Re: [Bf-committers] Blender 2.69 testbuild1 AHOY
I've changed id_type_items to use the brush icon rather than the particle icon in r60379. IRIE Shinsuke 13/09/26, IRIE Shinsuke wrote: >> I wouldn't be bothered with the present icon (originally intended for >> brushes) though. > > Using the brush icon looks strange to me because the line style is > quite different from the brushes... > > Anyway, the most confusing thing is the particle icon > (ICON_PARTICLE_DATA) is used for the ID-block type of line style in > rna_ID.c. In driver variable panels on the Graph Editor, ID-type > selector and ID-block selector use the different icons for line style. > > Did you use the particle icon there by mistake? > > IRIE Shinsuke > > 13/09/26, Tamito KAJIYAMA wrote: >> > Tamito-san, did you ask anyone to create the line style icon? >> >> No, I didn't. I would appreciate it if the person responsible for icon >> design is willing to create one for Freestyle line style data blocks. >> I wouldn't be bothered with the present icon (originally intended for >> brushes) though. >> >> Regards, >> ___ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
Re: [Bf-committers] Blender 2.69 testbuild1 AHOY
2013/9/26 IRIE Shinsuke > I've changed id_type_items to use the brush icon rather than the > particle icon in r60379. > > IRIE Shinsuke > > 13/09/26, IRIE Shinsuke wrote: > >> I wouldn't be bothered with the present icon (originally intended for > >> brushes) though. > > > > Using the brush icon looks strange to me because the line style is > > quite different from the brushes... > > > > Anyway, the most confusing thing is the particle icon > > (ICON_PARTICLE_DATA) is used for the ID-block type of line style in > > rna_ID.c. In driver variable panels on the Graph Editor, ID-type > > selector and ID-block selector use the different icons for line style. > > > > Did you use the particle icon there by mistake? > > > > IRIE Shinsuke > > > > 13/09/26, Tamito KAJIYAMA wrote: > >> > Tamito-san, did you ask anyone to create the line style icon? > >> > >> No, I didn't. I would appreciate it if the person responsible for icon > >> design is willing to create one for Freestyle line style data blocks. > >> I wouldn't be bothered with the present icon (originally intended for > >> brushes) though. > >> > >> Regards, > >> > ___ > Bf-committers mailing list > Bf-committers@blender.org > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > ___ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
Re: [Bf-committers] Blender 2.69 testbuild1 AHOY
Thank you Irie-san for the fix, I was not aware of the issue. And now I see better the downside of using the brush icon for line styles -- it is not nice to see two brush icons (one for brushes and the other for line styles) shown in the ID block selector. I would be grateful if a new icon is given to Freestyle line style ID blocks (possibly in the release after 2.69). -- KAJIYAMA, Tamito On 26/09/2013 09:03, IRIE Shinsuke wrote: > I've changed id_type_items to use the brush icon rather than the > particle icon in r60379. > > IRIE Shinsuke > > 13/09/26, IRIE Shinsuke wrote: >>> I wouldn't be bothered with the present icon (originally intended for >>> brushes) though. >> >> Using the brush icon looks strange to me because the line style is >> quite different from the brushes... >> >> Anyway, the most confusing thing is the particle icon >> (ICON_PARTICLE_DATA) is used for the ID-block type of line style in >> rna_ID.c. In driver variable panels on the Graph Editor, ID-type >> selector and ID-block selector use the different icons for line style. >> >> Did you use the particle icon there by mistake? >> >> IRIE Shinsuke >> >> 13/09/26, Tamito KAJIYAMA wrote: >>>> Tamito-san, did you ask anyone to create the line style icon? >>> >>> No, I didn't. I would appreciate it if the person responsible for icon >>> design is willing to create one for Freestyle line style data blocks. >>> I wouldn't be bothered with the present icon (originally intended for >>> brushes) though. >>> >>> Regards, ___ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
[Bf-committers] Blender 2.69 testbuild1 AHOY
*Bastien, are you sure is *r4771? that release number seems to be totally wrong, we are at 60382 right now. I thought it would have more attention in reporting this in here now that we're close to the release instead of getting lost in several bug reports in the bug tracker. ___ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
Re: [Bf-committers] Blender 2.69 testbuild1 AHOY
Hi Sam, He is most certainly referring to the svn "external" revision number for the addons. Here is some sample output from an `svn up`: Fetching external item into 'release/datafiles/locale' Updated external to revision 2280. Fetching external item into 'release/scripts/addons' Updated external to revision 4774. Fetching external item into 'release/scripts/addons_contrib' Updated external to revision 4774. Updated to revision 60382. Hope this clears up your concern. o/ Dan On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Sam Vila wrote: > *Bastien, are you sure is *r4771? that release number seems to be > totally wrong, we are at > > 60382 right now. I thought it would have more attention in reporting > this in here now that we're close to the release instead of getting > lost in several bug reports in the bug tracker. > ___ > Bf-committers mailing list > Bf-committers@blender.org > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > ___ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
Re: [Bf-committers] error compiling with CUDA 5.5 and vs2012
ok after many hours of testing and replacing file i've managed to make cuda see the vs2012 express, and did compile the x64 sm_30 successfully. but i try to compile sm_11, this is the error i get: http://www.pasteall.org/45886 i know kernels less than sm_20 is not supported by bf, but can you help me here guys, thanks. one other thing what is the status with building osl with mingw64 and scons, when i try to build i get this error: http://www.pasteall.org/45887 Regards Yousef Harfoush ba...@msn.com From: ba...@msn.com To: bf-committers@blender.org Subject: RE: [Bf-committers] error compiling with CUDA 5.5 and vs2012 Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 05:31:50 + > This error is not related to CUDA. Could you upload the file > H:\blender\build\win64-vc11\source\blender\makesrna\intern\RNA_blender_cpp.h > to pasteall? It seems to be different than what I have here. > yes it's not related to cuda, but here is the file you asked: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/33417300/RNA_blender_cpp.7z > I don't know what the status is of CUDA 5.5 + VS 2012, from what I > understand this was working. Maybe there is some special configuration > that needs to be tweaked, or there is some issue with the VS express > version, the error log here is unrelated so I can't tell. > i thought it was due to not being able to built cuda, and i've never been able to build the kernels for for the x64. now can't build x86 anymore. using r58371 scons, mingw32 -> successfully builds scons, mingw64 -> error -> log file: http://www.pasteall.org/43753 and with r60361 scons, mingw32 -> error -> 'ptxas' died with status 0xC005 (ACCESS_VIOLATION) scons, mingw64 -> error -> same as before is there away to build cuda without msvc11, i mean with mingw only. Regards Yousef Harfoush ba...@msn.com ___ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
