Re: [beagleboard] Vanilla kernel with real-time patch doesn't build for omap3 BBxM Ubuntu12.04
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 9:34 AM, wrote: > Hi, > > I patched a vanilla kernel for realtime and configured it for omap3 > beagle. However, after building it using make-kpkg with > "DEB_HOST_ARCH=armhf CLEAN_SOURCE=no fakeroot make-kpkg --arch=arm > --subarch=omap3 --cross-compile=arm-linux-gnueabihf- --initrd > --append-to-version -xenomai-2.6.3-omap3 --revision 1.4 kernel_image > kernel_headers", synaptic tells me it's armhf but no omap kernel. Despite > searching, how should I patch this vanilla kernel for omap3 so it runs on > the BBxM ? > Don't use the "subarch" flag with make-kpkg, it's for something else, not related to the "soc" family of arm devices.. Regards, -- Robert Nelson http://www.rcn-ee.com/ -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [beagleboard] Vanilla kernel with real-time patch doesn't build for omap3 BBxM Ubuntu12.04
Op maandag 10 februari 2014 16:34:51 UTC+1 schreef RobertCNelson: > > > > > On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 9:34 AM, > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I patched a vanilla kernel for realtime and configured it for omap3 >> beagle. However, after building it using make-kpkg with >> "DEB_HOST_ARCH=armhf CLEAN_SOURCE=no fakeroot make-kpkg --arch=arm >> --subarch=omap3 --cross-compile=arm-linux-gnueabihf- --initrd >> --append-to-version -xenomai-2.6.3-omap3 --revision 1.4 kernel_image >> kernel_headers", synaptic tells me it's armhf but no omap kernel. Despite >> searching, how should I patch this vanilla kernel for omap3 so it runs on >> the BBxM ? >> > > Don't use the "subarch" flag with make-kpkg, it's for something else, not > related to the "soc" family of arm devices.. > So I should use this exact build string, but without --subarch and will get an armhf kernel with omap3 ? -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [beagleboard] Vanilla kernel with real-time patch doesn't build for omap3 BBxM Ubuntu12.04
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 9:49 AM, wrote: > Op maandag 10 februari 2014 16:34:51 UTC+1 schreef RobertCNelson: > >> >> >> >> On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 9:34 AM, wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I patched a vanilla kernel for realtime and configured it for omap3 >>> beagle. However, after building it using make-kpkg with >>> "DEB_HOST_ARCH=armhf CLEAN_SOURCE=no fakeroot make-kpkg --arch=arm >>> --subarch=omap3 --cross-compile=arm-linux-gnueabihf- --initrd >>> --append-to-version -xenomai-2.6.3-omap3 --revision 1.4 kernel_image >>> kernel_headers", synaptic tells me it's armhf but no omap kernel. Despite >>> searching, how should I patch this vanilla kernel for omap3 so it runs on >>> the BBxM ? >>> >> >> Don't use the "subarch" flag with make-kpkg, it's for something else, not >> related to the "soc" family of arm devices.. >> > > So I should use this exact build string, but without --subarch and will > get an armhf kernel with omap3 ? > The answer to the first part should have been implied from my last email.. The second part, totally depends on what features you enabled for the "omap3" devices in your kernel .config. Regards, -- Robert Nelson http://www.rcn-ee.com/ -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [beagleboard] Vanilla kernel with real-time patch doesn't build for omap3 BBxM Ubuntu12.04
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:17 AM, wrote: > Op maandag 10 februari 2014 16:58:09 UTC+1 schreef RobertCNelson: > >> >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 9:49 AM, wrote: >> >>> Op maandag 10 februari 2014 16:34:51 UTC+1 schreef RobertCNelson: >>> On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 9:34 AM, wrote: > Hi, > > I patched a vanilla kernel for realtime and configured it for omap3 > beagle. However, after building it using make-kpkg with > "DEB_HOST_ARCH=armhf CLEAN_SOURCE=no fakeroot make-kpkg --arch=arm > --subarch=omap3 --cross-compile=arm-linux-gnueabihf- --initrd > --append-to-version -xenomai-2.6.3-omap3 --revision 1.4 kernel_image > kernel_headers", synaptic tells me it's armhf but no omap kernel. Despite > searching, how should I patch this vanilla kernel for omap3 so it runs on > the BBxM ? > Don't use the "subarch" flag with make-kpkg, it's for something else, not related to the "soc" family of arm devices.. >>> >>> So I should use this exact build string, but without --subarch and will >>> get an armhf kernel with omap3 ? >>> >> >> The answer to the first part should have been implied from my last email.. >> >> The second part, totally depends on what features you enabled for the >> "omap3" devices in your kernel .config. >> > > I configured it generally for omap2+, omap3 and beagle. Should there be > more features to enable to have it run on BBxM with Ubuntu Precise ? > More then likely yes.. But it depends on the kernel version.. So go build/test/enable/rebuild/test/etc... Regards, -- Robert Nelson http://www.rcn-ee.com/ -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [beagleboard] Vanilla kernel with real-time patch doesn't build for omap3 BBxM Ubuntu12.04
Op maandag 10 februari 2014 16:58:09 UTC+1 schreef RobertCNelson: > > > > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 9:49 AM, > wrote: > >> Op maandag 10 februari 2014 16:34:51 UTC+1 schreef RobertCNelson: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 9:34 AM, wrote: >>> Hi, I patched a vanilla kernel for realtime and configured it for omap3 beagle. However, after building it using make-kpkg with "DEB_HOST_ARCH=armhf CLEAN_SOURCE=no fakeroot make-kpkg --arch=arm --subarch=omap3 --cross-compile=arm-linux-gnueabihf- --initrd --append-to-version -xenomai-2.6.3-omap3 --revision 1.4 kernel_image kernel_headers", synaptic tells me it's armhf but no omap kernel. Despite searching, how should I patch this vanilla kernel for omap3 so it runs on the BBxM ? >>> >>> Don't use the "subarch" flag with make-kpkg, it's for something else, >>> not related to the "soc" family of arm devices.. >>> >> >> So I should use this exact build string, but without --subarch and will >> get an armhf kernel with omap3 ? >> > > The answer to the first part should have been implied from my last email.. > > The second part, totally depends on what features you enabled for the > "omap3" devices in your kernel .config. > I configured it generally for omap2+, omap3 and beagle. Should there be more features to enable to have it run on BBxM with Ubuntu Precise ? -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [beagleboard] Vanilla kernel with real-time patch doesn't build for omap3 BBxM Ubuntu12.04
Op maandag 10 februari 2014 17:18:24 UTC+1 schreef RobertCNelson: > > > > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:17 AM, > wrote: > >> Op maandag 10 februari 2014 16:58:09 UTC+1 schreef RobertCNelson: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 9:49 AM, wrote: >>> Op maandag 10 februari 2014 16:34:51 UTC+1 schreef RobertCNelson: > > > > On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 9:34 AM, wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I patched a vanilla kernel for realtime and configured it for omap3 >> beagle. However, after building it using make-kpkg with >> "DEB_HOST_ARCH=armhf CLEAN_SOURCE=no fakeroot make-kpkg --arch=arm >> --subarch=omap3 --cross-compile=arm-linux-gnueabihf- --initrd >> --append-to-version -xenomai-2.6.3-omap3 --revision 1.4 kernel_image >> kernel_headers", synaptic tells me it's armhf but no omap kernel. >> Despite >> searching, how should I patch this vanilla kernel for omap3 so it runs >> on >> the BBxM ? >> > > Don't use the "subarch" flag with make-kpkg, it's for something else, > not related to the "soc" family of arm devices.. > So I should use this exact build string, but without --subarch and will get an armhf kernel with omap3 ? >>> >>> The answer to the first part should have been implied from my last >>> email.. >>> >>> The second part, totally depends on what features you enabled for the >>> "omap3" devices in your kernel .config. >>> >> >> I configured it generally for omap2+, omap3 and beagle. Should there be >> more features to enable to have it run on BBxM with Ubuntu Precise ? >> > > More then likely yes.. But it depends on the kernel version.. So go > build/test/enable/rebuild/test/etc... > Oh, I did. Have reconfigured, rebuilt and tested 4 times by now, and keep getting the dpkg message that it's not an omap kernel. I took vanilla kernel 3.5.7 because of a necessary patch that supports this version. Is there any other kernel version you can recommend for omap3 ? Regards, hvn -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [beagleboard] Vanilla kernel with real-time patch doesn't build for omap3 BBxM Ubuntu12.04
Op maandag 10 februari 2014 17:27:11 UTC+1 schreef RobertCNelson: > > > > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:24 AM, > wrote: > >> Op maandag 10 februari 2014 17:18:24 UTC+1 schreef RobertCNelson: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:17 AM, wrote: >>> Op maandag 10 februari 2014 16:58:09 UTC+1 schreef RobertCNelson: > > > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 9:49 AM, wrote: > >> Op maandag 10 februari 2014 16:34:51 UTC+1 schreef RobertCNelson: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 9:34 AM, wrote: >>> Hi, I patched a vanilla kernel for realtime and configured it for omap3 beagle. However, after building it using make-kpkg with "DEB_HOST_ARCH=armhf CLEAN_SOURCE=no fakeroot make-kpkg --arch=arm --subarch=omap3 --cross-compile=arm-linux-gnueabihf- --initrd --append-to-version -xenomai-2.6.3-omap3 --revision 1.4 kernel_image kernel_headers", synaptic tells me it's armhf but no omap kernel. Despite searching, how should I patch this vanilla kernel for omap3 so it runs on the BBxM ? >>> >>> Don't use the "subarch" flag with make-kpkg, it's for something >>> else, not related to the "soc" family of arm devices.. >>> >> >> So I should use this exact build string, but without --subarch and >> will get an armhf kernel with omap3 ? >> > > The answer to the first part should have been implied from my last > email.. > > The second part, totally depends on what features you enabled for the > "omap3" devices in your kernel .config. > I configured it generally for omap2+, omap3 and beagle. Should there be more features to enable to have it run on BBxM with Ubuntu Precise ? >>> >>> More then likely yes.. But it depends on the kernel version.. So go >>> build/test/enable/rebuild/test/etc... >>> >> >> Oh, I did. Have reconfigured, rebuilt and tested 4 times by now, and keep >> getting the dpkg message that it's not an omap kernel. >> > > removing the "--subarch" crap will fix that... > > >> I took vanilla kernel 3.5.7 because of a necessary patch that supports >> this version. Is there any other kernel version you can recommend for omap3 >> ? >> > > v3.13.2 as it's the latest stable on kernel.org > And which is the previous stable for omap3 that you recommend ? Regards, hvn -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [beagleboard] Vanilla kernel with real-time patch doesn't build for omap3 BBxM Ubuntu12.04
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:24 AM, wrote: > Op maandag 10 februari 2014 17:18:24 UTC+1 schreef RobertCNelson: > >> >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:17 AM, wrote: >> >>> Op maandag 10 februari 2014 16:58:09 UTC+1 schreef RobertCNelson: >>> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 9:49 AM, wrote: > Op maandag 10 februari 2014 16:34:51 UTC+1 schreef RobertCNelson: > >> >> >> >> On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 9:34 AM, wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I patched a vanilla kernel for realtime and configured it for omap3 >>> beagle. However, after building it using make-kpkg with >>> "DEB_HOST_ARCH=armhf CLEAN_SOURCE=no fakeroot make-kpkg --arch=arm >>> --subarch=omap3 --cross-compile=arm-linux-gnueabihf- --initrd >>> --append-to-version -xenomai-2.6.3-omap3 --revision 1.4 kernel_image >>> kernel_headers", synaptic tells me it's armhf but no omap kernel. >>> Despite >>> searching, how should I patch this vanilla kernel for omap3 so it runs >>> on >>> the BBxM ? >>> >> >> Don't use the "subarch" flag with make-kpkg, it's for something else, >> not related to the "soc" family of arm devices.. >> > > So I should use this exact build string, but without --subarch and > will get an armhf kernel with omap3 ? > The answer to the first part should have been implied from my last email.. The second part, totally depends on what features you enabled for the "omap3" devices in your kernel .config. >>> >>> I configured it generally for omap2+, omap3 and beagle. Should there be >>> more features to enable to have it run on BBxM with Ubuntu Precise ? >>> >> >> More then likely yes.. But it depends on the kernel version.. So go >> build/test/enable/rebuild/test/etc... >> > > Oh, I did. Have reconfigured, rebuilt and tested 4 times by now, and keep > getting the dpkg message that it's not an omap kernel. > removing the "--subarch" crap will fix that... > I took vanilla kernel 3.5.7 because of a necessary patch that supports > this version. Is there any other kernel version you can recommend for omap3 > ? > v3.13.2 as it's the latest stable on kernel.org Regards, -- Robert Nelson http://www.rcn-ee.com/ -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [beagleboard] Vanilla kernel with real-time patch doesn't build for omap3 BBxM Ubuntu12.04
Op maandag 10 februari 2014 17:32:46 UTC+1 schreef RobertCNelson: > > >>> >>> I took vanilla kernel 3.5.7 because of a necessary patch that supports this version. Is there any other kernel version you can recommend for omap3 ? >>> >>> v3.13.2 as it's the latest stable on kernel.org >>> >> >> And which is the previous stable for omap3 that you recommend ? >> > > v3.13.1 > OK. Can you tell me about the difference with regard to omap between 3.13.2, and e.g. 3.5.7 or 3.8.13 ? These are all stable kernels. -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [beagleboard] Vanilla kernel with real-time patch doesn't build for omap3 BBxM Ubuntu12.04
> > >> >> >>> I took vanilla kernel 3.5.7 because of a necessary patch that supports >>> this version. Is there any other kernel version you can recommend for omap3 >>> ? >>> >> >> v3.13.2 as it's the latest stable on kernel.org >> > > And which is the previous stable for omap3 that you recommend ? > v3.13.1 Regards, -- Robert Nelson http://www.rcn-ee.com/ -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [beagleboard] Vanilla kernel with real-time patch doesn't build for omap3 BBxM Ubuntu12.04
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:48 AM, wrote: > Op maandag 10 februari 2014 17:32:46 UTC+1 schreef RobertCNelson: > >> > I took vanilla kernel 3.5.7 because of a necessary patch that supports > this version. Is there any other kernel version you can recommend for > omap3 > ? > v3.13.2 as it's the latest stable on kernel.org >>> >>> And which is the previous stable for omap3 that you recommend ? >>> >> >> v3.13.1 >> > > OK. Can you tell me about the difference with regard to omap between > 3.13.2, and e.g. 3.5.7 or 3.8.13 ? These are all stable kernels. > a few years of development.. Mostly has been the complete removal of the classic board files to device tree's.. Checkout kernel.org for all details.. or: git diff v3.5.7..v3.13.2 Regards, -- Robert Nelson http://www.rcn-ee.com/ -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [beagleboard] Vanilla kernel with real-time patch doesn't build for omap3 BBxM Ubuntu12.04
Op maandag 10 februari 2014 17:56:41 UTC+1 schreef RobertCNelson: > > > > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:48 AM, > wrote: > >> Op maandag 10 februari 2014 17:32:46 UTC+1 schreef RobertCNelson: >> >>> > > >> I took vanilla kernel 3.5.7 because of a necessary patch that >> supports this version. Is there any other kernel version you can >> recommend >> for omap3 ? >> > > v3.13.2 as it's the latest stable on kernel.org > And which is the previous stable for omap3 that you recommend ? >>> >>> v3.13.1 >>> >> >> OK. Can you tell me about the difference with regard to omap between >> 3.13.2, and e.g. 3.5.7 or 3.8.13 ? These are all stable kernels. >> > > a few years of development.. Mostly has been the complete removal of the > classic board files to device tree's.. Checkout kernel.org for all > details.. > > or: > > git diff v3.5.7..v3.13.2 > > OK, Thanks for your help. Regards, hvn -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [beagleboard] Vanilla kernel with real-time patch doesn't build for omap3 BBxM Ubuntu12.04
Op maandag 10 februari 2014 16:34:51 UTC+1 schreef RobertCNelson: > > > > > On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 9:34 AM, > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I patched a vanilla kernel for realtime and configured it for omap3 >> beagle. However, after building it using make-kpkg with >> "DEB_HOST_ARCH=armhf CLEAN_SOURCE=no fakeroot make-kpkg --arch=arm >> --subarch=omap3 --cross-compile=arm-linux-gnueabihf- --initrd >> --append-to-version -xenomai-2.6.3-omap3 --revision 1.4 kernel_image >> kernel_headers", synaptic tells me it's armhf but no omap kernel. Despite >> searching, how should I patch this vanilla kernel for omap3 so it runs on >> the BBxM ? >> > > Don't use the "subarch" flag with make-kpkg, it's for something else, not > related to the "soc" family of arm devices.. > I have removed the "subarch" flag, and now I get the error message "Kernel <.> does not match your subarchitecture omap, therefore not writing it to flash.". The running kernel (Ubuntu 12.04 omap armv7l) is v3.2.0-55-omap from repo. I noticed that the latest stable kernel indeed has a different configuration for omap. But I wonder, where does that message about "subarchitecture omap" really come from? The kernel configuration or the cross-compilation? -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [beagleboard] Vanilla kernel with real-time patch doesn't build for omap3 BBxM Ubuntu12.04
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 3:38 AM, wrote: > Op maandag 10 februari 2014 16:34:51 UTC+1 schreef RobertCNelson: > >> >> >> >> On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 9:34 AM, wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I patched a vanilla kernel for realtime and configured it for omap3 >>> beagle. However, after building it using make-kpkg with >>> "DEB_HOST_ARCH=armhf CLEAN_SOURCE=no fakeroot make-kpkg --arch=arm >>> --subarch=omap3 --cross-compile=arm-linux-gnueabihf- --initrd >>> --append-to-version -xenomai-2.6.3-omap3 --revision 1.4 kernel_image >>> kernel_headers", synaptic tells me it's armhf but no omap kernel. Despite >>> searching, how should I patch this vanilla kernel for omap3 so it runs on >>> the BBxM ? >>> >> >> Don't use the "subarch" flag with make-kpkg, it's for something else, not >> related to the "soc" family of arm devices.. >> > > I have removed the "subarch" flag, and now I get the error message "Kernel > <.> does not match your subarchitecture omap, therefore not writing it > to flash.". > Okay.. "not writing it to flash" your dealing with ubuntu's flash-kernel script. So when you install a *.deb, dpkg calls "flash-kernel"... It's a middle layer script that ubuntu wrote to "generically" install the boot files to the correct location for a bunch of devices. Unless you run ubuntu's kernel, it just gets in the way.. With my images: http://elinux.org/BeagleBoardUbuntu#Demo_Image I disable flash-kernel outright, as it always makes the wrong assumptions. via: https://github.com/RobertCNelson/omap-image-builder/blob/master/scripts/chroot.sh#L261 The running kernel (Ubuntu 12.04 omap armv7l) is v3.2.0-55-omap from repo. > I noticed that the latest stable kernel indeed has a different > configuration for omap. But I wonder, where does that message about > "subarchitecture omap" really come from? The kernel configuration or the > cross-compilation? > So good luck with dealing with the flash-kernel script.. Regards, -- Robert Nelson http://www.rcn-ee.com/ -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
