Re: javascript+protovis syntax coloring
I discovered it's possible to use protovis without the crazy markup and I don't know why they do it that way, the convenience methods it allows don't seem that special. Thanks! On Dec 29, 2010, at 13:06 , Lorin Rivers wrote: I'm working with Protovis http://vis.stanford.edu/protovis/, which is a javascript-based graphics library. The syntax for a protovis block adds +protovis to the end of the declaration in the html document, like so: script type=text/javascript+protovis protovis extends javascript but for the most part it's just plain javascript. What can I do to make BBEdit treat this as if it is javascript, or even better, extend the existing JS language module to support protovis? -- Lorin Rivers Mosasaur: Killer Technical Marketing http://www.mosasaur.com mailto:lriv...@mosasaur.com 512/203.3198 (m) -- Lorin Rivers Mosasaur: Killer Technical Marketing http://www.mosasaur.com mailto:lriv...@mosasaur.com 512/203.3198 (m) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit
Re: javascript+protovis syntax coloring
On Dec 29, 2010, at 18:30 , Rich Siegel wrote: On Wednesday, December 29, 2010, Lorin Rivers lriv...@mosasaur.com wrote: I'm working with Protovis http://vis.stanford.edu/protovis/, which is a javascript-based graphics library. The syntax for a protovis block adds +protovis to the end of the declaration in the html document, like so: script type=text/javascript+protovis Is that really necessary? If Protovis is just a library, then the code is just JavaScript and text/javascript should work just fine, right? Apparently so, that's how it gets loaded. What can I do to make BBEdit treat this as if it is javascript, or even better, extend the existing JS language module to support protovis? You can generate a tags file for Protovis symbols and put it in ~/Library/Application Support/BBEdit/Completion Data/JavaScript/ and the Protovis symbols will be recognized and eligible for coloring and completion. OK, I got the tags bit working, but since BBEdit isn't recognizing the protovis chunks as javascript, it's still not quite there. Is there a way to convince BBEdit that it really IS javascript, even though it's breaking some rules? -- Lorin Rivers Mosasaur: Killer Technical Marketing http://www.mosasaur.com mailto:lriv...@mosasaur.com 512/203.3198 (m) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit
javascript+protovis syntax coloring
I'm working with Protovis http://vis.stanford.edu/protovis/, which is a javascript-based graphics library. The syntax for a protovis block adds +protovis to the end of the declaration in the html document, like so: script type=text/javascript+protovis protovis extends javascript but for the most part it's just plain javascript. What can I do to make BBEdit treat this as if it is javascript, or even better, extend the existing JS language module to support protovis? -- Lorin Rivers Mosasaur: Killer Technical Marketing http://www.mosasaur.com mailto:lriv...@mosasaur.com 512/203.3198 (m) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit
Re: javascript+protovis syntax coloring
On Wednesday, December 29, 2010, Lorin Rivers lriv...@mosasaur.com wrote: I'm working with Protovis http://vis.stanford.edu/protovis/, which is a javascript-based graphics library. The syntax for a protovis block adds +protovis to the end of the declaration in the html document, like so: script type=text/javascript+protovis Is that really necessary? If Protovis is just a library, then the code is just JavaScript and text/javascript should work just fine, right? What can I do to make BBEdit treat this as if it is javascript, or even better, extend the existing JS language module to support protovis? You can generate a tags file for Protovis symbols and put it in ~/Library/Application Support/BBEdit/Completion Data/JavaScript/ and the Protovis symbols will be recognized and eligible for coloring and completion. R. -- Rich Siegel Bare Bones Software, Inc. sie...@barebones.com http://www.barebones.com/ Someday I'll look back on all this and laugh... until they sedate me. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit
