Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang

[Jeff Tantsura]

Yes/support

On 5/4/16, 7:17 AM, "BESS on behalf of Thomas Morin"  wrote:

>Hello working group,
>
>This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
>draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang [1] as a working group document.
>
>Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in both cases, 
>please also state the reasons).
>
>This poll runs until *May 25th*.
>
>This call runs in parallel with the adoption call on 
>draft-brissette-bess-evpn-yang hence the extended period.
>
>
>We are *coincidentally* also polling for knowledge of any other
>IPR that applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed
>in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669
>and 5378 for more details).
>
>==> *If* you are listed as a document author or contributor please
>respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any
>relevant IPR.
>
>The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from
>each author and contributor.
>
>If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please 
>explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet 
>been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>
>Thank you,
>
>Martin & Thomas
>bess chairs
>
>[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang
>
>___
>BESS mailing list
>BESS@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess


___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang

[Susan Hares]

Support for draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang.  It is a good start to this model. 

+1 to Giles comment that the bgp-parameters structure needs to be harmonized 
draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang. 

Both draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang and draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang should 
reference the base bgp model (draft-idr-bgp-model) as the bgp parameters should 
link to a bgp peer.   

How is this linkage occurring in the models? Are you simply augmenting the base 
BGP specification?  Is it true that your bgp-parameters do not require any 
policy? 

Sue Hares 

-Original Message-
From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Shah, Himanshu
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2016 4:34 PM
To: Giles Heron; Thomas Morin; Carl Moberg (camoberg)
Cc: bess@ietf.org; draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-y...@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang

Hi Giles -

Thanks for your support.
We will work through your comments as highest priority through the next 
iteration of the draft.

Thanks,
Himanshu

-Original Message-
From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Giles Heron
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 4:13 PM
To: Thomas Morin; Carl Moberg (camoberg)
Cc: bess@ietf.org; draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-y...@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang

Hi Thomas,

I support this document being adopted.

However I would like to see the comments that Carl Moberg and I brought to the 
authors in Prague get addressed (they still seem to be outstanding).   Sorry - 
I should have followed up on those before now.

There’s also some degree of overlap with draft-brissette-bess-evpn-yang, and 
with draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang-01, and I’d like to see common components 
(e.g. BGP RTs/RDs) being abstracted into common models.

Giles

> On 4 May 2016, at 15:17, Thomas Morin <thomas.mo...@orange.com> wrote:
> 
> Hello working group,
> 
> This email starts a two-week poll on adopting 
> draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang [1] as a working group document.
> 
> Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in both cases, 
> please also state the reasons).
> 
> This poll runs until *May 25th*.
> 
> This call runs in parallel with the adoption call on 
> draft-brissette-bess-evpn-yang hence the extended period.
> 
> 
> We are *coincidentally* also polling for knowledge of any other IPR 
> that applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in 
> compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for 
> more details).
> 
> ==> *If* you are listed as a document author or contributor please 
> respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any 
> relevant IPR.
> 
> The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from 
> each author and contributor.
> 
> If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly 
> respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in 
> conformance with IETF rules.
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Martin & Thomas
> bess chairs
> 
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang
> 
> ___
> BESS mailing list
> BESS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang

[Tapraj Singh (tapsingh)]

Resending due to mail delivery messages

Support as co-author

Not aware of any relevant IPR

Thanks,
Tapraj



On 5/5/16, 9:43 AM, "Tapraj Singh (tapsingh)" <tapsi...@cisco.com> wrote:

>As a co-author, I support this draft.
>
>
>Thanks
>Tapraj
>
>On 5/5/16, 7:48 AM, "BESS on behalf of Shah, Himanshu"
><bess-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of hs...@ciena.com> wrote:
>
>>Support as co-author.
>>I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.
>>
>>Himanshu using iPad (so excuse the auto-corrects...)
>>
>>From: BESS [bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Luay Jalil
>>[luayja...@gmail.com]
>>Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2016 6:23 AM
>>To: Thomas Morin
>>Cc: BESS; draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-y...@tools.ietf.org
>>Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang
>>
>>Resending due to mail delivery messages
>>
>>Support as co-author
>>
>>Not aware of any relevant IPR
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Luay
>>
>>On May 4, 2016 9:18 AM, "Thomas Morin"
>><thomas.mo...@orange.com<mailto:thomas.mo...@orange.com>> wrote:
>>Hello working group,
>>
>>This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
>>draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang [1] as a working group document.
>>
>>Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in both cases,
>>please also state the reasons).
>>
>>This poll runs until *May 25th*.
>>
>>This call runs in parallel with the adoption call on
>>draft-brissette-bess-evpn-yang hence the extended period.
>>
>>
>>We are *coincidentally* also polling for knowledge of any other
>>IPR that applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed
>>in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669
>>and 5378 for more details).
>>
>>==> *If* you are listed as a document author or contributor please
>>respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any
>>relevant IPR.
>>
>>The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from
>>each author and contributor.
>>
>>If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly
>>respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed
>>in conformance with IETF rules.
>>
>>Thank you,
>>
>>Martin & Thomas
>>bess chairs
>>
>>[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang
>>
>>___
>>BESS mailing list
>>BESS@ietf.org<mailto:BESS@ietf.org>
>>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
>>
>>___
>>BESS mailing list
>>BESS@ietf.org
>>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
>

___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang

[Adrian Farrel]

Thanks Himanshu,

That all sounds reasonable.

Adrian

> -Original Message-
> From: Shah, Himanshu [mailto:hs...@ciena.com]
> Sent: 25 May 2016 14:16
> To: adr...@olddog.co.uk; 'Thomas Morin'; bess@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-y...@tools.ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang
> 
> Hi Adrian -
> 
> Appreciate your detail review and the comments.
> Please see below inline responses to your comments..
> 
> Thanks,
> Himanshu
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
> Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 8:52 AM
> To: 'Thomas Morin'; bess@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-y...@tools.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang
> 
> Hi Thomas,
> 
> I'm not opposed to this work at all. But I think that the extensive use of the
word
> "service" in the document may cause a load of confusion.
> 
> As far as I can see, this YANG model is about operating and monitoring the
> network components and protocols that are used to realize (deliver) the
service.
> This is all information that the network operator (service provider) cares
about
> deeply, and that the equipment vendor must understand. But a lot of it is
beyond
> the concern (or understanding) of the service consumer who has requested the
> service.
> 
> If I might compare with the work of L3SM, we need to distinguish between the
> "service model" on the interface between the customer and the operator, and
> the "service delivery model" on the northbound interface of an orchestrator".
It
> may be helpful to consider two separate conceptual components: a "service
> orchestrator" that consumes a service model, and a "network orchestrator" that
> consumes the model in this document and uses it to work out what to tell
> protocols, network controller, etc.
> 
> Perhaps the document could be enhanced by a little extra text explaining how
> the model will be used. This need not be pages and pages, just a simple
> statement that, for example, it is expected that this model will be used by
the
> management tools run by network operators in order to manage and monitor the
> network resources that they use to deliver L2VPN services.
> 
> [Himanshu>] Agreed. Will clarify the purpose of the draft as you suggest
above.
> 
> 
> Might I ask also that one sentence is removed from the Abstract *before*
> adoption?
>This is a
>living document and contains aspects of object models that have been
>discussed extensively in the working group with consensus.
> It is not the place of the authors to claim consensus for the content of the
> document: that call belongs to the WG chairs in response to targeted questions
> to the WG. WG adoption is not a measure by which to determine consensus for
> the content of the document, either.
> 
> Additionally, the Introduction has:
>The definition work is undertaken initially by a smaller
>working group with members representing various vendors and service
>providers.
> I'm sure you don't mean to imply any subversion of the IETF process, and I am
> equally sure that this is just a matter of English usage.
> I think you need...
>The definition work was initially undertaken initially by a small
>group of co-authors with members representing various vendors and service
>providers.
> 
> [Himanshu>] Agreed on this as well. Did not mean to shortcut the due process
at
> IETF
> [Himanshu>]
> 
> Again, this change needs to be made before adoption.
> 
> [Himanshu>]
> [Himanshu>] Will update the draft to address your comments in the -00- version
> of the WG draft.
> Does that work for you?
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Adrian
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Morin
> > Sent: 04 May 2016 15:18
> > To: bess@ietf.org
> > Cc: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-y...@tools.ietf.org
> > Subject: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang
> >
> > Hello working group,
> >
> > This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
> > draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang [1] as a working group document.
> >
> > Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in both
> > cases, please also state the reasons).
> >
> > This poll runs until *May 25th*.
> >
> > This call runs in parallel with the adoption call on
> > draft-brissette-bess-evpn-yang hence the extended period.
> >
> >
> > We are *coincidentally* also polling for knowledge of any other IPR
> > that applies to this draft,

Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang

[Shah, Himanshu]

Hi Adrian -

Appreciate your detail review and the comments.
Please see below inline responses to your comments..

Thanks,
Himanshu


-Original Message-
From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 8:52 AM
To: 'Thomas Morin'; bess@ietf.org
Cc: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-y...@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang

Hi Thomas,

I'm not opposed to this work at all. But I think that the extensive use of the 
word "service" in the document may cause a load of confusion.

As far as I can see, this YANG model is about operating and monitoring the 
network components and protocols that are used to realize (deliver) the service.
This is all information that the network operator (service provider) cares 
about deeply, and that the equipment vendor must understand. But a lot of it is 
beyond the concern (or understanding) of the service consumer who has requested 
the service.

If I might compare with the work of L3SM, we need to distinguish between the 
"service model" on the interface between the customer and the operator, and the 
"service delivery model" on the northbound interface of an orchestrator". It 
may be helpful to consider two separate conceptual components: a "service 
orchestrator" that consumes a service model, and a "network orchestrator" that 
consumes the model in this document and uses it to work out what to tell 
protocols, network controller, etc. 

Perhaps the document could be enhanced by a little extra text explaining how 
the model will be used. This need not be pages and pages, just a simple 
statement that, for example, it is expected that this model will be used by the 
management tools run by network operators in order to manage and monitor the 
network resources that they use to deliver L2VPN services.

[Himanshu>] Agreed. Will clarify the purpose of the draft as you suggest above.


Might I ask also that one sentence is removed from the Abstract *before* 
adoption?
   This is a
   living document and contains aspects of object models that have been
   discussed extensively in the working group with consensus.
It is not the place of the authors to claim consensus for the content of the
document: that call belongs to the WG chairs in response to targeted questions 
to the WG. WG adoption is not a measure by which to determine consensus for the 
content of the document, either.

Additionally, the Introduction has:
   The definition work is undertaken initially by a smaller
   working group with members representing various vendors and service
   providers.
I'm sure you don't mean to imply any subversion of the IETF process, and I am 
equally sure that this is just a matter of English usage.
I think you need...
   The definition work was initially undertaken initially by a small
   group of co-authors with members representing various vendors and service
   providers.

[Himanshu>] Agreed on this as well. Did not mean to shortcut the due process at 
IETF
[Himanshu>] 

Again, this change needs to be made before adoption.

[Himanshu>] 
[Himanshu>] Will update the draft to address your comments in the -00- version 
of the WG draft.
Does that work for you?


Thanks,
Adrian

> -Original Message-
> From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Morin
> Sent: 04 May 2016 15:18
> To: bess@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-y...@tools.ietf.org
> Subject: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang
> 
> Hello working group,
> 
> This email starts a two-week poll on adopting 
> draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang [1] as a working group document.
> 
> Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in both 
> cases, please also state the reasons).
> 
> This poll runs until *May 25th*.
> 
> This call runs in parallel with the adoption call on 
> draft-brissette-bess-evpn-yang hence the extended period.
> 
> 
> We are *coincidentally* also polling for knowledge of any other IPR 
> that applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in 
> compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for 
> more details).
> 
> ==> *If* you are listed as a document author or contributor please 
> respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any 
> relevant IPR.
> 
> The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from 
> each author and contributor.
> 
> If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please 
> explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet 
> been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Martin & Thomas
> bess chairs
> 
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang
> 
> 

Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang

[Jeff Tantsura]

Yes/support




-Original Message-
>>From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Morin
>>Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2016 10:18 AM
>>To: bess@ietf.org
>>Cc: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-y...@tools.ietf.org
>>Subject: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang
>>
>>Hello working group,
>>
>>This email starts a two-week poll on adopting draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang
>>[1] as a working group document.
>>
>>Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in both cases,
>>please also state the reasons).
>>
>>This poll runs until *May 25th*.
>>
>>This call runs in parallel with the adoption call on
>>draft-brissette-bess-evpn-yang hence the extended period.
>>
>>
>>We are *coincidentally* also polling for knowledge of any other
>>IPR that applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed
>>in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669
>>and 5378 for more details).
>>
>>==> *If* you are listed as a document author or contributor please
>>respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any
>>relevant IPR.
>>
>>The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from
>>each author and contributor.
>>
>>If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please
>>explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet
>>been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>>
>>Thank you,
>>
>>Martin & Thomas
>>bess chairs
>>
>>[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang
>>
>>___
>>BESS mailing list
>>BESS@ietf.org
>>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
>
>___
>BESS mailing list
>BESS@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang

[Kamran Raza (skraza)]

Hi WG/chairs,

As a co-author, I support the adoption of this draft. I am also not aware
of any IPR associated with this draft.

Regards.
‹
Kamran Raza


On 2016-05-23, 1:31 PM, "Shah, Himanshu" <hs...@ciena.com> wrote:

>Including kamran raza..
>
>Thanks,
>Himanshu
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Morin
>Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2016 10:18 AM
>To: bess@ietf.org
>Cc: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-y...@tools.ietf.org
>Subject: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang
>
>Hello working group,
>
>This email starts a two-week poll on adopting draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang
>[1] as a working group document.
>
>Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in both cases,
>please also state the reasons).
>
>This poll runs until *May 25th*.
>
>This call runs in parallel with the adoption call on
>draft-brissette-bess-evpn-yang hence the extended period.
>
>
>We are *coincidentally* also polling for knowledge of any other
>IPR that applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed
>in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669
>and 5378 for more details).
>
>==> *If* you are listed as a document author or contributor please
>respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any
>relevant IPR.
>
>The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from
>each author and contributor.
>
>If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please
>explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet
>been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>
>Thank you,
>
>Martin & Thomas
>bess chairs
>
>[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang
>
>___
>BESS mailing list
>BESS@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang

[Adrian Farrel]

Hi Thomas,

I'm not opposed to this work at all. But I think that the extensive use of the
word "service" in the document may cause a load of confusion.

As far as I can see, this YANG model is about operating and monitoring the
network components and protocols that are used to realize (deliver) the service.
This is all information that the network operator (service provider) cares about
deeply, and that the equipment vendor must understand. But a lot of it is beyond
the concern (or understanding) of the service consumer who has requested the
service.

If I might compare with the work of L3SM, we need to distinguish between the
"service model" on the interface between the customer and the operator, and the
"service delivery model" on the northbound interface of an orchestrator". It may
be helpful to consider two separate conceptual components: a "service
orchestrator" that consumes a service model, and a "network orchestrator" that
consumes the model in this document and uses it to work out what to tell
protocols, network controller, etc. 

Perhaps the document could be enhanced by a little extra text explaining how the
model will be used. This need not be pages and pages, just a simple statement
that, for example, it is expected that this model will be used by the management
tools run by network operators in order to manage and monitor the network
resources that they use to deliver L2VPN services.

Might I ask also that one sentence is removed from the Abstract *before*
adoption?
   This is a
   living document and contains aspects of object models that have been
   discussed extensively in the working group with consensus.
It is not the place of the authors to claim consensus for the content of the
document: that call belongs to the WG chairs in response to targeted questions
to the WG. WG adoption is not a measure by which to determine consensus for the
content of the document, either.

Additionally, the Introduction has:
   The definition work is undertaken initially by a smaller
   working group with members representing various vendors and service
   providers.
I'm sure you don't mean to imply any subversion of the IETF process, and I am
equally sure that this is just a matter of English usage.
I think you need...
   The definition work was initially undertaken initially by a small
   group of co-authors with members representing various vendors and service
   providers.
Again, this change needs to be made before adoption.

Thanks,
Adrian

> -Original Message-
> From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Morin
> Sent: 04 May 2016 15:18
> To: bess@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-y...@tools.ietf.org
> Subject: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang
> 
> Hello working group,
> 
> This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
> draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang [1] as a working group document.
> 
> Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in both cases,
> please also state the reasons).
> 
> This poll runs until *May 25th*.
> 
> This call runs in parallel with the adoption call on
> draft-brissette-bess-evpn-yang hence the extended period.
> 
> 
> We are *coincidentally* also polling for knowledge of any other
> IPR that applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed
> in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669
> and 5378 for more details).
> 
> ==> *If* you are listed as a document author or contributor please
> respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any
> relevant IPR.
> 
> The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from
> each author and contributor.
> 
> If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please
> explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet
> been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Martin & Thomas
> bess chairs
> 
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang
> 
> ___
> BESS mailing list
> BESS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang

[Patrice Brissette (pbrisset)]

I support this draft as a co-author and I am not aware of any relevant IPR.



Regards,

Patrice

   Patrice Brissette
TECHNICAL LEADER.ENGINEERING

pbris...@cisco.com
Phone: +1 613 254 3336

Cisco Systems Canada Co. / Les Systemes Cisco Canada CIE
Canada
Cisco.com <http://www.cisco.com/global/CA/>







On 2016-05-23, 1:31 PM, "Shah, Himanshu" <hs...@ciena.com> wrote:

>Including kamran raza..
>
>Thanks,
>Himanshu
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Morin
>Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2016 10:18 AM
>To: bess@ietf.org
>Cc: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-y...@tools.ietf.org
>Subject: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang
>
>Hello working group,
>
>This email starts a two-week poll on adopting draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang
>[1] as a working group document.
>
>Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in both cases,
>please also state the reasons).
>
>This poll runs until *May 25th*.
>
>This call runs in parallel with the adoption call on
>draft-brissette-bess-evpn-yang hence the extended period.
>
>
>We are *coincidentally* also polling for knowledge of any other
>IPR that applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed
>in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669
>and 5378 for more details).
>
>==> *If* you are listed as a document author or contributor please
>respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any
>relevant IPR.
>
>The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from
>each author and contributor.
>
>If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please
>explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet
>been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>
>Thank you,
>
>Martin & Thomas
>bess chairs
>
>[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang
>
>___
>BESS mailing list
>BESS@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang

[Shah, Himanshu]

Including kamran raza..

Thanks,
Himanshu


-Original Message-
From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Morin
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2016 10:18 AM
To: bess@ietf.org
Cc: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-y...@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang

Hello working group,

This email starts a two-week poll on adopting draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang [1] as 
a working group document.

Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in both cases, please 
also state the reasons).

This poll runs until *May 25th*.

This call runs in parallel with the adoption call on 
draft-brissette-bess-evpn-yang hence the extended period.


We are *coincidentally* also polling for knowledge of any other
IPR that applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed
in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669
and 5378 for more details).

==> *If* you are listed as a document author or contributor please
respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any
relevant IPR.

The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from
each author and contributor.

If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please 
explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet 
been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.

Thank you,

Martin & Thomas
bess chairs

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang

___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang

[Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)]

I am not aware of any IPR related to the draft.

Regards

Matthew

On 04/05/2016, 15:17, "thomas.mo...@orange.com" 
wrote:

>Hello working group,
>
>This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
>draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang [1] as a working group document.
>
>Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in both cases,
>please also state the reasons).
>
>This poll runs until *May 25th*.
>
>This call runs in parallel with the adoption call on
>draft-brissette-bess-evpn-yang hence the extended period.
>
>
>We are *coincidentally* also polling for knowledge of any other
>IPR that applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed
>in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669
>and 5378 for more details).
>
>==> *If* you are listed as a document author or contributor please
>respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any
>relevant IPR.
>
>The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from
>each author and contributor.
>
>If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please
>explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet
>been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>
>Thank you,
>
>Martin & Thomas
>bess chairs
>
>[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang
>

___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang

[Santosh Esale]

I support adoption of this draft as a co-author. I am not aware of any IPR
related to this draft.


Thanks

Santosh
On 5/4/16, 7:17 AM, "Thomas Morin"  wrote:

>Hello working group,
>
>This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
>draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang [1] as a working group document.
>
>Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in both cases,
>please also state the reasons).
>
>This poll runs until *May 25th*.
>
>This call runs in parallel with the adoption call on
>draft-brissette-bess-evpn-yang hence the extended period.
>
>
>We are *coincidentally* also polling for knowledge of any other
>IPR that applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed
>in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669
>and 5378 for more details).
>
>==> *If* you are listed as a document author or contributor please
>respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any
>relevant IPR.
>
>The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from
>each author and contributor.
>
>If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please
>explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet
>been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>
>Thank you,
>
>Martin & Thomas
>bess chairs
>
>[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang
>
>___
>BESS mailing list
>BESS@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang

[Shah, Himanshu]

Hi Giles -

Thanks for your support.
We will work through your comments as highest priority through the next 
iteration of the draft.

Thanks,
Himanshu

-Original Message-
From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Giles Heron
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 4:13 PM
To: Thomas Morin; Carl Moberg (camoberg)
Cc: bess@ietf.org; draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-y...@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang

Hi Thomas,

I support this document being adopted.

However I would like to see the comments that Carl Moberg and I brought to the 
authors in Prague get addressed (they still seem to be outstanding).   Sorry - 
I should have followed up on those before now.

There’s also some degree of overlap with draft-brissette-bess-evpn-yang, and 
with draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang-01, and I’d like to see common components 
(e.g. BGP RTs/RDs) being abstracted into common models.

Giles

> On 4 May 2016, at 15:17, Thomas Morin <thomas.mo...@orange.com> wrote:
> 
> Hello working group,
> 
> This email starts a two-week poll on adopting 
> draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang [1] as a working group document.
> 
> Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in both cases, 
> please also state the reasons).
> 
> This poll runs until *May 25th*.
> 
> This call runs in parallel with the adoption call on 
> draft-brissette-bess-evpn-yang hence the extended period.
> 
> 
> We are *coincidentally* also polling for knowledge of any other IPR 
> that applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in 
> compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for 
> more details).
> 
> ==> *If* you are listed as a document author or contributor please 
> respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any 
> relevant IPR.
> 
> The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from 
> each author and contributor.
> 
> If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly 
> respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in 
> conformance with IETF rules.
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Martin & Thomas
> bess chairs
> 
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang
> 
> ___
> BESS mailing list
> BESS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang

[Malit-Crane, Maria Joecylyn B (Maria Malit-Crane)]

As co-author, I support.

I am not aware of IPR related to this draft.

Thanks,
Maria



-- Forwarded message --
From: Thomas Morin <thomas.mo...@orange.com<mailto:thomas.mo...@orange.com>>
Date: Wed, May 4, 2016 at 10:17 AM
Subject: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang
To: bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>
Cc: 
draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-y...@tools.ietf.org<mailto:draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-y...@tools.ietf.org>


Hello working group,

This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang [1] as a working group document.

Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in both cases, please 
also state the reasons).

This poll runs until *May 25th*.

This call runs in parallel with the adoption call on 
draft-brissette-bess-evpn-yang hence the extended period.


We are *coincidentally* also polling for knowledge of any other
IPR that applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed
in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669
and 5378 for more details).

==> *If* you are listed as a document author or contributor please
respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any
relevant IPR.

The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from
each author and contributor.

If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly 
respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in 
conformance with IETF rules.

Thank you,

Martin & Thomas
bess chairs

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang

___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org<mailto:BESS@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang

[DelRegno, Christopher N (Nick)]

As co-author, I support.

I am not aware of IPR related to this draft.

Thanks,
Nick

Christopher N. “Nick” Del Regno, Fellow
Verizon, VZ Labs
700 Hidden Ridge, W02G94
Irving, TX  75038
972-457-5173

-- Forwarded message --
From: Thomas Morin <thomas.mo...@orange.com<mailto:thomas.mo...@orange.com>>
Date: Wed, May 4, 2016 at 10:17 AM
Subject: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang
To: bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>
Cc: 
draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-y...@tools.ietf.org<mailto:draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-y...@tools.ietf.org>


Hello working group,

This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang [1] as a working group document.

Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in both cases, please 
also state the reasons).

This poll runs until *May 25th*.

This call runs in parallel with the adoption call on 
draft-brissette-bess-evpn-yang hence the extended period.


We are *coincidentally* also polling for knowledge of any other
IPR that applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed
in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669
and 5378 for more details).

==> *If* you are listed as a document author or contributor please
respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any
relevant IPR.

The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from
each author and contributor.

If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly 
respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in 
conformance with IETF rules.

Thank you,

Martin & Thomas
bess chairs

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang

___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org<mailto:BESS@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang

[Reshad Rahman (rrahman)]

Support adoption as WG doc.




On 2016-05-04, 10:17 AM, "BESS on behalf of Thomas Morin"
 wrote:

>Hello working group,
>
>This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
>draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang [1] as a working group document.
>
>Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in both cases,
>please also state the reasons).
>
>This poll runs until *May 25th*.
>
>This call runs in parallel with the adoption call on
>draft-brissette-bess-evpn-yang hence the extended period.
>
>
>We are *coincidentally* also polling for knowledge of any other
>IPR that applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed
>in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669
>and 5378 for more details).
>
>==> *If* you are listed as a document author or contributor please
>respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any
>relevant IPR.
>
>The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from
>each author and contributor.
>
>If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please
>explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet
>been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>
>Thank you,
>
>Martin & Thomas
>bess chairs
>
>[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang
>
>___
>BESS mailing list
>BESS@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang

[Reshad Rahman (rrahman)]

Support as co-author.


Not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.

Regards,
Reshad.

On 2016-05-04, 10:17 AM, "BESS on behalf of Thomas Morin"
 wrote:

>Hello working group,
>
>This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
>draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang [1] as a working group document.
>
>Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in both cases,
>please also state the reasons).
>
>This poll runs until *May 25th*.
>
>This call runs in parallel with the adoption call on
>draft-brissette-bess-evpn-yang hence the extended period.
>
>
>We are *coincidentally* also polling for knowledge of any other
>IPR that applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed
>in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669
>and 5378 for more details).
>
>==> *If* you are listed as a document author or contributor please
>respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any
>relevant IPR.
>
>The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from
>each author and contributor.
>
>If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please
>explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet
>been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>
>Thank you,
>
>Martin & Thomas
>bess chairs
>
>[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang
>
>___
>BESS mailing list
>BESS@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang

[Jonathan Hardwick]

Support as co-author.
I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.

Best regards
Jon

-Original Message-
From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Morin
Sent: 04 May 2016 15:18
To: bess@ietf.org
Cc: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-y...@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang

Hello working group,

This email starts a two-week poll on adopting draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang [1] as 
a working group document.

Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in both cases, please 
also state the reasons).

This poll runs until *May 25th*.

This call runs in parallel with the adoption call on 
draft-brissette-bess-evpn-yang hence the extended period.


We are *coincidentally* also polling for knowledge of any other
IPR that applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed
in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669
and 5378 for more details).

==> *If* you are listed as a document author or contributor please
respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any
relevant IPR.

The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from
each author and contributor.

If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please 
explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet 
been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.

Thank you,

Martin & Thomas
bess chairs

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang

___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang

[Ing-Wher (Helen) Chen]

As a co-author, I support adoption of this draft.  I'm not aware of any 
relevant IPR.

Thanks,
Helen

> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Morin [mailto:thomas.mo...@orange.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 4, 2016 10:18 AM
> To: bess@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-y...@tools.ietf.org
> Subject: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang
> 
> Hello working group,
> 
> This email starts a two-week poll on adopting draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang [1]
> as a working group document.
> 
> Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in both cases, please
> also state the reasons).
> 
> This poll runs until *May 25th*.
> 
> This call runs in parallel with the adoption call on 
> draft-brissette-bess-evpn-
> yang hence the extended period.
> 
> 
> We are *coincidentally* also polling for knowledge of any other
> IPR that applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed
> in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669
> and 5378 for more details).
> 
> ==> *If* you are listed as a document author or contributor please
> respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any
> relevant IPR.
> 
> The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from
> each author and contributor.
> 
> If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please
> explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet
> been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Martin & Thomas
> bess chairs
> 
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang
___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang

[Sajjad Ahmed]

Support as co-author.
I am not aware of any IPR related to this draft.

Regards ,
Sajjad.

-Original Message-
From: Shah, Himanshu [mailto:hs...@ciena.com] 
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2016 7:49 AM
To: Luay Jalil; Thomas Morin
Cc: BESS; draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-y...@tools.ietf.org
Subject: RE: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang

Support as co-author.
I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.

Himanshu using iPad (so excuse the auto-corrects...) 

From: BESS [bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Luay Jalil [luayja...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2016 6:23 AM
To: Thomas Morin
Cc: BESS; draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-y...@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang

Resending due to mail delivery messages

Support as co-author

Not aware of any relevant IPR

Thanks,
Luay

On May 4, 2016 9:18 AM, "Thomas Morin" 
<thomas.mo...@orange.com<mailto:thomas.mo...@orange.com>> wrote:
Hello working group,

This email starts a two-week poll on adopting draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang [1] as 
a working group document.

Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in both cases, please 
also state the reasons).

This poll runs until *May 25th*.

This call runs in parallel with the adoption call on 
draft-brissette-bess-evpn-yang hence the extended period.


We are *coincidentally* also polling for knowledge of any other IPR that 
applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with 
IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

==> *If* you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to 
this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR.

The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from each 
author and contributor.

If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly 
respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in 
conformance with IETF rules.

Thank you,

Martin & Thomas
bess chairs

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang

___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org<mailto:BESS@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang

[Zhuangshunwan]

Hi,

As a co-author, I support this draft.
I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this document.

Best Regards,
Shunwan

-邮件原件-
发件人: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Thomas Morin
发送时间: 2016年5月4日 22:18
收件人: bess@ietf.org
抄送: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-y...@tools.ietf.org
主题: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang

Hello working group,

This email starts a two-week poll on adopting draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang [1] as 
a working group document.

Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in both cases, please 
also state the reasons).

This poll runs until *May 25th*.

This call runs in parallel with the adoption call on 
draft-brissette-bess-evpn-yang hence the extended period.


We are *coincidentally* also polling for knowledge of any other
IPR that applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed
in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669
and 5378 for more details).

==> *If* you are listed as a document author or contributor please
respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any
relevant IPR.

The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from
each author and contributor.

If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please 
explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet 
been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.

Thank you,

Martin & Thomas
bess chairs

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang

___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang

[Jeff Tantsura]

Yes/support




On 5/4/16, 7:17 AM, "BESS on behalf of Thomas Morin"  wrote:

>Hello working group,
>
>This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
>draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang [1] as a working group document.
>
>Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in both cases, 
>please also state the reasons).
>
>This poll runs until *May 25th*.
>
>This call runs in parallel with the adoption call on 
>draft-brissette-bess-evpn-yang hence the extended period.
>
>
>We are *coincidentally* also polling for knowledge of any other
>IPR that applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed
>in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669
>and 5378 for more details).
>
>==> *If* you are listed as a document author or contributor please
>respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any
>relevant IPR.
>
>The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from
>each author and contributor.
>
>If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please 
>explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet 
>been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>
>Thank you,
>
>Martin & Thomas
>bess chairs
>
>[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang
>
>___
>BESS mailing list
>BESS@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang

[Andrew G. Malis]

Thomas,

I support adopting this as a WG draft, it’s excellent work.

Cheers,
Andy


On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Thomas Morin 
wrote:

> Hello working group,
>
> This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
> draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang [1] as a working group document.
>
> Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in both cases,
> please also state the reasons).
>
> This poll runs until *May 25th*.
>
> This call runs in parallel with the adoption call on
> draft-brissette-bess-evpn-yang hence the extended period.
>
>
> We are *coincidentally* also polling for knowledge of any other
> IPR that applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed
> in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669
> and 5378 for more details).
>
> ==> *If* you are listed as a document author or contributor please
> respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any
> relevant IPR.
>
> The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from
> each author and contributor.
>
> If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly
> respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in
> conformance with IETF rules.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Martin & Thomas
> bess chairs
>
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang
>
> ___
> BESS mailing list
> BESS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
>
___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess