> Uppercase tags are verboten in XHTML, for sure. But sadly I must point
> out, for the sake of completeness, that HTML5 does allow uppercase
> tags (and even camelCase). I think it's a step backwards, but there
> you have it. Lowercase is always right, though, and is the industry
> standard.
> 
> --Kerri
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
> "BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups.
> To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> <http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en>
> If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
> please email "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group.
> Follow @bbedit on Twitter: <http://www.twitter.com/bbedit>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: possible to set upper case tags as the default?

[Brian Frick]

Hi Bruce,

When I first started coding HTML in 1992, tags were uppercase. In fact, you can 
read more here:

http://www.w3schools.com/html/html_elements.asp

As of HTML 4 (1999), the W3C (the group that dictates HTML standards) 
recommended lowercase tags; HTML5 and XHTML require lowercase tags to validate. 
There's nothing stopping you from using uppercase tags in HTML, but if 
validation is needed, you shouldn't. 

I hope that clarifies.

--
Brian Frick

On Sep 29, 2011, at 11:45 PM, blinde  wrote:

> 
> john
> 
> ok, so now I'm confused. if tags are supposed to be lower case, why
> does bbedit offer a palette button to make tags upper case? also, the
> HTML spec shows attributes as lower case, but all of their examples
> have upper case tags
> 
> I don't mind learning something new... no matter how much it hurts!
> 
> please advise (although my question stands)
> 
> thx
> bruce
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Sep 29, 12:19 pm, John Delacour  wrote:
>> At 11:40 -0700 29/9/11, blinde wrote:
>> 
>>> actually, i use the utilities palette... but i'm looking for a setting
>>> so i don't have to do this manually... i would always get upper case
>>> tags... anyone else?
>> 
>> If Barebones were ever to make it possible to have upper case tags
>> inserted with their markup utilities, I'd suspect Rich had already
>> been sedated.  Do you write your validated code in HTML 4.01 (1999)
>> or HTML5?  If not then they're illegal.
>> 
>> JD
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
> "BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups.
> To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> <http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en>
> If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
> please email "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group.
> Follow @bbedit on Twitter: <http://www.twitter.com/bbedit>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
"BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
<http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en>
If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
please email "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group.
Follow @bbedit on Twitter: <http://www.twitter.com/bbedit>

Re: [ANN] BBEdit 10.0.1 (3063) pre-release

[Brian Frick]

Hmm, I don't think Chris Farley was consuming Folgers... LOL

Very well played.
--
Brian

On Jul 22, 2011, at 7:19 PM, Rich Siegel wrote:

> On Friday, July 22, 2011, Brian Frick  wrote:
> 
>> I don't know what you put in your coffee, Rich, but please, share your 
>> secret.
> 
> Folgers' crystals. 
> <http://www.hulu.com/watch/4154/saturday-night-live-schillervision-hidden-camera>.
> 
> R
> -- 
> Rich Siegel Bare Bones Software, Inc.
>   <http://www.barebones.com/>


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: [ANN] BBEdit 10.0.1 (3063) pre-release

[Brian Frick]

I don't know what you put in your coffee, Rich, but please, share your secret.
--
Brian

On Jul 22, 2011, at 3:05 PM, Rich Siegel wrote:

> Good { morning, afternoon, evening },
> 
> The announcement of a pre-release version on the list may come as a surprise 
> to some of you. :-) When preparing maintenance updates (which primarily *snip*
> Enjoy,
> 
> R.
> -- 
> Rich Siegel Bare Bones Software, Inc.
>   


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: BBedit 10.0 crashes in Lion during startup.

[Brian Frick]

Um, at the bottom of every email sent to the list is the following text:

"If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email 
"supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group."

That's pretty clear, and I highly recommend that you follow those instructions. 
 I also recommend you get a whole lot more specific with your issue than an 
email such as this.
--
Brian

On Jul 22, 2011, at 9:56 AM, bbeditor wrote:

> It shows the "Welcome to BBedit!" window, then the beach ball, then it 
> crashes.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
> "BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups.
> To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> 
> If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
> please email "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group.
> Follow @bbedit on Twitter: 



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: Arrange and morphing prefs windows

[Brian Frick]

I was just lamenting the loss of that feature.  I used it daily, religiously.  
I *need* that back...
--
Brian

On Jul 20, 2011, at 7:26 AM, stetner wrote:

> I hope I am not the only one who misses the window arranging function?
> 
> Also, as someone else mentioned, the morphing prefs pane is gross.
> 
> Doug

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
"BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at

If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
please email "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group.
Follow @bbedit on Twitter: 

Re: Arrange and morphing prefs windows

[Brian Frick]

I was just lamenting the loss of that feature.  I used it daily, religiously.  
I *need* that back...
--
Brian

On Jul 20, 2011, at 7:26 AM, stetner wrote:

> I hope I am not the only one who misses the window arranging function?
> 
> Also, as someone else mentioned, the morphing prefs pane is gross.
> 
> Doug


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: 64-bit?

[Brian Frick]

http://www.macrumors.com/2011/06/11/itunes-10-5-beta-is-64-bit-and-cocoa/
--
Brian

On Jul 19, 2011, at 2:25 PM, Steve Kalkwarf wrote:

> On Jul 19, 2011, at 2:37 PM, Brian wrote:
> 
>> BBEdit 10 is out and still not 64bit. Everything on my system is now
>> is 64bit (except iTunes, but that will be 64bit with the 10.5
>> release). Launching BBEdit increases overall system memory use by a
>> few hundred megabytes as it loads all of the 32bit versions of the
>> system frameworks. Are there any plans for 64-bit?
> 
> 
> iTunes is going to be 64-bit? Where did you hear that?
> 
> Steve
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
> "BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups.
> To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> 
> If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
> please email "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group.
> Follow @bbedit on Twitter: 



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: Fonts

[Brian Frick]

Another thing, most people forget to verify and correct permissions after an 
upgrade.  I'd recommend doing that, as well.  If all else fails, run disk 
utility to see if there are issues with your hard drive.  You'll want to 
correct all of those problems first.
--
Brian

On Mar 24, 2011, at 12:50 PM, April Mains wrote:

> works fine for me after upgrading to 10.6.7
> 
> April
> 
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Bill  wrote:
>> Greetings. After upgrading to Mac OS X 10.6.7 BBEdit 9.6.3 stopped
>> allowing me to select many of my user installed fonts including the
>> one I had been using as my default font (Bitstream Vera Sans Mono)
>> prior to the upgrade. Anyone else see this behavior or is something
>> messed up just on my system?


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: Fonts

[Brian Frick]

Probably you'll want to clear your font cache...

http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2462847&tstart=30
--
Brian

On Mar 24, 2011, at 12:50 PM, April Mains wrote:

> works fine for me after upgrading to 10.6.7
> 
> April
> 
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Bill  wrote:
>> Greetings. After upgrading to Mac OS X 10.6.7 BBEdit 9.6.3 stopped
>> allowing me to select many of my user installed fonts including the
>> one I had been using as my default font (Bitstream Vera Sans Mono)
>> prior to the upgrade. Anyone else see this behavior or is something
>> messed up just on my system?


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: HTML5 Form Elements

[Brian Frick]

You're right...  I wasn't being flippant when I said that; I meant precisely 
that the HTML5 spec is not completed, and instead of adding something that 
might (will) change over time, BareBones will smartly wait until it's completed 
before implementing it in BBEdit.
--
Brian

On Feb 7, 2011, at 10:35 AM, G. T. Stresen-Reuter wrote:

> 
> On Feb 7, 2011, at 1:37 PM, BeeRich wrote:
> 
>>> On 2011-02-06, at 10:42 AM, Brian M. Frick wrote:
>>> 
>>> In other words, t'll be there when it gets there.
>> 
>> If it was a graceful transition, then the tools should be made available as 
>> people would choose to be coding or testing in 5.  Just because it's there 
>> doesn't mean people have to use it.  And it is "there" as a new document 
>> choice, but falls short elsewhere.  
> 
> This is just a guess but I think Brian was saying that the HTML 5 
> specification isn't "there" yet. Again, I'm just getting into HTML 5 (and 
> thus, am speaking out of ignorance, not uncommon mind you) but I don't recall 
> seeing an official HTML 5 specification and until one is published, change 
> happens (much to the chagrin of our beloved BBEdit developers).
> 
>> Thanks for the advice on "it's here when it's here".  I didn't know that.  
> 
> And to paraphrase a famous politician, I think that depends on what the 
> definition of "it" is ;-)
> 
> Ted Stresen-Reuter
> 
> PS: Extra credit for those who correctly guess the original quote and can 
> cite the source!
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
> "BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups.
> To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> 
> If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
> please email "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group.
> Follow @bbedit on Twitter: 



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: BUG: FTP File Browser

[Brian Frick]

In the FTP browser?  Works just fine.  Probably something with your particular 
settings.
--
Brian

On Oct 27, 2010, at 8:26 AM, DJ N-4ceR wrote:

> Since update the function "Show items starting with '.'" does not work
> anymore. .files are ever hidden.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
> "BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups.
> To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> 
> If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
> please email "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group.
> Follow @bbedit on Twitter: 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
"BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at

If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
please email "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group.
Follow @bbedit on Twitter: 

Re: Saved window state frustration

[Brian Frick]

That is exactly what I was looking for.  I can't tell you how long I scoured 
the documentation, but completely forgot to check the damn release notes.

Thank you, Dennis.
--
Brian

On Aug 13, 2010, at 10:53 AM, Dennis Cox wrote:

> 
> 
> 
>> From: Brian Frick 
>> Reply-To: 
>> Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 10:51:43 -0500
>> To: 
>> Subject: Re: Saved window state frustration
>> 
>> No... I have tried that.  I can "save default window" and any new window
>> behaves properly.  It's only windows that aren't saved in the default-window
>> configuration that are re-opening in the last saved state.
>> 
>> I swear there used to be an option somewhere that said "Retain window state 
>> on
>> save" or something like that; if it was unchecked, then windows would re-open
>> in default config..
>> --
>> Brian
>> 
>> On Aug 13, 2010, at 10:46 AM, Kerri Hicks wrote:
>> 
>>> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Brian Frick 
>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> At one point, there was a setting to save (or not save) window state.  In
>>>> BBE9, it has been moved, removed, changed, or something to the point where 
>>>> I
>>>> cannot find the setting.
>>>> 
>>>> Can anyone direct me to the preference?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Do you mean the item under the Window menu, called "Save Default Window"?
>>> 
>>> --Kerri
>>> 
> 
> This has changed.
> 
> From the 9.5 release notes:
> 
> The internal format of saved document state has been reworked, as well as
> the behaviors for saving and loading it. The most important visible changes
> are as follows:
> 
> When saving state, BBEdit captures only those settings which are fundamental
> to the document (window position, selection range, folds, splitter setting),
> or settings which vary from the global preferences. The latter ensures that
> changes to the global preferences are never inappropriately overridden by
> document state.
> 
> So, for example, if the default document font is Consolas when you save the
> document, and the document uses that font, but you change the global
> preference to Menlo before the next time you open that same document, the
> document's font will be set to Menlo. (Note that this behavior applies to
> any document setting which takes its default from the prefs; the font is
> used only to illustrate.)
> 
> This change should resolve lots of confusion surrounding the question of "I
> changed my prefs, how come my document settings don't reflect that?"
> 
> The internal data format of the state has changed to accommodate this new
> behavior. Documents with existing saved state will exhibit the old behavior
> when they are opened; this is not a bug. BBEdit will write out the new state
> format the next time you save the document.
> 
> Note that the new format is not backward-compatible; so if you open the
> document with an older version of BBEdit, the new format state will be
> ignored.
> 
> Also:
> 
> If you are using the expert preference to save state in the document's
> resource fork (rather than in a central location), please note that the new
> format state data is not actually saved in a resource anymore - it is now
> written into an extended attribute, which you can verify from the command
> line using xattr -l /path/to/some/file.
> And finally:
> 
> A new "Normalize Options" command is available on the Edit menu. This
> command will reset the front document's display and editing options to the
> current defaults established by your preferences (including any
> language-specific overrides), and clear the document's saved state. This can
> be useful in situations where previously saved state is restored and
> contains undesired variances from your preferences.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
> "BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups.
> To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
> If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
> please email "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
"BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
please email "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group.

Re: Saved window state frustration

[Brian Frick]

If I manually make the window any size other than default size, locate it 
anywhere on the screen (not 0,0), and save, it reopens in exactly the same 
location as when I saved it.
--
Brian

On Aug 13, 2010, at 11:13 AM, Bruce Van Allen wrote:

> On 2010-08-13, Brian Frick wrote:
> 
>> No... I have tried that.  I can "save default window" and any new
>> window behaves properly.  It's only windows that aren't saved in the
>> default-window configuration that are re-opening in the last saved
>> state.
> 
> Going back to your original post,
> 
>> When I open a window and do a compare, I have a window left, a window right, 
>> and a window across the bottom that shows the diff results.  If I make 
>> changes and save a document, next time I open the window, it is opened in 
>> the same state -- either left or right with space along the bottom.
> 
> I find that this problem does NOT happen if I close the diff results window 
> first. Try that.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>   - Bruce
> 
> _bruce__van_allen__santa_cruz_ca_
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the "BBEdit Talk" 
> discussion group on Google Groups.
> To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
> If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email 
> "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
"BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
please email "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group.

Re: Saved window state frustration

[Brian Frick]

No... I have tried that.  I can "save default window" and any new window 
behaves properly.  It's only windows that aren't saved in the default-window 
configuration that are re-opening in the last saved state.

I swear there used to be an option somewhere that said "Retain window state on 
save" or something like that; if it was unchecked, then windows would re-open 
in default config..
--
Brian

On Aug 13, 2010, at 10:46 AM, Kerri Hicks wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Brian Frick  
> wrote:
>> 
>> At one point, there was a setting to save (or not save) window state.  In 
>> BBE9, it has been moved, removed, changed, or something to the point where I 
>> cannot find the setting.
>> 
>> Can anyone direct me to the preference?
> 
> 
> Do you mean the item under the Window menu, called "Save Default Window"?
> 
> --Kerri
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
> "BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups.
> To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
> If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
> please email "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
"BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
please email "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group.

Re: Saved window state frustration

[Brian Frick]

Right, I already tried that.  That's not an option for me.  It seems to be 
*gone*.
--
Brian

On Aug 13, 2010, at 9:30 AM, John Delacour wrote:

> At 09:15 -0500 13/08/2010, Brian Frick wrote:
> 
>> At one point, there was a setting to save (or not save) window state.  In 
>> BBE9, it has been moved, removed, changed, or something to the point where I 
>> cannot find the setting. 
>> 
>> Can anyone direct me to the preference?
> 
> Open the drawer in Preferences and go to Window Position.
> 
> JD
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the "BBEdit Talk" 
> discussion group on Google Groups.
> To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
> If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email 
> "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
"BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
please email "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group.

Saved window state frustration

[Brian Frick]

Is there any way to get BBEdit to behave appropriately when opening new windows 
or previously-edited windows?  I've been reading the manual all morning, and I 
swear up and down that I have the settings correct.

When I open a window and do a compare, I have a window left, a window right, 
and a window across the bottom that shows the diff results.  If I make changes 
and save a document, next time I open the window, it is opened in the same 
state -- either left or right with space along the bottom.

At one point, there was a setting to save (or not save) window state.  In BBE9, 
it has been moved, removed, changed, or something to the point where I cannot 
find the setting.  

Can anyone direct me to the preference?

Thanks!
--
Brian

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
"BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
please email "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group.

Re: Find and Replace, but not if ...

[Brian Frick]

Ronald's suggestion is nicer, because it uses grep.  But either way works =D  
Glad to help.
--
Brian

On Jul 2, 2010, at 1:19 PM, direwolf wrote:

> Duh. Thanks, Brian.
> 
> I was over-thinking it.
> Been writing javascript rules for a project all day, and got stuck in
> the If/Else mindset I guess! ;-)
> 
> thanks for the quick reply.
> 
> 
> On Jul 2, 1:38 pm, Brian Frick  wrote:
>> You can do that easily this way.
>> 
>> Find all  and replace with 
>> 
>> Then find all P1 and replace with P1.
>> 
>> --
>> Brian
>> 
>> On Jul 2, 2010, at 12:18 PM, direwolf wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> Hi,
>> 
>>> I'm trying to figure out if I can do a kind of weird find action with
>>> BBEdit.
>> 
>>> I would like to find all instance where 2 spaces occur in my file and
>>> replace with 1 space, but not the instances where the code has
>>> P1.
>> 
>>> So if I had the following lines:
>> 
>>> 1 Name  Here  (2 spaces between Name and Here)
>>> 2 Info  P1  (2 spaces between Info and P1)
>>> 3 Another  Example  Here  (2 spaces between Another and Example and
>>> Example and Here)
>> 
>>> If there a way to do a find that would Find the 2 spaces and replace
>>> with 1 space for #1 and #3, but ignore #2 and leave the 2 spaces
>>> before the P1?
>> 
>>> Hope that makes sense!
>> 
>>> Thanks for any help,
>>> kim
>> 
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>>> "BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups.
>>> To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
>>> If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem,
>>> please email "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
> "BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups.
> To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
> If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
> please email "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
"BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
please email "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group.

Re: Find and Replace, but not if ...

[Brian Frick]

You can do that easily this way.

Find all  and replace with 

Then find all P1 and replace with P1.

--
Brian

On Jul 2, 2010, at 12:18 PM, direwolf wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I'm trying to figure out if I can do a kind of weird find action with
> BBEdit.
> 
> I would like to find all instance where 2 spaces occur in my file and
> replace with 1 space, but not the instances where the code has
> P1.
> 
> So if I had the following lines:
> 
> 1 Name  Here  (2 spaces between Name and Here)
> 2 Info  P1  (2 spaces between Info and P1)
> 3 Another  Example  Here  (2 spaces between Another and Example and
> Example and Here)
> 
> If there a way to do a find that would Find the 2 spaces and replace
> with 1 space for #1 and #3, but ignore #2 and leave the 2 spaces
> before the P1?
> 
> Hope that makes sense!
> 
> Thanks for any help,
> kim
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
> "BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups.
> To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
> If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
> please email "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
"BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
please email "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group.

Re: Appending filename to each line in the file

[Brian Frick]

At the very least, you could do Text -> Prefix/Suffix lines with "  \t 
Basketball_Boys  "  in suffix for that file.  You'd have to do each file 
separately, but that's super easy.
--
Brian

On May 28, 2010, at 7:40 AM, dp wrote:

> I have 57 files. Each contains a list of student names. In order to import 
> into a database, I need to append the filename to the end of each line in 
> each file. To use a simplified example, the Basketball_Boys.tab file contains
> 
> Andy [tab] Aardvark
> Billy [tab] Badger
> Carl [tab] Cougar
> 
> I need for it to contain
> 
> Andy [tab] Aardvark [tab] Basketball_Boys
> Billy [tab] Badger [tab] Basketball_Boys
> Carl [tab] Cougar [tab] Basketball_Boys
> 
> It would be no problem to do a manual search and replace for a single file. 
> It would be no problem to do it multi-file if the filenames were all the 
> same. But with 57 different filenames, I'm looking for a way to streamline 
> the process. Can anyone help?
> 
> Thanks,
> dp
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
> "BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups.
> To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
> If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
> please email "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
"BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
please email "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group.

Re: Bug Report: v9.5 (2740) - HTML Formatting Utility Broken

[Brian Frick]

I think the answer here is to fix the problem (i.e., the thing producing crap 
code), not to fix the solution (i.e., BBEdit).  You cannot fault BBEdit for 
developing something that in all logical sense requires and relies on basic 
good syntax.
--
Brian

On May 6, 2010, at 9:39 AM, Matt Martini wrote:

> Roland and Others,
> 
> Thanks for taking a look at this for me.  Unfortunately, the html I am trying 
> to work with was generated, not something I wrote.
> I am aware of the many coding errors and problems, yet the reason I was using 
> BBEdit was so that I could review the code and write 
> something that would parse out elements of the page and do something useful 
> with them (in perl).  
> 
> In the past BBEdit let me put a document like this (malformed) into a format 
> I could read and work with.  
> Presently, it just runs off the side of the page forcing lots of horizontal 
> scrolling.
> 
> Maybe the developers at BareBones were "helping" us write better code by 
> forcing the code to be correct in order for it to be properly
> formatted (perl-tidy works like this, it barfs on syntax errors and that 
> actually helps debugging).  It would be nice however, if this change
> was documented (it doesn't work the same as it did in 8.7.2) and even better 
> would be a "sloppy" mode that worked as it did in the past
> so that we could work on broken documents.
> 
> Matt
> 
> 
> 
> On May 6, 2010, at 2:21 AM, Roland Küffner wrote:
> 
>> Hi Matt,
>> 
>> I just had a quick look at your file. I corrected the syntax of your single 
>> tags:  instead of  and  instead of . Each 
>> correction returned the formating function one step back in the "right 
>> direction". So, BBEdit obviously doesn't like misspelled elements (Syntax 
>> checking did also refuse to cooperate). Im not sure if this is an intended 
>> behavior and I'm also not sure if BBEdit changed on this from 8.7.2 to 9.5 
>> but it might explain your findings.
>> Write proper code
>> ;-)
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Roland
>> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
> "BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups.
> To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
> If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
> please email "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
"BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
please email "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group.

Re: BB-Gun removal

[Brian Frick]

Open Terminal.  cd .Trash.  rm -rf *
--
Brian

On Dec 17, 2009, at 11:57 AM, Tim in BC wrote:

> Long ago I installed BB-Gun, the Classic utility that changes filetype
> etc. to BBEdit settings.
> 
> Now I'm on SnowLeopard and don't need it.
> 
> I tried to delete it. Empty Trash says I can't because BB-Gun is in
> use.
> Since it won't actually run in SnowLeopard, I can't see how it can be
> in use.
> 
> It has survived a restart. I see no sign of it in my login items.
> BBEdit is closed.
> 
> How do I get rid of this thing?
> Or do I just move it out of the Trash and forget it?
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
> "BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups.
> To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
> If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
> please email "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group.



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: [ANN] BBEdit 9.3.1 Update available

[Brian Frick]

Yup, worked for me -- and I'm in Madison myself!
--
Brian

On Dec 8, 2009, at 10:23 AM, Peter Weil wrote:

> My copy of BBEdit (v9.3) still doesn't see any updates available. Has anyone 
> else been able to update using "Check for Updates"?
> 
> On Dec 8, 2009, at 9:05 AM, Rich Siegel wrote:
> 
>> The update is available immediately by choosing "Check for 
>> Updates" from the BBEdit menu,
> 
> --
> Peter Weil, Web Developer
> University Communications
> University of Wisconsin-Madison
> Phone: 608-262-6538
> Email: plw...@wisc.edu
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
> "BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups.
> To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
> If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
> please email "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group.



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: How to automatically add something at beginning and end of each line?

[Brian Frick]

Generally the manual would answer this.

Text -> prefix/suffix lines.
--
Brian

On Dec 5, 2009, at 8:25 PM, yozloy wrote:

> Hi, Everybody!
> I'm working on a project to convert some text to html.
> 
> what I got is many paragraphs, It makes sense use some functions to
> add  at the beginning of each line and and the end of each
> line.
> 
> any advice?
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
> "BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups.
> To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
> If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
> please email "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group.



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: Oddity after upgrading

[Brian Frick]

Empty your trash.  Recreate your dock shortcut.  
--
Brian

On Nov 12, 2009, at 10:05 AM, Scott wrote:

> Using OSX 10.6.2
> 
> Just upgraded BBEdit to 9.3 via the built-in updater and now I'm
> experiencing a problem. If I right-click on a file to open with
> BBEdit, I get a "File Cannot Be Opened -35" or another message along
> the lines of "BBEdit cannot be opened because it is in the trash".
> 
> There is a copy of BBEdit in the trash, which I presume is a result of
> the update; BBEdit also exists in it's normal spot in Applications.
> 
> Should I be clearing the trash right away after upgrade? Or is there
> another issue afoot?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Scott
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
> "BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups.
> To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
> If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, 
> please email "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group.



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: How to indicate NEW content in a timely manner?

[Brian Frick]

Write a PHP script.

Figure out the length of time, or the range of dates, or whatever your  
variable is, like so:


if $todaysDate > $startDate and $todaysDate < $endDate, $show = true;
if $show = true {
display HTML
}

Clearly you'll need to work out the details but this is how I "remove"  
items from a calendar of events in a timely manner, the midnight after  
the end of the event.


--
Brian

On Oct 21, 2009, at 6:14 AM, RobS wrote:



Sorry, I was so close to the problem that I forgot to explain a
salient point. It's not the page that is new; it's items within the
page. So indicating that the page has been updated would not help
since it's always being updated. See, for example...
http://www.jottings.ca/john/voices/reservoir1.html

There are about 35 NEW indicators within the page, indicating that
certain poems have been added recently. But some of them are not very
recent and the NEW indicator should be removed. I was hoping for some
sort of parameter that could be added to the span that would help me
automagically remove old ones from time to time.

Rob
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
"BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem,
please email "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---





smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: Feature suggestion

[Brian Frick]

Hah. Never mind.  It's a "hidden" feature already.

See what I mean!??!
--
Brian



On Sep 17, 2009, at 10:21 AM, Brian Frick wrote:

I don't know how difficult it would be to implement, but I'd like to  
see a "search" field to the Preferences for BBEdit, much like that  
which exists in the System Preferences.  It'd make finding certain  
preferences a whole heck of a lot easier.


--
Brian







smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Feature suggestion

[Brian Frick]

I don't know how difficult it would be to implement, but I'd like to  
see a "search" field to the Preferences for BBEdit, much like that  
which exists in the System Preferences.  It'd make finding certain  
preferences a whole heck of a lot easier.


--
Brian





smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: XHTML: Naive question about in (Document Syntax check)

[Brian Frick]

Not dumb; it certainly isn't intuitive.  =)
--
Brian


On May 31, 2009, at 4:17 PM, Fritz Anderson wrote:


On 31 May 2009, at 1:19 PM, Brian Frick wrote:


You need to put the input in a block element, like a  tag.


Ah. I knew it was something dumb.

Thank you, and John Delacour. Sorry for the noise.

— F


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: XHTML: Naive question about in (Document Syntax check)

[Brian Frick]

You need to put the input in a block element, like a  tag.
--
Brian



On May 31, 2009, at 12:52 PM, Fritz Anderson wrote:



For testing purposes, I have a number of form fragments like this:





in my page. The reason I think this is a BBEdit question is that when
I do Markup > Check > Document Syntax, I get errors like:

results.xhtml:76:  Document type does not permit element “” in
content of element “”.

The header declarations are:


http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd";>
http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en">

The XHTML tutorials I've seen confirm my understanding that 
elements are the whole point of s. What gives?

— F


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "BBEdit Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
If you have a specific feature request or would like to report a  
suspected (or confirmed) problem with the software, please email to "supp...@barebones.com 
" rather than posting to the group.

-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---





smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: Deprecated still available via Markup > Font Style

[Brian Frick]

That's precisely right, and exactly what I said in about 20 words  
earlier :D

Thanks for backing me up, Lewis!

--
Brian Frick

On Jan 22, 2009, at 10:17 PM, "le...@gmail"  wrote:

>
> On 22-Jan-2009, at 13:27, interrobang wrote:
>> Just curious, because it caused a sh!t storm of a discussion in the
>> office today, why BBEdit (which was denigrated unfairly as a WYSIWYG
>> editor, or that it just plain sucked...) still inserts an  for
>> italics when the  has been deprecated in favor of .
>
> No, this is completely wrong and anyone who told you  is deprecated
> in favor of  has no idea what they are talking about, and doesn't
> understand the meaning and use of those two tags. They should also
> probably be made to step away from any computer task that involves
> HTML coding until they've had a good, strong, thorough clue infusion.
>
> <http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/index/elements.html>
>
> Tags that have been deprecated include
> and 
>
> There are some elements that have been deprecated for particular uses.
> The most obvious example is the  tags which have been
> deprecated for POSITIONING, but are perfectly OK and reasonable and
> should be used for displaying tabular data blocks. In fact, using CSS
> to create a positioning format for tabular data instead of using
>  is just as wrong as using a table to create a menu across the
> top of your page. Another common example is  which is
> often use to indent text.  This use is deprecated and 
> should only be used when a multi-line quote needs to be set off from
> the rest of the text.  All positioning, like indenting, needs be done
> in CSS.
>
>  is used when you want to mark text in italics.  This is the proper
> way to, for example, tag a title of a book or movie, or the name of
> the publishing source (magazine, newspaper), or to indicate that a bit
> of text is in a foreign language. For example, the MLA bibliography
> format is:
>
>>> Books-One Author: Author's last name, First name.  Title of
>>> Book.  Place of Publication: Publisher, copyright date.
>>>
>>> Smith, John.  History of the World.  Baltimore: Scribner's
>>> Sons, 1994.
>
> and the MLA standard says:
>
>>> Everything that is italicized in the examples may be underlined if
>>> writing by hand or
>>> using a standard typewriter, but if you are using a computer,
>>> italics are preferred.
>
> If you mark this up using  you are simply doing it wrong. If your
> professor is a pedant (and really, aren't they all? :) you will get
> marked down for this.
>
>  is used to emphasize text.  If you are writing, "I am not going
> to do that" and you want to place emphasis on the 'not' you wrap it in
>  tags.  Our you might wrap the "I" or the "that" depending on
> where the vocal emphasis is meant to apply.  This might be displayed
> as italic text, but it might be displayed as bold text, underlined, or
> perhaps in red text on a black background with a 1pt blue box around
> it.   simply means "make this stand out".  has a related tag,
>  which is reserved for those rare cases when you need to
> indicate an additional emphasis. For example, if you write a technical
> paper you might put article reference numbers in 
> tags to make them stand out more visually, and to also separate them
> from the rest of the document structure for easy reference, finding,
> scraping, etc.
>
> And while we're all here, the same is true with  and .
> Strong is NOT (I could have written that not) a replacement
> for  and  is not deprecated. The trouble with  is that
> bolding is sorta the red-headed step-child of the typesetting world,
> and there are very few cases where it is actually proper to bold a
> word or a phrase.  In most cases I can think of where you might want
> bold text what you really want is .  I can't think of a good
> and proper use of bold other than to want to make text VISUALLY bold,
> and in that case you should use css. I'm probably forgetting something
> though.
>
> Essentially, there are two parts to HTML.  There is "what the page
> looks like" and that should be CSS controlled, fully and completely.
> Then there is "what the page is" and that should be controlled via the
> logical markup.  and  are visual (what the page looks like)
> while  and  are logical (what the page is).
>
> One place where  and  matter is in screen readers for the
> blind.  Advanced screen readers will actually shift the pitch down for
> a  element and, as far as I know, ignore visual markup
> elements like  and .
>
>
> -- 
> Advance and attack

Re: Deprecated still available via Markup > Font Style

[Brian Frick]

Well, that's not necessarily true.

 has been deprecated in favor of  only for instances where  
you're emphasizing text.   should still be used for italicizing  
book titles, magazine titles, etc. where the text isn't emphasized,  
but should be italicized.  There's a difference.

--
Brian



On Jan 22, 2009, at 2:27 PM, interrobang wrote:



Just curious, because it caused a sh!t storm of a discussion in the
office today, why BBEdit (which was denigrated unfairly as a WYSIWYG
editor, or that it just plain sucked...) still inserts an  for
italics when the  has been deprecated in favor of .

I even upgraded to 9.x today from 8.7.2 thinking that perhaps it would
have been corrected in the latest release.

What the story?

mjb | interrobangletterpress.com / linotypesetting.com

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "BBEdit Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
If you have a specific feature request or would like to report a  
suspected (or confirmed) problem with the software, please email to "supp...@barebones.com 
" rather than posting to the group.

-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---





smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: BBEdit 9.1

[Brian Frick]

I second that!!  I too miss that feature.  Is it hidden?

-Brian

On Dec 16, 2008, at 9:37 AM, Govinda wrote:

> OK, now I also have a negative... sorry:
> in 'save a copy to ftp server' I am very much missing something I
> could do before 9.1 --> delete a file.  If I save to the wrong
> directory, then the fastest way to correct that is just to delete from
> within this same re-invoked dialogue box.  Also I ditto the others in
> liking the dialogue to default to my previous bookmark.

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "BBEdit Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
If you have a specific feature request or would like to report a suspected (or 
confirmed) problem with the software, please email to "supp...@barebones.com" 
rather than posting to the group.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Auto Save Default Window

[Brian Frick]

No, he's right.  I've tried to save my FTP default window at 0,0 and  
it absolutely REFUSES to open there.  In fact, any time I open a new  
FTP window, it comes up at 10,0.  I can't stand it.

-Brian

On Dec 15, 2008, at 7:52 PM, Dennis wrote:

>
> On Dec 15, 2008, at 3:32 PM, Bashar80 wrote:
>
>> Now, there is another fault state that version 9 always goes to.
>> It's annoying and I won't update my BBEdit until they fix the  
>> problem.
>
> I'm not seeing this problem on my system. My windows open exactly
> where I saved them and at the proper size in BBEdit 9.x.
>
> Have you contacted Bare Bone Support for help?
>
> -Dennis
>
> >


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "BBEdit Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
If you have a specific feature request or would like to report a suspected (or 
confirmed) problem with the software, please email to "supp...@barebones.com" 
rather than posting to the group.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

yellow highlight

[Brian Frick]

This may be a really dumb question, but:

I miss the yellow highlight that showed what LINE I am on (BBEdit 8).   
Seems to have disappeared in 9, and I'd like it back.  Can you tell me  
how to re-activate it?  I would look in the manual but I cannot for  
the life of me remember what it's actually called.

-Brian

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "BBEdit Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
If you have a specific feature request or would like to report a suspected (or 
confirmed) problem with the software, please email to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" 
rather than posting to the group.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: BBEdit icon not showing in Applications folder

[Brian Frick]

Log out your user and log back in.

--
Brian



On Aug 29, 2008, at 11:16 PM, Rey Bango wrote:

>
> Hi Guys & Gals,
>
> I installed BBEdit several hours ago but the icon doesn't seem to be
> appearing when I go into my applications folder:
>
> http://skitch.com/reybango/ww4s/applications
>
> Notice how it seems to use what appears as a default icon.
>
> What would cause that? I'm new to Macs and I'm not quite sure if
> that's normal.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Rey
>
> >


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"BBEdit Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: I don't know if anyone's ever asked this, but...

[Brian Frick]

And by heal, I mean heel.

> LOL nice.  It only counts if they have goldfish in the heal and you  
> are listening to Shaft...
>
> --
> Brian
>
> On Aug 29, 2008, at 2:12 PM, Seth Dillingham wrote:
>
>>
>> On 8/29/2008, Brian Frick said:
>>
>>> Do you use BBEdit to write BBEdit?  I'm assuming you almost
>>> exclusively use Macs to program, since the final product is
>>> Mac-only.   But do you use any other platforms to help with
>>> development of your  software?  I'm just curious.  Thanks!
>>
>> I use platform shoes while coding the language modules. Does
>> that count?

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"BBEdit Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: I don't know if anyone's ever asked this, but...

[Brian Frick]

LOL nice.  It only counts if they have goldfish in the heal and you  
are listening to Shaft...

--
Brian

On Aug 29, 2008, at 2:12 PM, Seth Dillingham wrote:

>
> On 8/29/2008, Brian Frick said:
>
>> Do you use BBEdit to write BBEdit?  I'm assuming you almost
>> exclusively use Macs to program, since the final product is
>> Mac-only.   But do you use any other platforms to help with
>> development of your  software?  I'm just curious.  Thanks!
>
> I use platform shoes while coding the language modules. Does
> that count?

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"BBEdit Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

I don't know if anyone's ever asked this, but...

[Brian Frick]

Do you use BBEdit to write BBEdit?  I'm assuming you almost  
exclusively use Macs to program, since the final product is Mac-only.   
But do you use any other platforms to help with development of your  
software?  I'm just curious.  Thanks!

--
Brian




--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"BBEdit Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---