Re: Speed issues with Broadcom 4311

2007-08-29 Thread Larry Finger
Anderson, Scott wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I wanted to report that I'm experiencing extremely slow speeds (20k) 
> down or less using my Broadcom 4311 and the newer b43 driver. Pages have 
> a very hard time loading. I'm currently running Fedora7 with the 
> 2.6.22.4-65.fc7 kernel. My access point is an old Linksys wireless B 
> router with wep encryption.
> 
> Lspci Shows: 01:00.0 Network controller: Broadcom Corporation Dell 
> Wireless 1390 WLAN Mini-PCI Card (rev 01)
> 
> 
> 
> Iwconfig Shows:
> 
> wlan0 IEEE 802.11g  ESSID:"atlst" 
>   Mode:Managed  Frequency:2.412 GHz  Access Point: 
> 00:0C:41:6F:1F:6A  
>   Bit Rate=5.5 Mb/s  
>   Retry min limit:7   RTS thr:off   Fragment thr=2346 B  
>   Encryption key:F5CC-E107-D3
>   Link Quality=73/100  Signal level=-57 dBm  Noise level=-63 dBm
>   Rx invalid nwid:0  Rx invalid crypt:0  Rx invalid frag:0
>   Tx excessive retries:0  Invalid misc:0   Missed beacon:0

Have you had experiences with other bcm43xx drivers with this card and AP? Some 
people have reported
poor performance at 11Mb/s, but others have no problems.

I just tested my BCM4311 with b43 from wireless-dev, WEP encryption, and an AP 
set for b-only 
operation. It's speed adjusted to 11 Mbs fairly quickly and yielded about 4 Mbs 
uploads using iperf. 
Due to my network configuration, I couldn't measure download speed.

BTW, when you send iwconfig output to the list, please obscure the encryption 
key. You have just
published it to the whole world.

Larry


___
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev


Speed issues with Broadcom 4311

2007-08-29 Thread Anderson, Scott
Hello,

I wanted to report that I'm experiencing extremely slow speeds (20k) down or 
less using my Broadcom 4311 and the newer b43 driver. Pages have a very hard 
time loading. I'm currently running Fedora7 with the 2.6.22.4-65.fc7 kernel. My 
access point is an old Linksys wireless B router with wep encryption.

Lspci Shows: 01:00.0 Network controller: Broadcom Corporation Dell Wireless 
1390 WLAN Mini-PCI Card (rev 01)



Iwconfig Shows:

wlan0 IEEE 802.11g  ESSID:"atlst"  
  Mode:Managed  Frequency:2.412 GHz  Access Point: 00:0C:41:6F:1F:6A   
  Bit Rate=5.5 Mb/s   
  Retry min limit:7   RTS thr:off   Fragment thr=2346 B   
  Encryption key:F5CC-E107-D3
  Link Quality=73/100  Signal level=-57 dBm  Noise level=-63 dBm
  Rx invalid nwid:0  Rx invalid crypt:0  Rx invalid frag:0
  Tx excessive retries:0  Invalid misc:0   Missed beacon:0

Dmesg Shows: ATTACHED




Dmesg
Description: Dmesg
___
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev


Re: fetching wireless dev

2007-08-29 Thread John W. Linville
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 09:54:16PM +0200, Richard Jonsson wrote:

> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/git/wireless-dev$ git checkout -b 
> everything origin/everything
> Switched to a new branch "everything"
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/git/wireless-dev$ git branch
> * everything
>master
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/git/wireless-dev$ git pull
> Warning: No merge candidate found because value of config option
>   "branch.everything.merge" does not match any remote branch 
> fetched.
> No changes.

Well, you did just clone the repository -- no new changes since
your clone...

John
-- 
John W. Linville
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev


Re: fetching wireless dev

2007-08-29 Thread Richard Jonsson
Larry Finger skrev:
> Richard Jonsson wrote:
>> ---
>> Thank you both, but with "git pull" I get this instead:
>>
>> $ git pull
>> Warning: No merge candidate found because value of config option
>>  "branch.everything.merge" does not match any remote branch 
>> fetched.
>>
>> A google search turned up one relevant result, but it didn't help
> 
> Did you do the steps that Linville outlined? I reproduce his notes below:
> 
> 
> /home/linville/git/wireless-dev
> [linville-t43.mobile]:> git branch
> * master
> 
> /home/linville/git/wireless-dev
> [linville-t43.mobile]:> git branch -r
>   origin/HEAD
>   origin/adm8211
>   origin/b43
>   origin/everything
>   origin/iwlwifi
>   origin/mac80211
>   origin/master
>   origin/merged-upstream
>   origin/mm-master
>   origin/p54
>   origin/rt2x00
>   origin/ssb
>   origin/zd1211rw
> 
> /home/linville/git/wireless-dev
> [linville-t43.mobile]:> git checkout -b everything origin/everything
> Switched to a new branch "everything"
> 
> /home/linville/git/wireless-dev
> [linville-t43.mobile]:> git branch
> * everything
>   master
> 
> 
> Is this what you see with a 'git branch' command?
> 
> Larry

Yes, that's exactly what I see. Just started over with a fresh tree by 
following Linvilles instructions in this topic/thread. I also typed the 
additional commands you said, and got the exact same output, reproduced 
below:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/git$ rm -rf wireless-dev/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/git$ git clone --reference linux-2.6 
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-dev.git 
wireless-dev
Initialized empty Git repository in /usr/src/git/wireless-dev/.git/
remote: Generating pack...
remote: Done counting 3229 objects.
remote: Deltifying 3229 objects...
remote:  100% (3229/3229) done
Indexing 3229 objects...
remote: Total 3229 (delta 2651), reused 3098 (delta 2614)
  100% (3229/3229) done
Resolving 2651 deltas...
  100% (2651/2651) done
Checking 22461 files out...
  100% (22461/22461) done
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/git$ cd wireless-dev/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/git/wireless-dev$ git branch
* master
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/git/wireless-dev$ git branch -r
   origin/HEAD
   origin/adm8211
   origin/at76
   origin/ath5k
   origin/b43
   origin/everything
   origin/iwlwifi
   origin/mac80211
   origin/master
   origin/merged-upstream
   origin/mm-master
   origin/p54
   origin/pending-upstream
   origin/rt2x00
   origin/ssb
   origin/zd1211rw
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/git/wireless-dev$ git checkout -b 
everything origin/everything
Switched to a new branch "everything"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/git/wireless-dev$ git branch
* everything
   master
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/git/wireless-dev$ git pull
Warning: No merge candidate found because value of config option
  "branch.everything.merge" does not match any remote branch 
fetched.
No changes.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/git/wireless-dev$
___
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev


Re: fetching wireless dev

2007-08-29 Thread Larry Finger
Richard Jonsson wrote:
> ---
> Thank you both, but with "git pull" I get this instead:
> 
> $ git pull
> Warning: No merge candidate found because value of config option
>  "branch.everything.merge" does not match any remote branch 
> fetched.
> 
> A google search turned up one relevant result, but it didn't help

Did you do the steps that Linville outlined? I reproduce his notes below:


/home/linville/git/wireless-dev
[linville-t43.mobile]:> git branch
* master

/home/linville/git/wireless-dev
[linville-t43.mobile]:> git branch -r
   origin/HEAD
   origin/adm8211
   origin/b43
   origin/everything
   origin/iwlwifi
   origin/mac80211
   origin/master
   origin/merged-upstream
   origin/mm-master
   origin/p54
   origin/rt2x00
   origin/ssb
   origin/zd1211rw

/home/linville/git/wireless-dev
[linville-t43.mobile]:> git checkout -b everything origin/everything
Switched to a new branch "everything"

/home/linville/git/wireless-dev
[linville-t43.mobile]:> git branch
* everything
   master


Is this what you see with a 'git branch' command?

Larry
___
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev


Re: fetching wireless dev

2007-08-29 Thread Richard Jonsson
Larry Finger skrev:
> Richard Jonsson wrote:
>> I can't figure out how to keep up to date with the wireless dev tree.
>> I've set up as told by John W. Linville in a post here and use the 
>> "everything" branch.
>>
>> When browsing the tree at kernel.org I see changes from 24'th of 
>> august, but my local copy is from 15'th (when I first fetched) even 
>> after "git fetch". What command am I supposed to use?
> 
> 'git pull' will get any updates.
> 
>> What is the best practice to apply patches not yet in Linvilles tree?
>>
>> My purpose is to test patches from the list and will probably not do 
>> patches myself.
> 
> The "best" practice is probably in the eye of the user. What I do is to 
> get the patch text into my wireless-dev tree by downloading or by saving 
> the email containing the patch. If you do the latter, be careful about 
> the white space. Too many mailers change tabs into spaces that kills the 
> application of the patch.
> 
> To apply patches, I use quilt. With it, you can "quilt import" the file 
> and apply the patch with "quilt push". To remove the patch, use the 
> "quilt pop" command. In case you do want to write your own patches, 
> start with the "quilt new" command, then modify the source using the 
> "quilt edit" command, followed by "quilt refresh". You can find a 
> description of quilt from 'man quilt' or on-line.
> 
> Larry
> 
Sorry Larry, I realised I sent you a private copy of this message.
---
Thank you both, but with "git pull" I get this instead:

$ git pull
Warning: No merge candidate found because value of config option
  "branch.everything.merge" does not match any remote branch 
fetched.

A google search turned up one relevant result, but it didn't help.

___
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev


Re: fetching wireless dev

2007-08-29 Thread John W. Linville
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 07:34:58PM +0200, Richard Jonsson wrote:
> I can't figure out how to keep up to date with the wireless dev tree.
> I've set up as told by John W. Linville in a post here and use the 
> "everything" branch.
> 
> When browsing the tree at kernel.org I see changes from 24'th of august, 
> but my local copy is from 15'th (when I first fetched) even after "git 
> fetch". What command am I supposed to use?

I think 'git pull' is what you want.  But be warned that wireless-dev
will be rebased from time to time, and pulling won't work across
rebases.

> What is the best practice to apply patches not yet in Linvilles tree?
> 
> My purpose is to test patches from the list and will probably not do 
> patches myself.

The best practice would be to keep an up-to-date copy of Linus' tree
(i.e. linux-2.6) using 'git pull'.  Then when you want to experiment
w/ wireless-dev, you can create a lightweight clone (my terminology)
using a command like this:

   git clone --reference linux-2.6 
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-dev.git 
wireless-dev

Then create a working branch for yourself:

   git checkout -b work origin/everything

Then you can apply patch emails for testing.  Save the patch email
in mbox format, then use this command:

   git applymbox patch.mbox

Then, build-test-patch-repeat... :-)

Hth!

John
-- 
John W. Linville
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev


Re: fetching wireless dev

2007-08-29 Thread Larry Finger
Richard Jonsson wrote:
> I can't figure out how to keep up to date with the wireless dev tree.
> I've set up as told by John W. Linville in a post here and use the 
> "everything" branch.
> 
> When browsing the tree at kernel.org I see changes from 24'th of august, 
> but my local copy is from 15'th (when I first fetched) even after "git 
> fetch". What command am I supposed to use?

'git pull' will get any updates.

> What is the best practice to apply patches not yet in Linvilles tree?
> 
> My purpose is to test patches from the list and will probably not do 
> patches myself.

The "best" practice is probably in the eye of the user. What I do is to get the 
patch text into my 
wireless-dev tree by downloading or by saving the email containing the patch. 
If you do the latter, 
be careful about the white space. Too many mailers change tabs into spaces that 
kills the 
application of the patch.

To apply patches, I use quilt. With it, you can "quilt import" the file and 
apply the patch with 
"quilt push". To remove the patch, use the "quilt pop" command. In case you do 
want to write your 
own patches, start with the "quilt new" command, then modify the source using 
the "quilt edit" 
command, followed by "quilt refresh". You can find a description of quilt from 
'man quilt' or on-line.

Larry

___
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev


Re: fetching wireless dev

2007-08-29 Thread Andreas Schwab
Richard Jonsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> When browsing the tree at kernel.org I see changes from 24'th of august, 
> but my local copy is from 15'th (when I first fetched) even after "git 
> fetch". What command am I supposed to use?

Use "git pull" instead.  "git fetch" only fetches new objects, but does
not merge them.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
___
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev


fetching wireless dev

2007-08-29 Thread Richard Jonsson
I can't figure out how to keep up to date with the wireless dev tree.
I've set up as told by John W. Linville in a post here and use the 
"everything" branch.

When browsing the tree at kernel.org I see changes from 24'th of august, 
but my local copy is from 15'th (when I first fetched) even after "git 
fetch". What command am I supposed to use?

What is the best practice to apply patches not yet in Linvilles tree?

My purpose is to test patches from the list and will probably not do 
patches myself.

Richard
___
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev


Re: bcm43xx-mac80211 problems with advanced wpa

2007-08-29 Thread Larry Finger
John H. wrote:
> I will confirm that this actually works on my school network.
> 2.6.22.4 with the b43 module does, that is.
> 
> However, it works if I manually do dhclient wlan0 as opposed to ifup
> wlan0, which is strange as wlan0 is configured to use dhcp.

Perhaps it is a timing problem.

Larry


___
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev


Re: bcm43xx-mac80211 problems with advanced wpa

2007-08-29 Thread John H.
I will confirm that this actually works on my school network.
2.6.22.4 with the b43 module does, that is.

However, it works if I manually do dhclient wlan0 as opposed to ifup
wlan0, which is strange as wlan0 is configured to use dhcp.

On 8/24/07, Larry Finger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Daniel Ostrow wrote:
> > 
> >> ioctl[SIOCSIWAUTH]: Operation not supported
> >> WEXT auth param 4 value 0x0 -
> >> ioctl[SIOCSIWAUTH]: Operation not supported
> >> WEXT auth param 5 value 0x1 -
> > 
> >
> > For what it is worth I get the above messages from wpa_supplicant as
> > well using b43. They don't seem to inhibit the functionality of my setup
> > at all but I am including details below for whatever the information
> > will help with.
> >
> > My system is a Dell Latitude D520, it has a 4311 in addition to a b44
> > wired nick, I have ssb, b44 and b43 compiled as modules (not by choice
> > but my machine panics if I build in ssb and b44 and leave b43 as a
> > module) from a pull of the #everything branch from Linville's
> > wireless-dev tree from yesterday. I am running Gentoo (as if the e-mail
> > address didn't give that away) with wpa_supplicant-0.5.8. I am
> > connecting to two different networks using wpa_supplicant one WPA-PSK
> > the other WPA2-PSK, the (edited) configs are below.
> >
> > network={
> >   ssid="gatekeeper"
> >   key_mgmt=WPA-PSK
> >   psk=""
> >   priority=1
> > }
> >
> > network={
> >   ssid="WSTMBLG2"
> >   proto=RSN
> >   key_mgmt=WPA-PSK
> >   pairwise=TKIP
> >   group=TKIP
> >   psk=""
> >   priority=2
> > }
> >
> > I did not see these messages from wpa_supplicant before I moved to b43
> > from bcm43xx (softmac). As I said though...they don't seem to inhibit
> > anything, I associate and connect at very good rates, just thought I'd
> > pass along the anecdotal information. Kepp up the great work, the driver
> > works like a charm!
>
> In bcm43xx, those IOCTL's were implemented. In mac80211, they are not as they 
> are not needed. As you
> see, those messages are not fatal.
>
> Larry
> ___
> Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
> Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
>
___
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev