Re: [Bf-committers] Open Invention Network

2011-10-27 Thread Damir Prebeg
I'm sure that everyone has done this already but no one posted that
here - If you google for OIN, you can find interesting things:

http://www.itworld.com/open-source/117730/lawsuit-raises-questions-about-open-invention-network-linux-foundation

In that article you can find this link:

http://fosspatents.blogspot.com/2010/08/oracle-sues-google-says-android.html


On 27 October 2011 17:04, Kent Mein  wrote:
> In reply to Ton Roosendaal (t...@blender.org):
>
>> From: Ton Roosendaal 
>> To: bf-blender developers 
>> Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 11:13:28 +0200
>> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936)
>> Subject: [Bf-committers] Open Invention Network
>> Reply-To: bf-blender developers 
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've been contacted by this organization:
>> http://www.openinventionnetwork.com
>>
>> With the request if Blender Foundation would join as a (free, no
>> costs) member. It's mainly meant as public endorsement from us for them.
>>
>> I don't have much time time to investigate their position in free/open
>> matters. Advice or crits therefore is welcome :)
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> -Ton-
>>
>
> Reading through their website kind of gave me the impression why would we
> want to join this?  Seems like something we don't want to get into.
>
> Looking at the comments about it on slashdot
> (http://linux.slashdot.org/story/11/04/20/1642224/Linux-Patent-Protection-Network-Lures-Facebook-HP?utm_source%3Drss1.0%26utm_medium%3Dfeed)
> I Really like the summary from this person, it's mid topic so it's a little
> confusing but read on... :)
>
>> Re:Trust them as far as you can throw them (Score:5, Informative)
>> by icebike (68054) on Wednesday April 20 2011, @02:09PM (#35883508)
>> > And how do we know that they're not simply joining up to see what others
>> > have there, to make it easier for them to win IP lawsuits?
>>
>> Most patent portfolios come with irrevocable commitments to allow any
>> patent they submit to the portfolio to be used freely forever.
>> This one apparently DOES NOT have such a commitment.
>>
>> From their Agreement:
>>
>> 1.1 Subject to Section 1.2(b), OIN, grants to You and Your Subsidiaries a
>> royalty-free, worldwide, nonexclusive, non-transferable license under OIN
>> Patents to make, have made, use, import, and Distribute any products or
>> services. In addition to the foregoing and without limitation thereof,
>> with respect only to the Linux System, the license granted herein
>> includes the right to engage in activities that in the absence of this
>> Agreement would constitute inducement to infringe or contributory
>> infringement (or infringement under any other analogous legal doctrine
>> in the applicable jurisdiction).
>>
>> Sounds all laudable and such, BUT:
>>
>> There are still some worrisome features of this organization, such as the
>> fact that the FSF is NOT part of it, and they are really granting cross
>> licensing only to other members. Further, they have built a pretty
>> massive escape clause into their License Agreement
>> [openinventionnetwork.com] in Section 2.
>>
>> A careful read of their cross license agreement suggest this could turn
>> ugly after enough patents are in the system which also find their way into
>> Linux.
>>
>> The FAQ is here: http://www.openinventionnetwork.com/about_faq.php
>> The membership is here: http://www.openinventionnetwork.com/licensees.php
>> [openinventionnetwork.com] (just about every Distro you ever heard of is
>> represented).
>
> So I'd say if we consider we should ask the FSF their take on it...
> Otherwise skip it. At this point I think it would make us more of a target
> than we currently are. :)
>
> Kent
> --
> m...@cs.umn.edu
> http://www.cs.umn.edu/~mein
> ___
> Bf-committers mailing list
> Bf-committers@blender.org
> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
>
___
Bf-committers mailing list
Bf-committers@blender.org
http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers


Re: [Bf-committers] Open Invention Network

2011-10-27 Thread Kent Mein
In reply to Ton Roosendaal (t...@blender.org):

> From: Ton Roosendaal 
> To: bf-blender developers 
> Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 11:13:28 +0200
> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936)
> Subject: [Bf-committers] Open Invention Network
> Reply-To: bf-blender developers 
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I've been contacted by this organization:
> http://www.openinventionnetwork.com
> 
> With the request if Blender Foundation would join as a (free, no  
> costs) member. It's mainly meant as public endorsement from us for them.
> 
> I don't have much time time to investigate their position in free/open  
> matters. Advice or crits therefore is welcome :)
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -Ton-
> 

Reading through their website kind of gave me the impression why would we
want to join this?  Seems like something we don't want to get into.

Looking at the comments about it on slashdot
(http://linux.slashdot.org/story/11/04/20/1642224/Linux-Patent-Protection-Network-Lures-Facebook-HP?utm_source%3Drss1.0%26utm_medium%3Dfeed)
I Really like the summary from this person, it's mid topic so it's a little
confusing but read on... :)

> Re:Trust them as far as you can throw them (Score:5, Informative)
> by icebike (68054) on Wednesday April 20 2011, @02:09PM (#35883508)
> > And how do we know that they're not simply joining up to see what others 
> > have there, to make it easier for them to win IP lawsuits?
> 
> Most patent portfolios come with irrevocable commitments to allow any 
> patent they submit to the portfolio to be used freely forever.
> This one apparently DOES NOT have such a commitment.
> 
> From their Agreement:
> 
> 1.1 Subject to Section 1.2(b), OIN, grants to You and Your Subsidiaries a 
> royalty-free, worldwide, nonexclusive, non-transferable license under OIN 
> Patents to make, have made, use, import, and Distribute any products or 
> services. In addition to the foregoing and without limitation thereof, 
> with respect only to the Linux System, the license granted herein 
> includes the right to engage in activities that in the absence of this 
> Agreement would constitute inducement to infringe or contributory 
> infringement (or infringement under any other analogous legal doctrine 
> in the applicable jurisdiction).
>
> Sounds all laudable and such, BUT:
> 
> There are still some worrisome features of this organization, such as the 
> fact that the FSF is NOT part of it, and they are really granting cross 
> licensing only to other members. Further, they have built a pretty 
> massive escape clause into their License Agreement 
> [openinventionnetwork.com] in Section 2.
> 
> A careful read of their cross license agreement suggest this could turn 
> ugly after enough patents are in the system which also find their way into 
> Linux.
> 
> The FAQ is here: http://www.openinventionnetwork.com/about_faq.php 
> The membership is here: http://www.openinventionnetwork.com/licensees.php 
> [openinventionnetwork.com] (just about every Distro you ever heard of is 
> represented).

So I'd say if we consider we should ask the FSF their take on it...
Otherwise skip it. At this point I think it would make us more of a target
than we currently are. :)

Kent
-- 
m...@cs.umn.edu
http://www.cs.umn.edu/~mein
___
Bf-committers mailing list
Bf-committers@blender.org
http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers


Re: [Bf-committers] Open Invention Network

2011-10-27 Thread Αντώνης Ρυακιωτάκης
"The neutrality of this post is disputed" and I agree. It has a clear
marketing style. The language is tailored espacially for linux people
and that makes me very suspicious. From a cursory glance I can't
exactly make out what these guys want to do. "Acquiring patents"
sounds strange to me plus the fact that there are a lot of industries
inside makes me think what their motives would be. In the discussion
page there are some claims that the organization has failed to do what
it was supposed to do on occasion...What does an organization
"aqcuiring patents" comprised of big industries want anyway(or what
can they do with the patents in the future)? The point is, these
people are not against patents, rather they are an agreed upon
workaround for that. I am going to check their homepage too.
___
Bf-committers mailing list
Bf-committers@blender.org
http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers


[Bf-committers] Open Invention Network

2011-10-27 Thread Sergey Kurdakov
Hi

wikipedia has a good summary

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Invention_Network

Regards
Sergey
___
Bf-committers mailing list
Bf-committers@blender.org
http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers


[Bf-committers] Open Invention Network

2011-10-27 Thread Ton Roosendaal
Hi all,

I've been contacted by this organization:
http://www.openinventionnetwork.com

With the request if Blender Foundation would join as a (free, no  
costs) member. It's mainly meant as public endorsement from us for them.

I don't have much time time to investigate their position in free/open  
matters. Advice or crits therefore is welcome :)

Thanks,

-Ton-


Ton Roosendaal  Blender Foundation   t...@blender.orgwww.blender.org
Blender Institute   Entrepotdok 57A  1018AD Amsterdam   The Netherlands

___
Bf-committers mailing list
Bf-committers@blender.org
http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers