Re: getting process id under NT
I have tried your pm and it works well on XP but does not on my NT platform. I have the following error : Error - Variant '$_[0]' support status is unknown. This can happen if you 'use Win32::Process::Info ();'. Please do not do that. eod When I set the environment variables I have Windows_NT has OS. So it should work no ? Happytown a écrit : > On Jul 30, 11:09�am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ron Bergin) wrote: > > On Jul 29, 9:12�am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Epanda) wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi HappyTown > > > > > I have seen your web link but I don't think it can show me the PID if > > > I give the name of an existing and running Win NT application. > > > > > On 28 juil, 05:24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Happytown) wrote: > > > > > > On Jul 26, 3:14�am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Epanda) wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > I would like to know if it is possible to get win32 process ID under > > > > > Windows NT without using Win32::OLE because this one does not work > > > > > under NT. > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > Maybe, this module can help > > > > you:http://search.cpan.org/~cosimo/Win32-API-0.55/API.pm > > > > Win32::API will do what you need, however, it's not the easiest to > > use. �Getting the process info requires calling several (about 5) > > different C functions in kernel32.dll and setting up the function > > calls can be tricky. > > > > It would be easier and better to use Win32::Process::Info (which uses > > Win32::API) and let it deal with setting up the function > > calls.http://search.cpan.org/~wyant/Win32-Process-Info-1.012/lib/Win32/Proc...- > > Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > Yes, you're right. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://learn.perl.org/
Re: getting process id under NT
Hi HappyTown I have seen your web link but I don't think it can show me the PID if I give the name of an existing and running Win NT application. On 28 juil, 05:24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Happytown) wrote: > On Jul 26, 3:14 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Epanda) wrote: > > > Hi, > > > I would like to know if it is possible to get win32 process ID under > > Windows NT without using Win32::OLE because this one does not work > > under NT. > > > Thanks > > Maybe, this module can help > you:http://search.cpan.org/~cosimo/Win32-API-0.55/API.pm -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://learn.perl.org/
getting process id under NT
Hi, I would like to know if it is possible to get win32 process ID under Windows NT without using Win32::OLE because this one does not work under NT. Thanks -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://learn.perl.org/
Re: perl2exe
What is the version I need for perl2exe which is compatible with 5.10 ? I don't understand why perl2exe of 2001 is not compatible because only modules change in perl 5.0 to 5.10. So I don't understand and I know that lastest version of perl2exe is not free and I can't buy it. Is there another solution ? Thanks On 24 juil, 10:55, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stewart Anderson) wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Rob Dixon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 23 July 2008 21:10 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Cc: epanda > > Subject: Re: perl2exe > > > epanda wrote: > > > > I am using perl2exe (Oct 27, 2001) and it works fine for little > script > > > without several .pm and it does good binary conversion. > > > I am working without any install of perl8.8 or 10. > > > > Now I want to include Win32::process which includes others > > > dependencies and I would like to know if I can continue using > perl2exe > > > and install perl 10. > > > > How can I include all .pm easily with the install of perl 10 and > > > perl2exe is it compatible ? > > > You need to install a different version of perl2exe to build images > that > > use > > Perl 5.10. You should install Perl 5.10 on your PC as well as the > relevant > > modules for your program. Once you have tested it thoroughly under the > > perl > > interpreter you can use perl2exe to build an executable image. > > > HTH, > > > Rob > > [Stewart Anderson] > Hi, I thought I read somewhere that generating executable Perl > binaries was at best in the prototype stages of evolution. I'm not > putting down the efforts of IndigoSTAR or any others who are involved > in producing tools like this, just seeking a clarification on how > robust and reliable the programs created are as compared to their > original Perl counterparts? > > Thanks > > Stu. > > Information in this email including any attachments may be privileged, > confidential and is intended exclusively for the addressee. The views > expressed may not be official policy, but the personal views of the > originator. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender by > return e-mail and delete it from your system. You should not reproduce, > distribute, store, retransmit, use or disclose its contents to anyone. Please > note we reserve the right to monitor all e-mail communication through our > internal and external networks. SKY and the SKY marks are trade marks of > British Sky Broadcasting Group plc and are used under licence. British Sky > Broadcasting Limited (Registration No. 2906991), Sky Interactive Limited > (Registration No. 3554332), Sky-In-Home Service Limited (Registration No. > 2067075) and Sky Subscribers Services Limited (Registration No. 2340150) are > direct or indirect subsidiaries of British Sky Broadcasting Group plc > (Registration No. 2247735). All of the companies mentioned in this paragraph > are incorporated in England and Wales and share the same registered office at > Grant Way, Isleworth, Middlesex TW7 5QD. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://learn.perl.org/
perl2exe
Hello I am using perl2exe (Oct 27, 2001) and it works fine for little script without several .pm and it does good binary conversion. I am working without any install of perl8.8 or 10. Now I want to include Win32::process which includes others dependencies and I would like to know if I can continue using perl2exe and install perl 10. How can I include all .pm easily with the install of perl 10 and perl2exe is it compatible ? Thanks Best Regards Epanda -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://learn.perl.org/
Re: Parsing XML
Hi Rob, I only have to read values from nodes but I am amazing by what you say. But the XML file can take 10 Mb. I thought that expat was the faster parser because I have found this link http://www.xml.com/lpt/a/37. Maybe it was true in 1999 but it isn't not at all. You have to notice that the parser has to be a modular one that I can call in C++ method. Could RegExp be more efficient and faster than a classical Parser XPat or MSXML ? More than that, I have heard that there is another generation which combine DOM and SAX parser, it is a microsoft I think but I have lost the name. Thanks On 19 juil, 03:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rob Dixon) wrote: > Epanda wrote: > > > Epanda wrote: > > >> I would like to know if we can parse XML with regexp faster than with > >> an MSXML or Xerces library ? > > > I just want to parse an XML and I have seen that the XML!!Parser of > > Perl based on Expat is the most faster ofth world, I don't know Twig. > > > My XML is classical : > > > > > > > > > > > > > OM > > SAT > > > > > > TPS > > 3E+01 > > > > > > > > > but can be very big. > > XML::Twig is built on Expat, and is especially good at processing large files > one element at a time instead of loading the whole file into memory first. For > instance, if your data consists of multiple independent elements > XML::Twig can be set up to process them individually and so save memory. Take > a > look herehttp://www.xmltwig.com/xmltwig/ > > But if you are hoping to write something that is faster than MSXML or Xerces > you > may be unsucessful. Perl also has XML::LibXML and XML::Xerces modules as well > if > you want to try those. > > What do you need to do with the data? It may be possible with regular > expressions if the data is consistently formatted. > > Rob -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://learn.perl.org/
Re: Parsing XML
I would implement XML::LibXML or a better one, twig or Expat just to see if it is faster and then implement it in a C++ class. Have you got a sample of using Expat ? or Twig ? Are those lib available in C++ and twig or expat are faster than MSXML or Xerces ? Thanks On 19 juil, 13:15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dermot) wrote: > 2008/7/19 Amit Saxena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 6:44 AM, Rob Dixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Epanda wrote: > > >> > Epanda wrote: > > >> >> I would like to know if we can parse XML with regexp faster than with > >> >> an MSXML or Xerces library ? > > >> > I just want to parse an XML and I have seen that the XML!!Parser of > >> > Perl based on Expat is the most faster ofth world, I don't know Twig. > > >> > My XML is classical : > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > OM > >> > SAT > >> > > >> > > >> > TPS > >> > 3E+01 > >> > > >> > > >> > > > >> > but can be very big. > > >> XML::Twig is built on Expat, and is especially good at processing large > >> files > >> one element at a time instead of loading the whole file into memory first. > >> For > >> instance, if your data consists of multiple independent elements > >> XML::Twig can be set up to process them individually and so save memory. > >> Take a > >> look herehttp://www.xmltwig.com/xmltwig/ > > >> But if you are hoping to write something that is faster than MSXML or > >> Xerces you > >> may be unsucessful. Perl also has XML::LibXML and XML::Xerces modules as > >> well if > >> you want to try those. > > >> What do you need to do with the data? It may be possible with regular > >> expressions if the data is consistently formatted. > > >> Rob > >> Hi ! > > > I am using use XML::SAX::ParserFactory . > > > I want to know whether it's a better alternative than suggested so far in > > this thread or not ? > > > If not, please suggest. > > > Regards, > > Amit Saxena > > In many ways it's a preference which parser you use. I would say if > you have a large amount of data in your XML then, XML::LibXML is a the > best option. I haven't seen anything like it for sheer speed. > > Dp. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://learn.perl.org/
Re: Parsing XML
On 18 juil, 21:08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Epanda) wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to know if we can parse XML with regexp faster than with > an MSXML or Xerces library ? > > Thanks > Best Regards I just want to parse an XML and I have seen that the XML!!Parser of Perl based on Expat is the most faster ofth world, I don't know Twig. My XML is classical : OM SAT TPS 3E+01 but can be very big. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://learn.perl.org/
Parsing XML
Hi, I would like to know if we can parse XML with regexp faster than with an MSXML or Xerces library ? Thanks Best Regards -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://learn.perl.org/
Re: regexp behin assertions ?
Sorry I hadn't enought time /(? Hi > > Where is a solution(s) of this thread? > > It's a litle bit weird ask for help, and don't offer a "posible solution". > > At least with a study case would be enough, don't mentioning further details. > > cheers -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://learn.perl.org/
Re: substitution
It is ok I have found the good one substitution for me but I am amazing that perl is not as clever as vimscript regex in limitation of assertions. ex : perl is lost when I want to say that a digit has to not be preceed by this sentence : /(? epanda schreef: > > > I want to replace my pattern by the corresponding value of the key > > in the hash table [...] > > with a single %s/pattern/hashpattern/g expression > > Why that last condition? Sounds like homework. > And is unsound: often you want to do the longest possible change first. > > -- > Affijn, Ruud > > "Gewoon is een tijger." -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://learn.perl.org/
Re: regexp behin assertions ?
I can't it is confidential and I have found. Thanks a lot On 2 juil, 00:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gunnar Hjalmarsson) wrote: > epanda wrote: > > Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote: > >> [ Please do not top-post! ] > > > > >> Maybe I'm dumb, but it's not clear to me what you want to achieve. It > >> might be easier to help you if you showed us a few _examples_, both of > >> strings that should match and strings that should not match. > > > I can show you sample on hotmail if you want. files can't be shown > > What would Hotmail have to do with it? Can't you post sample strings here? > > Never mind; since you keep top-posting, I'm not inclined to help. > > -- > Gunnar Hjalmarsson > Email:http://www.gunnar.cc/cgi-bin/contact.pl -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://learn.perl.org/
Re: regexp behin assertions ?
I can show you sample on hotmail if you want. files can't be shown On 1 juil, 21:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gunnar Hjalmarsson) wrote: > [ Please do not top-post! ] > > > > epanda wrote: > > Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote: > >> epanda wrote: > >>> I would like to identify in a pattern a number wich is not > > >>> preceded by another number a word or a ';' > >>> followed > >>> by ;number > >>> ~ ;\d+ > > >>> I have tried this s/\d+(? > >> You probably want to reverse the order. > > >> /(? > > In fact I would like my number is not preceded by a or a > > > > > I have tried that but error : > > s/(? > lookbehind not implemented at HashTableItems.pl line 207 > > Yes, as is stated in "perldoc perlre", "(? fixed-width look-behind. Hence you may not use the "+" quantifier. > > You know that the \wcharacter class includes digits, right? > > Maybe I'm dumb, but it's not clear to me what you want to achieve. It > might be easier to help you if you showed us a few _examples_, both of > strings that should match and strings that should not match. > > -- > Gunnar Hjalmarsson > Email:http://www.gunnar.cc/cgi-bin/contact.pl -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://learn.perl.org/
Re: substitution
yes to distinguish in file3 the first d;, it is sufficient to avoid it by preceded WORD;\s+\d+; but I have tried that and it is not working (? epanda wrote: > > this is not working > > > here is an example of my file and I just want to replace with one > > regexp > > > in file1 ddd ddd by the value stored in my hash table > > in file2 all d > > in file3 not the first d; but all the others which is preceed by > > WORD; > > > in all files > > not replacing block like that d;d;dd > > not replacing the 2 in WORD/WORD2; > > > file1 > > WORD/WORD2; d;d;dd; d;d;dd; d;d;d; > > d;d;d; ddd ddd ddd ddd > > WORD/WORDWORD1/WORD1; d;d;dd; d;d;dd; d;d;d; d;d;d; ddd ddd > > ddd ddd d > > > file2 > > WORD; d; dd; dd; dd; d; d; d; dd; dd; d; ddd; ddd; ddd; > > ddd; ddd; ; > > > file3 > > WORD/WORD1; d; d; ddd; ; > > > Thanks Rob if you can help > > I think you should post some real data so that we can see the difference > between > the fields you want translating. It's not clear, for instance, whether WORD is > always the same word or if it can be used to determine the behaviour of the > replacement. > > This seems to be close to what you need: > > s/ (? > but I can't see how to distinguish the first d; in file3 to be left > unmodified. > > Rob -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://learn.perl.org/
Re: regexp behin assertions ?
In fact I would like my number is not preceded by aor a I have tried that but error : s/(? epanda wrote: > > I would like to identify in a pattern a number wich is not > > > preceded by another number a word or a ';' > > followed > > by ;number > > ~ ;\d+ > > > I have tried this s/\d+(? > You probably want to reverse the order. > > /(? > -- > Gunnar Hjalmarsson > Email:http://www.gunnar.cc/cgi-bin/contact.pl -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://learn.perl.org/
regexp behin assertions ?
Hi, I would like to identify in a pattern a number wich is not preceded by another numbera word or a ';' followed by ;number ~ ;\d+ I have tried this s/\d+(?http://learn.perl.org/
substitution
Hi, I have to do a substitution of a pattern in a text file, this pattern is a key of a hash table previously set. so I want to replace my pattern by the corresponding value of the key in the hash table ex : file : n1 n22 hash : n1 => wordA n2 => wordB n22 => wordN I want to have filenew like this : file : wordA wordN with a single %s/pattern/hashpattern/g expression Thanks for helping -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://learn.perl.org/
