RE: Use Carp in package

2003-06-24 Thread Dan Muey
Excellent, Thanks Jenda and Tassilo

Yeah I did mean qw() instead of () oops.

Thanks for the info, I think I will just use Carp; and take your 
wisdom and apply it's functions appropriately

Thanks again!

What a great list!!!


Dan

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Use Carp in package

2003-06-24 Thread Tassilo von Parseval
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 01:52:20PM -0500 Dan Muey wrote:

> I'm writing a simple module to return a few variables and functions.
> 
> The perldoc perlmod* stuff says I should use Carp; and call that
> instead of warn().
> So..
> 1)
> If I use Carp shoud I still use warnings; in the package?

Those two are independent of each other. Carp provides ways for you, the
programmer, do emit warnings and error messages. They'll show up no
matter whether warnings are in effect. Warnings on the other hand will
make the Perl interpreter emit messages when it has encountered
something warnings-worthy. It's the same as with warn(): You use that
indepently from warnings, too.

> 2)
> If I understand it correctly the preffered way would be to do:
> 
> use Carp;
> ...
> carp("Watch your monkey");
> 
> Instead of:
> ...
> warn("Watch your monkey");
> 
> Is that a correct assumption?

Yes, this is correct.

> 3)
> Should I just do 
> 
> use Carp(carp);
> Since I'll only be calling carp() ( assuming carp() is warn()'s
> replacement in Carp.pm )

That's up to you. Carp exports carp() and croak(). I usually end up
needing both after a while. 

Tassilo
-- 
$_=q#",}])!JAPH!qq(tsuJ[{@"tnirp}3..0}_$;//::niam/s~=)]3[))_$-3(rellac(=_$({
pam{rekcahbus})(rekcah{lrePbus})(lreP{rehtonabus})!JAPH!qq(rehtona{tsuJbus#;
$_=reverse,s+(?<=sub).+q#q!'"qq.\t$&."'!#+sexisexiixesixeseg;y~\n~~;eval


-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Use Carp in package

2003-06-24 Thread Jenda Krynicky
From: "Dan Muey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I'm writing a simple module to return a few variables and functions.
> 
> The perldoc perlmod* stuff says I should use Carp; and call that
> instead of warn(). So.. 1) If I use Carp shoud I still use warnings;
> in the package? 

Definitely. "use Carp" and "use warnings" are not as related as it 
may seem. "use warnings" is a pragma that controls the warnings 
issued by Perl itself, and "use Carp" allows you to issue a warning 
(or die) from perspective of caller. That is the message will contain 
the filename and line number of the call to your function, not of 
some line in the function itself. 

> 2) If I understand it correctly the preffered way
> would be to do:
> 
> use Carp;
> ...
> carp("Watch your monkey");
> 
> Instead of:
> ...
> warn("Watch your monkey");

Depends. If you want to say the user of your module did something you 
don't like you should use carp(), if you fail doing somethig you 
should warn().

Depends on where do you want the "user" of your module to look.

> 3)
> Should I just do 
> 
> use Carp(carp);
> Since I'll only be calling carp() ( assuming carp() is warn()'s
> replacement in Carp.pm )

I guess you mean
use Carp qw(carp);

yes, you may do that.

Jenda
= [EMAIL PROTECTED] === http://Jenda.Krynicky.cz =
When it comes to wine, women and song, wizards are allowed 
to get drunk and croon as much as they like.
-- Terry Pratchett in Sourcery


-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]